Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity.



 Science > Physics > Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: ""
Date: 03 Apr 2007 08:17:09 PM
Object: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity.
Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed at http://physicsnext.org
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 03 Apr 2007 08:52:23 PM
On Apr 3, 5:17 pm,
wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org

He was banning future submissions from _you_ because you are
submitting junk. Given your inability to read for comprehension as
well as your misconceptions about relativity, ignoring all future
submissions from you seems to be a good idea.
I enjoyed the letter from Howard Georgi [despite the fact it is poor
taste to publically post private correspondence] as well as the
referee's report because it was *such* a slam against you. The editor
is correct - your insertion of arbitrary junk into a well-tested
theory is uninteresting and therefore not publishable, your asinine
comparisons between classical mechanics and relativity
notwithstanding.
Plus I think it is hilarious that you believe NASA is "sitting" on
proof that 'Einstein was wrong' with such certainty despite the fact
there has not been one paper published on the GP-B results.
What is even _more_ hilarious is that you are such a fuckup that you
cannot even get arXiv endorsement and you rationalize it by saying
they 'chicken out'. That is quite telling - the paper has to be a real
stinker for *that* to happen.
This will be posted to your "blog" as well, but I expect it to be
deleted because it will most likely be the only comment anyone ever
leaves.
.
User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 03 Apr 2007 09:06:49 PM
On Apr 3, 5:52 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
WAIT IT GETS BETTER! This has displaced me from both doing homework as
well as watching dvd rips of Space: Above and Beyond - it is *that*
interesting.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/848621cb003b977b/af3d4061a4c89c1c?lnk=st&q=%22Ashish+Sirohi%22&rnum=1&hl=en#af3d4061a4c89c1c
http://www.infiniteseriestheorem.org/
Read the letters from the Fields folks - oh man. This nut is a physics
and math crank!
http://www.columbiaspectator.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&ustory_id=d9bc0f78-61a1-49d6-b985-8b44825de724
http://cuspeech.org/
Nutter here continued to spam Columbia university with junk even after
several court orders told him to stop. So now he plays martyr!
You can't beat having a true whackjob entertain you with the entire
cost being a few minutes with google. ***** I love the internet.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 03 Apr 2007 09:38:21 PM
On Apr 3, 7:06 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 3, 5:52 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

WAIT IT GETS BETTER! This has displaced me from both doing homework as
well as watching dvd rips of Space: Above and Beyond - it is *that*
interesting.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/848621cb00...http://www.infiniteseriestheorem.org/

Read the letters from the Fields folks - oh man. This nut is a physics
and math crank!

http://www.columbiaspectator.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&...http://cuspeech.org/

Nutter here continued to spam Columbia university with junk even after
several court orders told him to stop. So now he plays martyr!

You can't beat having a true whackjob entertain you with the entire
cost being a few minutes with google. ***** I love the internet.

Is this cretin still in the US?
.

User: "JanPB"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 01:36:10 PM
On Apr 3, 7:06 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 3, 5:52 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

WAIT IT GETS BETTER! This has displaced me from both doing homework as
well as watching dvd rips of Space: Above and Beyond - it is *that*
interesting.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/848621cb00...http://www.infiniteseriestheorem.org/

Read the letters from the Fields folks - oh man. This nut is a physics
and math crank!

http://www.columbiaspectator.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&...http://cuspeech.org/

Nutter here continued to spam Columbia university with junk even after
several court orders told him to stop. So now he plays martyr!

You can't beat having a true whackjob entertain you with the entire
cost being a few minutes with google. ***** I love the internet.

One thing the Internet has certainly uncovered is the sheer number of
people with mild psychiatric disorders who focus on science. Until the
Internet it was assumed most of those people "naturally" tended to
various pseudo-religions.
--
Jan Bielawski
.
User: "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 02:54:21 PM
Obviously!?
Then, all that, means a simply, that the communication of people among each
others, does cure anything, a psychologically and a sociologically,
something which it does makes ready to move further, and this what is all
about.
--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Simply As That!
"JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175711770.236830.90410@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 3, 7:06 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 3, 5:52 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]

WAIT IT GETS BETTER! This has displaced me from both doing homework as
well as watching dvd rips of Space: Above and Beyond - it is *that*
interesting.


http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/848621cb00...http
://www.infiniteseriestheorem.org/


Read the letters from the Fields folks - oh man. This nut is a physics
and math crank!


http://www.columbiaspectator.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&...http
://cuspeech.org/


Nutter here continued to spam Columbia university with junk even after
several court orders told him to stop. So now he plays martyr!

You can't beat having a true whackjob entertain you with the entire
cost being a few minutes with google. ***** I love the internet.


One thing the Internet has certainly uncovered is the sheer number of
people with mild psychiatric disorders who focus on science. Until the
Internet it was assumed most of those people "naturally" tended to
various pseudo-religions.

--
Jan Bielawski

.

User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 02:33:46 PM
On Apr 4, 2:36 pm, "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 3, 7:06 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Apr 3, 5:52 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:


[...]


WAIT IT GETS BETTER! This has displaced me from both doing homework as
well as watching dvd rips of Space: Above and Beyond - it is *that*
interesting.


http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/848621cb00...


Read the letters from the Fields folks - oh man. This nut is a physics
and math crank!


http://www.columbiaspectator.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&...


Nutter here continued to spam Columbia university with junk even after
several court orders told him to stop. So now he plays martyr!


You can't beat having a true whackjob entertain you with the entire
cost being a few minutes with google. ***** I love the internet.


One thing the Internet has certainly uncovered is the sheer number of
people with mild psychiatric disorders who focus on science. Until the
Internet it was assumed most of those people "naturally" tended to
various pseudo-religions.

--
Jan Bielawski

To people who know little about either, science and religion seem much
the same. One can argue that for the average layman in Europe (for
instance), science *is* the modern religion. They certainly don't
understand it in any depth and accept it uncritically.
.
User: "Androcles"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 04:01:41 PM
<jamesahart79@gmail.com> wrote in message =
news:1175715226.062626.314820@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 4, 2:36 pm, "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 3, 7:06 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Apr 3, 5:52 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:


[...]


WAIT IT GETS BETTER! This has displaced me from both doing homework =

as

well as watching dvd rips of Space: Above and Beyond - it is *that*
interesting.


=

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/848621cb00...=


Read the letters from the Fields folks - oh man. This nut is a =

physics

and math crank!


=

http://www.columbiaspectator.com/home/index.cfm?event=3DdisplayArticle&.=

...


Nutter here continued to spam Columbia university with junk even =

after

several court orders told him to stop. So now he plays martyr!


You can't beat having a true whackjob entertain you with the entire
cost being a few minutes with google. ***** I love the internet.


One thing the Internet has certainly uncovered is the sheer number of
people with mild psychiatric disorders who focus on science. Until =

the

Internet it was assumed most of those people "naturally" tended to
various pseudo-religions.

--
Jan Bielawski

=20
To people who know little about either, science and religion seem much
the same. One can argue that for the average layman in Europe (for
instance), science *is* the modern religion. They certainly don't
understand it in any depth and accept it uncritically.

That's Jan Bielawski to a T.
=20
(Toned down for my grandchildren)
"JanPB" <filmart@gmail.com> wrote in message =
news:1172078787.841294.4840@t69g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

Just ask your question precisely.


HAHAHA!
As if you'd give a precise answer.
Ok, I will anyway.
How far is it from A to A and how long will it take to =

get there... err... dumbhead?


It obviously depends


HAHAHA!
As if you'd give a precise answer. I'll try again.


How far is it from A to A and how long will it take to get =

there... err... stupid dumbhead?


Saying "from A to A"


HAHAHA!
As if you'd give a precise answer. I'll try again.


How far is it from A to A and how long will it take to get =

there... err... stoopid dumbheaded imbecile?


The question "How far is it from A to A" has infinitely many =

answers.


HAHAHA!
Three strikes, you are out, stooopid.
The answer was zero.


No, the answer is not zero.


HAHAHA!
That's a keeper.
"A-A <> 0" - Bilewacky.

=20
Distance travelled by photon from A to A is not A-A. End of story.

=20
It doesn't get much funnier than that.
.

User: "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 03:01:11 PM
It's because somebody knows something about it that we can't talk about
physics.
It's the things that nobody knows anything about we can discuss.
-- Richard Feynman
--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Simply As That!
<jamesahart79@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175715226.062626.314820@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 4, 2:36 pm, "JanPB" <film...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 3, 7:06 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:



On Apr 3, 5:52 pm, "Eric Gisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:


[...]


WAIT IT GETS BETTER! This has displaced me from both doing homework as
well as watching dvd rips of Space: Above and Beyond - it is *that*
interesting.



http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/848621cb00...


Read the letters from the Fields folks - oh man. This nut is a physics
and math crank!



http://www.columbiaspectator.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticle&...


Nutter here continued to spam Columbia university with junk even after
several court orders told him to stop. So now he plays martyr!


You can't beat having a true whackjob entertain you with the entire
cost being a few minutes with google. ***** I love the internet.


One thing the Internet has certainly uncovered is the sheer number of
people with mild psychiatric disorders who focus on science. Until the
Internet it was assumed most of those people "naturally" tended to
various pseudo-religions.

--
Jan Bielawski


To people who know little about either, science and religion seem much
the same. One can argue that for the average layman in Europe (for
instance), science *is* the modern religion. They certainly don't
understand it in any depth and accept it uncritically.

.





User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 03 Apr 2007 09:58:08 PM
On Apr 3, 6:17 pm,
wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org

How sad, you are completely...nuts!
http://physicsnext.org/SR%20Discrete%20PhysicsNext.pdf
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 03 Apr 2007 09:34:37 PM
On Apr 3, 6:17 pm,
wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org

New cretin alert.
.

User: "PD"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 04:43:34 PM
On Apr 3, 8:17 pm,
wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org

And well deserved, it appears.
Perhaps you think that you have the *right* to be published.
PD
.
User: "Androcles"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 05:54:02 PM
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message =
news:1175723014.415874.95160@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 3, 8:17 pm,

wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org

=20
And well deserved, it appears.
Perhaps you think that you have the *right* to be published.
=20
PD

Freedom of the press belongs to those that own one.
I do not permit Georgi to publish his crap on my website, =20
there is no reason he should publish my material.
I do publish some of Uncle Stooopid's crap, though.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Morons/UncleStooopid.htm
I could publish some of yours but you are not funny enough to bother =
with,
Phuckwit Duck.
.


User: "Igor"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 05:14:57 PM
On Apr 3, 9:17 pm,
wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org

To truly question anything, one must first understand what it is that
one is questioning. Uneducated gibberish will never cut it. You got
off way too easy.
.

User: "The_Man"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 04 Apr 2007 01:55:26 PM
On Apr 3, 9:17 pm,
wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org

You should submit your excellent "work" to the journals "Science" or
"Nature". The editors there will probably write even funnier
rejections.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 05 Apr 2007 09:17:01 PM
On Apr 4, 6:17 am,
wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org

When it comes to attacks on special relativity there are certain
experts here (Carlip, Baez, Hillman, Roberts and others, see
http://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html)
who are known for their "patient, detailed refutations". Well,
refutations that adress specific content are welcome! Thank you.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 05 Apr 2007 09:49:39 PM
On Apr 5, 7:17 pm,
wrote:

On Apr 4, 6:17 am,

wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org


When it comes to attacks on special relativity there are certain
experts here (Carlip, Baez, Hillman, Roberts and others, seehttp://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html)
who are known for their "patient, detailed refutations". Well,
refutations that adress specific content are welcome! Thank you.

Yes, they are very patient.
And you are still a crank. It is good that they booted you back to
India.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 09 Apr 2007 08:43:42 AM
On Apr 6, 7:49 am,
wrote:

On Apr 5, 7:17 pm,

wrote:

On Apr 4, 6:17 am,

wrote:


Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org


When it comes to attacks on special relativity there are certain
experts here (Carlip, Baez, Hillman, Roberts and others, seehttp://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html)
who are known for their "patient, detailed refutations". Well,
refutations that adress specific content are welcome! Thank you.


Yes, they are very patient.
And you are still a crank. It is good that they booted you back to
India.

I have sent an email to our esteemed relativity stars (Carlip, Baez,
Hillman, Roberts) respectfully requesting them to knock this paper
down, given their expertise as mentioned in the article.
However, I do not think there is anything they can knock because the
points made in the paper are, in fact, correct. They, as intelligent
people, would realize that.
This is the email I sent:
--------------
Referring to the article http://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html,
I would be very grateful if you could post comments on the paper
mentioned in the below sci.physics thread.Your unique expertise and
analysis would be most appreciated. The paper can be accessed at
http://physicsnext.org/
--------------
.
User: "Dirk Van de moortel"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 09 Apr 2007 10:34:26 AM
<as7y@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1176126222.889912.225420@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

On Apr 6, 7:49 am,

wrote:

On Apr 5, 7:17 pm,

wrote:

On Apr 4, 6:17 am,

wrote:


Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org


When it comes to attacks on special relativity there are certain
experts here (Carlip, Baez, Hillman, Roberts and others,
see http://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html )
who are known for their "patient, detailed refutations". Well,
refutations that adress specific content are welcome! Thank you.


Yes, they are very patient.
And you are still a crank. It is good that they booted you back to
India.


I have sent an email to our esteemed relativity stars (Carlip, Baez,
Hillman, Roberts) respectfully requesting them to knock this paper
down, given their expertise as mentioned in the article.

However, I do not think there is anything they can knock because the
points made in the paper are, in fact, correct. They, as intelligent
people, would realize that.

This is the email I sent:
--------------
Referring to the article
http://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html,
I would be very grateful if you could post comments on the paper
mentioned in the below sci.physics thread.Your unique expertise and
analysis would be most appreciated. The paper can be accessed at
http://physicsnext.org/

The article
http://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html,
refers to a well known and malicious crank Tom Van Flandern:
http://metaresearch.org/solar%20system/cydonia/proof_files/proof.asp
Would that be sufficient as a comment?
Dirk Vdm
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 09 Apr 2007 09:13:39 AM
On Apr 9, 6:43 am,
wrote:

On Apr 6, 7:49 am,

wrote:

On Apr 5, 7:17 pm,

wrote:


On Apr 4, 6:17 am,

wrote:


Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed athttp://physicsnext.org


When it comes to attacks on special relativity there are certain
experts here (Carlip, Baez, Hillman, Roberts and others, seehttp://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html)
who are known for their "patient, detailed refutations". Well,
refutations that adress specific content are welcome! Thank you.


Yes, they are very patient.
And you are still a crank. It is good that they booted you back to
India.


I have sent an email to our esteemed relativity stars (Carlip, Baez,
Hillman, Roberts) respectfully requesting them to knock this paper
down, given their expertise as mentioned in the article.

However, I do not think there is anything they can knock because the
points made in the paper are, in fact, correct. They, as intelligent
people, would realize that.

This is the email I sent:
--------------
Referring to the articlehttp://archive.salon.com/people/feature/2000/07/06/einstein/print.html,
I would be very grateful if you could post comments on the paper
mentioned in the below sci.physics thread.Your unique expertise and
analysis would be most appreciated. The paper can be accessed athttp://physicsnext.org/
--------------

Your so called "paper" is a jumble of nonsense. So, I doubt that
anyone would waste their time in explaining all the errors in it.
Besides, your autistic type will never-ever admit to your "paper"
being in error. So , you are stuck in being ignored. Get a life.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 09 Apr 2007 09:47:33 AM


Your so called "paper" is a jumble of nonsense. So, I doubt that
anyone would waste their time in explaining all the errors in it.
Besides, your autistic type will never-ever admit to your "paper"
being in error. So , you are stuck in being ignored. Get a life.- Hide quoted text -

You have no "errors" to point to, let alone "all the errors"!
Before you talk about not admitting to errors pointed out, you have to
point them out. Of course you have no idea about special relativity
but love to act otherwise :-)
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 09 Apr 2007 09:58:35 AM
On Apr 9, 7:47 am,
wrote:

Your so called "paper" is a jumble of nonsense. So, I doubt that
anyone would waste their time in explaining all the errors in it.
Besides, your autistic type will never-ever admit to your "paper"
being in error. So , you are stuck in being ignored. Get a life.- Hide quoted text -


You have no "errors" to point to, let alone "all the errors"!

Before you talk about not admitting to errors pointed out, you have to
point them out. Of course you have no idea about special relativity
but love to act otherwise :-)

Just as I thought.
.






User: "John Anderson"

Title: Re: Lifetime ban from journal for questioning Special Relativity. 03 Apr 2007 10:22:39 PM
hdfjaskdfla
as7y@yahoo.com wrote:

Professor Howard Georgi's letter banning future submissions and other
details about paper can be viewed at http://physicsnext.org

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
"Corrections to Special Relativity"
[Humor] 10 questions Special Relativity can't possibly answer
WHY PHYSICISTS BELIEVE IN SPECIAL RELATIVITY
Special Relativity Question
HIS 2004 - Special Session on Neuro-Fuzzy Controllers - submission 15/10/2004
A simple mathematical disproof of the special theory
Re: GOD=G_uv special ed. dept.
Re: Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes
Help on Special Relativity
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame)
Weak Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Combined With Special Relativity
I need help on Special Relativity...
Special Relativity as applied to "Black Holes"?
Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER