Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon...



 Science > Physics > Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon...

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Anonymous"
Date: 07 Apr 2006 04:43:37 PM
Object: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon...
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, "nytecam" wrote:

..for those who saw it like
http://home...
Nytecam 51N 0.1W
<snipped for clarity>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yes. "Cat's out o' the bag". Man did NEVER walk on the Moon.
That's because NASA's six allegedly-manned and half-million
miles per round-trip(!) missions to the Moon (1969-72) were
at best unmanned flights in competition with the U.S.S.R.'s
contemporaneous Soviet Luna/Lunakhod unmanned Moon missions.
"They couldn't make it so they faked it." Thus, the "manned"
portions of the missions were actually filmed under the top-
secret, heavily-guarded domed soundstages in the high desert
of Area 51, NV, perhaps around Pine Gap, AUS and maybe other
remote and publicly-inaccessible locations around the world.
__________________________________________________
Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand
buggies & actors running along in their deflated
monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
brazenly obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.
__________________________________________________
&Here it is 2006, and NASA *still* has enough headaches trying
to cope with the challenges (remember the Challenger shuttle?)
of low-earth orbit manned spacecraft. But things were "easier"
generations ago, back in the bygone era of sliderules, hippies
and flower children. Yupp! Back then, the laws of physics were
a lot easier to deal with than they are now and that's obvious.
Our technology was FAR more advanced back then, than it is now. :-D
Obviously...
The Moon is far beyond the reach of manned spacecraft, to wit:
ALTITUDE COMPARISON CHART
SHUTTLE VS. MOON & MANMADE SATELLITES
(not to scale)
x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x
| |
| |
| |
| |
~ ~214,000 MILES ~
~ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ~
| |
| |
| |
x------High-altitude orbit ~25,000+ miles altitude------x
| |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
| |
| |
~ ~10,000 MILES ~
~ ~
| |
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
| |
| |
~ ~10,000 MILES ~
~ ~
| |
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x
x------JPL/NASA Space Shuttle orbit ~300 miles altitude-x
x------Intl. Space Station orbit ~220 miles altitude |
x------Earth's sea level -0- miles altitude-------------x
To give you an idea of the scale involved, if each hard line
break in the chart below equals roughly 10,000 miles, to wit:
x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x
| 230,000 |
| 220,000 |
| 210,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 190,000 |
| 180,000 |
| 170,000 |
| 160,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 140,000 |
| 130,000 |
| 120,000 |
| 110,000 |
| 100,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 80,000 |
| 70,000 |
| 60,000 |
| 50,000 |
| 40,000 |
| 30,000 |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x
Thus the low-earth shuttle orbit would fit somewhere between
the center and baseline of the bottom 'x'--hardly visible at
all at this scale. And yet, that is the HIGHEST altitude any
manned flight has ever successfully sustained for any length
of time! But the "men to the moon" fairytale devotees don't
want to face up to these and other glaring facts in evidence:
*Apollo Moon Missions 1969-1972 Were At Best *Unmanned*:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.org
*Quasi-Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.org
Enjoy Life!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Take Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=HCRHGLQM38786.0401967593@anonymous.poster

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRDbJBZljD7YrHM/nEQJ1DwCgoSuE6FLy00ZRtm5jfnEDnCz3X8EAnizM
zXPGw24u3l2blrkuIlh/lpUN
=nT7K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.

User: "Rich"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 11:02:33 PM
Wait, wait! I found out something!
Turns out, that huge megamovie studio set
they're building on the Toronto waterfront
(lots of movies shot there because it's so much less
expensive than the U.S.) is actually being built to house
the first "moon base" and "manned Mars mission landing site."
You do believe it, right?
They'll have to expand the movie studio with a chilled lot when they
do the Europa landing and set-up the drill site....
.

User: "shockwaveriderz"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 10:18:24 PM
"Anonymous" wrote in message > Man did NEVER walk on the Moon.
neither did I, what a bummer.
shockie B)
.
User: "Robert Juliano"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 10:23:47 PM
shockwaveriderz wrote:


"Anonymous" wrote in message > Man did NEVER walk on the Moon.

neither did I, what a bummer.

shockie B)

Shockie,
I propose we all get together, build a craft, and walk on the moon...
Just to ***** off danny-boy
.


User: "Brad Guth"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 06:38:22 PM
"They couldn't make it so they faked it."
At least that's the US/USSR truth and nothing but the truth.
Problem is that too often you're looking at the artificial stuff that's
within those EVA Kodak moments rather than appreciating the image
itself that's about a Xenon lamp illuminated as they can possibly get,
and we still haven't a viable fly-by-rocket lander.
Besides, it's nowadays taking a far greater energy of a 6 stage effort
that's utilizing the very best and most nifty and efficient formula of
their launching less than half the Apollo mass into LEO. Going to the
moon in just three days is technically doable if their Saturn V weren't
packing along so much inert mass, instead packing more fuel. Of their
making into orbiting our moon within 4 days or perhaps a bit longer is
also doable, though supposedly that's not of what transpired according
to the NASA/Apollo scriptures.
-
Brad Guth
.
User: "I"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 07:42:18 PM
Sorry Brad - but given the rantings of one, lonely, sad, learning-disabled, obtuse, dense,
paranoid idiot with a fixation on fecal matter and related body parts, vs. the documented
physical proof provided by dozens of astronauts, and hundreds of thousands of engineers
and scientists,
who do you think the world believes?
(hint - it's NOT the lonely, sad, learning-disabled, obtuse, dense, paranoid idiot with a
fixation on fecal matter).
.
User: "Brad Guth"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 11:37:36 AM

who do you think the world believes?

Intelligent folks should obviously believe in what I believe.
Strange how the regular laws of physics and of the independent
hard-science seems to keep favoring the truth and nothing but the
truth.
-
Brad Guth
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 07:06:52 PM
<<< Intelligent folks should obviously believe in what I believe. >>>
HA HA HA HA HA HA ... OMG
.

User: "I"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 10 Apr 2006 09:53:22 PM
"Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1144514256.126577.110720@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

Intelligent folks should obviously believe in what I believe.

Oh man, Cherry Coke stings like hell coming out my sinuses that way.
Frck it, I nded a nw kdb anywy.
Sn fa btch!!@
.
User: "Rand Simberg"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 10 Apr 2006 09:55:58 PM
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:53:22 -0400, in a place far, far away, "I"
<sp@mbait.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as
to indicate that:

"Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1144514256.126577.110720@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...

Intelligent folks should obviously believe in what I believe.


Oh man, Cherry Coke stings like hell coming out my sinuses that way.

[cue laugh track]
"That's my Brad!'
<uproarious laughter>
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 10 Apr 2006 11:28:03 PM
Gulet passed and I invited the for lunch.
An old thia lady packed me a pipe full of opium and bud. It was
taisters pleasers.
The gulet from thia all the way past solomon after tuna .
the gulet was very nice for 150 years old.


.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 11 Apr 2006 11:37:15 AM
Nasa cant walk a tite rope.
Not with a lunar lander.
pushing to the side just pushes the rope over.
Pushing down out at the side does the same push the rope over.
Nasa did the 2 worse mistakes that can be done on a tite rope or a surf
board.
Nasa has no chance of controling the lander now or then using the
lander they biult.
No computer can corect the fall with these side thrusters nasa biult.
Not even nasa can defie the laws.

.




User: ""

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 01:23:46 PM
Well, I'm 49 so that means, if it's true, Min was around 11 in 1969,
far old enough to remember
Apollo 11.
Then of course, there were folks far older, who were more involved in
smoking grass or even in Vietnam, who might have missed it.
.
User: "Brad Guth"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 09 Apr 2006 05:22:02 PM
eddiestard,
Even though all could have been orchestrated from the relative safety
and orbital efficiency of LL-1, I'm thinking that we probably went to
the moon, orbited at least once or even a few times upon each mission,
and then got real smart about it by way of getting the hell out of
there before it was too late for their DNA and onboard film.
Considerating the given situation, their supposed mission dosage was
actually next to nothing. Hard to believe if having been so touchy
feely with all the dark and nasty naked truth of what that reactive
moon should have represented.
-
Brad Guth
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 10 Apr 2006 01:23:38 AM
Brad,
You are being funny, right?
You mean no one told you about the guy who tried to pick a fight with
Edwin Aldrin?
Aldrin 1 to Moonhoaxer 0
Aldrin punched the guy in the nose and very few folks are feeling
sympathetic
to the Moonhoaxer!
.
User: "Brad Guth"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 11 Apr 2006 10:00:59 AM
eddiestard,
So therefore, you're excluding whatever's evidence and/or hard-science
and of the regular laws of physics that rocks your boat, and instead
accepting infomercial-science without a speck of remorse.
Keep up the good brown-nosed work, as that's exactly what Hitler and of
the collaborating Jews needed in order to pull off their fiasco. The
same goes for your actions having supported our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush), whereas without such pagan minions as yourself we
couldn't have caused so much collateral damage and carnage of the
innocent.
-
Brad Guth
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 11 Apr 2006 11:28:17 AM
Nasa has no hard evidence .
Nasa STILL cant fly the lander.
The lander just wount work then or now.
If your standing on a surf board and start to fall over , you cant put
your hand against the side of the dock and push to stop the falling over
..
You see the idiots doing fake test .
You see the sidethrusters fire in the test and push against the dock
time after time.
BUT there is NO gound to push against.
The bottom will slide sideways and it will fall over or flip 180 from
the side thruster not quite square with the side fall direction.
You ALL know it to be a FACT they used side thrusters .
Side thrusters wount work now or then.
You still cant stop a fallover wile floating , or with a side thust
or side down thust ,,the bottom will just slide over .
There is no expert board stander that can defie the laws.
No lander operator can use a side thruster to corect any amount of
fallover.
You must push the board back under you.
The push at the bottom to slide th board over is the only method that
can work.
Thats just not what Nasa has or had.
They had side thrusters 10 feet out extended
with rockets at the ends .
If they are falling over they fire a side rocket down . That will
only slide the bottom over.
It will allso flip the craft over if its now square with the fall.
If its just 10 deg from the fall over direction to the side thruster
,,the craft will role over.
.
User: "Chris"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 11 Apr 2006 01:02:38 PM
Hello,
I solved this stability problem with a computer controlled feedback system
so that the pilot holding the control stick is able to fly with his
intuition, and I was the first test pilot who flew the test bed rocket hash
up in a desert in new mexico over a small mountain had my sandwiches and
flew back, I was reported by some campers and as UFO. Ha.
By the way a similar control system is used on the jump jet and the viking
mars lander. I was involved with the fly by wire system that enables the
shuttle to glide into land under the control of a pilot. It is to do with
the delay between moving the control surface and the space plane responding.
This makes it impossible to control without the computer feedback mechanism.
I also did atomic weapons design once. Don't like them though.
Chris.
"tj Frazir" <GravityPhysics@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:25292-443BD921-607@storefull-3213.bay.webtv.net...
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 11 Apr 2006 10:45:58 PM
Your out of your head.
1 . The lunar lander has side thrusters .
2 ,,I just told you why side thrusters will just not work.
1 ,,firing the side thruster in ANY direction will
slide the bottom of the craft NOT corect a fallover.
2 , I just told you again why you can fire a side thruster .
1 . the lunar lander test allso used side thrusters.

firing one is equaal to pushing against a dock to stop your

fall wile you stand on a surf board. The surf board is floating and
gets no friction aganst the ground .
The board slides out from under you as soon as you try pushing against
the dock.
IT WILL NEVER WORK.
and the idiots at nasa know damb well it dont work.
You saw them fake lunar landing test too.
.








User: ""

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 08:08:12 PM
here here. that would be a conspiracy that would be impossible to keep
under wraps.
this is just the ranting of another innumerate.
.
User: "Noah Little"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 06:40:03 AM
wrote:

here here.

Please, folks, it's "hear, hear."
--
Noah
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 06:55:34 AM
Please, folks, it's "hear, hear."
**************************
"There are none so deaf as s/he who will not hear."
.





User: "DAC"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 15 Apr 2006 08:44:40 PM

| 230,000 |
| 220,000 |
| 210,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 190,000 |
| 180,000 |
| 170,000 |
| 160,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 140,000 |
| 130,000 |
| 120,000 |
| 110,000 |
| 100,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 80,000 |
| 70,000 |
| 60,000 |
| 50,000 |
| 40,000 |
| 30,000 |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x

You do know that gravity goes down by the square of the distance right?
So your figures should be like this:
479.5831523 Moon
469.041576
458.2575695
447.2135955
435.8898944
424.2640687
412.3105626
400
387.2983346
374.1657387
360.5551275
346.4101615
331.662479
316.227766
300
282.8427125
264.5751311
244.9489743
223.6067977
200
173.2050808 Geo
141.4213562
100
Well that about wraps that up.
.

User: "Robert Juliano"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 05:08:49 PM
Anonymous wrote:

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, "nytecam" wrote:

..for those who saw it like
http://home...
Nytecam 51N 0.1W
<snipped for clarity>



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Yes. "Cat's out o' the bag". Man did NEVER walk on the Moon.
That's because NASA's six allegedly-manned and half-million
miles per round-trip(!) missions to the Moon (1969-72) were
at best unmanned flights in competition with the U.S.S.R.'s
contemporaneous Soviet Luna/Lunakhod unmanned Moon missions.

"They couldn't make it so they faked it." Thus, the "manned"
portions of the missions were actually filmed under the top-
secret, heavily-guarded domed soundstages in the high desert
of Area 51, NV, perhaps around Pine Gap, AUS and maybe other
remote and publicly-inaccessible locations around the world.
__________________________________________________

Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand
buggies & actors running along in their deflated
monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
brazenly obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.
__________________________________________________

&Here it is 2006, and NASA *still* has enough headaches trying
to cope with the challenges (remember the Challenger shuttle?)
of low-earth orbit manned spacecraft. But things were "easier"
generations ago, back in the bygone era of sliderules, hippies
and flower children. Yupp! Back then, the laws of physics were
a lot easier to deal with than they are now and that's obvious.
Our technology was FAR more advanced back then, than it is now. :-D


Obviously...

The Moon is far beyond the reach of manned spacecraft, to wit:


ALTITUDE COMPARISON CHART
SHUTTLE VS. MOON & MANMADE SATELLITES
(not to scale)

x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x
| |
| |
| |
| |
~ ~214,000 MILES ~
~ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ~
| |
| |
| |
x------High-altitude orbit ~25,000+ miles altitude------x
| |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
| |
| |
~ ~10,000 MILES ~
~ ~
| |
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
| |
| |
~ ~10,000 MILES ~
~ ~
| |
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x
x------JPL/NASA Space Shuttle orbit ~300 miles altitude-x
x------Intl. Space Station orbit ~220 miles altitude |
x------Earth's sea level -0- miles altitude-------------x


To give you an idea of the scale involved, if each hard line
break in the chart below equals roughly 10,000 miles, to wit:

x------Moon's mean geocentric distance ~239,000 miles---x
| 230,000 |
| 220,000 |
| 210,000 |
| 200,000 |
| 190,000 |
| 180,000 |
| 170,000 |
| 160,000 |
| 150,000 |
| 140,000 |
| 130,000 |
| 120,000 |
| 110,000 |
| 100,000 |
| 90,000 |
| 80,000 |
| 70,000 |
| 60,000 |
| 50,000 |
| 40,000 |
| 30,000 |
x------Geostationary orbit ~22,300 miles altitude-------x
x------Mid-altitude orbit ~12,500 miles altitude--------x
x------Low-altitude orbit below ~1200 miles altitude----x

Thus the low-earth shuttle orbit would fit somewhere between
the center and baseline of the bottom 'x'--hardly visible at
all at this scale. And yet, that is the HIGHEST altitude any
manned flight has ever successfully sustained for any length
of time! But the "men to the moon" fairytale devotees don't
want to face up to these and other glaring facts in evidence:

*Apollo Moon Missions 1969-1972 Were At Best *Unmanned*:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=VTKA4X1O37500.9704861111@Gilgamesh-frog.org

*Quasi-Uncensored Apollo Moon Hoax Bookmarks:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=7RL5KJIX37499.1691435185@Gilgamesh-frog.org

Enjoy Life!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/

*Take Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test (how smart are you, really):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=HCRHGLQM38786.0401967593@anonymous.poster

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRDbJBZljD7YrHM/nEQJ1DwCgoSuE6FLy00ZRtm5jfnEDnCz3X8EAnizM
zXPGw24u3l2blrkuIlh/lpUN
=nT7K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

min,
please go and take your meds. Your rants are moving from the merely
irritating, and into the realms of the pathetic.
Bob
.

User: "Tom Biasi"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 06:07:17 PM
I am 56 years old. I made believe that I was sick so that I could stay home
from school and watch Alan Sheppard take his little journey.
I have followed the space program ever since. Thank you very much for
setting me straight. All these years I believed the things I saw were true.
Thanks;
Tom
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 08:20:13 AM
<<I am 56 years old. I made believe that I was sick so that I could
stay home
from school and watch Alan Sheppard take his little journey.
I have followed the space program ever since. Thank you very much for
setting me straight. All these years I believed the things I saw were
true. >>
I'm not quite that old but I skipped that same day of school ... I did
that again on July 20, 1969 ... I think that must have been summer
school though, I can't remember now, but it didn't matter really
because the whole school stopped and watched on their TV and only fools
try to disprove it now.
.
User: "Robert Juliano"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 08:40:01 AM
wrote:

<<I am 56 years old. I made believe that I was sick so that I could
stay home
from school and watch Alan Sheppard take his little journey.
I have followed the space program ever since. Thank you very much for
setting me straight. All these years I believed the things I saw were
true. >>

I'm not quite that old but I skipped that same day of school ... I did
that again on July 20, 1969 ... I think that must have been summer
school though, I can't remember now, but it didn't matter really
because the whole school stopped and watched on their TV and only fools
try to disprove it now.

I remember my family all huddled around the TV, to watch the first
landing, back in '69. After the landing, EVERYBODY joined into the party.
I really wish we'd go back.
Bob
.

User: "Noah Little"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 08:50:01 AM
wrote:

I'm not quite that old but I skipped that same day of school ... I did
that again on July 20, 1969 ... I think that must have been summer
school though, I can't remember now, but it didn't matter really
because the whole school stopped and watched on their TV and only fools
try to disprove it now.

....just as only fools rise to the bait of those who do.
.
User: "Tom Biasi"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 08:56:39 AM
"Noah Little" <me2@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:e18em8$5ln$14@n4vu2.n4vu.com...

Secret237@Verizon.net wrote:

I'm not quite that old but I skipped that same day of school ... I did
that again on July 20, 1969 ... I think that must have been summer
school though, I can't remember now, but it didn't matter really
because the whole school stopped and watched on their TV and only fools
try to disprove it now.


...just as only fools rise to the bait of those who do.

I know, we fed the troll but it brought back memories and generated a little
nostalgic discussion.
For that I'll throw the trolls a crumb.
Tom
.



User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 08 Apr 2006 04:38:12 AM
"Tom Biasi" <tombiasi@REMOVEoptonline.net> wrote in message
news:AgCZf.126$Yp1.110@fe09.lga...

I am 56 years old. I made believe that I was sick so that I could stay home
from school and watch Alan Sheppard take his little journey.
I have followed the space program ever since. Thank you very much for
setting me straight. All these years I believed the things I saw were
true.
Thanks;
Tom

Well, if missing school has meant you have grown up believing things that
people like Min say - it would have been a lot better if you hadn't watched
the journey...
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Man DID NEVER Walk on the Moon... 07 Apr 2006 06:36:10 PM
I think the joke eventually will be that we're destined for such
accomplishments under the auspices of the Global Brain that the Apollo
program will look like sandbox play.
.



  Page 1 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
Re: Man NEVER Walked on the Moon-yes he did...
We never said they gave negative results, and they did not in fact give negative results (Miller 1926)
Re: Selective Physics & The Chain of Evidence was Re: Geoff Cashman: Forever the reactionary, never the bride was Re: No 757 Debris At The Pentagon was Re: Is this the entry holeat the Pentagon?
Re: Never in One's Local Inertial Frame .
Always m=f/a; never f=ma
The Smart Model Never Dies It Just Fades Away
Never return ticket to state vector?
?? Those who terrorised Hiroshima or Nagasaki never apologized
Magnetic field never produces electric force
Why the Sagans and the Gardners will never win.
Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
You can never disprove relativity
Inertia never changes
There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to fin
Re: The Great Conspiracy: The 9/11 News Special You Never Saw.
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER