| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"G. L. Bradford" |
| Date: |
03 Sep 2007 04:07:31 PM |
| Object: |
Mathematicians versus Semanticists |
The vast majority of mathematicians are not semanticists. And the vast
majority of semanticists are not mathematicians. They mirror each other
precisely. Not all semanticists, just a very, very, few are crossovers. Not
all mathematicians, just a very, very, few are crossovers. They mirror
across the board.
The third member of the triumvirate is the priest presiding over the
funeral.
GLB
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists |
03 Sep 2007 07:50:33 PM |
|
|
On Sep 3, 5:07 pm, "G. L. Bradford" <glbra...@insightbb.com> wrote:
The vast majority of mathematicians are not semanticists. And the vast
majority of semanticists are not mathematicians. They mirror each other
precisely. Not all semanticists, just a very, very, few are crossovers. Not
all mathematicians, just a very, very, few are crossovers. They mirror
across the board.
The third member of the triumvirate is the priest presiding over the
funeral.
GLB
Heck, this guy has not hint of a clue. He doesn't quite grasp the fact
that physicists only employ mathematics as a tool, about akin to their
experimental instrumentation, just as as an accountant employs simple
arithmetic to reach the bottom line.
Harry C.
.
|
|
|
| User: "G. L. Bradford" |
|
| Title: Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists |
04 Sep 2007 02:09:12 AM |
|
|
<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1188867033.889430.248890@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 3, 5:07 pm, "G. L. Bradford" <glbra...@insightbb.com> wrote:
The vast majority of mathematicians are not semanticists. And the vast
majority of semanticists are not mathematicians. They mirror each other
precisely. Not all semanticists, just a very, very, few are crossovers.
Not
all mathematicians, just a very, very, few are crossovers. They mirror
across the board.
The third member of the triumvirate is the priest presiding over the
funeral.
GLB
Heck, this guy has not hint of a clue. He doesn't quite grasp the fact
that physicists only employ mathematics as a tool, about akin to their
experimental instrumentation, just as as an accountant employs simple
arithmetic to reach the bottom line.
Harry C.
What "physicists"? Where? I dealt in a relational 'physic' as I see it --
and just where did I mention 'physicist' or "physicists" even once here?
Quote me where I did in the above! Point it out!!!
(chuckle) As a certain saying goes, "You're making my day." You are very
dimwittedly making my point for me.
GLB
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Christiansen" |
|
| Title: Re: Mathematicians versus Semanticists |
04 Sep 2007 02:16:37 AM |
|
|
"G. L. Bradford" <glbrad01@insightbb.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:y_udnYr85qsYmUDbnZ2dnUVZ_rCtnZ2d@insightbb.com...
<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1188867033.889430.248890@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 3, 5:07 pm, "G. L. Bradford" <glbra...@insightbb.com> wrote:
The vast majority of mathematicians are not semanticists. And the vast
majority of semanticists are not mathematicians. They mirror each other
precisely. Not all semanticists, just a very, very, few are crossovers.
Not
all mathematicians, just a very, very, few are crossovers. They mirror
across the board.
The third member of the triumvirate is the priest presiding over the
funeral.
GLB
Heck, this guy has not hint of a clue. He doesn't quite grasp the fact
that physicists only employ mathematics as a tool, about akin to their
experimental instrumentation, just as as an accountant employs simple
arithmetic to reach the bottom line.
Harry C.
What "physicists"? Where? I dealt in a relational 'physic' as I see it --
and just where did I mention 'physicist' or "physicists" even once here?
Quote me where I did in the above! Point it out!!!
(chuckle) As a certain saying goes, "You're making my day." You are very
dimwittedly making my point for me.
GLB
If you don't want physicist to answer, don't post on sci. physics.
John Christiansen
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
