| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"derekfd" |
| Date: |
31 Jan 2005 12:34:28 PM |
| Object: |
Mechanical Gravity Theory |
Hey guys and girls
THis is my first post, Ive been reading some of the threads on here,
pretty interesting. God and Gov. Telepathy is quite entertaining.
One interesting theory is that given that our consciousness is
comprised of many different different levels, when one dies these
different states go quiet at different speeds. Near death
experiences (like say, seeing hell!!!) would be the activity of a
state of consciousness that has yet to shut down, thus a reflection
of the persons expectations being given a clear moment to express
itself
Right now your wondering, isnt this person supposed to be responding
to that thread. Well no I don't want to. I don't want to be
anywhere near that sort of a discussion. THreads like that have too
many people with their minds already made up. I want to talk about a
thread that I found on the stephen wolfram forum. It seems to be
getting popular and I find it very interesting. Wondering what
everyone here thought about it. It begun with a Mechanical Theory of
Gravity
http://forum.wolframscience.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=1344
THe thread moves from here
http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=153
Lets see what you guys think.
*---------------------------------*
Posted at: http://www.GroupSrv.com
Check: http://www.HotCodecs.com
*---------------------------------*
.
|
|
| User: "derekfd" |
|
| Title: Re:Mechanical Gravity theory |
01 Feb 2005 04:31:13 PM |
|
|
I should have thought things would turn out like this
Eric thank you for your response
True the theory lacks mathematical conclusions, I don't think this guy
was expecting a free trip to Sweden or anything. ***** can
be in the form of mathematical conclusions as well. The point behind
this paper, as well as wolfram is an attempt to gain a perspectice
from which research can be approached. It's entailment of gravity
provides cause for exploration.
http://forum.wolframscience.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=1344
http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=153
[/quote]
*---------------------------------*
Posted at: http://www.GroupSrv.com
*---------------------------------*
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John C. Polasek" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
31 Jan 2005 08:02:57 PM |
|
|
On 31 Jan 2005 12:34:28 -0600, deez@nyu-dot-edu.no-spam.invalid
(derekfd) wrote:
Hey guys and girls
THis is my first post, Ive been reading some of the threads on here,
pretty interesting. God and Gov. Telepathy is quite entertaining.
One interesting theory is that given that our consciousness is
comprised of many different different levels, when one dies these
different states go quiet at different speeds. Near death
experiences (like say, seeing hell!!!) would be the activity of a
state of consciousness that has yet to shut down, thus a reflection
of the persons expectations being given a clear moment to express
itself
Right now your wondering, isnt this person supposed to be responding
to that thread. Well no I don't want to. I don't want to be
anywhere near that sort of a discussion. THreads like that have too
many people with their minds already made up. I want to talk about a
thread that I found on the stephen wolfram forum. It seems to be
getting popular and I find it very interesting. Wondering what
everyone here thought about it. It begun with a Mechanical Theory of
Gravity
http://forum.wolframscience.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=1344
THe thread moves from here
http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=153
Lets see what you guys think.
*---------------------------------*
Posted at: http://www.GroupSrv.com
Check: http://www.HotCodecs.com
*---------------------------------*
Wolfram's "New Kind of Snow". Pure drivel.
John Polasek
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
31 Jan 2005 04:13:48 PM |
|
|
derekfd wrote:
Hey guys and girls
THis is my first post, Ive been reading some of the threads on here,
pretty interesting.
Here's a hint: Ignorance is pain not pleasure.
God and Gov. Telepathy is quite entertaining.
Idiot.
One interesting theory is that given that our consciousness is
comprised of many different different levels, when one dies these
different states go quiet at different speeds.
[snip]
Hopeless idiot.
Usenet's cloaca,
*---------------------------------*
Posted at: http://www.GroupSrv.com
Check: http://www.HotCodecs.com
*---------------------------------*
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
31 Jan 2005 05:05:20 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:41FEAD9C.E32DFFD6@hate.spam.net...
derekfd wrote:
Hey guys and girls
THis is my first post, Ive been reading some of the threads on here,
pretty interesting.
Here's a hint: Ignorance is pain not pleasure.
God and Gov. Telepathy is quite entertaining.
Idiot.
One interesting theory is that given that our consciousness is
comprised of many different different levels, when one dies these
different states go quiet at different speeds.
[snip]
Hopeless idiot.
Schwartz ("Uncle" Alice) gets his rocks off by following his
own standard procedure:
1) Snip and say "[snip crap]". (Schwartz doesn't actually read the
post.)
2) Insult to poster by saying "psychotic imbecile".
This, Schwartz finds thrilling.
Nobody else gives a damn, but Schwartz is happy.
The best way to deal with Schwartz is simply ignore the idiot,
but failing that, follow his own procedure, its all he'll ever
understand anyway.
Then you'll have a long thread of
[snip crap]
You are a psychotic imbecile.
[snip crap]
You are a psychotic imbecile.
[snip crap]
You are a psychotic imbecile.
[snip crap]
You are a psychotic imbecile.
[snip crap]
You are a psychotic imbecile.
[snip crap]
You are a psychotic imbecile.
[snip crap]
You are a psychotic imbecile.
ad infinitum ad nausem
This demonstrates that one of the two parties involved really IS
psychotic, and believe me, I've tested the theory, Schwartz WILL have
the last word.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
01 Feb 2005 10:13:03 AM |
|
|
derekfd wrote:
Hey guys and girls
THis is my first post, Ive been reading some of the threads on here,
pretty interesting. God and Gov. Telepathy is quite entertaining.
One interesting theory is that given that our consciousness is
comprised of many different different levels, when one dies these
different states go quiet at different speeds. Near death
experiences (like say, seeing hell!!!) would be the activity of a
state of consciousness that has yet to shut down, thus a reflection
of the persons expectations being given a clear moment to express
itself
Right now your wondering, isnt this person supposed to be responding
to that thread. Well no I don't want to. I don't want to be
anywhere near that sort of a discussion. THreads like that have too
many people with their minds already made up. I want to talk about a
thread that I found on the stephen wolfram forum. It seems to be
getting popular and I find it very interesting. Wondering what
everyone here thought about it. It begun with a Mechanical Theory of
Gravity
http://forum.wolframscience.com/attachment.php?s=&postid=1344
Worthless.
It is not a mathematical theory, it is a loose collection of paragraphs
that pretend to be a theory.
THe thread moves from here
http://forum.wolframscience.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=153
"I think this theory matches the observations of classical Newtonian
gravity quite well. "
Translation: "I have no fucking clue how to make this match even
classical physics, much less GR."
I cannot tell who is more ignorant, the author or his supporters.
Lets see what you guys think.
*---------------------------------*
Posted at: http://www.GroupSrv.com
Check: http://www.HotCodecs.com
*---------------------------------*
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
31 Jan 2005 03:17:23 PM |
|
|
derekfd wrote:
[snip]
Wondering what everyone here thought about it. It begun with a
Mechanical
Theory of Gravity
[snip]
Sometimes it is better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than to
speak and remove all doubt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
31 Jan 2005 04:44:17 PM |
|
|
John Schoenfeld wrote:
derekfd wrote:
[snip]
Wondering what everyone here thought about it. It begun with a
Mechanical
Theory of Gravity
[snip]
Sometimes it is better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than to
speak and remove all doubt.
Did you learned your lesson?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/messages/92d84e95ac2bb07e,3=
6d742cf266aff74,2a9828f780d7cc25,f76934de7ad86811,1d675f9ac17498f0,a19e26bc=
e102776a,3f6cda04ca19dc6b,608b8e35f9ad25a1,4df27c625d2d9464,bbc9554adedfb5a=
6?thread_id=3D81ccf87c504396b2&mode=3Dthread&noheader=3D1&q=3DSchoenfeld+la=
ws+of+motion#doc_92d84e95ac2bb07e
"SCHOENFELDS 1ST LAW: same as Newtons 1st law.
SCHOENFELDS 2ND LAW:
F =3D (m + dm/dv)a (PROOF AT END OF POST)
SCHOENFELDS 3rd LAW: same as Newtons 3rd law.
SCHOENFELDS GENERALIZED MASS FORMULA:
m(v) =3D sum[i=3D0, n] (m^i(0) v^i) / i!
where
m^x(0) =3D is x'th derivative of the rest mass function
n =3D such that m^(n+1)(v) =3D 0.
SCHOENFELDS GENERALIZED MOMENTUM FORMULA:
p =3D m(v) v
=3D v sum[i=3D0, n] (m^i(0) v^i) / i!
My Laws are perfectly consistent with orthodox physics since=AD orthodox
physics *ASSUMES* dm/dv =3D 0 which simplies my laws significa=ADntly. "
Or didn't you?
I personally doubt it. A crank is a crank.
Mike
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
31 Jan 2005 05:41:47 PM |
|
|
Mike wrote:
John Schoenfeld wrote:
derekfd wrote:
[snip]
Wondering what everyone here thought about it. It begun with a
Mechanical
Theory of Gravity
[snip]
Sometimes it is better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than to
speak and remove all doubt.
Did you learned your lesson?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/messages/92d84e95ac2bb07e,3=
6d742cf266aff74,2a9828f780d7cc25,f76934de7ad86811,1d675f9ac17498f0,a19e26bc=
e102776a,3f6cda04ca19dc6b,608b8e35f9ad25a1,4df27c625d2d9464,bbc9554adedfb5a=
6?thread_id=3D81ccf87c504396b2&mode=3Dthread&noheader=3D1&q=3DSchoenfeld+la=
ws+of+motion#doc_92d84e95ac2bb07e
"SCHOENFELDS 1ST LAW: same as Newtons 1st law.
SCHOENFELDS 2ND LAW:
F =3D (m + dm/dv)a (PROOF AT END OF POST)
SCHOENFELDS 3rd LAW: same as Newtons 3rd law.
SCHOENFELDS GENERALIZED MASS FORMULA:
m(v) =3D sum[i=3D0, n] (m^i(0) v^i) / i!
where
m^x(0) =3D is x'th derivative of the rest mass function
n =3D such that m^(n+1)(v) =3D 0.
SCHOENFELDS GENERALIZED MOMENTUM FORMULA:
p =3D m(v) v
=3D v sum[i=3D0, n] (m^i(0) v^i) / i!
My Laws are perfectly consistent with orthodox physics since=AD
orthodox
physics *ASSUMES* dm/dv =3D 0 which simplies my laws significa=ADntly. "
Or didn't you?
I personally doubt it. A crank is a crank.
I realize now why your brother was an only child.=20
Mike
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
01 Feb 2005 07:22:29 AM |
|
|
John Schoenfeld wrote:
I realize now why your brother was an only child.
You better ealise that F = dp/dt = mdv/dt + vdm/dt
before you expose yourself once more
Mike
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Schoenfeld" |
|
| Title: Re: Mechanical Gravity Theory |
01 Feb 2005 11:58:48 AM |
|
|
Mike wrote:
John Schoenfeld wrote:
I realize now why your brother was an only child.
You better ealise that F = dp/dt = mdv/dt + vdm/dt
before you expose yourself once more
You are as useless as rubber lips on a woodpecker. Do the the math
again, dip *****.
Mike
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
