| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
27 Aug 2006 01:31:31 AM |
| Object: |
Missing Pentagon Evidence |
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/missing.html
Missing Pentagon Evidence
The Suppression of Decisive Pentagon Attack Evidence
Secrecy has surrounded the aftermath of the September 11th attack of
the Pentagon. The paucity of unambiguous evidence outside of eyewitness
reports that a jetliner hit the building has fueled speculation about
the nature of the event. Immediately following the attack, actions by
officials reveal a concerted program to mop up what evidence of the
attack remained in its immediate aftermath and to conceal it and
information about its very existence indefinitely. The common
interpretation that these actions indicate an attempt cover up that
something other than Flight 77 crashed at the Pentagon ignores other
plausible interpretations.
Aircraft Remains
Photographs taken immediately following the attack show a number of
pieces of apparent aircraft debris. One of the larger pieces was
documented by a photograph by passery-by Mark Faram. It shows the piece
on the lawn northwest of the heliport, a few hundred feet from the
impact center, suggesting it may have been moved before Faram arrived.
Other photographs show people, some in dress attire, moving pieces of
debris.
Columns of people in FBI jackets walked portions of the Pentagon lawn
and adjacent roads shortly after the attack, apparently to pick up
crash debris. The photographs and videos of these activities do not
suggest any attempt to carefully note and record the positions of any
debris they may have been finding. The scouring of the lawn and moving
of pieces of wreckage apparently occurred relatively soon after the
crash, while initial firefighting operations were underway.
Footage of the Attack
As of May, 2006, the only video footage of the Pentagon crash that has
been released to the public are three-minute clips from two Pentagon
security cameras north of the crash site. Neither video clearly shows
details of the crash, but one seems to show an aircraft obscured by a
parking lot structure in the frame before the fist one showing the
explosion.
The five frames from the first video leaked in 2002 fueled speculation
that the Pentagon was not hit by a jetliner because. In Painful
Deceptions , Eric Hufschmid points out:
* The first frame shows a vapor trail of the kind made by missiles,
not jetliners.
* The first frame shows an apparent mostly-obscurred plane that is
much too small to be a 757.
* The second frame shows an explosion whose white color indicates
the detonation of an explosive rather than the deflagration of jet
fuel.
None of these observations support conclusions about what hit the
Pentagon, since the video's resolution is too poor to make definitive
conclusions, and it is possible that the imagery was edited.
It may be that the video recordings from surrounding businesses
confiscated by the FBI in the wake of the attack clearly show the
jetliner. Its release continues to be sought through the Freedom of
Information Act case documented at Flight77.info and summerized with
this timeline.
Many people think that the suppression of evidence from the Pentagon
attack is evidence that something other than Flight 77, a Boeing 757,
crashed into the Pentagon. However, there are explanations for the way
officials have handled the evidence that are consistent with the attack
plane being Flight 77. For example, destroying and hiding evidence at
all of the 9/11/01 crime scenes serves the coverup by limiting the
information available to investigators, and cultivating false legends
about the attack.
.
|
|
| User: "CWatters" |
|
| Title: Re: Missing Pentagon Evidence |
27 Aug 2006 04:01:32 AM |
|
|
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1156660291.431998.280230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/missing.html
Columns of people in FBI jackets walked portions of the Pentagon lawn
and adjacent roads shortly after the attack, apparently to pick up
crash debris. The photographs and videos of these activities do not
suggest any attempt to carefully note and record the positions of any
debris they may have been finding.
Why would they want to. It wasn't a regular accident.
Human remains were also recovered.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jimpgh2002" |
|
| Title: Re: Missing Pentagon Evidence |
27 Aug 2006 11:59:39 AM |
|
|
On 26 Aug 2006 23:31:31 -0700, wrote:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/missing.html
Missing Pentagon Evidence
The Suppression of Decisive Pentagon Attack Evidence
I guess ALL these people are liars:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster" |
|
| Title: Re: Missing Pentagon Evidence |
27 Aug 2006 09:41:31 PM |
|
|
I agree with the first 3 repliers.
now, there are two especial considerations regarding the towers and
the Pentagon (apparently, WTC7 also fell
into the subway): a)
the Pentagon is a amassive concrete thing; b)
there is apparently a bimetallic reaction,
when aluminum hits iron with sufficient force,
known as "thermite," I was told.
The Suppression of Decisive Pentagon Attack Evidence
I guess ALL these people are liars:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_pentagon_eyewitnesses.html
the definition of dark matter/energy/what ever, appears to be,
that which is neccesary to preserve the increasing preponderance
of the Einsteinmaniacal Aether or "fabric of space-time," since
it doesn't appear to work for the rotation of galaxies,
for one thing. definitively, its employment is its meaning, since
it would be otherwise unemployed.
thus:
the brachistocrhone problem actually helped Leibniz and Bernoulli
to establish "the" calculus. I'm sure, Newton had to weigh-in
with his cannonballs, but, Who cares?... I mean,
all he did was algebraize Kepler's orbital constraints
-- without mentioning herr doktor-professor K. -- although
evidence points to his stealing the 2nd-power law
from what's-his-face (no-one knows, since Sir Duh destroyed all
of his portraits at the Society, which wrote a whole Philosophic Tract,
to obfuscate the basic idea)....
Bernoulli's paper is fairly elementary,
even in French.
thus:
to be featured in the next movie,
"Harry Potter's New Crusades and
the 'Public' Charter Schools: Faith-based Initiatives
in the New Millennium CCE: Come the Rapture,
No Child Left Behind!:"
http://larouchepub.com/other/2006/3333uk_scoop_soc.html
--it takes some to jitterbug!
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/2006_articles/Amplitude.W05.pdf
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2006/3322_ethanol_no_science.html
http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/howthenation.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PerfectlyAble" |
|
| Title: Re: Missing Pentagon Evidence |
27 Aug 2006 02:19:04 AM |
|
|
This is nonsense. The Pentagon had a policy for decades about
not taking photographs, also would have policies regards airplanes
crashing into the Pentagon, even how to react, i.e. clear debris
and keep people out, e.g. Clinton's Whitehouse visitor by a Cessna.
They were also supposed to have a missile
battery to combat such attacks, but hey even that could be hype
just to keep such an attack offbalance and thinking. Just as the
accredited pilot is said to have been unable to fly a cessna a
month before could have been faking to throw authories off.
Personally I believe planes did hit both the Pentagon and the WTC.
Whether they were remote controlled is another question, but
hey who would have the technology and motive to have the US
invade the middle east and secure the two great rivers of the region.
A country needing water to grow, maybe?#@#? No thoughts???
Anyway, no US President would want the fact that he failed
to protect America followed by even the possibility it was a friend.
But it does underline how able Bush has been in harming Israli
interests for the last five years culiminating in the S.Lebanon failer.
Whether Bush is appeasing Osama, or stuffing Israel, its pretty
clear the guy is clueless, whether thats for real or because Cheney
could never have been elected and choose Bush to keep the seat warm,
or (more unlikely) Bush is a really good actor. HAHA.
But in incidents like this it is best to ignore everything everyone
says and just consider the facts and in the greater picture whether
that was bad for the US. Two big buildings were demolished by
acts of terrorism, homegrown, friendly or foriegn. Bush was on
the job at the time and was duty bound to make sure such an
incident didn't happen. Bush failed to protect America. The
only way Bush could win re-election was to invade Iraq based
on now obvious lying. America is now weaker than its ever been.
Americians who don't get it, here's the headline, you're all suckers
for Bush's charm, he failed in his duty, no remorse he rebounds
and lies his way back into office. Suckers!
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com wrote:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/missing.html
Missing Pentagon Evidence
The Suppression of Decisive Pentagon Attack Evidence
Secrecy has surrounded the aftermath of the September 11th attack of
the Pentagon. The paucity of unambiguous evidence outside of eyewitness
reports that a jetliner hit the building has fueled speculation about
the nature of the event. Immediately following the attack, actions by
officials reveal a concerted program to mop up what evidence of the
attack remained in its immediate aftermath and to conceal it and
information about its very existence indefinitely. The common
interpretation that these actions indicate an attempt cover up that
something other than Flight 77 crashed at the Pentagon ignores other
plausible interpretations.
Aircraft Remains
Photographs taken immediately following the attack show a number of
pieces of apparent aircraft debris. One of the larger pieces was
documented by a photograph by passery-by Mark Faram. It shows the piece
on the lawn northwest of the heliport, a few hundred feet from the
impact center, suggesting it may have been moved before Faram arrived.
Other photographs show people, some in dress attire, moving pieces of
debris.
Columns of people in FBI jackets walked portions of the Pentagon lawn
and adjacent roads shortly after the attack, apparently to pick up
crash debris. The photographs and videos of these activities do not
suggest any attempt to carefully note and record the positions of any
debris they may have been finding. The scouring of the lawn and moving
of pieces of wreckage apparently occurred relatively soon after the
crash, while initial firefighting operations were underway.
Footage of the Attack
As of May, 2006, the only video footage of the Pentagon crash that has
been released to the public are three-minute clips from two Pentagon
security cameras north of the crash site. Neither video clearly shows
details of the crash, but one seems to show an aircraft obscured by a
parking lot structure in the frame before the fist one showing the
explosion.
The five frames from the first video leaked in 2002 fueled speculation
that the Pentagon was not hit by a jetliner because. In Painful
Deceptions , Eric Hufschmid points out:
* The first frame shows a vapor trail of the kind made by missiles,
not jetliners.
* The first frame shows an apparent mostly-obscurred plane that is
much too small to be a 757.
* The second frame shows an explosion whose white color indicates
the detonation of an explosive rather than the deflagration of jet
fuel.
None of these observations support conclusions about what hit the
Pentagon, since the video's resolution is too poor to make definitive
conclusions, and it is possible that the imagery was edited.
It may be that the video recordings from surrounding businesses
confiscated by the FBI in the wake of the attack clearly show the
jetliner. Its release continues to be sought through the Freedom of
Information Act case documented at Flight77.info and summerized with
this timeline.
Many people think that the suppression of evidence from the Pentagon
attack is evidence that something other than Flight 77, a Boeing 757,
crashed into the Pentagon. However, there are explanations for the way
officials have handled the evidence that are consistent with the attack
plane being Flight 77. For example, destroying and hiding evidence at
all of the 9/11/01 crime scenes serves the coverup by limiting the
information available to investigators, and cultivating false legends
about the attack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
