| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"kenseto" |
| Date: |
21 Sep 2006 08:49:36 AM |
| Object: |
Model Mechanics |
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Address for my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
.
|
|
| User: "harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 04:46:20 AM |
|
|
"kenseto" <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:QLwQg.14$Cq3.1@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Address for my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
One section of your theory:
"How does light get from point A to point B? The current assumption is that,
locally, light travels in a
straight line towards the target, and that, in a train of light pulses, the
first pulse hits the target is the
first one the source generated. These assumptions both make sense if the
target is stationary relative
to the light pulses, but if the target moves the second assumption could be
erroneous. Fig 3 describes
a thought experiment that is currently used by physicists to derive the time
dilation equation. A light
clock is constructed of two mirrors parallel to each other with light pulses
bouncing between them.
In one period of the clock, a light pulse travels up to the top mirror and
returns back to the bottom
mirror. The diagram shows that the light pulse is presumed to travel a slant
path when the light clock
is in motion. This is not a realistic description of the actual event. It
raises the question: How does
light know when to follow a vertical path and when to follow one of the
infinite numbers of slant
paths? It is more realistic to say that light will always follow the
perpendicular path on its way to the
upper mirror. The reason is that the vertical path is the direction where
all the light pulses are
directed. Figure 4 shows this: the first pulse of a train of pulses follows
the original path AB, but the
pulse detected at "E" travels the path CE."
Ken, you have made such statements before änd I see that you still do. I can
only conclude that my brain is wired differently from yours...
Harald
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 07:44:51 AM |
|
|
"harry" <harald.vanlintelButNotThis@epfl.ch> wrote in message
news:1158918380_13@sicinfo3.epfl.ch...
"kenseto" <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:QLwQg.14$Cq3.1@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Address for my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
One section of your theory:
"How does light get from point A to point B? The current assumption is
that,
locally, light travels in a
straight line towards the target, and that, in a train of light pulses,
the
first pulse hits the target is the
first one the source generated. These assumptions both make sense if the
target is stationary relative
to the light pulses, but if the target moves the second assumption could
be
erroneous. Fig 3 describes
a thought experiment that is currently used by physicists to derive the
time
dilation equation. A light
clock is constructed of two mirrors parallel to each other with light
pulses
bouncing between them.
In one period of the clock, a light pulse travels up to the top mirror and
returns back to the bottom
mirror. The diagram shows that the light pulse is presumed to travel a
slant
path when the light clock
is in motion. This is not a realistic description of the actual event. It
raises the question: How does
light know when to follow a vertical path and when to follow one of the
infinite numbers of slant
paths? It is more realistic to say that light will always follow the
perpendicular path on its way to the
upper mirror. The reason is that the vertical path is the direction where
all the light pulses are
directed. Figure 4 shows this: the first pulse of a train of pulses
follows
the original path AB, but the
pulse detected at "E" travels the path CE."
Ken, you have made such statements before änd I see that you still do. I
can
only conclude that my brain is wired differently from yours...
You need to tell me why you disagree with what I said. What I wrote is
falsifiable by the proposed experiments in the same paper. Also it explains
the SR concept of time dilation. In addition it explains why the path of a
photon (or a short pulse of light) is not definable.
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
21 Sep 2006 03:38:01 PM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
You have been told by many why it is a joke. There is no experimental
evidence gravitation depends on the state of absolute motion and
especially in the direction of motion wrt an absolute space as your
theory postulates.
You are an empirical fool who keeps on spamming these groups with utter
nonsense.
Mike
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Address for my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
21 Sep 2006 06:57:12 PM |
|
|
"Mike" <eleatis@yahoo.gr> wrote in message
news:1158871081.562363.41620@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
You have been told by many why it is a joke. There is no experimental
evidence gravitation depends on the state of absolute motion and
especially in the direction of motion wrt an absolute space as your
theory postulates.
Hey idiot....the Pound and Rebka experiment is experimental evidence that
gravitation depends on absolute motion. The familiar electric experiment
that currents flowing in the wires in the same direction (absolute motion of
the electrons moving in the same direction) gives rise to an attractive
force is another experimental support for gravity is dependent on the
direction of absolute motion.
You are an empirical fool who keeps on spamming these groups with utter
nonsense.
You are an idiot.
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
21 Sep 2006 08:56:15 AM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Address for my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
Money grubbing spam.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
21 Sep 2006 10:01:51 AM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Address for my website:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/index.htm
Ken Seto
Reported as spam.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
21 Sep 2006 09:22:43 AM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Seto's immortal fumbles
http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+fumble+site%3Ausers.pandora.be
Seto is a registered crank at crank dot net
http://www.google.com/search?q=seto+site%3Awww.crank.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
21 Sep 2006 07:07:36 PM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
21 Sep 2006 11:03:35 PM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Interesting comment from a kook who claims that that SR is a
subset of his own crank "theory".
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 07:45:48 AM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:rgJQg.62773$aJ.22011@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been
formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Interesting comment from a kook who claims that that SR is a
subset of his own crank "theory".
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 11:16:01 AM |
|
|
Sam Wormley wrote:
kenseto wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Interesting comment from a kook who claims that that SR is a
subset of his own crank "theory".
Interesting that he no longer responds to me, but he never tires of
cutting and pasting his "runt of the SR experts" blather to you. I
would have expected you to have been ignored by him a long time ago.
PD
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 12:00:58 PM |
|
|
PD wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
kenseto wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Interesting comment from a kook who claims that that SR is a
subset of his own crank "theory".
Interesting that he no longer responds to me, but he never tires of
cutting and pasting his "runt of the SR experts" blather to you. I
would have expected you to have been ignored by him a long time ago.
PD
Ken doesn't like me to show that he has difficulty with the simplest
of concepts, so I have to be relegated to... his image of me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 12:29:53 PM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:eFUQg.200717$1i1.159195@attbi_s72...
PD wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
kenseto wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been
formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of
absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Interesting comment from a kook who claims that that SR is a
subset of his own crank "theory".
Interesting that he no longer responds to me, but he never tires of
cutting and pasting his "runt of the SR experts" blather to you. I
would have expected you to have been ignored by him a long time ago.
You can prove that black is white and night is day.....so it is a waste of
time talking to you. That's why you are in my kill file
PD
Ken doesn't like me to show that he has difficulty with the simplest
of concepts, so I have to be relegated to... his image of me.
ROTFLOL....you have not said one intellgent thing all these years.
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "PD" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 02:53:08 PM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:eFUQg.200717$1i1.159195@attbi_s72...
PD wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
kenseto wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been
formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of
absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Interesting comment from a kook who claims that that SR is a
subset of his own crank "theory".
Interesting that he no longer responds to me, but he never tires of
cutting and pasting his "runt of the SR experts" blather to you. I
would have expected you to have been ignored by him a long time ago.
You can prove that black is white and night is day.....so it is a waste of
time talking to you. That's why you are in my kill file
Well, since I'm in his killfile, Seto will not see this. But I will
reply that Seto finds it enormously frustrating that what he thought
all these years was black is in fact, according to evidence, white, and
what he thought all these years was night is in fact, according to
evidence, day. However, this realization is too much to bear, perhaps,
and this is why he thinks I'm just playing games with him rather than
trying to explain truth to him.
PD
PD
Ken doesn't like me to show that he has difficulty with the simplest
of concepts, so I have to be relegated to... his image of me.
ROTFLOL....you have not said one intellgent thing all these years.
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "harry" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 04:39:01 AM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Sam, this is a science forum. Please don't state your personal unverifiable
opinion as fact please.
Harald
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 01:36:46 PM |
|
|
harry wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Sam, this is a science forum. Please don't state your personal unverifiable
opinion as fact please.
Harald
OK--I'll just state an observation that remains empirically correct:
There is no absolute motion (velocity) and there is no state of absolute
rest (no velocity).
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
22 Sep 2006 03:58:58 PM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:23WQg.156473$FQ1.31475@attbi_s71...
harry wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:TexQg.61843$aJ.23653@attbi_s21...
kenseto wrote:
A new model of the universe called Model Mechanics has been
formulated.
Model Mechanics is based on the concept of absolute motion. Absoulte
Motion
is that motion of an object in a stationary, structured and elastic
light-conducting medium called the E-Matrix. Also absolute motion is
that
motion of an object wrt the local light rays in the E-Matrix. The
following
papers describing Model Mechanics is in my website:
1. Unification of Physics.
2.Origin of the Universe as Interpreted by Model Mechanics.
3. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
4. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.
5. Past Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion.
Ken Seto
Seto--There is no absolute motion and there is no state of absolute
rest. Thank you for registering at crank dot net, Seto!
Sam, this is a science forum. Please don't state your personal
unverifiable
opinion as fact please.
Harald
OK--I'll just state an observation that remains empirically correct:
There is no absolute motion (velocity) and there is no state of
absolute
rest (no velocity).
What is the observation that is empirically correct that there is no
absolute motion??? OTOH the Pound and Rebka ahows that there is absolute
motion wrt the vertical light rays in the vertical direction.
Since you admitted that there is no observer is in a state of absolute rest
then why does SR insists that an observer sees all the clocks moving wrt him
are running slow and all the rods moving wrt the observer are contracted.
This is true only for an observer who is in a state of absolute rest.
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
23 Sep 2006 03:14:20 AM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
Since you admitted that there is no observer is in a state of absolute rest
then why does SR insists that an observer sees all the clocks moving wrt him
are running slow and all the rods moving wrt the observer are contracted.
This is true only for an observer who is in a state of absolute rest.
A conclusion not supported by any measurement. ***** your ill defined
proposed "experiment." Only you can find any meaning to the
descriptions or the "logic" employed in it. Trials? This isn't about
statistics. No one else ever has or ever will find meaning in it.
It's meaningless doubletalk.
You're just trying to sell a foolish book by a crazy or dishonest
author. How many fools have bought copies?
The cut and paste "runt of the SRians" crap (or perhaps memorized crap
by now) that you are bound to respond to this with only serves as
evidence that you can in no way be taken seriously. As if further
evidence were really needed.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
23 Sep 2006 07:49:50 AM |
|
|
"Bob Cain" <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in message
news:N-qdnaPUQL9CcYnYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@giganews.com...
kenseto wrote:
Since you admitted that there is no observer is in a state of absolute
rest
then why does SR insists that an observer sees all the clocks moving wrt
him
are running slow and all the rods moving wrt the observer are
contracted.
This is true only for an observer who is in a state of absolute rest.
A conclusion not supported by any measurement.
You are a fucking idiot runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
23 Sep 2006 08:02:54 AM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
"Bob Cain" <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in message
news:N-qdnaPUQL9CcYnYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@giganews.com...
kenseto wrote:
Since you admitted that there is no observer is in a state of absolute
rest
then why does SR insists that an observer sees all the clocks moving wrt
him
are running slow and all the rods moving wrt the observer are
contracted.
This is true only for an observer who is in a state of absolute rest.
A conclusion not supported by any measurement.
You are a fucking idiot runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Seto, do you not realize how much of a raving loony you are?
In science, experimental and observational data are essential.
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
23 Sep 2006 08:10:59 AM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:2gaRg.202076$1i1.64667@attbi_s72...
kenseto wrote:
"Bob Cain" <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in message
news:N-qdnaPUQL9CcYnYnZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@giganews.com...
kenseto wrote:
Since you admitted that there is no observer is in a state of absolute
rest
then why does SR insists that an observer sees all the clocks moving
wrt
him
are running slow and all the rods moving wrt the observer are
contracted.
This is true only for an observer who is in a state of absolute rest.
A conclusion not supported by any measurement.
You are a fucking idiot runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Seto, do you not realize how much of a raving loony you are?
In science, experimental and observational data are essential.
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
25 Sep 2006 02:26:12 AM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
This is what proves beyond anyone's doubt that Seto is Loony Toons.
How could anyone be taken seriously who continually regurgitates this
rant? Hell, who could be taken seriously after spouting it even once?
I'd like to say it doesn't become you, Ken, but...
Your "experiment" is not comprehensible to anyone but you. None of
your endlessly circular evasions are comprehensible. No one, nada,
has ever made a lick of sense of any of it. But you. This does _not_
imply that you are a genius.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "kenseto" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
25 Sep 2006 07:07:38 AM |
|
|
"Bob Cain" <arcane@arcanemethods.com> wrote in message
news:0bGdnT3K36kGGYrYnZ2dnUVZ_qSdnZ2d@giganews.com...
kenseto wrote:
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
This is what proves beyond anyone's doubt that Seto is Loony Toons.
How could anyone be taken seriously who continually regurgitates this
rant? Hell, who could be taken seriously after spouting it even once?
I'd like to say it doesn't become you, Ken, but...
Your "experiment" is not comprehensible to anyone but you. None of
your endlessly circular evasions are comprehensible. No one, nada,
has ever made a lick of sense of any of it. But you. This does _not_
imply that you are a genius.
That's because you are a runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: Model Mechanics |
25 Sep 2006 03:49:18 PM |
|
|
kenseto wrote:
That's because you are a runt of the SRians.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Q.E.D.
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
