More Re: Russell's Antimony (Paradox) Apparently Disproven



 Science > Physics > More Re: Russell's Antimony (Paradox) Apparently Disproven

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 08 May 2007 01:04:43 AM
Object: More Re: Russell's Antimony (Paradox) Apparently Disproven

From Osher Doctorow

The axiom of comprehension says that for all z1, all z2,..., all zn,
there exists a y for all x such that "x is an element of y iff phi(x)
holds", where phi(x) is some predicate or formula involving x.
The axiom of extensionality says that for all x and for all y, "for
all z, 'u iff v'," iff x = y where u is (x is an element of x) and v
is (z is an element of y).
Osher Doctorow
.

 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER