Science > Physics > Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
08 Sep 2006 10:58:11 AM |
| Object: |
Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM |
http://physicsmathforums.com
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity.
MDT is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted
by quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The
genius and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model
which shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics
derive from the same fundamental physical reality-the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.
Moving Dimensions Theory advances science by showing that curious
phenomena in both quantum mechanics and relativity arise from a common
space-time structure wherein the fourth dimension is expanding relative
to the three spatial dimensions. MDT offers a physical path to the
unification of previously disparate phenomena within a common context
founded upon a simple physical model of spacetime. MDT addresses the
deeper questions that many leading researchers, seeking to further
fictional fads instead of science, have chosen to ignore.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
But after thirty years of the absurdity of String Theory, millions of
dollars from the NSF, and billions of complementary dollars from tax
and tuition and endowments spent on killing physics and indie
physicists, perhaps it's time for something that makes sense-for a
physical theory that actually accounts for a deeper reality from which
both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, from which time, entanglement,
gravity, entropy, interference, the constant speed of light,
relativistic time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy emerge. It's time for Moving Dimensions
Theory-MDT.
-The Physicist with No Name
I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only thirty-five? Well to tell you the truth in all this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk!? -Clint Eastwood
I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more
likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood
Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood
Why, despite so much effort by thousands of the most talented and
well-trained scientists, has fundamental physics made so little
definitive progress in the last twenty-five years? -Lee Smolin,
"How Do You Fight Sociology?" in The Trouble With Physics: The Rise
Of String Theory, The Fall of Science, And What Comes Next
..=2E.universities are now much more professionalized than they were a
generation or two ago. Whereas university faculties have stopped
growing, there has been a marked increase in the number and power of
administrators. Thus, in hiring, there is less reliance on the
judgment of individual professors and more on statistical measures of
achievement, such as funding and citation levels... -Lee Smolin,
"How Do You Fight Sociology?" in The Trouble With Physics: The Rise
Of String Theory, The Fall of Science, And What Comes Next
The problem is of course not confined to science. The pace of
innovation in curriculum planning and teaching methods is positively
medieval. Any proposal for change has to be approved by the faculty,
and in general most professors see nothing wrong with how they have
been teaching for decades. I have learned how resistant universities
are to change. -Lee Smolin, "How Do You Fight Sociology?" in The
Trouble With Physics: The Rise Of String Theory, The Fall of Science,
And What Comes Next
THE CLASSIC POMO HIPSTER ENCOUNTER
BASED ON "A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS"
When a man with a .45 meets a man with a rifle, the man with a pistol
is a dead man. -Ramon from Sergio Leone's A Fistful of Dollars
I'll stick with my forty-fives. -The Man with No Name from A Fistful
of Dollars
The modern translation of this is:
"When a man with a Ph.D. in String Theory, backed by a possee of
pomo-hipster NSF-plundering string theorists meets a man armed with
logic and reason, the man armed with logic and reason is a dead man."
-String Theorist
"I'll stick with my logic and reason." -The Physicist with No
Name
"That a man can take pleasure in marching in formation to the strains
of a band is enough to make me despise him. He has only been given his
big brain by mistake; a backbone was all he needed. This plague-spot of
civilization ought to be abolished with all possible speed."
-Albert Einstein
THE SHOWDOWN
BASED ON "A FISTFUL OF DOLLARS"
When a man with .45 meets a man with a rifle, you said, the man with a
pistol's a dead man. Let's see if that's true. Go ahead, load up and
shoot. -The Man with No Name from A Fistful of Dollars
Sarah Belding: Be careful. You're a man who makes people afraid, and
that's dangerous.
The Stranger: It's what people know about themselves inside that makes
'em afraid.
-Clint Eastwood's High Plains Drifter
In High Plains Drifter, a mysterious gunfighter with no name rides into
town. He guns down three outlaws, and the cowardly town hires him to
help defend the town from three far more formidable outlaws. Not long
ago, as the town stood on and watched, these latter outlaws whipped to
death the town's former lawman-Marshal Jim Duncan-who lies in
grave with no name.
So it is that the tenured theorists and their hired hands in the form
of postdocs and grad students stood on and watched as physics, and the
physicist with no name, was whipped to death with papers titled,
"Frobenius transformation, mirror map and instanton numbers" and
"Fractional two-branes, toric orbifolds and the quantum McKay
correspondence." It was as if Dave Eggers had taken over the physics
department with his corporate fraud.
String theory is representative of what has been playing out in
numerous arenas-on Wall Street (Enron, Worldcom, pension-raiding), in
literature (Frey, rampant plagiarism, plotless, storyless hype), in
government (those who promise to cut taxes raise them). What it comes
down to is the destruction of truth, freedom, and the individual by
elite fools with ambitions overshadowing their talents. Want to be the
next Einstein or Shakespeare or Bill Gates? Sign up for our
pomo-hipster MBA/JD/Ph.D. program! The pomo academy must destroy
common sense in order to hawk their product.
Sergio Leone's genius, as represented in the "Man with No Name"
trilogy, made Clint Eastwood an international star. We love Leone and
Eastwood-indeed we love the Western-because it reminds us that so
often it is that truth and beauty are outnumbered, that the arrogance
of outlaws and mobs would tend to corrupt all institutions over time,
were it not for the lone, rugged individual with Law in his heart and a
..45 Revolver in his holster.
The three movies shot in Italy included "A Fistful of Dollars,"
"For a Few Dollars More," and "The Good, The Bad, and the
Ugly." And far, far more can be learned about human psychology and
sociology within Leone's and Eastwood's westerns than within the
psychology and sociology department. And if you wish to understand
modern (postmodern) physics, literature, finance, accounting, or
anything tainted by the sordid pomo philosophy, you've got to
undertand psychology and sociology. For the first rule of pomo
corruption is to replace truth, logic, reason, and the individual with
mob rule. So it is that the small minds-the supporting outlaws in
all the Westerns-band together in corrupt regimes.
So it is that Ed Witten, Brian Greene, Michio Kaku, Paul Davies, Lisa
Randall, and other esteemed String Theorists have had to hire an attack
dog-Lubos Motl. The tenured string Theorists never distance
themselves nor criticize Lubos-indeed they have vast financial
incentives to encourage and applaud his dervish, outlaw behavior:
Regarding the publication of his book, Not Even Wrong, Peter Woit
reports on his blog:
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
Update: Lubos has posted his usual slanderous review of the book on the
Amazon site, and then presumably logged in from many different places
to vote for his own review. Now it seems I get just one star instead of
the two I got in the UK, since it seems I have "abandoned any
integrity". As usual, he's very big on intellectual integrity. He
lists as the first "embarassing error" in the book the Gev instead
of Tev typo that was in the British edition, although he is well aware
that, thanks to him, the typo was fixed for the US edition, which is
the one he's reviewing. He's also paranoid and delusional, accusing
me of "using various tricks to erase all inconvenient reviews".
Update: Since Lubos's review of NEW on Amazon has been deleted, he is
now offering $20 to anyone who posts a one-star review of "the book
with the black satanic cover", and manages to get Amazon to leave it
there for at least two weeks. Yet another example of string
theorist's belief in the "market-place of ideas", I guess.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
For this, Ed Witten and Brian Greene sign off on a vast raise for Lubos
who has never done and will never do any meaningful, lasting physics.
That is how embarrassing theoretical physics has become.
Esteemed physicist Peter Woit (author of Not Even Wrong) reviews
esteemed physicist's Lee Smolin's book (The Trouble with Physics)
on his blog:
What most fascinated me about Smolin's book is the personal story
behind it. He was a graduate student at Harvard during the same years
that I was an undergraduate there, and describes well that place and
time. The standard model had just been formulated a few years earlier,
and experimental confirmation was pouring in. Many of the people
responsible for the standard model were there at Harvard, and there was
more than a bit of justifiable pride and arrogance. Smolin was of a
philosophical bent, and initially put off:
The atmosphere was not philosophical; it was harsh and aggressive,
dominated by people who were brash, cocky, confident, and in some cases
insulting to people who disagreed with them.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
Smolin gives many examples of the "groupthink" behavior of the
string theory community, while characterizing string theorists as
"almost all more open-minded and self-critical and less dogmatic than
they are en masse." He describes string theorists as:
..=2E. supremely confident both of the truth of string theory and of their
superiority over those unable or unwilling to do it. To many string
theorists, especially the young ones with no memory of physics before
their time, it is incomprehensible that a talented physicist, given the
chance, would choose to be anything but a string theorist.
..=2E.Anyone who hangs out with string theorists encounters this kind of
supreme confidence regularly. No matter what the problem under
discussion, the one option that never comes up (unless introduced by an
outsider) is that the theory might simply be wrong. If the discussion
veers to the fact that string theory predicts a landscape and hence
makes no predictions, some string theorists will rhapsodize about
changing the definition of science.
Some string theorists prefer to believe that string theory is too
arcane to be understood by human beings, rather than consider the
possibility that it might just be wrong.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/
What Woit doesn't elaborate on is just how cowardly the community
is. Every man gets to make a choice, and Smolin and Woit chose to
never criticize the vast NSF funding suspect theories receive.
Tragically, it appears Woit and Smolin have devoted a large segment of
their careers to tearing down that which wasn't even there in the
first place.
I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only five? Well to tell you the truth in all this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk! Clint Eastwood
I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a string theorist is,
the more likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood
Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood
Josey Wales: Are you gonna pull those pistols or whistle Dixie?
Ten Bears: These things you say we will have, we already have.
Josey Wales: That's true. I ain't promising you nothing extra. I'm just
giving you life and you're giving me life. And I'm saying that men can
live together without butchering one another.
Ten Bears: It's sad that governments are chiefed by the double tongues.
There is iron in your words of death for all Comanche to see, and so
there is iron in your words of life. No signed paper can hold the iron.
It must come from men. The words of Ten Bears carries the same iron of
life and death. It is good that warriors such as we meet in the
struggle of life... or death. It shall be life.
Josey Wales: Now remember, things look bad and it looks like you're not
gonna make it, then you gotta get mean. I mean plumb, mad-dog mean.
'Cause if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live nor
win. That's just the way it is.
Actually, I would not even be prepared to call string theory a
"theory" rather a "model" or not even that: just a hunch. After
all, a theory should come together with instructions on how to deal
with it to identify the things one wishes to describe, in our case the
elementary particles, and one should, at least in principle, be able to
formulate the rules for calculating the properties of these particles,
and how to make new predictions for them. Imagine that I give you a
chair, while explaining that the legs are still missing, and that the
seat, back and armrest will perhaps be delivered soon; whatever I did
give you, can I still call it a chair? --Gerard 't Hooft, In Search
of the Ultimate Building Blocks
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
Every great advance in science has issued from a new audacity of the
imagination. -John Dewey, The Quest For Certainty
There ain't no rules around here! We're trying to accomplish something!
-Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931) U. S. inventor.
All religions, arts and sciences are branches of the same tree. All
these aspirations are directed toward ennobling man's life, lifting it
from the sphere of mere physical existence and leading the individual
towards freedom.
-Albert Einstein
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!-William Wallace in Braveheart
Whatever ceases to ascend, fails to preserve itself and enters upon its
inevitable path of decay. It decays ... by reason of the failure of the
new forms to fertilize the perceptive achievements which constitute its
past history.' - Alfred North Whitehead, F.R.S., Sc.D., Religion in
the Making, Cambridge University Press, 1927, p. 144.
INTRODUCTION
In this day and age of unprecedented hype, hand-waving, and hoaxes in
theoretical physics, Dynamic Dimensions Theory rocks the universe with
a simple postulate.
The object of science is to unify formerly disparate phenomena within
a deeper framework, and Dynamic Dimensions Theory unifies both Quantum
Mechanics and Relativity with a simple framework.
For instance, both the results of the double-slit experiment and length
contraction of relativity are suddenly understood in the profound
context of Dynamic Dimensions Theory.
The famous equation E=3Dmc2 is presented in a deeper context, finally
accounting for the deeper physical reality that gives massive energies
to small masses seemingly at rest.
Godel's paradox of block-time is resolved, and action at a distance
and quantum entanglement are explained within the simple framework of
Dynamic Dimensions Theory.
The arrow of time and entropy-the second law of thermodynamics-are
accounted for, and time dialation is explained.
Dynamic dimensions theory is a theory so revolutionary that it may be
banned from the academy for years, as health benefits and tenure are
far more important than truth, logic, and reason in today's
postmodern academies.
And at last time is explained as a phenomenon that emerges from a
deeper physical reality.
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
THE SPECIFIC POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the rate of c in units of the Planck length, giving rise
to time and all classical, quantum mechanical, and relativistic
phenomena.
MDT IN BRIEF
Without further adieu, allow me to present the beauty and elegance of
MDT by showing both its simplicity and far-reaching ability to account
for and answer fundamental questions. All of the below will be
elaborated on throughout the book.
Questions Addressed by MDT:
Why does light have a maximum, constant speed independent of the
source? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions. A photon is momenergy that exists orthogonal to
the three spatial dimensions. It is carried along by the expanding
fourth dimension. So no matter how fast the source is moving when the
photon is emitted, the photon travels at the rate with which the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus c
is always independent of the movement of the source.
Why are light and energy quantized? The fourth dimension is expanding
in a quantized manner relative to the three spatial dimensions. Light
and energy are matter rotated completely into the fourth expanding
dimension, and as it expands in a quantized manner, light and energy
are thus quantized.
Why is the velocity of light constant in all frames? Time is an
emergent phenomena that arises because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The flow of time
is inextricably wed to the emission and propagation of photons. In all
biological, mechanical, and electronic clocks, the emission and
propagation of photons is what determines time. The velocity of light
is always measured with respect to time, which is inextricably linked
to the velocity of light. This tautology ensures that the velocity of
light, measured relative to the velocity of light, will always be the
same.
How can photons display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental photon propagates as a spherical wave-front, surfing the
fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth expanding
dimension appears as a spherical wavefront as it expands through the
three spatial dimensions. The act of measurement localizes the
photon's momenergy, taking it out of the expanding fourth dimension
and trapping it in the three stationary spatial dimensions, and it
appears as a localized particle, trapped by electrons as it blackens a
grain on a photographic plate.
How can matter display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental electron is abuzz with photons. Photons are continually
being emitted into the fourth expanding dimension and reabsorbed by the
electron. The continual dance with these photons gives the electron
its wave properties. Nothing moves without photons which up the net
probability that the combine momenergy will be in the expanding fourth
dimension. The more photons one adds to an object, the greater the
chance it has of existing in the expanding fourth dimension, and thus
it moves.
Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. That
means that what begins as a point in the fourth dimension is a sphere
with a 186,000 mile radius one second later. So it is that the entire
spherical wavefront of the photon exists in the exact same place in
time. Hence the non-locality observed in double slit experiments, the
EPR effect, and quantum entanglement. Take two interacting spin =BD
photons and let them propagate at the speed of c in opposite
directions. They are yet at the exact same place in time! And too,
they are yet in the exact same place of the fourth expanding dimension.
Why does time stop at the speed of light?
Time depends on the emission and propagation of photons. If no photons
are emitted, time does not occur. This holds true whether the clock is
an unwinding copper spring, a biological system such as a heart, or an
oscillating quartz crystal. No photom emission=3Dno time! As an object
approaches the speed of light, its ability to emit photons without
reabsorbing them diminishes. An object traveling at the speed of light
cannot emit a photon.
How come a photon does not age?
A photon represents momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth
expanding dimension. A photon stays the exact same place in the fourth
dimension, no matter how far it travels. A photon stays the exact same
place in time, no matter how far it travels. Again, time is not the
fourth dimension, but in inherits properties of the fourth dimension.
Why are inertial mass and gravitational mass the same thing?
Why do moving bodies exhibit length contraction?
Movement is always accompanied by a shortening in length. This is
because the only way for a body to move is for it to undergo a rotation
into the forth dimension, which is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions. The more energy an electron has, the more photons
it possesses, and the higher probability it exists in the expanding
fourth dimension. Hence its length appears contracted as perceived
from the three spatial dimensions.
Why are mass and energy equivalent?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. That means that a baseball sitting on a lab table
stationary in our three-dimensional inertial reference frame, is yet
moving at a fantastic velocity relative to the fourth dimension. Hence
every seemingly stationary mass has a vast energy, as given by E=3Dmc2.
In a nuclear reaction matter is rotated into the expanding fourth
dimension, appearing as high-enegry photons (gamma rays) propagating at
the same velocity of the fourth expanding dimension-c.
Why does time's arrow point in the direction it points in? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Hence
every photon naturally expands in a spherically symmetric manner.
Hence every electron, or piece of matter that interacts with photons,
is naturally carried outward from a central point in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence the particles in a drop of dye in a swimming
pool dissipate in a spherically symmetric manner, and are never
reunited. Hence time's arrow and entropy.
Why do photons appear as spherically-symmetric wavefronts traveling at
a velocity c? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions at the velocity c. Hence photons, which are tiny
packets of momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth dimension, appear
as spherically-symmetric wavefronts propagating at the velocity c.
Why is there a minus sign in the following metric?
x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=3Ds^2
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. Hence the only way to stay still in the
space-time continuum, and to achieve a 0 interval, is to move with the
velocity of light.
What deeper reality underlies Einstein's postulates of relativity?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. This single postulate assures that the
speed of light is constant for all observers and that the laws of
physics are the same in all inertial frames.
What deeper reality underlies Newton's laws?
Newton's laws are an approximation of relativity and quantum
mechanics, and as MDT underlies QM & relativity, it underlies
Newton's laws.
Why is an increase in velocity always accompanied by a decrease in
length as measured by an external observer? All increases in velocity
are accompanied by rotations into the fourth dimension. All
particles can be represented by momenergy 4-vectors. The greater the
momenrgy component in the expanding fourth dimension, the greater the
velocity and speed of the particle. Rest mass is the invariant here.
It never changes. It prefers the three spatial dimensions. In order
for it to move, one must gain energy in the form of photons. These
photons prefer the fourth expanding dimension. The more photons one
adds, the greater the component of the momenergy 4-vector that appears
in the fourth expanding dimension, the more energy the particle has,
the shorter it appears, and the faster it moves.
How MDT Is Aiding Fellow Physicists
"The conclusions from Bell's theorem are philosophically startling;
either one must totally abandon the realistic philosophy of most
working scientists or dramatically revise our concept of space-time."
-Abner Shimony and John Clauser
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this new concept of space-time. The
vast ambitions of most tenure-track physicists, including string
theorists and LQG hypers, causes them to focus on irrelevant, minute
questions, and thus, though funded by millions for over thirty years,
have not yet been able to string the bow. Deeper, true physicists,
such as Abner Shimony and John Clauser are alert to the fact that
physics need news ideas.
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
"The discovery of the quantum of action shows us not only the natural
limitation of classical physics, but, by throwing a new light upon the
old philsophical problem of the objective existence of phenomena
indepedently of our observations, confronts us with a situation
hitherto unknown in natural science." -Niels Bohr
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"I think we need a new way to look at time, not either Quantum
Mechanics or Relativity." -Roger Penrose
Time is an emergent property of a fourth dimension that is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus it inherits properties
of the fourth expanding dimension, but time is not the fourth expanding
dimension. MDT underlies time and explains time on a more fundamental
level.
"Should we be prepared to see some day a new structure for the
foundations of physics that does away with time? . . . Yes, because
'time' is in trouble." -John Wheeler
Time is an emergent property of a fourth dimension that is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus it inherits properties
of the fourth expanding dimension, but time is not the fourth expanding
dimension. MDT underlies time and explains time on a more fundamental
level.
"Time is clothed in a different garment for each role it plays in our
thinking." -John Wheeler
Time is an emergent property of a fourth dimension that is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus it inherits properties
of the fourth expanding dimension, but time is not the fourth expanding
dimension. MDT underlies time and explains time on a more fundamental
level.
"The word time came not from heaven but form the mouth of man." -John
Wheeler
Time is an emergent property of a fourth dimension that is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus it inherits properties
of the fourth expanding dimension, but time is not the fourth expanding
dimension. MDT underlies time and explains time on a more fundamental
level.
"My ideas about time all developed from the realization that if nothing
were to change we could not say that times passes. Change is primary,
time, if it exists at all, is something we deduce from it. My Italian
collaborator Bruno Bertotti and I found that the deep structure of
Einstein's general theory of relativity does correspond to this truth.
It is telling us that time does not exist as an independent thing and
that change is indeed primary. However, this is in the framework of
so-called classical physics, the form of physics that developed before
quantum mechanics was discovered. When the idea that time has no
independent existence is combined with the basic facts of quantum
mechanics in the simplest possible way, the implications are startling.
.. .The quantum universe is static. Only timeless Nows exist. The
quantum rules give them different probabilities. We experience the most
probable Nows as individual instants of time. The appearance of motion
and a flow of time are both illusions created by very special structure
of the instants that we experience." -Julian Barbour,
http://www.platonia.com/ideas.html
Time is an emergent property of a fourth dimension that is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus it inherits properties
of the fourth expanding dimension, but time is not the fourth expanding
dimension. MDT underlies time and explains time on a more fundamental
level.
"The mystery of time's arrow is the oldest problem in science
concerning the nature of time, predating even the theory of
relativity." -Paul Davies, About Time
MDT accounts for Time's Arrow: The fourth dimension is expanding
relative to the three spatial dimensions. Photons are momenergy
rotated entirely into this expanding fourth dimension. Hence any group
of photons originating from a central point will be found distant to
one-another. Hence every photon naturally expands in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence every electron, or piece of matter, is
naturally carried outward from a central point in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence a drop of dye in a swimming pool dissipates in
a spherically symmetric manner, and is never reunited. Hence time's
arrow and entropy.
Moving Dimensions Theory & On The Advancement Of Physics
Physics has been furthered far more often by a rugged individual
acknowledging the simple and obvious in a pursuit of the truth than
book-keepers-in-training playing games in the abstruse in pursuit of
tenure. The advancement of physics has ever depended far more on
logic, reason, and Truth than government grants, tenure, group think,
peer-reviewed journals, and aging bureaucracies. "That is the way
things are because that is the way things are," has lead to far more
physics than the contemporary, "things can't be that way because the
math dictates that we live in thirty-three dimensions and four are
curled up, and that is what NSF is funding."
When nobody could measure nor detect the supposed ether, Einstein
proclaimed, "there is no ether." When experiments showed that light
existed only in quantized packets, Einstein proclaimed that light only
existed in quantized packets, and he won the Nobel Prize. When spectra
from atoms showed discreet energies, Niels Bohr proclaimed that
electrons orbits were quantized, and he received a Nobel Prize. When
Maxwell's Equations had a recurring constant, Maxwell used c to denote
it, and Einstein proclaimed that the speed of light must be constant
for all observers-and so Special Relativity was born. When Einstein
juxtaposed objects falling towards the earth getting closer together
with the fact that two people starting at the equator, walking on
originally parallel lines of longitude towards the North Pole, would
come together because they were walking on a curve surface, Einstein
proclaimed that the space-time around a massive object must also be
curved. This along with Einstein's realization that the force of
gravity would be rendered null in free-fall, lead to General
Relativity.
And so it is that in the above paragraph you have the roots of the
greatest achievements of physics in the past 100+ years, dwarfing
String Theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, and thousands of their variatons,
which deal in the abstruse, complicated, muddled, and mythological
worlds which are safe from physics simple rigor.
Moving Dimensions Theory returns us to simpler times. It starts with
the simple and keeps it simple. Light travels with a maximum velocity
of c, because the fourth dimension is expanding at a rate relative to
the three spatial dimensions at the velocity of c. A photon expands
through space in a spherically symmetric manner. This is because the
fourth dimension expands through the three spatial dimensions in a
spherically symmetric manner. Energy and mass are equivalent, expressed
by E=3Dmc^2, because energy is nothing more than mass rotated into the
expanding fourth dimension. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen effect (EPR)
effect, which calls instantaneous action at a distance "spooky," can be
accounted for by the expanding dimension-as a point expands, it is yet
a single locale in that dimension, and hence though separated by
distance in space, interacting particles may be in the same place in
the time dimension, and hence connected. The null vector of the photon,
which remains 0 no matter how far the photon travels in space-time, may
be accounted for by the fact that the fourth dimension is moving, and
thus the only way to stay still in the four dimensions is to move with
along with the expanding dimension. In Lorentzian Transformations,
there is no way for an object to be rotated into the time dimension
without it moving-this can be explained by the fact that the time
dimension is expanding. All wave-particle duality can be seen as the
result of the universe's existence upon a reality that has three
stationary spatial dimensions and one expanding time dimension-when
matter exists in the stationary dimensions, it is seen as mass, or a
particle. When matter exists in the time dimension it is seen as wave,
or a photon, or energy. Depending how we choose to observer matter
determines whether we observe its wave or particle properties. Photons
are quantized bundles of energy that propagate at the velocity of
c-this is because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the
three spatial dimensions in a quantized manner, in units of Planck's
length at the rate of c. The Second Law of Thermodyamics, or the law of
Entropy, states that the universe tends towards disorder. This is
because the fourth dimension is expanding in a spherically symmetric
manner, constantly carrying all photons and interacting particles away
from one another-thus a drop of food coloring in a pool will be carried
outward and evenly distributed. In 1949 Godel published a paper showing
that within the theory of relativity, time as we understand it, does
not exist. Einstein recognized Godel's paper as "an important
contribution to the general theory of relativity," and since then
physicists have not been able to find any logical shortcomings in
Godel's work, and nobody has been able to account for the existence of
time. But the Theory of Moving Dimensions accounts for time as we know
it by showing that it is an emergent property of the underlying
dimension's intrinsic relative movement. Relativity becomes
increasingly exact at long-length scales but fails at short ones
because space-time itself is quantized, as the time dimension is
expanding in units of the Planck length.
The concept of general relativity's smooth geometry, at large scales,
disappears on short-distance scales-this has been a problem to string
theorists, but only because they were never bold enough to recognize
that's the way it is because that's the way it is. Realizing this might
have lead one of them to see that the fourth dimension is expanding at
a rate of c relative to the three spatial dimensions. So it is seen
that Moving Dimensions Theory offers a simple model upon which all
known phenomena of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics may rest. And
because the underlying architecture of the universe is
quantized-because the fourth dimension expands at the rate of c in
units of the Planck length relative to the three spatial dimensions,
quantum mechanics works for the small, while general relativity works
for the large. That is the way it is because that is the way it
is-this was the realization that lead to the postulate of MDT: the
fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.
Are New Ideas Important in Physics?
String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses.
-Richard Feynman
An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually
winning over and converting its opponents: What does happen is that the
opponents gradually die out. -Max Planck
..=2E.I do feel strongly that this is nonsense! ...I think all this
superstring stuff is crazy and is in the wrong direction. ... I don't
like it that they're not calculating anything. ...why are the masses
of the various particles such as quarks what they are? All these
numbers ... have no explanations in these string theories - absolutely
none! ... -Richard Feynman in Davies and Brown, Superstrings,
Cambridge 1988, pp. 194-195.
String theory is the Enron of physics, and like Enron, it is but the
tip of the iceberg of the widespread group-think decline. Where Enron
and Worldcom and Global Crossing lied to plunder pensions and
investors, String Theory lies to plunder tax and tuition dollars. With
millions of NSF dollars at stake, and billions more in the way of tax
and tuition, fashion and group-think are now held superior to logic and
reason in physics. And as in all totalitarian systems which hold
themselves above logic, reason, truth, justice, and practicality, the
worst are promoted, while the best are exiled. The group-think
sycophants get the postdocs, while the indie physicists must forage on
their own.
Are new ideas important in physics as prominent physicists so often
proclaim? If so, then why are young scientists with new ideas based in
logic, reason, and reality, so often castigated, impugned, and
crucified while those who quietly, passively, and uncreatively accept
the nonsensical, none-physics, crackpot mythologies of String Theory
and M-Theory rewarded with vast salaries, health benefits, TV shows,
book deals, and tenure?
I would very much like to discuss my new theory here, but I am
forbidden from even mentioning its name, as the String Theorists and
other fashionistas do not approve of theories with postulates based in
logic and reason. And so their multi-billion dollar myth is perpetuated
at the expense of logic, reason, and physics.
But time is on our side. And what is time? I am not allowed to say, as
my theory is banned for the moment.
The current state of physics has several Prominent Physicsists and
Great Thinkers spinning in their graves:
The world we have made as a result of the level of thinking we have
done thus far creates problems we cannot solve at the same level of
thinking at which we created them. -Albert Einstein
Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by the age of
eighteen. -Albert Einstein
The mere formulation of a problem is far more often essential than its
solution, which may be merely a matter of mathematical or experimental
skill. To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old
problems from a new angle requires creative imagination and marks real
advances in science. -Albert Einstein
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre
minds. -Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein's three rules of work:
1=2E Out of clutter, find simplicity.
2=2E From discord, find harmony.
3=2E In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
-Albert Einstein
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious-it is
the source of all true art and science. -Albert Einstein
Science and art belong to the whole world, and before them vanish the
barriers of nationality. -Goethe
It is the tension between creativity and skepticism that has produced
the stunning and unexpected findings of science. -Carl Sagan
Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for
further development. -Julius Sextus Frontinus, Highly regarded
engineer in Rome, 1st century A.D.
And if everybody says that you are wrong, then you are one step ahead.
But there is one situation which is better still, when everyone begins
to laugh about you, then you know you are two steps ahead. Albert
Szent-Gyorgi (Nobel-prize winning biochemist who discovered vitamin C)
One cannot step twice into the same river. -Heraclitus
While the rational mind is important, we gain a new perspective when we
learn how many of the greatest scientific insights, discoveries, and
revolutionary inventions appeared first to their creators as fantasies,
dreams, trances, lightening-flash insights, and other non-ordinary
states of consciousness. -Willis Harman and Howard Rheingold
"Let us learn to dream, gentlemen." -Kekule, famous for his
dream-inspired scientific breakthrough-discovering the molecular
structure of benzene, advised his fellow scientists:
Whenever you look at a piece of work and you think the fellow was
crazy, then you want to pay some attention to that. One of you is
likely to be, and you had better find out which one it is. It makes an
awful lot of difference. -Charles Franklin Kettering (1876-1958)
U=2ES. engineer and inventor.
An essential aspect of creativity is not being afraid to fail. -Dr.
Edwin Land
All sciences are now under the obligation to prepare the ground for
then future task of the philosopher, which is to solve the problem of
value, to determine the true hierarchy of values. -Friedrich
Nietzsche
I wish to be at any time hereafter only a yea-sayer!
-Friedrich Nietzsche
We must be physicists in order to be creative since so far codes of
values and ideals have been constructed in ignorance of physics or even
in contradiction to physics. -Friedrich Nietzsche
A thinker sees his own actions as experiments and questons.. as
attempts to find out something. Success and failure are for him answers
above all. -Friedrich Nietzsche
There are no facts, only interpretations. -Friedrich Nietzsche
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.
-Isaac Newton
Max Planck, the father of quantum theory, felt that the pioneer
scientist must have a vivid intuitive imagination, for new ideas are
not generated by deduction, but by "artistically creative
imagination."
In "Shorter Bartlett's Familiar Quotations," by John Bartlett, 1937,
1980, 1992.
It is by intuition that we discover and by logic we prove. -Henri
Poincar=E9, Mathematician
Knowledge has three degrees-opinion, science, and illumination. The
means or instrument of the first is sense; of the second, dialectic; of
the third, intuition. This last is absolute knowledge founded on the
identity of the mind knowing with the object known. -Plotinus
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.
-Isaac Newton
Max Planck, the father of quantum theory, felt that the pioneer
scientist must have "a vivid intuitive imagination, for new ideas are
not generated by deduction, but by artistically creative imagination."
An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually
winning over and converting its opponents: What does happen is that the
opponents gradually die out. -Max Planck
http://physicsmathforums.com
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM |
10 Sep 2006 12:23:53 PM |
|
|
An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually
winning over and converting its opponents: What does happen is that
the
opponents gradually die out.
-Max Planck-
<SNIP>
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
<SNIP>
VERGON
I'll spare you the rest of it because I suppose you read it -- as far
as you care to.
As for me, I basically got lost by the postulate -- which is the
foundation of the theory.
Time needs to be defined. To me it is the comparison of all motions to
a standard.
"400 feet per second" is the generic use. The second is based on the
rotation of the
earth --- which was the standard -- now it is certain vibrations of the
excited cesium atom.
All the old wives tales about time can be forgotten.
HOW does time "expand" in relation to the x,y,z, dimensions?
I don't know, so I quit there.
I offer in its place my own theory and invite you to take a look at it.
It is logical, orderly, self consistent, consistent with empiricism and
inline with all accepted physical laws.
It fits Occam's Razor to a T.
Basically it displays a sub-particle particle that is the base unit of
the universe.
The title is On the Quantum as a Physical Entity. Among other things it
produces a quantum description of gravity and reveals that action at a
distance is an illusion. It also offers a formula and description of
the mechanics of the strong force.
If one would care to look at it, go to http://www.wbabin.net and find
LIST OF AUTHORS then click on Vertner Vergon
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM |
10 Sep 2006 01:07:34 PM |
|
|
http://physicsmathforums.com
susskind hates nobel laureates, feynman, and einstein
that is because feyman, einstein, and nobel laureates get in the way of
him pillaging your tax and tuition dollars with crank physics.
It is anomalous to replace the four-dimensional continuum by a
five-dimensional one and then subsequently to tie up artificially one
of those five dimensions in order to account for the fact that it does
not manifest itself. -Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest
String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman,
Noble Laureate
String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick.
-Laughlin, Nobel Laureate
Actually, I would not even be prepared to call string theory a
"theory"rather a "model" or not even that: just a hunch. After
all, a theory should come together with instructions on how to deal
with it to identify the things one wishes to describe, in our case the
elementary particles, and one should, at least in principle, be able to
formulate the rules for calculating the properties of these particles,
and how to make new predictions for them. Imagine that I give you a
chair, while explaining that the legs are still missing, and that the
seat, back and armrest will perhaps be delivered soon; whatever I did
give you, can I still call it a chair? -Gerard 't Hooft, Nobel
Laureate in String Theory
"It is tragic, but now, we have the string theorists, thousands of
them, that also dream of explaining all the features of nature. They
just celebrated the 20th anniversary of superstring theory. So when one
person spends 30 years, it's a waste, but when thousands waste 20
years in modern day, they celebrate with champagne. I find that
curious." Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate
I don't like that they're not calculating anything. I don't like
that they don't check their ideas. I don't like that for anything
that disagrees with a n experiment, they cook up an explanation-a
fix-up to say, "Well, it might be true." For example, the theory
requires ten dimensions. Well, maybe there's a way of wrapping up six
of the dimensions. Yes, that's all possible mathematically, but why
not seven? When they write their equation, the equation should decide
how many of these things get wrapped up, not the desire to agree with
experiment. In other words, there's no reason whatsoever in
superstring theory that it isn't eight out of the ten dimensions that
get wrapped up and that the result is only two dimensions, which would
be completely in disagreement with experience. So the fact that it
might disagree with experience is very tenuous, it doesn't produce
anything; it has to be excused most of the time. It doesn't look
right. -Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate in Physics
But superstring physicists have not yet shown that theory really works.
They cannot demonstrate that the standard theory is a logical outcome
of string theory. They cannot even be sure that their formalism
includes a description of such things as protons and electrons. And
they have not yet made even one teeny-tiny experimental prediction.
Worst of all, superstring theory does not follow as a logical
consequence of some appealing set of hypotheses about nature. Why, you
may ask, do the string theorists insist space is none-dimensional?
Simply because string theory doesn't make sense in any other kind of
space. Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate in Physics
http://physicsmathforums.com
vergon@gawab.com wrote:
An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually
winning over and converting its opponents: What does happen is that
the
opponents gradually die out.
-Max Planck-
<SNIP>
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
<SNIP>
VERGON
I'll spare you the rest of it because I suppose you read it -- as far
as you care to.
As for me, I basically got lost by the postulate -- which is the
foundation of the theory.
Time needs to be defined. To me it is the comparison of all motions to
a standard.
"400 feet per second" is the generic use. The second is based on the
rotation of the
earth --- which was the standard -- now it is certain vibrations of the
excited cesium atom.
All the old wives tales about time can be forgotten.
HOW does time "expand" in relation to the x,y,z, dimensions?
I don't know, so I quit there.
I offer in its place my own theory and invite you to take a look at it.
It is logical, orderly, self consistent, consistent with empiricism and
inline with all accepted physical laws.
It fits Occam's Razor to a T.
Basically it displays a sub-particle particle that is the base unit of
the universe.
The title is On the Quantum as a Physical Entity. Among other things it
produces a quantum description of gravity and reveals that action at a
distance is an illusion. It also offers a formula and description of
the mechanics of the strong force.
If one would care to look at it, go to http://www.wbabin.net and find
LIST OF AUTHORS then click on Vertner Vergon
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM |
11 Sep 2006 10:50:38 AM |
|
|
Lee Smolin's new cutting-edge book, The Trouble With Physics: The Rise
of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next, documents
how String Theorists, in order to better pillage tax and tution
dollars, have banned questions pertaining to physics, and instead
dictate that physicists who seek employment must only play little
masturabory games, as evidenced by the hilarious titles of the millions
of meaningless string theory papers on arxiv.org.
Moving Dimensions Theory offers the new idea regarding space-time,
unifying quantum mechanics and relativity in a single physical
framework--note the word "physical."
http://physicsmathforums.com
Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all experimental
tests and phenomena associated with special and general relativity. MDT
is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena as predicted by
quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive experiments. The genius
and novelty of MDT is that it presents a common physical model which
shows that phenomena from both relativity and quantum mechanics derive
from the same fundamental physical reality.
Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop Quantum Gravity account for quantum
entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows these derive
from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG
account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length contraction.
MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical reality.
Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of light, nor
the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source,
nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from the same
underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor Loop
Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe which
troubled Eisntein. MDT resolves this paradox.
Simply put, MDT replaces the contemporary none-theories with a physical
theory, complete with a simple postulate that unifies formerly
disparate phenomena within a simple context.
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.
-Albert Einstein
But after thirty years of the absurdity of String Theory, millions of
dollars from the NSF, and billions of complementary dollars from tax
and tuition and endowments spent on killing physics and indie
physicists, perhaps it's time for something that makes sense-for a
physical theory that actually accounts for a deeper reality from which
both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, from which time, entanglement,
gravity, entropy, interference, the constant speed of light,
relativistic time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of
mass and energy emerge. It's time for Moving Dimensions Theory-MDT.
-The Physicist with No Name
I know what you're thinking. Did he say there were thirty-six
dimensions or only thirty-five? Well to tell you the truth in all this
excitement I've kinda lost track myself. But being this is a .45
Revolver-the most powerful hand gun in the world and would blow your
head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question--Do I feel
lucky? Well, do ya punk!? -Clint Eastwood
I'm interested in the fact that the less secure a man is, the more
likely he is to have extreme prejudice. -Clint Eastwood
Go ahead. Make my day. -Clint Eastwood
MDT IN BRIEF
Without further adieu, allow me to present the beauty and elegance of
MDT by showing both its simplicity and far-reaching ability to account
for and answer fundamental questions. All of the below will be
elaborated on throughout the book.
Questions Addressed by MDT:
Why does light have a maximum, constant speed independent of the
source? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. A photon is momenergy that exists orthogonal to the three
spatial dimensions. It is carried along by the expanding fourth
dimension. So no matter how fast the source is moving when the photon
is emitted, the photon travels at the rate with which the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Thus c
is always independent of the movement of the source.
Why are light and energy quantized? The fourth dimension is expanding
in a quantized manner relative to the three spatial dimensions. Light
and energy are matter rotated completely into the fourth expanding
dimension, and as it expands in a quantized manner, light and energy
are thus quantized.
Why is the velocity of light constant in all frames? Time is an
emergent phenomena that arises because the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The flow of time is
inextricably wed to the emission and propagation of photons. In all
biological, mechanical, and electronic clocks, the emission and
propagation of photons is what determines time. The velocity of light
is always measured with respect to time, which is inextricably linked
to the velocity of light. This tautology ensures that the velocity of
light, measured relative to the velocity of light, will always be the
same.
How can photons display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental photon propagates as a spherical wave-front, surfing the
fourth expanding dimension. This is because the fourth expanding
dimension appears as a spherical wavefront as it expands through the
three spatial dimensions. The act of measurement localizes the photon's
momenergy, taking it out of the expanding fourth dimension and trapping
it in the three stationary spatial dimensions, and it appears as a
localized particle, trapped by electrons as it blackens a grain on a
photographic plate.
How can matter display both wave and particle properties? The
fundamental electron is abuzz with photons. Photons are continually
being emitted into the fourth expanding dimension and reabsorbed by the
electron. The continual dance with these photons gives the electron its
wave properties. Nothing moves without photons which up the net
probability that the combine momenergy will be in the expanding fourth
dimension. The more photons one adds to an object, the greater the
chance it has of existing in the expanding fourth dimension, and thus
it moves.
Why are there non-local effects in quantum mechanics? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. That
means that what begins as a point in the fourth dimension is a sphere
with a 186,000 mile radius one second later. So it is that the entire
spherical wavefront of the photon exists in the exact same place in
time. Hence the non-locality observed in double slit experiments, the
EPR effect, and quantum entanglement. Take two interacting spin =BD
photons and let them propagate at the speed of c in opposite
directions. They are yet at the exact same place in time! And too, they
are yet in the exact same place of the fourth expanding dimension.
Why does time stop at the speed of light?
Time depends on the emission and propagation of photons. If no photons
are emitted, time does not occur. This holds true whether the clock is
an unwinding copper spring, a biological system such as a heart, or an
oscillating quartz crystal. No photom emission=3Dno time! As an object
approaches the speed of light, its ability to emit photons without
reabsorbing them diminishes. An object traveling at the speed of light
cannot emit a photon.
How come a photon does not age?
A photon represents momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth
expanding dimension. A photon stays the exact same place in the fourth
dimension, no matter how far it travels. A photon stays the exact same
place in time, no matter how far it travels. Again, time is not the
fourth dimension, but in inherits properties of the fourth dimension.
Why are inertial mass and gravitational mass the same thing?
Why do moving bodies exhibit length contraction?
Movement is always accompanied by a shortening in length. This is
because the only way for a body to move is for it to undergo a rotation
into the forth dimension, which is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions. The more energy an electron has, the more photons
it possesses, and the higher probability it exists in the expanding
fourth dimension. Hence its length appears contracted as perceived from
the three spatial dimensions.
Why are mass and energy equivalent?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions. That means that a baseball sitting on a lab table
stationary in our three-dimensional inertial reference frame, is yet
moving at a fantastic velocity relative to the fourth dimension. Hence
every seemingly stationary mass has a vast energy, as given by E=3Dmc2.
In a nuclear reaction matter is rotated into the expanding fourth
dimension, appearing as high-enegry photons (gamma rays) propagating at
the same velocity of the fourth expanding dimension-c.
Why does time's arrow point in the direction it points in? The fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. Hence
every photon naturally expands in a spherically symmetric manner. Hence
every electron, or piece of matter that interacts with photons, is
naturally carried outward from a central point in a spherically
symmetric manner. Hence the particles in a drop of dye in a swimming
pool dissipate in a spherically symmetric manner, and are never
reunited. Hence time's arrow and entropy.
Why do photons appear as spherically-symmetric wavefronts traveling at
a velocity c? The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three
spatial dimensions at the velocity c. Hence photons, which are tiny
packets of momenergy rotated entirely into the fourth dimension, appear
as spherically-symmetric wavefronts propagating at the velocity c.
Why is there a minus sign in the following metric?
x^2+y^2+z^2-c^2t^2=3Ds^2
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. Hence the only way to stay still in the
space-time continuum, and to achieve a 0 interval, is to move with the
velocity of light.
What deeper reality underlies Einstein's postulates of relativity?
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions at the velocity c. This single postulate assures that the
speed of light is constant for all observers and that the laws of
physics are the same in all inertial frames.
What deeper reality underlies Newton's laws?
Newton's laws are an approximation of relativity and quantum mechanics,
and as MDT underlies QM & relativity, it underlies Newton's laws.
Why is an increase in velocity always accompanied by a decrease in
length as measured by an external observer? All increases in velocity
are accompanied by rotations into the fourth dimension. All particles
can be represented by momenergy 4-vectors. The greater the momenrgy
component in the expanding fourth dimension, the greater the velocity
and speed of the particle. Rest mass is the invariant here. It never
changes. It prefers the three spatial dimensions. In order for it to
move, one must gain energy in the form of photons. These photons prefer
the fourth expanding dimension. The more photons one adds, the greater
the component of the momenergy 4-vector that appears in the fourth
expanding dimension, the more energy the particle has, the shorter it
appears, and the faster it moves.
How MDT Is Aiding Fellow Physicists
"The conclusions from Bell's theorem are philosophically startling;
either one must totally abandon the realistic philosophy of most
working scientists or dramatically revise our concept of space-time."
-Abner Shimony and John Clauser
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this new concept of space-time. The
vast ambitions of most tenure-track physicists, including string
theorists and LQG hypers, causes them to focus on irrelevant, minute
questions, and thus, though funded by millions for over thirty years,
have not yet been able to string the bow. Deeper, true physicists, such
as Abner Shimony and John Clauser are alert to the fact that physics
need news ideas.
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"For me, then, this is the real problem with quantum theory: the
apparently essential conflict between any sharp formulation and
fundamental relativity. It may be that a real synthesis of quantum and
relativity theories requires not just technical developments but
radical conceptual renewal." -John Bell
Moving Dimensions Theory provides this radical conceptual renewal. The
expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet appear to be
at the exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the
new concept of space-time.
"Entanglement is not one but rather the characteristic trait of quantum
mechanics." -Erwin Schrodinger
The expanding fourth dimension gives rise to non-local phenomena and
quantum entanglement, as the expanding fourth dimension means that two
events separated in the three spatial dimensions can yet be at the
exact same place in the fourth dimension. MDT thus provides the new
concept of space-time.
http://physicsmathforums.com
Robert Cohen wrote:
Here is my succinct interpretation
of the author's major complaints.
The field is full of phonies who teach "physical science."
They often act like they understand what reality is, no matter.
The possible dimensions of reality are infinte, damne 'em all to helle
forever.
Einstein couldn't tie his shoe w/o Mom's help until 8 or 9 or 10 (like
me).
Werner von Braun utilized slave-labor
Oppy wore a porkpie hat while building the bomb, rather than a
protective pithy helmet.
Jeanne Dixon predicted JFK's fate: She is one of the better ones, I
suppose.
drelliot@gmail.com wrote:
http://physicsmathforums.com/
The first step to recovery is admitting that there is a problem.
"Houston, we have a problem. Pomo-hipster String Theory."
Books like Smolin's give me faith that Reason, Science, and Physics
will again be celebrated in our lifetimes.
Smolin provides an excellent review of the Standard Model, and a
well-balanced overview of where we can go from here.
'Tis the dawn of a new era.
This book, together with Woit's Not Even Wrong signifies the beginning
of the end of a dark, postmodern age in physics.
Postmodern philosophies brought us all the Enrons, all the plagiarism
scandals that plague the literary industry, and string theory. All were
all based on the same pomo-hipster trick--an elite group of snarky
insiders deconstructing classical ideals and instituting secret
handhsakes and jumbled jargon in their stead, corrupting those very
entities that supported them.
Truth, beauty, and physics were sacrificed--indeed--today string
theorists would rather get rid of science than admit that string
theology has not only failed, but it has created a dependent class of
thousands of physicists who depend on string theory hoaxes for salaries
and benefits.
Search nsf.org and arxiv.org for "String," or "Strings," or "Stringy,"
and you will see the sad, embarrassing results of massive egoes gone
wild. Self-referential, meaningless paper after self-referential,
meaningless paper--all penned by those with ambitions overshadowning
their talents. And no physics in sight--indeed, physics became the
cause of expulsion from the physics department.
Logic, reason, and Reality must be held over all else in physics.
For physics is not math--it is physics.
It is not politics--it is physics.
It is not jargon nor cutesy jokes--it is physics.
Einstein, Bohr, Wheeler, Feynman, and Dirac were all very humble
men--humble before Reality.
We would be wise to follow their lead, to not deconstruct these giants
and all they stood for, but to stand upon their shoulders so as to see
further.
Physics must first and foremost be rooted in physical reality. Now and
forever.
Hopefully LQG and Moving Dimensions Theory can pave the way to a brand
new day where one is not exlcuded from scientific conferences and
funding because of one's love of logic, reason, and science.
http://physicsmathforums.com/
drelliot@gmail.com wrote:
http://physicsmathforums.com
susskind hates nobel laureates, feynman, and einstein
that is because feyman, einstein, and nobel laureates get in the way of
him pillaging your tax and tuition dollars with crank physics.
It is anomalous to replace the four-dimensional continuum by a
five-dimensional one and then subsequently to tie up artificially one
of those five dimensions in order to account for the fact that it does
not manifest itself. -Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest
String theorists don't make predictions, they make excuses. -Feynman,
Noble Laureate
String theory is like a 50 year old woman wearing too much lipstick.
-Laughlin, Nobel Laureate
Actually, I would not even be prepared to call string theory a
"theory"rather a "model" or not even that: just a hunch. After
all, a theory should come together with instructions on how to deal
with it to identify the things one wishes to describe, in our case the
elementary particles, and one should, at least in principle, be able to
formulate the rules for calculating the properties of these particles,
and how to make new predictions for them. Imagine that I give you a
chair, while explaining that the legs are still missing, and that the
seat, back and armrest will perhaps be delivered soon; whatever I did
give you, can I still call it a chair? -Gerard 't Hooft, Nobel
Laureate in String Theory
"It is tragic, but now, we have the string theorists, thousands of
them, that also dream of explaining all the features of nature. They
just celebrated the 20th anniversary of superstring theory. So when one
person spends 30 years, it's a waste, but when thousands waste 20
years in modern day, they celebrate with champagne. I find that
curious." Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate
I don't like that they're not calculating anything. I don't like
that they don't check their ideas. I don't like that for anything
that disagrees with a n experiment, they cook up an explanation-a
fix-up to say, "Well, it might be true." For example, the theory
requires ten dimensions. Well, maybe there's a way of wrapping up six
of the dimensions. Yes, that's all possible mathematically, but why
not seven? When they write their equation, the equation should decide
how many of these things get wrapped up, not the desire to agree with
experiment. In other words, there's no reason whatsoever in
superstring theory that it isn't eight out of the ten dimensions that
get wrapped up and that the result is only two dimensions, which would
be completely in disagreement with experience. So the fact that it
might disagree with experience is very tenuous, it doesn't produce
anything; it has to be excused most of the time. It doesn't look
right. -Richard Feynman, Nobel Laureate in Physics
But superstring physicists have not yet shown that theory really works.
They cannot demonstrate that the standard theory is a logical outcome
of string theory. They cannot even be sure that their formalism
includes a description of such things as protons and electrons. And
they have not yet made even one teeny-tiny experimental prediction.
Worst of all, superstring theory does not follow as a logical
consequence of some appealing set of hypotheses about nature. Why, you
may ask, do the string theorists insist space is none-dimensional?
Simply because string theory doesn't make sense in any other kind of
space. Sheldon Glashow, Nobel Laureate in Physics
http://physicsmathforums.com
vergon@gawab.com wrote:
An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually
winning over and converting its opponents: What does happen is that
the
opponents gradually die out.
-Max Planck-
<SNIP>
THE GENERAL POSTULATE
OF DYNAMIC DIMENSIONS THEORY
The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial
dimensions.
<SNIP>
VERGON
I'll spare you the rest of it because I suppose you read it -- as far
as you care to.
As for me, I basically got lost by the postulate -- which is the
foundation of the theory.
Time needs to be defined. To me it is the comparison of all motions to
a standard.
"400 feet per second" is the generic use. The second is based on the
rotation of the
earth --- which was the standard -- now it is certain vibrations of the
excited cesium atom.
All the old wives tales about time can be forgotten.
HOW does time "expand" in relation to the x,y,z, dimensions?
I don't know, so I quit there.
I offer in its place my own theory and invite you to take a look at it.
It is logical, orderly, self consistent, consistent with empiricism and
inline with all accepted physical laws.
It fits Occam's Razor to a T.
Basically it displays a sub-particle particle that is the base unit of
the universe.
The title is On the Quantum as a Physical Entity. Among other things it
produces a quantum description of gravity and reveals that action at a
distance is an illusion. It also offers a formula and description of
the mechanics of the strong force.
If one would care to look at it, go to http://www.wbabin.net and find
LIST OF AUTHORS then click on Vertner Vergon
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM
Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM
Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM
John Cramer's Type II Transaction explains low entropy of universe?
(video) Professor Steven Jones explains how the Twin Towers & WTC bldg 7 were brought down with explosives on 9/11
electrons in concentric 16-member rings explains the periodic table
Plankenstein Explains : Nonlocality, Superluminality, Wave-Particle Duality and WhichWay Information
A Theory of Everything that explains Gravity, Magnetisim, Electrostatic force
| God=G_uv Explains Lack of Civility on Atheist-Dominated Newsgroups
Why I don't like Niggers, the dark potter rarely explains Zamfir, it irrigates Lloyd instead, Canadian Prancing Kook.
Updated TOE explains Quarks, Magnetism, Dark matter and Dark energy and how they are related
Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com
There Is No Need For The String Theory The Smart Model Explains It...
MICHEL JANSSEN EXPLAINS LENGTH CONTRACTION
Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Time in Both QM & SR: Roger Penrose Has Been Seeking Moving Dimensions Theory
|
|
|
