| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
07 Jul 2003 06:03:07 PM |
| Object: |
My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
Consider a remote observer traveling in quite empty space.
At some time, he opens a small pressure vessel and emits a jet of air ahead of
him. At the same time, a loud speaker sends a sound wave through the air jet.
|_____
_____| ____________air and sound-> (partial vacuum)
_____|
What happens to the velocity of the sound as the jet diffuses and dissipates?
Not sure, eh? A shock wave, perhaps?
Well, let's assume it starts out as normal relative to the speed of the
speaker, as determined by density of the air adjacent to it. What subsequently
happens to the sound as the air diffuses into the low density space is anyone's
guess - but let's not worry about that too much. (Frankly, I would not like to
predict the precise outcome).
I say this is somewhat analogous to light that is emitted by a remote source in
space. It starts out at a local speed of c relative to the source then settles
down to the 'local EM speed' as it moves away.
I say that the whole of space is filled with a 'sea of swirling EM' whose
'density' and local velocity varies considerably. I call it the H-aether
(Henri's aether). As with ordinary matter, Haether is pretty low density
everywhere except near large bodies of matter. Light wants to move at 'c' in
this medium but because of the Haether's rarity, it takes time to settle down.
Thus photons can be moving in the same direction for significant distances and
at different speeds whilst in close proximity to each other. Photons themselves
make up the Haether. Their own infiltration alters the density and macroscopic
movement of the local Haether but they all eventually settle down to the same
speed just like air molecules after a 747 has passed through it. The local
Haether density determines the speed at which equilibration will occur.
I should not think that light disipates as quickly as sound.
This theory seems to conform to all the evidence. Local source dependency
explains the MMX and does not conflict with Binary star data. Doppler shifts
occur as normal and Maxwell is obeyed. I can also explain quite a few other
things with this theory. The wave/particle nature of light is one. My
'sawtooth' or 'serated bullet' model of the photon and EM waves fits into this
beautifully.
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Minor Crank" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
07 Jul 2003 09:48:46 PM |
|
|
"HenriWilson" <Henri@the.edge> wrote in message
news:f8digvsc047b2eb3lh55l8qhpdui8ai31j@4ax.com...
<snip>
Better every day? Indeed Yes. Every day it looks deader. And deader. And
deader....
Minor Crank
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
07 Jul 2003 09:17:25 PM |
|
|
Henri@the.edge(HenriWilson) wrote:
Consider a remote observer traveling in quite empty space.
At some time, he opens a small pressure vessel and emits a jet of air ahead of
him. At the same time, a loud speaker sends a sound wave through the air jet.
|_____
_____| ____________air and sound-> (partial vacuum)
_____|
What happens to the velocity of the sound as the jet diffuses and dissipates?
Not sure, eh? A shock wave, perhaps?
Well, let's assume it starts out as normal relative to the speed of the
speaker, as determined by density of the air adjacent to it. What subsequently
happens to the sound as the air diffuses into the low density space is anyone's
guess - but let's not worry about that too much. (Frankly, I would not like to
predict the precise outcome).
I say this is somewhat analogous to light that is emitted by a remote source in
space. It starts out at a local speed of c relative to the source then settles
down to the 'local EM speed' as it moves away.
I say that the whole of space is filled with a 'sea of swirling EM' whose
'density' and local velocity varies considerably. I call it the H-aether
(Henri's aether). As with ordinary matter, Haether is pretty low density
everywhere except near large bodies of matter. Light wants to move at 'c' in
this medium but because of the Haether's rarity, it takes time to settle down.
Thus photons can be moving in the same direction for significant distances and
at different speeds whilst in close proximity to each other. Photons themselves
make up the Haether. Their own infiltration alters the density and macroscopic
movement of the local Haether but they all eventually settle down to the same
speed just like air molecules after a 747 has passed through it. The local
Haether density determines the speed at which equilibration will occur.
I should not think that light disipates as quickly as sound.
This theory seems to conform to all the evidence. Local source dependency
explains the MMX and does not conflict with Binary star data. Doppler shifts
occur as normal and Maxwell is obeyed. I can also explain quite a few other
things with this theory. The wave/particle nature of light is one. My
'sawtooth' or 'serated bullet' model of the photon and EM waves fits into this
beautifully.
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
The truth:
"Light is everywhere all the time. It's only visible when vibrated.
No aether or particles needed."
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Abhi" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 07:14:08 AM |
|
|
HenriWilson <Henri@the.edge> wrote in message
news:f8digvsc047b2eb3lh55l8qhpdui8ai31j@4ax.com...
Consider a remote observer traveling in quite empty space.
At some time, he opens a small pressure vessel and emits a jet of air
ahead of
him. At the same time, a loud speaker sends a sound wave through the air
jet.
|_____
_____| ____________air and sound-> (partial vacuum)
_____|
What happens to the velocity of the sound as the jet diffuses and
dissipates?
Not sure, eh? A shock wave, perhaps?
Well, let's assume it starts out as normal relative to the speed of the
speaker, as determined by density of the air adjacent to it. What
subsequently
happens to the sound as the air diffuses into the low density space is
anyone's
guess - but let's not worry about that too much. (Frankly, I would not
like to
predict the precise outcome).
I say this is somewhat analogous to light that is emitted by a remote
source in
space. It starts out at a local speed of c relative to the source then
settles
down to the 'local EM speed' as it moves away.
I say that the whole of space is filled with a 'sea of swirling EM' whose
'density' and local velocity varies considerably. I call it the H-aether
(Henri's aether). As with ordinary matter, Haether is pretty low density
everywhere except near large bodies of matter. Light wants to move at 'c'
in
this medium but because of the Haether's rarity, it takes time to settle
down.
Thus photons can be moving in the same direction for significant distances
and
at different speeds whilst in close proximity to each other. Photons
themselves
make up the Haether. Their own infiltration alters the density and
macroscopic
movement of the local Haether but they all eventually settle down to the
same
speed just like air molecules after a 747 has passed through it. The local
Haether density determines the speed at which equilibration will occur.
I should not think that light disipates as quickly as sound.
This theory seems to conform to all the evidence. Local source dependency
explains the MMX and does not conflict with Binary star data. Doppler
shifts
occur as normal and Maxwell is obeyed. I can also explain quite a few
other
things with this theory. The wave/particle nature of light is one. My
'sawtooth' or 'serated bullet' model of the photon and EM waves fits into
this
beautifully.
I really admire you Henry. You have not given up yet.
There is no aether or Henry aether. Space itself is medium moving with
matter in time. Consider space springs originating from infinity and
coverging at center of sphere forming elementary particle of our universe.
These space springs are stretched. When we cut all these springs connected
to each other at center of sphere, every spring starts burning and
collapsing towards infinity. Imagine a spiraling, helical burning
end(vapourising in time) i.e. photons travelling across every spring towards
infinity with speed of light. The distance between two coils of springs is
wavelength of light. In direction of motion of body, spring is compressed
and in opposite direction, this spring is stretched. This gives us that damn
Doppler effect.
-Abhi.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Curran" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 12:08:09 PM |
|
|
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
Most rational people would stop and ask, maybe i am wrong. But you
are so arrogant the concept of you being mistaken is incomprehnsible
to you.
Physicists are by nature a skeptical questioning lot. One would think
that if your ideas had merit, they would get some support. But they
don't, What does this tell you?
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "wchogg" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 12:24:38 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Paul Curran wrote:
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
Most rational people would stop and ask, maybe i am wrong. But you
are so arrogant the concept of you being mistaken is incomprehnsible
to you.
Physicists are by nature a skeptical questioning lot. One would think
that if your ideas had merit, they would get some support. But they
don't, What does this tell you?
Oooh, ooh, I know this one!
It tells him we're all a bunch of useless wankers.
Or were you asking what conclusion a normal person would come to?
--
William C. Hogg
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
09 Jul 2003 06:12:10 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:24:38 -0500, wchogg <griffith@ups.physics.wisc.edu>
wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Paul Curran wrote:
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
Most rational people would stop and ask, maybe i am wrong. But you
are so arrogant the concept of you being mistaken is incomprehnsible
to you.
Physicists are by nature a skeptical questioning lot. One would think
that if your ideas had merit, they would get some support. But they
don't, What does this tell you?
Oooh, ooh, I know this one!
It tells him we're all a bunch of useless wankers.
Or were you asking what conclusion a normal person would come to?
It is really funny! You people think you have all the answers when in fact you
have none.
Consider a number of lasers traveling in the same direction at different
speeds. At a certain instant they are are all aligned next to an observer..
They all simultaneously emit short pulses of light.
You people claim that all the pulses will travel together, ad infinitem. You
have no idea what would make them do this or what would determine the common
speed. It obviously could not be connected to their source velocities because
they are all different. So it must be a property of space.
You also claim that the observer would measure the (one-way) speed of all the
pulses to be c. You prove this with a little maths trick. You use the SR
velocity addition equation w=(u+c)/1+uc/c^2), which, surprise! surprise!
always produces the result w=c. Of course you know nobody has so far been able
to measure OWLS so you sit smuggly in your seemingly impregnable position.
Well, it is now only a matter of time before somebody uses the latest clocks to
bring down your whole stupid 'religion'..
You fellows really don't have a clue.
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
09 Jul 2003 10:02:04 PM |
|
|
Henri@the.edge(HenriWilson) wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:24:38 -0500, wchogg <griffith@ups.physics.wisc.edu>
wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Paul Curran wrote:
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
Most rational people would stop and ask, maybe i am wrong. But you
are so arrogant the concept of you being mistaken is incomprehnsible
to you.
Physicists are by nature a skeptical questioning lot. One would think
that if your ideas had merit, they would get some support. But they
don't, What does this tell you?
Oooh, ooh, I know this one!
It tells him we're all a bunch of useless wankers.
Or were you asking what conclusion a normal person would come to?
It is really funny! You people think you have all the answers when in fact you
have none.
Consider a number of lasers traveling in the same direction at different
speeds. At a certain instant they are are all aligned next to an observer..
They all simultaneously emit short pulses of light.
You people claim that all the pulses will travel together, ad infinitem. You
have no idea what would make them do this or what would determine the common
speed. It obviously could not be connected to their source velocities because
they are all different. So it must be a property of space.
You also claim that the observer would measure the (one-way) speed of all the
pulses to be c. You prove this with a little maths trick. You use the SR
velocity addition equation w=(u+c)/1+uc/c^2), which, surprise! surprise!
always produces the result w=c. Of course you know nobody has so far been able
to measure OWLS so you sit smuggly in your seemingly impregnable position.
Well, it is now only a matter of time before somebody uses the latest clocks to
bring down your whole stupid 'religion'..
And if that were to happen, all those people would learn from the
'successful experiment', correct the mistakes in their theories, and
move on. BFD. It's happened many times before, an will happen many
times again. That's science. Again, BFD.
Of course there will still be winers who complain that, "you people
think you have all the answers", when the 'successful experiment'
doesn't provide "all the answers". Wah!
Jim
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Ralph" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 10:28:24 AM |
|
|
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
No wonder you feel at home here
SR
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Abhi" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
09 Jul 2003 11:50:57 AM |
|
|
Henri@the.edge(HenriWilson) wrote in message news:<62blgvcdbi4brqbl1lh0lsnr30qlekrua0@4ax.com>...
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 05:14:08 -0700, "Abhi" <Abhijit_B_Patil@hotmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
That's the way I was used to think in initial days when everyone in
this NG was opposing my views. But when I step in shoes of other
posters, I find them to be absolutely right. Why should someone accept
that, "speed of gravity is instantaneous" when till date I have no
experimental or logical proof?
Physics is all about experimental proofs. I don't have it. You don't
have it.
Keep trying Henri. Who knows, your theory might turn out to be right
in this game.
-Abhi.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
09 Jul 2003 05:01:10 PM |
|
|
On 9 Jul 2003 09:50:57 -0700, (Abhi) wrote:
Henri@the.edge(HenriWilson) wrote in message news:<62blgvcdbi4brqbl1lh0lsnr30qlekrua0@4ax.com>...
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 05:14:08 -0700, "Abhi" < > wrote:
[snip]
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
That's the way I was used to think in initial days when everyone in
this NG was opposing my views. But when I step in shoes of other
posters, I find them to be absolutely right. Why should someone accept
that, "speed of gravity is instantaneous" when till date I have no
experimental or logical proof?
Physics is all about experimental proofs. I don't have it. You don't
have it.
Keep trying Henri. Who knows, your theory might turn out to be right
in this game.
What annoys me Abhi is that SRians seem incapable of thinking constructively
about anything.
They think they have all the answer - but they don't have any.
-Abhi.
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Abhi" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
09 Jul 2003 09:45:30 PM |
|
|
Henri@the.edge(HenriWilson) wrote in message news:<234pgvc2s7l9ep4rv8iktogb4iqr39uh59@4ax.com>...
On 9 Jul 2003 09:50:57 -0700, (Abhi) wrote:
Henri@the.edge(HenriWilson) wrote in message news:<62blgvcdbi4brqbl1lh0lsnr30qlekrua0@4ax.com>...
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 05:14:08 -0700, "Abhi" < > wrote:
[snip]
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
That's the way I was used to think in initial days when everyone in
this NG was opposing my views. But when I step in shoes of other
posters, I find them to be absolutely right. Why should someone accept
that, "speed of gravity is instantaneous" when till date I have no
experimental or logical proof?
Physics is all about experimental proofs. I don't have it. You don't
have it.
Keep trying Henri. Who knows, your theory might turn out to be right
in this game.
What annoys me Abhi is that SRians seem incapable of thinking constructively
about anything.
They think they have all the answer - but they don't have any.
Of course, they don't have any answer which we are trying to find out.
In my wildest imagination, I can not apply any curved space theory to
find origin of universe, life or exact nature of gravity, charge,
magnetism, light, mass, elementary particle etc. Leave alone infinite
emotions of human beings.
There are somethings which I know better than anyone. People and
places which I never thought or seen in my life, where from those
things come in my dream? Where does our emotions, hard earned
knowledge goes when our body is burned down to ashes or buried? Our
body is disintegrated after death and same atoms which formed our
brain and body, will be part of another animal or human being. But
where are we? Where am I? What is going on?
We need answer to such questions, be it with relativity or without
relativity.
-Abhi.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
10 Jul 2003 04:58:00 AM |
|
|
On 9 Jul 2003 19:45:30 -0700, (Abhi) wrote:
Henri@the.edge(HenriWilson) wrote in message news:<234pgvc2s7l9ep4rv8iktogb4iqr39uh59@4ax.com>...
On 9 Jul 2003 09:50:57 -0700, (Abhi) wrote:
Henri@the.edge(HenriWilson) wrote in message news:<62blgvcdbi4brqbl1lh0lsnr30qlekrua0@4ax.com>...
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 05:14:08 -0700, "Abhi" < > wrote:
[snip]
Really, it is a waste of time trying to do anything sensible on this NG.
You are all a bunch of useless wankers.
That's the way I was used to think in initial days when everyone in
this NG was opposing my views. But when I step in shoes of other
posters, I find them to be absolutely right. Why should someone accept
that, "speed of gravity is instantaneous" when till date I have no
experimental or logical proof?
Physics is all about experimental proofs. I don't have it. You don't
have it.
Keep trying Henri. Who knows, your theory might turn out to be right
in this game.
What annoys me Abhi is that SRians seem incapable of thinking constructively
about anything.
They think they have all the answer - but they don't have any.
Of course, they don't have any answer which we are trying to find out.
In my wildest imagination, I can not apply any curved space theory to
find origin of universe, life or exact nature of gravity, charge,
magnetism, light, mass, elementary particle etc. Leave alone infinite
emotions of human beings.
There are somethings which I know better than anyone. People and
places which I never thought or seen in my life, where from those
things come in my dream? Where does our emotions, hard earned
knowledge goes when our body is burned down to ashes or buried? Our
body is disintegrated after death and same atoms which formed our
brain and body, will be part of another animal or human being. But
where are we? Where am I? What is going on?
We need answer to such questions, be it with relativity or without
relativity.
Don't worry about the spiritual questions, let's just concentrate on the many
unanswered physical ones. Physics has come to a dead end. Relativity and
aspects of QM have sidetracked it.
-Abhi.
Henri Wilson.
Why is the creative output of one SRian equal to the total produced by one million of them?
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Old Man" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
07 Jul 2003 08:07:20 PM |
|
|
HenriWilson <Henri@the.edge> wrote in message
news:f8digvsc047b2eb3lh55l8qhpdui8ai31j@4ax.com...
Consider a remote observer traveling in quite empty space.
At some time, he opens a small pressure vessel and emits a jet of air
ahead of
him. At the same time, a loud speaker sends a sound wave through the air
jet.
|_____
_____| ____________air and sound-> (partial vacuum)
_____|
What happens to the velocity of the sound as the jet diffuses and
dissipates?
Not sure, eh? A shock wave, perhaps?
Well, let's assume it starts out as normal relative to the speed of the
speaker, as determined by density of the air adjacent to it. What
subsequently
happens to the sound as the air diffuses into the low density space is
anyone's
guess - but let's not worry about that too much. (Frankly, I would not
like to
predict the precise outcome).
I say this is somewhat analogous to light that is emitted by a remote
source in
space. It starts out at a local speed of c relative to the source then
settles
down to the 'local EM speed' as it moves away.
Henry forgot to explain how a homogeneous medium supports the
transmission of transverse electromagnetic waves. It can't be assumed
because fluids support only longitudinal waves. [Old Man]
Henri Wilson.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 06:39:07 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:07:20 -0500, "Old Man" <nomail@nomail.net> wrote:
HenriWilson <Henri@the.edge> wrote in message
news:f8digvsc047b2eb3lh55l8qhpdui8ai31j@4ax.com...
Consider a remote observer traveling in quite empty space.
At some time, he opens a small pressure vessel and emits a jet of air
ahead of
him. At the same time, a loud speaker sends a sound wave through the air
jet.
|_____
_____| ____________air and sound-> (partial vacuum)
_____|
What happens to the velocity of the sound as the jet diffuses and
dissipates?
Not sure, eh? A shock wave, perhaps?
Well, let's assume it starts out as normal relative to the speed of the
speaker, as determined by density of the air adjacent to it. What
subsequently
happens to the sound as the air diffuses into the low density space is
anyone's
guess - but let's not worry about that too much. (Frankly, I would not
like to
predict the precise outcome).
I say this is somewhat analogous to light that is emitted by a remote
source in
space. It starts out at a local speed of c relative to the source then
settles
down to the 'local EM speed' as it moves away.
Henry forgot to explain how a homogeneous medium supports the
transmission of transverse electromagnetic waves. It can't be assumed
because fluids support only longitudinal waves. [Old Man]
Haether is not a homogeneous fluid.
Haether consists of the stuff that EM fields are made of. Light takes its
fields along with it. Eventually these fields intermingle with fields from
other light and reach a common velocity.
Don't you believe in EM fields you Old *****?
Henri Wilson.
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
09 Jul 2003 06:12:08 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:27:10 -0500, "Old Man" <nomail@nomail.net> wrote:
HenriWilson <Henri@the.edge> wrote in message
news:35blgvs1042kbd8fn6i76ksvvp6lqfja6t@4ax.com...
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:07:20 -0500, "Old Man" <nomail@nomail.net> wrote:
HenriWilson <Henri@the.edge> wrote in message
news:f8digvsc047b2eb3lh55l8qhpdui8ai31j@4ax.com...
Henry forgot to explain how a homogeneous medium supports the
transmission of transverse electromagnetic waves. It can't be assumed
because fluids support only longitudinal waves. [Old Man]
Haether is not a homogeneous fluid.
Haether consists of the stuff that EM fields are made of. Light takes its
fields along with it. Eventually these fields intermingle with fields from
other light and reach a common velocity.
Don't you believe in EM fields you Old *****?
You bet! Old Man also understands that classical electromagnet fields
obey linear superposition. QED provides interesting exceptions for
high energy densities, but, at moderate energy densities, electromagnetic
fields don't interact. Photons have extremely small form factors for
interaction with other photons. So, how does Henry make an Aether
out of that? [Old Man]
What happens at extremely LOW energy densities? You cannot tell me that the
fields that make up one remote 'photon' will not interact with those of another
in some small way.
Any answer you give will be pure speculation.
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert J. Kolker" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 12:50:39 PM |
|
|
HenriWilson wrote:
This theory seems to conform to all the evidence. Local source dependency
explains the MMX and does not conflict with Binary star data. Doppler shifts
occur as normal and Maxwell is obeyed. I can also explain quite a few other
things with this theory. The wave/particle nature of light is one. My
'sawtooth' or 'serated bullet' model of the photon and EM waves fits into this
beautifully.
Have you published? If not, why not.
Bob Kolker
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 06:52:49 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 17:50:39 GMT, "Robert J. Kolker" <bobkolker@comcast.net>
wrote:
HenriWilson wrote:
This theory seems to conform to all the evidence. Local source dependency
explains the MMX and does not conflict with Binary star data. Doppler shifts
occur as normal and Maxwell is obeyed. I can also explain quite a few other
things with this theory. The wave/particle nature of light is one. My
'sawtooth' or 'serated bullet' model of the photon and EM waves fits into this
beautifully.
Have you published? If not, why not.
Haven't reached that stage yet.
Bob Kolker
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 06:50:38 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:06:38 -0700, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
HenriWilson wrote:
Consider a remote observer traveling in quite empty space.
Already wrong - Casimir effect, electron anomalous g-value, Rabi
vacuum oscillations, Lamg shift...
At some time, he opens a small pressure vessel and emits a jet of air ahead of
him.
[snip]
I say this is somewhat analogous to light that is emitted by a remote source in
space. It starts out at a local speed of c relative to the source then settles
down to the 'local EM speed' as it moves away.
Say what you want. After all.
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html>
Experimental constraints on General relativity.
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
It's all crap!
Physics is on the wrong path altogether.
Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!
See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Curran" |
|
| Title: Re: My H-Aether Theory Looks Better Every Day. |
08 Jul 2003 12:10:55 PM |
|
|
Relativity in the GPS system
It's all crap!
Physics is on the wrong path altogether.
If this were true, then why are they able to make things that work
following these principles full of crap? How can they give answers
to questions that seem to hold up to time ?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
