My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4



 Science > Physics > My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Douglas Eagleson"
Date: 06 Jan 2005 01:09:19 PM
Object: My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4
A detector for the quantum system is proposed. In Copenhagen a
statistical existence is proposed. And to prove statistics either truly
existent or nonexistent is the objective. Thus defining it complete or
incomplete as a theory.
So, I propose to one-up Einstein's detector system, because common
scientists do not believe Einstein.
Is quantum mechanics a-ok? "Should I invest the study time in a
failed theory?", an implication.
A single quanta is placed on a copper sheet at almost absolute zero.
Right now an entire computer with moving atoms has been built out of
single quanta, assembled atom by atom.
In theoretical class terms, this proves a failed class of theory. And
so the experiment is altered to advance quantum mechanics with the
alternative interpretation.
Pointing the atom time wise.
Place a quanta.
And statistical location is then a time change dimension.
And the shuffling atom computer of IBM has done this. A single atom
nicely moves from allowed state to allowed state. Defining the quanta
in relation to its well.
Psi(1)=Psi(2) energy determines the boundary values now.
A path integral, above. A simple, simple thing, without statistical
allusion.
Solid State.
NO, barns. No crossections exist in this interpretation of QM.
3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4
Of course 1=|a||h| also.
This is hamilton's matrix integrated. A solid state vector space of
4-state dimensions. H1,H2,H3 are space, and H1 is time.
The eigenfunction states as always in solid state physics.
Except the imaginary component is to disappear by choice of the
phsyical constant.
.

User: "nospam"

Title: Re: My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4 06 Jan 2005 01:46:56 PM
"Douglas Eagleson" <eagleson2004123@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105038559.310862.248310@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

A detector for the quantum system is proposed. In Copenhagen a
statistical existence is proposed. And to prove statistics either truly
existent or nonexistent is the objective. Thus defining it complete or
incomplete as a theory.

So, I propose to one-up Einstein's detector system, because common
scientists do not believe Einstein.

*There is a literature that does not reach the voracious mass. It is the
work of creators, issued from a real necessity in the author, produced for
himself. It expresses the knowledge of a supreme egoism, in which laws
wither away. Every page must explode, either by profound heavy seriousness,
the whirlwind, poetic frenzy, the new, the eternal, the crushing joke,
enthusiasm for principles, or by the way in which it is printed. On the one
hand a tottering world in flight, betrothed to the glockenspiel of hell, on
the other hand: new men. Rough, bouncing, riding on hiccups. Behind them a
crippled world and literary quacks with a mania for improvement.
I say unto you: there is no beginning and we do not tremble, we are not
sentimental. We are a furious Wind, tearing the dirty linen of clouds and
prayers, preparing the great spectacle of disaster, fire, decomposition.* We
will put an end to mourning and replace tears by sirens screeching from one
continent to another. Pavilions of intense joy and widowers with the sadness
of poison. Physics is the signboard of abstraction; advertising and business
are also elements of poetry.
I destroy the drawers of the brain and of social organization: spread
demoralization wherever I go and cast my hand from heaven to hell, my eyes
from hell to heaven, restore the fecund wheel of a universal circus to
objective forces and the imagination of every individual.
Philosophy is the question: from which side shall we look at life, God, the
idea or other phenomena. Everything one looks at is false. I do not consider
the relative result more important than the choice between cake and cherries
after dinner. The system of quickly looking at the other side of a thing in
order to impose your opinion indirectly is called dialectics, in other
words, haggling over the spirit of fried potatoes while dancing method
around it. If I cry out:
Ideal, ideal, ideal,
Knowledge, knowledge, knowledge,
Boomboom, boomboom, boomboom,
I have given a pretty faithful version of progress, law, morality and all
other fine qualities that various highly intelligent men have discussed in
so manv books, only to conclude that after all everyone dances to his own
personal boomboom, and that the writer is entitled to his boomboom: the
satisfaction of pathological curiosity; a private bell for inexplicable
needs; a bath; pecuniary difficulties; a stomach with repercussions in life;
the authority of the mystic wand formulated as the bouquet of a phantom
orchestra made up of silent fiddle bows greased with philtres made of
chicken manure. With the blue eye-glasses of an angel they have excavated
the inner life for a dime's worth of unanimous gratitude. If all of them are
right and if all pills are Pink Pills, let us try for once not to be right.
Some people think they can explain rationally, by thought, what they think.
But that is extremely relative. Psychoanalysis is a dangerous disease, it
puts to sleep the anti-objective impulses of men and systematizes the
bourgeoisie. There is no ultimate Truth. The dialectic is an amusing
mechanism which guides us / in a banal kind of way / to the opinions we had
in the first place. Does anyone think that, by a minute refinement of logic,
he has demonstrated the truth and established the correctness of these
opinions? Logic imprisoned by the senses is an organic disease. To this
element philosophers always like to add: the power of observation. But
actually this magnificent quality of the mind is the proof of its impotence.
We observe, we regard from one or more points of view, we choose them among
the millions that exist. Experience is also a product of chance and
individual faculties. Science disgusts me as soon as it becomes a
speculative system, loses its character of utility-that is so useless but is
at least individual. I detest greasy objectivity, and harmony, the science
that finds everything in order. Carry on, my children, humanity . . .
Science says we are the servants of nature: everything is in order, make
love and bash your brains in. Carry on, my children, humanity, kind
bourgeois and journalist virgins . . . I am against systems, the most
acceptable system is on principle to have none. To complete oneself, to
perfect oneself in one's own littleness, to fill the vessel with one's
individuality, to have the courage to fight for and against thought, the
mystery of bread, the sudden burst of an infernal propeller into economic
lilies.... Every product of disgust capable of becoming a negation of the
family is Physics; a protest with the fists of its whole being engaged in
destructivc action:
*Dada; knowledge of all the means rejected up until now by the shamefaced
sex of comfortable compromise and good manners:
Physics; abolition of logic, which is the dance of those impotent to create:
Physics; of every social hierarchy and equation set up for the sake of
values by our valets:
Physics; every object, all objects, sentiments, obscurities, apparitions and
the precise clash of parallel lines are weapons for the fight:
Physics; abolition of memory:
Physics; abolition of archaeology:
Physics; abolition of prophets:
Physics; abolition of the future:
Physics; absolute and unquestionable faith in every god that is the
immediate product of spontaneity:* Physics; elegant and unprejudiced leap
from a harmony to the other sphere; trajectory of a word tossed like a
screeching phonograph record; to respect all individuals in their folly of
the moment: whether it be serious, fearful, timid, ardent, vigorous,
determined, enthusiastic; to divest one's church of every useless cumbersome
accessory; to spit out disagreeable or amorous ideas like a luminous
waterfall, or coddle them -with the extreme satisfaction that it doesn't
matter in the least-with the same intensity in the thicket of one's
soul-pure of insects for blood well-born, and gilded with bodies of
archangels. Freedom:
Physics Physics Physics, a roaring of tense colors, and interlacing of
opposites and of all contradictions, grotesques, inconsistencies: LIFE
.
User: "Douglas Eagleson"

Title: Re: My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4 06 Jan 2005 05:55:40 PM
nospam wrote:

"Douglas Eagleson" <eagleson2004123@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1105038559.310862.248310@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

A detector for the quantum system is proposed. In Copenhagen a
statistical existence is proposed. And to prove statistics either

truly

existent or nonexistent is the objective. Thus defining it

complete or

incomplete as a theory.

So, I propose to one-up Einstein's detector system, because common
scientists do not believe Einstein.




*There is a literature that does not reach the voracious mass. It is

the

work of creators, issued from a real necessity in the author,

produced for

himself. It expresses the knowledge of a supreme egoism, in which

laws

wither away. Every page must explode, either by profound heavy

seriousness,

the whirlwind, poetic frenzy, the new, the eternal, the crushing

joke,

enthusiasm for principles, or by the way in which it is printed. On

the one

hand a tottering world in flight, betrothed to the glockenspiel of

hell, on

the other hand: new men. Rough, bouncing, riding on hiccups. Behind

them a

crippled world and literary quacks with a mania for improvement.

I say unto you: there is no beginning and we do not tremble, we are

not

sentimental. We are a furious Wind, tearing the dirty linen of clouds

and

prayers, preparing the great spectacle of disaster, fire,

decomposition.* We

will put an end to mourning and replace tears by sirens screeching

from one

continent to another. Pavilions of intense joy and widowers with the

sadness

of poison. Physics is the signboard of abstraction; advertising and

business

are also elements of poetry.

I destroy the drawers of the brain and of social organization: spread
demoralization wherever I go and cast my hand from heaven to hell, my

eyes

from hell to heaven, restore the fecund wheel of a universal circus

to

objective forces and the imagination of every individual.

Philosophy is the question: from which side shall we look at life,

God, the

idea or other phenomena. Everything one looks at is false. I do not

consider

the relative result more important than the choice between cake and

cherries

after dinner. The system of quickly looking at the other side of a

thing in

order to impose your opinion indirectly is called dialectics, in

other

words, haggling over the spirit of fried potatoes while dancing

method

around it. If I cry out:

Ideal, ideal, ideal,

Knowledge, knowledge, knowledge,

Boomboom, boomboom, boomboom,

I have given a pretty faithful version of progress, law, morality and

all

other fine qualities that various highly intelligent men have

discussed in

so manv books, only to conclude that after all everyone dances to his

own

personal boomboom, and that the writer is entitled to his boomboom:

the

satisfaction of pathological curiosity; a private bell for

inexplicable

needs; a bath; pecuniary difficulties; a stomach with repercussions

in life;

the authority of the mystic wand formulated as the bouquet of a

phantom

orchestra made up of silent fiddle bows greased with philtres made of
chicken manure. With the blue eye-glasses of an angel they have

excavated

the inner life for a dime's worth of unanimous gratitude. If all of

them are

right and if all pills are Pink Pills, let us try for once not to be

right.

Some people think they can explain rationally, by thought, what they

think.

But that is extremely relative. Psychoanalysis is a dangerous

disease, it

puts to sleep the anti-objective impulses of men and systematizes the
bourgeoisie. There is no ultimate Truth. The dialectic is an amusing
mechanism which guides us / in a banal kind of way / to the opinions

we had

in the first place. Does anyone think that, by a minute refinement of

logic,

he has demonstrated the truth and established the correctness of

these

opinions? Logic imprisoned by the senses is an organic disease. To

this

element philosophers always like to add: the power of observation.

But

actually this magnificent quality of the mind is the proof of its

impotence.

We observe, we regard from one or more points of view, we choose them

among

the millions that exist. Experience is also a product of chance and
individual faculties. Science disgusts me as soon as it becomes a
speculative system, loses its character of utility-that is so useless

but is

at least individual. I detest greasy objectivity, and harmony, the

science

that finds everything in order. Carry on, my children, humanity . . .
Science says we are the servants of nature: everything is in order,

make

love and bash your brains in. Carry on, my children, humanity, kind
bourgeois and journalist virgins . . . I am against systems, the most
acceptable system is on principle to have none. To complete oneself,

to

perfect oneself in one's own littleness, to fill the vessel with

one's

individuality, to have the courage to fight for and against thought,

the

mystery of bread, the sudden burst of an infernal propeller into

economic

lilies.... Every product of disgust capable of becoming a negation of

the

family is Physics; a protest with the fists of its whole being

engaged in

destructivc action:

*Dada; knowledge of all the means rejected up until now by the

shamefaced

sex of comfortable compromise and good manners:

Physics; abolition of logic, which is the dance of those impotent to

create:


Physics; of every social hierarchy and equation set up for the sake

of

values by our valets:

Physics; every object, all objects, sentiments, obscurities,

apparitions and

the precise clash of parallel lines are weapons for the fight:

Physics; abolition of memory:

Physics; abolition of archaeology:

Physics; abolition of prophets:

Physics; abolition of the future:

Physics; absolute and unquestionable faith in every god that is the
immediate product of spontaneity:* Physics; elegant and unprejudiced

leap

from a harmony to the other sphere; trajectory of a word tossed like

a

screeching phonograph record; to respect all individuals in their

folly of

the moment: whether it be serious, fearful, timid, ardent, vigorous,
determined, enthusiastic; to divest one's church of every useless

cumbersome

accessory; to spit out disagreeable or amorous ideas like a luminous
waterfall, or coddle them -with the extreme satisfaction that it

doesn't

matter in the least-with the same intensity in the thicket of one's
soul-pure of insects for blood well-born, and gilded with bodies of
archangels. Freedom:

Physics Physics Physics, a roaring of tense colors, and interlacing

of

opposites and of all contradictions, grotesques, inconsistencies:

LIFE
That is quite a reply. Thanks for the expression of yourselfs.
.


User: "Douglas Eagleson"

Title: Re: My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4 06 Jan 2005 08:42:39 PM
A function such as this is hard to solve. And the trick was to allow
certain matrix values. Implying that the physical interpretation was
correct. A "0" matrix value implies no eigenfunction causation, while
the "1" value causes a function to appear.
And to have symmetry of this matrix state the physical system symmetry
was obvious.
For instance, let |H| = |0 0 0 1| = H1,H2,H3,H1
|0 0 0 1|
|0 0 0 1|
|0 0 0 1|
All H matricies are identical in this symmetry,
with the time dimension equated to the space.
Equated in the fashion of the single right column existing with the
single right column of the space matrices.
Interprete this physically.
Then do this for all interpretable equations!
And find they allow the single constant solution.
Douglas Eagleson- Gaithersburg
.
User: "Douglas Eagleson"

Title: Re: My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4 06 Jan 2005 08:48:53 PM
Physical interpretation of the example is a follows. A single time in
a single space dimension. And it is abstract dimension in this case.
A symmetry of force of relativity. A small force appears. Always. An
arrow of time defined.
.


User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4 06 Jan 2005 01:37:11 PM
Douglas Eagleson wrote:


A detector for the quantum system is proposed. In Copenhagen a
statistical existence is proposed. And to prove statistics either truly
existent or nonexistent is the objective. Thus defining it complete or
incomplete as a theory.

So, I propose to one-up Einstein's detector system, because common
scientists do not believe Einstein.

[snip]
Short argument. Bonus points: Learn how to write grammatical English.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.

User: "Douglas Eagleson"

Title: Re: My New Path Integral- 3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4 06 Jan 2005 08:21:13 PM
Douglas Eagleson wrote:

A detector for the quantum system is proposed. In Copenhagen a
statistical existence is proposed. And to prove statistics either

truly

existent or nonexistent is the objective. Thus defining it complete

or

incomplete as a theory.

So, I propose to one-up Einstein's detector system, because common
scientists do not believe Einstein.

Is quantum mechanics a-ok? "Should I invest the study time in a
failed theory?", an implication.

A single quanta is placed on a copper sheet at almost absolute zero.

Right now an entire computer with moving atoms has been built out of
single quanta, assembled atom by atom.

In theoretical class terms, this proves a failed class of theory. And
so the experiment is altered to advance quantum mechanics with the
alternative interpretation.

Pointing the atom time wise.

Place a quanta.

And statistical location is then a time change dimension.

And the shuffling atom computer of IBM has done this. A single atom
nicely moves from allowed state to allowed state. Defining the

quanta

in relation to its well.

Psi(1)=Psi(2) energy determines the boundary values now.

A path integral, above. A simple, simple thing, without statistical
allusion.
Solid State.

NO, barns. No crossections exist in this interpretation of QM.


3.5cm-sec= |H1|^4+|H2|^4+|H3|^4+|H1|^4

Of course 1=|a||h| also.

This is hamilton's matrix integrated. A solid state vector space of
4-state dimensions. H1,H2,H3 are space, and H1 is time.

The eigenfunction states as always in solid state physics.
Except the imaginary component is to disappear by choice of the
phsyical constant.

A best guess is actually 3.5e-5 cm-sec for the mathematical atom.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Path integral constant?
Interaction term in path integral
Feynman Path Integral From T3/T2 = kT1 Part 2: the Exponent
Repost from SCI.p.Research-Matrix Determinant as Path Integral?
Path Integral Approach vs. Huygen's principle
Feynman Path Integral From T3/T2 = kT1
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 65: (Convolution) Integral Equations
Is it representative for a numerical integral to be faster than numerical ODE?
Aristotle and the Integral
should Gauss's Law of Magnetism be: Integral B dot dA = q/p + q/p_t
please help a girl again: An integral is an antidervative, so can'twe integrate the derivative to get back to the original equation?
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 3: Integral Equations
"listen, do you know any way of doing quantum mechanics, starting with action - where the action integral comes into the quantum mechanics?"
Difficult integral - who can help?
Re: What is the integral of x^^x?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER