My Newest Nuke design



 Science > Physics > My Newest Nuke design

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "ralph"
Date: 24 Jan 2005 05:22:51 PM
Object: My Newest Nuke design
A New Weapon- a kind of nuke
By a nuke designer- semianonymous
Making a nuke is easy. The hard part is making
advanced designs of novel advantage.
The hurtle of enrichment is surmounted by using
simple W by X body fusion and an accelerator.
A novel design is as hard as any true invention.
So making a special design for earth moving is this
one. I read somplace about artificial harbors being
exploded into place.
So this one is specially formulated to have a property
of efficient earth moving. Small and efficient will
minimize the radiation conseqences.
A tamper is to be used to make the vapor vortex.
I saw a picture once where the bomb casing effected
the final shape of the explosion gas.
And so making all the special gas direct into one
direction is this invention's intention.
A special gas column is producable. And the trick is to
make it a large percentage of the overpressure wave front.
So making the vortex appear in the aftermath is this
novelty. A vortex is self stable and will last to the
end of the thermal absorption of all the radiation.
A case heavy and large is necessary to reproduce the small
frontal vortexs?
So examine the effect of the case. Inertia causes the
force to take a shape. And the spherical case caused the
symmetric vortex points.
And so the use of the shape to be created as the cause
of the vortex is the concept to be used in altering the
bomb core design itself to generate vorticies.
A simple analogy is to take the tempurature of the
vortex as the cause of the vortex location in the picture of the
detonation. Making all vortex's have the higher energy
than the surrounding gas.
So alter the shape of the ground to that necessary to make
a single ground directed vortex. And place the bomb in the
right location.
And alter the core design to reproduce this effect.
A single steel rod inside the exploding core will
cause the vortex. And to maximize the vortex the
strength of the rod must be sufficient to redirect
the neutron wave front.
Can simple steel redirect the front?
Yes by interference it will alter without necessary
benefit of solid state strength.
********** <- neutron wavefront
* * toward center of the
* * supercritical and
* beyond "alpha" mass.
*
* *
* *
**********
**********
* *
* *
*
*
* *
* *
**********
**********
* *
* *
*
*
* *
* *
**********
**********
* *
* *
*
*
* *
* *
**********
This crossection of the steel rod in the
center of the cylindrical mass will interfer
a dense wavefrount. And the angle and size
of the conic indentations is about
as drawn, thirty degrees!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And the effect is to concentrate the dis-solutionment
wavefront. And the gas seeking to escape will
blow the ends out of the core, self destructing the
efficient design.
So making the compression heavy on the ends will
keep the assembly together long enough for all the
enriched uranium in the conic indentations to disolve by
neutron wavefrount interaction.
A large up and down vortex is the outcome and the
small and efficient harbor is the larger outcome.
A small mass is needed and explosive assembly can
make the top and bottom stay together long enough
for a large vortex.
A single column of explosion!
A line explosion using the line of neutron
scattering steel cones in the center of the
uranium.
And so the designer optimized the accelerator placment
and inverted this design to the more advanced
version.
_____ accelerator target for x10^15 neutron trigger
pulse.
steel plates stacked replaces the conic rod.
*************
* * *
*************
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
*************
* * *
*************
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
*************
* * *
*************
XXXXXXXXXXXXX - X is the urinaium now
*************
* * *
*************
And the trigger target is shot through a hole in the
center of the steel plates. The asterick in the center
of the asterick square denotes a small hole vertical
in the stack.
And the trick here is to now build the accelerator
into the exploding bomb chemical. A cheap easy
to destroy linac implodes.
A several inch offset of the accelerator is enough
to prevent a single dense plasma of dueterium from
reaching the target of about 100 curies of tritium.
So implode the waveguide!
Except the neutrons need to scatter out from the
center hole stack and meet at the circle edges.
The plates now being circles stacked.
And then build the accelerator into the steel plates!
Making the stack of plates now elements in the
waveguide walls. Build the waveguide into the center
hole system. A three inch diameter guide will suffice.
And place the target at the center. Implying two
stacked accelerators with the beams directed to the
steel stack center.
And the trick now is to make the neutrons interfer
and trigger the outer circle of enriched uranium.
And this requires multile targets and not one placed in
the center of the device!
So make each plate an accelerator with the outer ring
the target.
*************
a * b
*************
a and b are now places on the ring of tritium absorbed
onto metal. The center asterisk is now a pellet of deutrium
to be vaporized and accelerated to the walls.
So a heavy walled colapsable disc accelerator, now!!!!
Hay, that is just the thing a few hundred curies per
inch of ring and a nice static voltage accelerator.
Making the stack material necessarily insulate.
So all that is needed is reflecting strong and
nonconducting disc walls. Or just coat the steel
with a few thousanths of an inch of paint. And
allow the electric breakdown of the wall to be slower than the
rather dynamic pellet destruction.
A 150 Kev voltage disc accelerator can be made easy.
Allowing a target use. That is it.
Heavy walled ring accelerators, at 100 curies per inch
of outer wall ring. Inch plate steel top and bottom.
And the center rod is now only an elecytric conducting rod for the
trigger accelerator.
****************************************************
Normally the trigger is fired after compression
has just begun. And to compress just before triggering
implies a hard accelerator design. Making the material
between the plated compress while the insides do not is
them required. So make the outside wall of one half inch
thick steel and begin the explosion, on the top and the bottom,
near the outside rim of the steel slabs.
Assembly is then implied to be only of the vortex. Making the
need for a whole cylindrical explosive layer unnecessary.
********|********
********|********
**a * b** <-1/2 inch wall here.
********|********
********|********
So the entire disc diameter is about one foot.
And 1.5 inches thick.
And two discs will be necessary for the minimal
vortex.
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM-ignite explosives here
********|********
********|********
**a * b** <-1/2 inch wall here.
********|********
********|********
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX <-nice 10 percent U-233
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX one inch thick
********|********
********|********
**a * b** <-1/2 inch wall here.
********|********
********|********
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM-ignite here also
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM <- nice one foot thick
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM C-4 or 7 layer
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
The sides are compressed and stay assembled
only long enough to make the vortex.
All told this last two layer design is about
one kiloton in the vortex direction, except the
total yield is 100 tons. Implying the directionality.
The proper place to ignite the slabs is the inside
layer next to the steel disc accelerators.
A donut of trigger neutrons emanating from the
ring a and b pass through only one inch of steel.
**************************************************
That is my newest design. A small one hundred ton
column of earth moving power. And remember the
explosion asymmetry mean efficient and cleaner
earth moving.
I was trying to find a place to test the design out.
Making a real harbor and all. 100 tons is small so
scale to ten plates and three feet of explosives and
get one kiloton! Except three feet of explosives is
scarry stuff. So maybe just fire of ten small ones to make
a nice square or rectangular harbor.
My next design will be a nice 150 kV pulsed and reusable
voltage source. A five milliamp current to test the design
will make the user confident in its ultimate 100 milliamp
self destructive usage.
.

User: "ralph"

Title: Re: My Newest Nuke design 24 Jan 2005 07:05:25 PM
Sorry about the format errors.
a rod of conic section was transformed to half a rod.
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: My Newest Nuke design 24 Jan 2005 05:56:18 PM
ralph wrote:
[snip crap]

A tamper is to be used to make the vapor vortex.
I saw a picture once where the bomb casing effected
the final shape of the explosion gas.

[snip more crap]

A single steel rod inside the exploding core will
cause the vortex. And to maximize the vortex the
strength of the rod must be sufficient to redirect
the neutron wave front.

[snip still more crap]

Heavy walled ring accelerators, at 100 curies per inch
of outer wall ring. Inch plate steel top and bottom.

[snip rest of crap]
Uncle Al would have gone for chrome-moly. Then Homeland Severity can
start confiscating upscale bicycles.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
User: "ralph"

Title: Re: My Newest Nuke design 24 Jan 2005 06:50:45 PM
Uncle Al wrote:

ralph wrote:
[snip crap]

A tamper is to be used to make the vapor vortex.
I saw a picture once where the bomb casing effected
the final shape of the explosion gas.

[snip more crap]

A single steel rod inside the exploding core will
cause the vortex. And to maximize the vortex the
strength of the rod must be sufficient to redirect
the neutron wave front.

[snip still more crap]

Heavy walled ring accelerators, at 100 curies per inch
of outer wall ring. Inch plate steel top and bottom.

[snip rest of crap]

Uncle Al would have gone for chrome-moly. Then Homeland Severity can
start confiscating upscale bicycles.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

chrom/moly is nice easy to weld steel.
a good steel can be hardened to >100psi.
Special >150psi steel is real good stuff,
but really unnecessary.
.
User: "Ken S. Tucker"

Title: Re: My Newest Nuke design 24 Jan 2005 07:24:45 PM
Guys, one word "smoke detectors".
Collect up all the old detectors, remove the Am241,
and replace your furnace with a few buckets of that.
Critical mass may be obtained by a fat guy jumping
on the pile...does anyone else watch the Red-Green
show, duh...
Ken
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: My Newest Nuke design 24 Jan 2005 07:51:43 PM
ralph wrote:


Uncle Al wrote:

ralph wrote:
[snip crap]

A tamper is to be used to make the vapor vortex.
I saw a picture once where the bomb casing effected
the final shape of the explosion gas.

[snip more crap]

A single steel rod inside the exploding core will
cause the vortex. And to maximize the vortex the
strength of the rod must be sufficient to redirect
the neutron wave front.

[snip still more crap]

Heavy walled ring accelerators, at 100 curies per inch
of outer wall ring. Inch plate steel top and bottom.

[snip rest of crap]

Uncle Al would have gone for chrome-moly. Then Homeland Severity can
start confiscating upscale bicycles.

chrom/moly is nice easy to weld steel.

a good steel can be hardened to >100psi.
Special >150psi steel is real good stuff,
but really unnecessary.

Idiot. The photon stream from a fission trigger into a fusion
secondary has literal viscosity that must be considered. You aren't
even a bad joke. "100 curies." Idiot.
BTW, stooopid, do you know what is wrong with the standard diagram of
the depleted uranium buffer between the fission trigger and the
plutonium carrot? The beauty is that it is omitted by not being
missing.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: My Newest Nuke design 24 Jan 2005 08:45:54 PM
Only another nutron in orbit around the nucleus will cause 2 nutrons to
eject.
Thats 1 million electrons and 1 billion photons of mass .
MOST atoms absorb it and eject no nutrons.
For Evry 2 .
making the nuke is easy ,,shure bozo.
You cant make the magnet !!
fuel rods are easy , bomb grade is not easy.
How much dead water do you have ?
Ever see water burn ?
Tap water explodes.
heavy water or no water.
Then the magnet.
10,000 volt magnet cooled with gasses small enouph to fit threw a 6
inch hole.
The you nead 6 smart motherfuckers.
now we got ya .
.

User: "ralph"

Title: Re: My Newest Nuke design 25 Jan 2005 06:53:33 PM
Uncle Al wrote:

ralph wrote:


Uncle Al wrote:

ralph wrote:
[snip crap]

A tamper is to be used to make the vapor vortex.
I saw a picture once where the bomb casing effected
the final shape of the explosion gas.

[snip more crap]

A single steel rod inside the exploding core will
cause the vortex. And to maximize the vortex the
strength of the rod must be sufficient to redirect
the neutron wave front.

[snip still more crap]

Heavy walled ring accelerators, at 100 curies per inch
of outer wall ring. Inch plate steel top and bottom.

[snip rest of crap]

Uncle Al would have gone for chrome-moly. Then Homeland Severity

can

start confiscating upscale bicycles.


chrom/moly is nice easy to weld steel.

a good steel can be hardened to >100psi.
Special >150psi steel is real good stuff,
but really unnecessary.


Idiot. The photon stream from a fission trigger into a fusion
secondary has literal viscosity that must be considered. You aren't
even a bad joke. "100 curies." Idiot.

BTW, stooopid, do you know what is wrong with the standard diagram of
the depleted uranium buffer between the fission trigger and the
plutonium carrot? The beauty is that it is omitted by not being
missing.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

a photon has little to zero effect on the reaction
of the hydrogen atoms.
100 curies per inch of radius for the disc accelerator
is alot of tritium. It will make the nueutrons necessary
to start the alppha double atom reaction for u-233 10%.
all sorts of compositions of bombs will function.
Mine are efficient and use minimal material.
this bomb has no hydrogen layer because the
vortex is to be generated. and size is required to
allow the neutrons to interfere. so super efficient
hydrogen would be to large a bomb.
.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER