Science > Physics > NASA Pioneer Anomaly as Vacuum Coherence Hedgehog Defect
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
28 Dec 2004 04:14:44 PM |
| Object: |
NASA Pioneer Anomaly as Vacuum Coherence Hedgehog Defect |
Also the Pioneer anomaly measures H from the Hubble flow, i.e. a_g = -
cH back to Sun from the dark energy hollow halo hedgehog topological
defect in the single-valued vacuum coherence starting at 20AU from the
Sun. Such defects should be found in all stars as a remnant of how stars
form in the first place. This same vacuum coherence explains how
Einstein's cosmological constant is small.
On Dec 28, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
On Dec 28, 2004, at 1:32 PM, wrote:
What part of "uniformity of space" do you still not understand? If an
observer can locally detect a certain type of motion of himself and his
co-moving measuring instruments through the vacuum, then space is not
"uniform" with respect to that type of motion.
J: With that definition space is not "uniform" because of the Hubble
flow and the cosmic black body radiation. This is now a well-established
fact. The dipole Doppler shift anisotropy "velocity" of Earth through
CBB is well measured as is the temperature giving a time from the Big
Bang hot plasma.
Our galaxy is moving at 454 km/sec mean with error +- 125 km/sec
relative to Hubble flow of the expansion of space in the direct l = 163
deg +- 15 deg , b = -11 deg +- 14 deg p. 301 Narlikar Cosmology
(Cambridge, 1983)
Fig 1.20 (b) p. 22 explains convention for Galactic longitude l and
latitude b on the Celestial Sphere. These measurements are 20 years old.
Probably better ones now.
J: Fock may be clear in his text that you have pulled out of context.
Z: I gave you the context. You have his book.
J: Major time required.
Z: I never said or implied that space was actually uniform in the sense
of actual "general relativity". In fact I say it is not. Apparently you
agree with this.
J: Facts cannot be refuted.
J: How would I measure if space were "physically uniform"? What does it
mean?
Z: This is a stupid question that of course is impossible to answer.
J: Wrong. See above.
.
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: NASA Pioneer Anomaly as Vacuum Coherence Hedgehog Defect |
28 Dec 2004 05:57:01 PM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote:
Also the Pioneer anomaly measures H from the Hubble flow, i.e. a_g = -
cH back to Sun from the dark energy hollow halo hedgehog topological
defect in the single-valued vacuum coherence starting at 20AU from the
Sun. Such defects should be found in all stars as a remnant of how stars
form in the first place. This same vacuum coherence explains how
Einstein's cosmological constant is small.
On Dec 28, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
On Dec 28, 2004, at 1:32 PM, wrote:
What part of "uniformity of space" do you still not understand? If an
observer can locally detect a certain type of motion of himself and his
co-moving measuring instruments through the vacuum, then space is not
"uniform" with respect to that type of motion.
J: With that definition space is not "uniform" because of the Hubble
flow and the cosmic black body radiation. This is now a well-established
fact. The dipole Doppler shift anisotropy "velocity" of Earth through
CBB is well measured as is the temperature giving a time from the Big
Bang hot plasma.
Our galaxy is moving at 454 km/sec mean with error +- 125 km/sec
relative to Hubble flow of the expansion of space in the direct l = 163
deg +- 15 deg , b = -11 deg +- 14 deg p. 301 Narlikar Cosmology
(Cambridge, 1983)
Fig 1.20 (b) p. 22 explains convention for Galactic longitude l and
latitude b on the Celestial Sphere. These measurements are 20 years old.
Probably better ones now.
J: Fock may be clear in his text that you have pulled out of context.
Z: I gave you the context. You have his book.
J: Major time required.
Z: I never said or implied that space was actually uniform in the sense
of actual "general relativity". In fact I say it is not. Apparently you
agree with this.
J: Facts cannot be refuted.
J: How would I measure if space were "physically uniform"? What does it
mean?
Z: This is a stupid question that of course is impossible to answer.
J: Wrong. See above.
Jack, your VVFWS award probablilities are looking excellent -- good
luck!
--
"I;m psychic, dumb *****."
"Do back to Neanderthal man fer you!"
"Learn some science if you really want to know."
...Alexa Cameron demonstrates her 200+ alien-implanted IQ
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
