| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"fallingsky" |
| Date: |
09 Feb 2005 09:34:39 PM |
| Object: |
Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? |
Hello all,
I realize the technical qualifications of the group are varied (from
nonexistent to expert), but I'd like to get everyone's thoughts on the
best area for study in regards to military railguns. I am a graduate
student and a US military officer at a university that shall remain
nameless, and my thesis topic will concern the future Army/Navy Railgun
for long-range fire support. There are a lot of technical problems to
be solved in order to make this technology viable in the rough world of
operational deployment, and I'm wondering what you all believe would be
the best area for me to focus my Master's Thesis upon.
The area my advisor is leading me toward is to continue the work
they've been doing on an alternative power system for the weapon.
Current plan is to use compulsators (rotating flywheels) which have
issues with structural stability, rate of fire, and service life; or to
use banks of high voltage capacitors which have issues with physical
size, low operational lifetimes for each capacitor at design voltage,
and shock survivability. Our work has been leading to a design for a
Pulse Forming Inductive network powered by long-life, low voltage
capacitors or batteries feeding a storage inductor which then feeds the
railgun. It's a worthy area of study and there is still a lot to be
done in order to find the best inductor design, decide between
batteries or ultracapacitors, and figure out how to control the
switching.
The other area I'm interested in is the barrel design. Like many
groups, we are trying to zero in on the best rail configuration to
ensure a long operational life under heavy use, despite the problems of
armature lubrication/electrical contact, arc-quenching, and rail
ablation, as well as cooling and ease of manufacture. My early
inquiries in why the big dogs in this field are developing railguns
vice coilguns were that coilguns were more efficient but lacked the
initial boost of a railgun, and also that relative complexity and
achievability was a factor. My thought (supported by recent papers on
synchronous and asynchronous hybrid rail/coilguns) was that railguns
may never be operationally viable because of the rail-life issues over
successive firings. My interest is in adapting or developing the
hybrid concepts to one that fits the required specifications of the
Naval railgun. I figured you could use a short, replaceable railgun
for an initial boost, and then the bulk of the barrel would be an
asynchronous inductive coilgun.
Which idea has more merit? Which is more important to the future
success of this tech? Which would you go for? What problems do you
feel are inherent in both? I'm interested in what the group thinks.
Very respectfully,
Fallingsky
.
|
|
| User: "DAH" |
|
| Title: re:Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? |
18 Feb 2005 09:33:48 AM |
|
|
Hey sailor,
the new buzz phrase in Navy circles is 'free electron lasers'. Photon
packets travel much faster, the targeting can be lightning fast, the
rep rate higher, hardware fatigue less, and the size maybe
significantly smaller. A small photoinjected linac, some klystrons
and pulse forming networks, a superconducting undulator, some fast
adaptive optics, and radar multi-targeting, and you have a battleship
deployable FEL missile defense. There certainly are any number of
technical issues to be resoved in battleship deployable FELs, but
before you commit to endless hours of reinventing an obsolescent
wheel, at least investigate the nascent competition.
DAH 2/18/05
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "fallingsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? |
18 Feb 2005 10:24:32 AM |
|
|
Once again, never said I was a sailor, but there are indeed students
working on a free electron laser (as well as the airborne laser and the
Army's chemical laser) and the projects are going quite well. This is
a tandem initiative in the electric weapons community, because the
deployment timeframes of the two systems are quite different, and
because a laser is not the end-all, be-all of weaponry, being limited
to line of sight and suffering from diffraction and scattering near the
surface of the earth. The Navy FEL is primarily being looked at as a
defensive weapon, where the railgun is for offense and far over the
horizon targeting. I would not characterize the railgun as
obsolescent. Also, you are underestimating the footprint of the FEL by
more than a little, just as you are the technical hurdles that remain
in deploying the system. I thought about working on a laser system,
but A) they were full and B) they are a lot farther from fielding a
weapon. Thank you for your participation and for your concern,
however.
- Fallingsky
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? hand held |
18 Feb 2005 10:00:37 PM |
|
|
I have it now.
A hand held supergun.
The barrel is sprconducting coils 1/3 bullet long with the barrel hole
in it and the barrel chamber is live . the next coil ad barel section
is staged and live but each is insulated and the barel has many coil and
barel grounds down the lenth.
NOW HERES THE STUNNING PART.
The bullet is steel with a superconductor coil thew it and its post
leads are rings on the bullt.
2 of the strongest magnets on earth ,,1 is the barrel and the other is
the bullet.
This round will pass threw a tank at 17000 mph.
I garentee this method.
a super conducting strand smaller than a hair
but with the bullet of you could not take it off a steel plate with a
jeep.
The projectile will be a supermagent .
a superconductive short life strand,
We can fry the conductor but it will burn on the way to the target.
Its by far better than anyone elses.
A superconductor wount nead near the power . I can charge the grip
capaciter.
1000 shots ,,from the palm of your hand.
1/4 inch long round 1/8 wide 1oz.
then a big one for planes.
25000 mph 5 pound bullet.
THE BULLET MUST BE AN ELECTROMAG TOO
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
project assesment by .
Gravityphysics
outa my fucking mind ,,into evryones hands.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? hand held |
18 Feb 2005 10:59:01 PM |
|
|
If you want it . call comander thorngren at carderock and ask for the
liquid piston sliding vane giant.
Ill toss in an eletron beam welder you can play with .
Ill make a parts trade for my air craft carrior i bought from brazil for
2 mil.
and another tin can DD .
For a sub tender like Gompers Ill build a cannon. a 5 pound stooting
star .
yellowstone or any tenders.
in 10 years Ill be 60 and Im biulding a VETS fleet. colecting planes
,,evrything.
a have a few but the ACC is the best .
usa biult sold to UK 42 and to brazil in 55 .
16000 ton. going wih a pair of GE.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? hand held |
19 Feb 2005 12:16:23 AM |
|
|
tj Frazir wrote:
If you want it . call comander thorngren at carderock and ask for the
Wow, after 10 years the hypothetical guy is still a commander.. amazing.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? hand held |
18 Feb 2005 10:48:58 PM |
|
|
i got rid of all the parts.
I stacked the coils and wire it up .
when I ire it it turns on and the bulet lenth
is the 2 conectors .
the bulet is a SC electromagnet and thee barel is too.
thats all the parts.
The bulets lenth moving is the motor controle.
Just 2 of the worlds strongest magnets.
Less wieght ,,easy to build.
A super gun 1oz.
a hand gun that can take out a tank.
or a plane that can take down anything.
5 lb
25000 mph
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? hand held |
19 Feb 2005 12:15:40 AM |
|
|
tj Frazir wrote:
NOW HERES THE STUNNING PART.
The fact that your brain generates enough power to support more than three
brain cells.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or Power Supply? |
18 Feb 2005 05:26:29 PM |
|
|
What's the current state of the art in durable materials with high
conductivity, for barrel design on a railgun?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
18 Feb 2005 10:36:35 PM |
|
|
I want another tin can for my colection from philidelphia.
DD ?
hust another good hull ill strip it out .
Ill swap the army or navy for the handgun.
For $ 5 mil ill biuld the 5 pound cannon .
200 pounds plus the amo loader.
25000 mph $ 80 per round.
pistol rounds 5 bucks. 17000 mph.
The SC STATOR Projectile.
Strait line motor barrel.
SC manets handle 1500 watts in the pistol.
50,000 watts per pound projectle.
350,000 psi. imact from the pistol.
the cannon should vapourise a tank and leave a pit.
Out on deck in the dark it shoots a line of light
a shooting star.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 03:53:12 PM |
|
|
(tj Frazir) wrote in news:24641-4216C253-266
@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net:
I want another tin can for my colection from philidelphia.
DD ?
hust another good hull ill strip it out .
Ill swap the army or navy for the handgun.
For $ 5 mil ill biuld the 5 pound cannon .
200 pounds plus the amo loader.
25000 mph $ 80 per round.
pistol rounds 5 bucks. 17000 mph.
The SC STATOR Projectile.
Strait line motor barrel.
SC manets handle 1500 watts in the pistol.
50,000 watts per pound projectle.
350,000 psi. imact from the pistol.
the cannon should vapourise a tank and leave a pit.
Out on deck in the dark it shoots a line of light
a shooting star.
You need a partner who can write.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 06:02:50 PM |
|
|
Money is no problem. John.
any time you want to make a few mil a day you just ask Ill put you in
the trade leads and you and me will play with 100 mil of the Gov money
and make 10 mil for you per trade.
Not the stock market crap.
we will find buyers and sellers and and be the middle man with the
ships.
if the math works the bank backs it .
it it dont ,,dont do it .
Its simple as *****. The world is based on it.
Id have 30 billion but spent 4 then spent 1 then gave 5 away .
Then made 2 more.
besides the forest ,,the reason for my evrything.
I make a bil on woodproducts per year.
Thats 1/2 ***** paper.
4 pounds for evry person in usa.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 06:29:22 PM |
|
|
(tj Frazir) wrote in news:11834-4217D3AA-138
@storefull-3218.bay.webtv.net:
Money is no problem. John.
any time you want to make a few mil a day you just ask Ill put you in
the trade leads and you and me will play with 100 mil of the Gov money
and make 10 mil for you per trade.
What are trade leads?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? 500ton 4oz |
19 Feb 2005 06:40:32 PM |
|
|
The bullet has a SC coil in it.
The base of bulet is a tac . the coil is around it making an electromag
out of the tac.
One end of the coil leed is on the top part of the bulet as the other
end is on the tac at the botom.
So the tac slides into the base of the bulet.
The shape of te top part of the bullet has a ring nerl to contact the
bulet and the bottom has the same .......
The space puts a lead on te 1rst and 3rd coil and 1 coil is between
not cherged.
as the bulet moves up its pulled and pushed and is pulling and pushing
..
all 4 best posible actions.
No resistance to impulsive force.
No moving parts other than the bullet.
Np phase ampilifes or anything.
The bullet cant outrun conductivity .
conductivity is quicker than the bulet.
By making an electromagnet out of the bulet
I can put 350,000 pounds behind that 1 oz round.
I sent 1 oz of steel threw 1 3/8 two plates.
3 inches or so.
burns out in about 20 miles.
it draws a line out of sight like a shooting star.
It blows the rocks on the island up.
even after its been there a few min its still smokin.
its liquid steel as it flys.
going 25000 mph.
I put 3 more hours in making better rounds.
I made a double with 2 scip spaces.
a 2 sc round.
havnt tryed it yet.
I made by winding SC thred 50 more smll rounds and stacked a new un
open box of SC motor coils.
1000 turns per round.
220 V 100 amp. super conducting 10 x a hair.
one point set.
Bought the wire ar ASC.
Its a bad ***** fucking gun !!
ALL I nead to do is shove the round in it.
and its gone ..as soon as the leads hit its no more.
i could fire as fast as I can stick them in.
No electric is used unless you stick the bullet in and its too quick
to meter.
It is its own motor controle ,,, the motion of the bulet ,,,,no
capaciters or nothin.
I could put 1 million pounds on a 4 oz.
500 ton 4 oz
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 05:51:00 PM |
|
|
The usa gov dont want me to change.
My spelling fucking sucks.
But evry time I biuld something ,, its the boss.
My 1000 foot fall on the 20 inch pipe hydroelectric is 38 MW. A
planet record 500 to 1 better than any other hydrolelectric on the
planet.
88 . its just the 88th thing the gov got.
I have 22 bil ..Ill give the kid some money and i want my boat in the
fraser yard wisconsin.
Its the best electric gun on the planet .
When I nead somthing I must invent it even if its a combination of
xsisting parts.
On this ship we have a mini foundry , machine shop weld shop
electrical lab ..
I have an hitochi mill on here wroth 4 million.
crane cables ,,you name it..I have 190 tons of spare parts. I can
drill a hole in the sea floor
I can load 500 ton from 20,000 feet.
I pull up to deep wrecks and unload them like they were at the dock
and made 200 mil a month 6 months a year.
I trade and load ,,and buy forest for logs.
I cant spell in englih but do math ,,,oh *****..I do math.
Im russian from alaska indian.
I biuld my way around my death.
I biult the ship I run an live on.
No one quite understands LPE.
200,000 hp per shaft ballanced gas air steam 2 cycle liquid water
pistons driving a sliding vane rotor that uses inner wheels as cams.
I just biult a hydroelectric 20 inch pipe 1000 foot fall driving a
slide vanes 20x30 600 si
600 square inch with 500 psi against it as another vane slides up to
block the water in its place. 300,000 pounds of thrust driving a 50,000
hp gen 38 MW .
Biult a hydro 38 Mw with no dam ..just a pipe 20 inch 2 miles long and
a big wheel with sliding vanes and a inside wheel for a cam to push the
vane out the rotor.
I beet evry hydro on the planet 500 to 1.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 06:27:46 PM |
|
|
(tj Frazir) wrote in news:11834-4217D0E4-137
@storefull-3218.bay.webtv.net:
The usa gov dont want me to change.
Why should you change? If you've got a working RG pistol that can
pierce 1.25" armor, you're in the driver's seat, buddy. Make a video
tape of the thing in action and send it to a Pentagon general in charge
of advanced technology development.
If that doesn't work, send the tape to 60 Minutes, along with a properly
written note about how the Army won't listen to you.
And find a friend who can write. You need to surround yourself with
people who can compensate for your shortcomings.
Incidentally, you can't hold the thing in your hand, can you? The
recoil would probably blow your arm clean off, right?
My spelling fucking sucks.
But evry time I biuld something ,, its the boss.
Know anybody who can draw diagrams of this thing?
And what else have you built...?
--
"I prefer to detour the repository of tradition, wherever possible."
--James Steranko
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 07:33:14 PM |
|
|
Pults SCEM 850 T x 2 mags because i have mag against mag , 350,000
psi.
heres the coil specs .
Magnetic Field of the Strongest Magnet
Address:http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/AnnaWoo.shtml Changed:8:23
PM on Saturday, February 19, 2005
The officer =A1=8E=8E=DE=9E is in the seat.
go ahead and file a patt i dont care.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
20 Feb 2005 08:06:11 PM |
|
|
Pop goes te 850 tesla against 850 tesla
as the bulet is a SC coil magnet too.
a speeker magnet is about 01 tesla.
A superconductor at 50 tesla.
A high voltage pop is about 850 tesla in a SC.
Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB
Group: sci.physics Date: Sat, Feb 19, 2005, 8:33pm From:
GravityPhysics@webtv.net (tj=A0Frazir)
=A0=A0Pults SCEM 850 T x 2 mags because i have mag against mag , 350,000
psi.
=A0=A0=A0=A0heres the coil specs .
Magnetic Field of the Strongest Magnet
Address:http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/AnnaWoo.shtml Changed:8:23
PM on Saturday, February 19, 2005
=A0=A0The officer =A1=8E=8E=DE=9E is in the seat.
=A0go ahead and file a patt i dont care.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
18 Mar 2005 11:33:37 PM |
|
|
(tj Frazir) wrote in news:16791-42194213-274
@storefull-3217.bay.webtv.net:
Pop goes te 850 tesla against 850 tesla
as the bulet is a SC coil magnet too.
a speeker magnet is about 01 tesla.
A superconductor at 50 tesla.
A high voltage pop is about 850 tesla in a SC.
Your numbers are fucked, because 850 Tesla would blow your supertanker into
orbit. And there's no way a speaker magnet is 01 Tesla. Where's your
decimal place?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 07:50:13 PM |
|
|
EC21 Product Catalogs - Search 400000 export products from global
suppliers
Address:http://search3.ec21.com/search/ProductCategoryCount.cgi?category=C000006
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 07:46:16 PM |
|
|
Liquid piston engines.
60 rpm water pistons v twin that drive a sliding vane 24 iinch rotor at
500 rpm .
138 HP at 516 mpg.
and hydroelectic plants.
and vacume insualtion 4 x 8 sheets ,,are 2 sheets of steel with a beed
at evry inch to hold them apart with a spac between.
a micro hose cnects each pannel to a vaccume pump and the thrmal
contuctivity of my walls can be turned on and off with the vaccume pump.
The ship is a thermos.
my deck house will float and sail away if the ship sank.
I can see threw the sea.
I can see the moon light from the sea floor.
I biuld the strongest tubing on earth.
I biult the best spectromiter and xray laser to find gold and platinum
on the planet.
toulk the worlds first image of the sea floor below 20,000 feet. ( 20
inventions )
I biult 2 saw mills.
I make tolet paper with my own inventions.
Pods to replace rudders on ships.
dyanmic posistioning.
I re invented the engine room front to back.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 08:16:55 PM |
|
|
So some on wants 4 containers and even after you sent it on some one
elses ship you ca still mach a chunk.
I buy my ships and chagre the rates.
I allso buy ships load a deal on it just to do the deal if the deal
will pay the ship off and make me a mil.
then Ill load it with wood and park it in the med.
Current TAAFLO Rates: Trans-Atlantic American Flag Liner Operators and
Trans-Pacific American Flag Berth Operators
Address:http://www.taaflo-tpafbo.com/current_taaflo_rates2.html
Changed:6:17 PM on Friday, January 21, 2005
people think im nutz ,,a billionaire with a webtv.
till its time to play with money .
Then Im the ship master.
Tao the tungass giant
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
18 Mar 2005 11:27:46 PM |
|
|
(tj Frazir) wrote in news:11834-4217F317-189
@storefull-3218.bay.webtv.net:
people think im nutz ,,a billionaire with a webtv.
till its time to play with money .
How do you get a webtv to work in the middle of the ocean? Do you have a
webcam?
Have you had a chance to think about my funding request? You hinted that
you'd throw some cash my way. Have you changed your mind? I just pulled
that number $100,000 out of the air, guessing that if I were a billionaire,
I'd think that was small change. What number did you have in mind?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 07:54:10 PM |
|
|
Trade leads ,,any and evry place on the planet
the buyer and the seller and if you can sshop prices and compair and see
you can make 50 cents a pound then we use the GOV bank and do all the
math ..
India Trade Zone - Search Results
Address:http://www.indiatradezone.com/search/buyers/searchresults.asp?filterby=BYR&phrase=ALL&filterby=BYR&domain=ALL&cid=&orderby=&Srchstr=wanted+hardwood
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 08:01:41 PM |
|
|
make a list with brazil thailand and china
trade list.
usa ,,,the world over.
Evry time you load a boat ou make a few mil or many mil.
WorldBidItaly International Trade Leads Import Export b2b Marketplace
Address:http://www.worldbiditaly.com/tradeleads/view.htm?session=&subcat=201&type=Buy
corn ,,chicken wings ,, ***** paper..
steel, coal,,wood,,
Dont matter what you have .
This is what rocks the planet.
not the stock market..evryone knows how much they are making because
evry deal is the math on erything.
If you got the balls to be rich Ill send you there fucking quick.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 08:07:36 PM |
|
|
yuo will nead this.
Export-Import Bank of the United States
Address:http://www.exim.gov/
list cif shipping cost quote buyer quote and seller quote and quote your
profit.
10 % customs terrif ..all cost.
Like you want to prove to me how much you will profit .. no limit to
your credit.
evrything can be secured.
This is how the world moves around.
Export-Import Bank of the United States
Address:http://www.exim.gov/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Schutkeker" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 07:35:42 PM |
|
|
Dear TJ,
What are SCSPSLMB & LPE?
Russians are the only decent mathematicians around. Lord knows
Americans can't do it.
What are your barrel & slug materials, steel? If you want to sell this
to the US army, you'll need a lifetime study on the barrel, measured as
the number of shots before failure. Or just prove that the number is so
large, you can't realistically reach it in an experiment lasting a
convenient length of time. Do you have a reloading mechanism for this
thing, or is it hand loaded?
You make a small mistake in your approach to design problems. You'll
build something even if it's means using existing parts. You want build
them *especially* with existing parts. Don't re-invent the wheel if you
don't need to, because there's enough obstacles to success without
making new ones for yourself.
Can I have a couple of hundred thousand dollars? I'm a starving
equation scribbler trying to crack one of the greatest unsolved problems
in physics, and I need a rich patron. I'm slowly running out of cash,
and if I can't finish the solution before I go broke, I'm screwed. I'll
have to take a part time job as a lecturer at my local university, and
with my health problems, that means I'll never finish.
I want to get my name in the history of science. I'd be happy to open
my research to you completely, but I won't do it in this forum, because
the experts here will try to steal my ideas. We'll have to correspond
directly, and if you want to e-mail me, just take NOSPAM off my address,
above.
I'd go in on the gun with you, but money is not my priority, and you
need a writer who is physically located in the same place you are. This
Usenet arrangement we have is a severe bandwidth block.
*****, you could just write up the damn gun in Russian and send it to
Condoleeza Rice with a VHS enclosed. She used to be a Russian studies
professor at Stanford, so she may speak your language. Maybe that'll
get their attention. Does your word processor work well in the Cyrillic
alphabet?
BTW, if you do a lot of math, have you ever used Cardon's method for
factoring cubic equations? That's my current headache.
Sincerely,
John Schutkeker
GravityPhysics@webtv.net (tj Frazir) wrote in
news:11834-4217D0E4-137@storefull-3218.bay.webtv.net:
The usa gov dont want me to change.
My spelling fucking sucks.
But evry time I biuld something ,, its the boss.
My 1000 foot fall on the 20 inch pipe hydroelectric is 38 MW. A
planet record 500 to 1 better than any other hydrolelectric on the
planet.
88 . its just the 88th thing the gov got.
I have 22 bil ..Ill give the kid some money and i want my boat in the
fraser yard wisconsin.
Its the best electric gun on the planet .
When I nead somthing I must invent it even if its a combination of
xsisting parts.
On this ship we have a mini foundry , machine shop weld shop
electrical lab ..
I have an hitochi mill on here wroth 4 million.
crane cables ,,you name it..I have 190 tons of spare parts. I can
drill a hole in the sea floor
I can load 500 ton from 20,000 feet.
I pull up to deep wrecks and unload them like they were at the dock
and made 200 mil a month 6 months a year.
I trade and load ,,and buy forest for logs.
I cant spell in englih but do math ,,,oh *****..I do math.
Im russian from alaska indian.
I biuld my way around my death.
I biult the ship I run an live on.
No one quite understands LPE.
200,000 hp per shaft ballanced gas air steam 2 cycle liquid water
pistons driving a sliding vane rotor that uses inner wheels as cams.
I just biult a hydroelectric 20 inch pipe 1000 foot fall driving a
slide vanes 20x30 600 si
600 square inch with 500 psi against it as another vane slides up to
block the water in its place. 300,000 pounds of thrust driving a
50,000 hp gen 38 MW .
Biult a hydro 38 Mw with no dam ..just a pipe 20 inch 2 miles long
and
a big wheel with sliding vanes and a inside wheel for a cam to push
the vane out the rotor.
I beet evry hydro on the planet 500 to 1.
--
"I prefer to detour the repository of tradition, wherever possible."
--James Steranko
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 08:30:23 PM |
|
|
tj Frazir wrote:
My 1000 foot fall on the 20 inch pipe hydroelectric is 38 MW. A
planet record 500 to 1 better than any other hydrolelectric on the
planet.
Yeah, just like your miracle engine that was going to end the oil age 3
years ago... yet magically still no sign of it anywhere... wow..
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
19 Feb 2005 09:33:47 PM |
|
|
Moron ..
a 3 mile pipe with 1000 foot fall is 500 psi.
20 inch pipe
the sliding vane is 20 x 30 inch with 500 psi pushing it forward
dumbass.
Thats 300,000 pounds of thrust moron max.
Thats 300,000 hp moron max.
Converted to shaft on the rim wheel 50,000 hp is 38 MW .
Thats real moron max.
250,000 bucks biult a 38 mw.
$ 50,000 a day value.
$ 1.5 mil month
if I was charging them money .
I biult this for the poor.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
20 Feb 2005 06:00:06 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, tj Frazir
<GravityPhysics@webtv.net>
wrote
on Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:33:47 -0500
<11418-4218051B-101@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net>:
Moron ..
a 3 mile pipe with 1000 foot fall is 500 psi.
20 inch pipe
the sliding vane is 20 x 30 inch with 500 psi pushing it forward
dumbass.
Thats 300,000 pounds of thrust moron max.
Thats 300,000 hp moron max.
Converted to shaft on the rim wheel 50,000 hp is 38 MW .
Thats real moron max.
250,000 bucks biult a 38 mw.
$ 50,000 a day value.
$ 1.5 mil month
if I was charging them money .
I biult this for the poor.
So what's stopping you from building this engine, Mr. Multi-millionaire?
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Naval Railgun: Barrel Design or ShootingStar? SCSPSLMB |
20 Feb 2005 07:21:02 AM |
|
|
Does 300,000 pounds of thrust queal 60 hp Ghost ??
300,000 pounds of thrust is 300,000 hp in't it ghost !!!!
pto of 50000 hp on the shaft of the wheel against the rim.
38 mw is a ***** of a long way from 60 hp.
What's wrong with your math Ghost ??
600si X 500 psi.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
