| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"malibu" |
| Date: |
15 Mar 2007 12:32:46 PM |
| Object: |
neutrino waves |
In playing with the idea
that energy must be in the form of
linked rotations in order to maintain
a form;
the photon
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/wavetrain2.GIF
merges with the axis of travel twice per cycle.
All the spokes follow the same wave.
The neutrino wave does not have to merge
with the axis of travel:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/neutrino2.GIF
If the neutrino is viewed as a wheel
coming towards the observer rotating at
the same rate as it tumbles front to back,
then when face-on and vertical the 12 o'clock
spoke makes the wave above.
All the spokes on this wheel will follow different
pathways; for each frequency there will
be an infinite number of different waves.
And none of them ever merge with the axis of
travel, except the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock spokes.
The conclusion being that there are huge
numbers of different neutrinos possible, and
very very few of them can be stopped by matter.
Here's a nice look at the wheel doing
the 12 o'clock spoke from the top
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/neutrino.GIF
John
Galaxy Model for the Atom
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john
.
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: neutrino waves |
15 Mar 2007 07:25:27 PM |
|
|
John, you can't make any progress without the quantum mechanics!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Cardinale" |
|
| Title: Re: neutrino waves |
15 Mar 2007 09:00:35 PM |
|
|
Obvious protein decficiency. Probably since pre-natal times.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: neutrino waves |
15 Mar 2007 04:59:33 PM |
|
|
On Mar 15, 9:32 am, "malibu" <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
[...]
Why don't you play with the idea of "getting an education" ?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: neutrino waves |
15 Mar 2007 02:12:40 PM |
|
|
malibu wrote:
In playing with the idea
that energy must be in the form of
linked rotations in order to maintain
a form;
[snip crap]
All the spokes on this wheel will follow different
pathways; for each frequency there will
be an infinite number of different waves.
[snip rest of crap]
You would be more eloquent if you were silent.
Idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
| User: "malibu" |
|
| Title: Re: neutrino waves |
15 Mar 2007 04:05:28 PM |
|
|
On Mar 15, 1:12 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
malibu wrote:
In playing with the idea
that energy must be in the form of
linked rotations in order to maintain
a form;
[snip crap]
All the spokes on this wheel will follow different
pathways; for each frequency there will
be an infinite number of different waves.
[snip rest of crap]
You would be more eloquent if you were silent.
Idiot.
Does it matter if a dinosaur is left-
or right-handed?
Are the waves I pictured right- or left-handed?
Do you have clue one what it is
*you* are looking for?
Do you think neutrinos are involved in gravity/inertia?
John
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Moroney" |
|
| Title: Re: neutrino waves |
15 Mar 2007 05:12:49 PM |
|
|
"malibu" <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> writes:
On Mar 15, 1:12 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
[snip rest of crap]
You would be more eloquent if you were silent.
Idiot.
Does it matter if a dinosaur is left-
or right-handed?
Are the waves I pictured right- or left-handed?
Do you have clue one what it is
*you* are looking for?
Do you think neutrinos are involved in gravity/inertia?
How about, instead of cooking up fancy .GIF files and calling them
neutrinos or whatever, explain what is rotating, why you believe
those whatevers are rotating in that relationship, and most importantly,
what _evidence_ there is of this, and they aren't just figments of your
imagination. Also, explain how Maxwell's Equations have a contradictory
solution for the photon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "malibu" |
|
| Title: Re: neutrino waves |
15 Mar 2007 06:05:47 PM |
|
|
On Mar 15, 4:12 pm, (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
"malibu" <vega...@accesscomm.ca> writes:
On Mar 15, 1:12 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
[snip rest of crap]
You would be more eloquent if you were silent.
Idiot.
Does it matter if a dinosaur is left-
or right-handed?
Are the waves I pictured right- or left-handed?
Do you have clue one what it is
*you* are looking for?
Do you think neutrinos are involved in gravity/inertia?
How about, instead of cooking up fancy .GIF files and calling them
neutrinos or whatever, explain what is rotating, why you believe
those whatevers are rotating in that relationship, and most importantly,
what _evidence_ there is of this, and they aren't just figments of your
imagination. Also, explain how Maxwell's Equations have a contradictory
solution for the photon.
Rotation of space causes a separation of
virtual particles which stores energy.
That circularly-polarized photons have their
polarization change rate linked to their
frequency constitutes evidence for a linked
rotation of one-to-one.
Virtual particles, or Space Itself, or
aether particles, or just energy is doing
the rotating.
John
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Moroney" |
|
| Title: Re: neutrino waves |
16 Mar 2007 12:31:26 PM |
|
|
"malibu" <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> writes:
On Mar 15, 4:12 pm, (Michael Moroney)
wrote:
How about, instead of cooking up fancy .GIF files and calling them
neutrinos or whatever, explain what is rotating, why you believe
those whatevers are rotating in that relationship, and most importantly,
what _evidence_ there is of this, and they aren't just figments of your
imagination. Also, explain how Maxwell's Equations have a contradictory
solution for the photon.
Rotation of space causes a separation of
virtual particles which stores energy.
That circularly-polarized photons have their
polarization change rate linked to their
frequency constitutes evidence for a linked
rotation of one-to-one.
Virtual particles, or Space Itself, or
aether particles, or just energy is doing
the rotating.
What rotation of space? Evidence? How is "polarization change of
circularly-polarized photons" evidence of multiple rotations?
What is rotating? Why don't Maxwell's Equations come up with something
like that, rather than sinusoidal E and B fields at right angles to
each other?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
