NEUTRON STAR NEAR



 Science > Physics > NEUTRON STAR NEAR

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Nick"
Date: 03 May 2007 11:41:29 PM
Object: NEUTRON STAR NEAR
The sun is a second generation star. Meaning that there was a star
that went before it. The star that went before the solar system went
supernova and deposited all the elements that make up the planets. I
believe it was the kind of supernova that left a neutron star; a dead
star core behind. Astronomers call this Nemesis. But what happened to
Nemesis? If it left the vicinity it might still be close by. I predict
that a new investigation into our sun's dark companion will take
place. That it exists is nearly certain in my opinion. Where it went
if anywhere is the question. If this neutron star has been cooling for
4.5 billion years it should be entirely dark. It might have swept up
most of the debris in its orbit. Its orbit is considered 26 milllion
years. The evidence of Nemesis that we have now may be the
gravitational disturbance that the outer planets experience. It might
not be a 10th planet. It might be Nemesis. To detect it we ought to be
waiting for the next Gamma Ray Burst that comes from it.
MITCH RAEMSCH -- LIGHT FELL --
.

User: "Nick"

Title: Re: NEUTRON STAR NEAR 04 May 2007 09:21:35 PM
On May 3, 9:41 pm, Nick <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

The sun is a second generation star. Meaning that there was a star
that went before it. The star that went before the solar system went
supernova and deposited all the elements that make up the planets. I
believe it was the kind of supernova that left a neutron star; a dead
star core behind. Astronomers call this Nemesis. But what happened to
Nemesis? If it left the vicinity it might still be close by. I predict
that a new investigation into our sun's dark companion will take
place. That it exists is nearly certain in my opinion. Where it went
if anywhere is the question. If this neutron star has been cooling for
4.5 billion years it should be entirely dark. It might have swept up
most of the debris in its orbit. Its orbit is considered 26 milllion
years. The evidence of Nemesis that we have now may be the
gravitational disturbance that the outer planets experience. It might
not be a 10th planet. It might be Nemesis. To detect it we ought to be
waiting for the next Gamma Ray Burst that comes from it.

MITCH RAEMSCH -- LIGHT FELL --

THERE MAY BE A NEUTRON STAR NEARBY.
.
User: "Michael Moroney"

Title: Re: NEUTRON STAR NEAR 05 May 2007 12:04:20 AM
Nick <macromitch@yahoo.com> writes:

On May 3, 9:41 pm, Nick <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

The sun is a second generation star. Meaning that there was a star
that went before it. The star that went before the solar system went
supernova and deposited all the elements that make up the planets. I
believe it was the kind of supernova that left a neutron star; a dead
star core behind.

THERE MAY BE A NEUTRON STAR NEARBY.

Very unlikely. All the stars we see in the night sky are on their own
orbit around the galactic center, and are moving relative to the earth.
In a few million years, the night sky will be unrecognizable. After 4.5+
billion years, the core of any supernova nearby could be anywhere, perhaps
clear across the galaxy. Besides, I don't think the solar system was
formed from the remains of one particular supernova, but from many of them
over time.
.
User: "Dave Typinski"

Title: Re: NEUTRON STAR NEAR 05 May 2007 12:42:27 AM
On Sat, 5 May 2007 05:04:20 +0000 (UTC),
moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote:

Nick <macromitch@yahoo.com> writes:

On May 3, 9:41 pm, Nick <macromi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

The sun is a second generation star. Meaning that there was a star
that went before it. The star that went before the solar system went
supernova and deposited all the elements that make up the planets. I
believe it was the kind of supernova that left a neutron star; a dead
star core behind.


THERE MAY BE A NEUTRON STAR NEARBY.


Very unlikely. All the stars we see in the night sky are on their own
orbit around the galactic center, and are moving relative to the earth.
In a few million years, the night sky will be unrecognizable. After 4.5+
billion years, the core of any supernova nearby could be anywhere, perhaps
clear across the galaxy. Besides, I don't think the solar system was
formed from the remains of one particular supernova, but from many of them
over time.

Why "many"?
Oh wait, you're saying that many novae contributed matter to the
protostellar cloud out of which our solar system condensed, not that
many novae triggered the collapse.
Ah, well, never mind then.
--
Dave Typinski
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Repent, for the End is Near
Smart Model Accelerator Comparison Of Proton Near Speed Of Light
Strongest-Ever Month-of-May Typhoon Hits China Near Hong Kong.
Static temperature in gas near heated boundary wall
Redshift of Light Near a Black Hole
2006 Tectonic Plate Motion Reversal Near Acapulco Puzzles EarthquakeScientists
Re: Nocturnal Life on Venus and of near UV laser communications
Model of inside of Sun (radiative zone near center)
electric field near an isolated conductor
New solar sail proposal might win one of NASA's Centennial Challenges near term.
AHH, Shouldn't we panic about the ASTEROID coming near Earth tomorrow??
Re: Man Accused In Children's Near-Drowning Severely Beaten
Why do charged particles behave strangely near black holes?
Re: Nocturnal Life on Venus and of near UV laser communications
What is the electric field near a rotating wire?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER