Science > Physics > New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
02 Feb 2005 11:07:59 PM |
| Object: |
New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding |
I have been working on an atomic model which assumes that atoms are
made up of alternating series of protons and electrons. The original
web site describing my first attempts at this model can be found at:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/frankhu/buildatm.htm
However, this initial model could not explain the observed electron
shells. After re-working the model, I have discovered an arrangement
which can account for the observed energy levels. This model can also
account for the molecular binding characteristics (common oxidation
numbers and binding angles) for some of the atoms I have worked out in
detail from Hydrogen to Neon. See this revised model at:
http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/atmpics2.html
This model provides a clear and intuitive reason why atoms have the
properties that they do. If you think it is a little difficult to
explain how electron clouds could possibly form bonds, have a look at
this model. In this model, bonds form through simple electrostatic
attraction of oppositely charged particles.
.
|
|
| User: "Y.Porat" |
|
| Title: Re: New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding |
03 Feb 2005 12:01:10 AM |
|
|
Goood morning Fraqnli!!!!
do you folow a guy in the net his name is Y.Porat?
he has something similar say cubic but .....
listed carefuly if you dont waht to spend the rest of your life on
something that has no chance:
it at all you have to combine your cubes .......
LINEARILY go it ???
that model is in my book for more than 10 years
other people could testify about it.
now
after i finished my model and without knowing about it
i read in a chemistry book that
the Amwrican chemist at the beginning of the 20 th
century Gilbert lewis
suggested his octet model
and descrived it as
cubes connected linearlily!!!
yet
*that was his **atomic model**
my *unprecedented * discovery waas that ........
it is not only the atom that can be described that way
but .....
the nuceus as well !!!!
iow
the atomic structure
IS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE *GEOMETRIC STRUCTURE* OF THE NUC !!!
if you got it please stick it deap into your mind
and memory
because that should sve you and the rest of the world
a lot of mumbling
and a huge wast of time
that is my friendly suggestion
i cannot in principle be against any model because....
i deeply believe in the saying of
Mau ce tung:
'let a thousand flowers flourish'!!!!
ie lack of compultion in scince!
anyway that is my sensere suggestion.
and if you dont mind - very substanciated.
more and more as time passes!!
never a refutal of it !
----------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding |
03 Feb 2005 11:21:13 PM |
|
|
I have studied your model. But it cannot explain the experimentally
observed ionization pattern. Notice that this is experimental data and
not something arbitrary. It falls into specific patterns which your
linear model cannot possibly explain. The Cubic Model carries along
with it many of the initial advantages of your model, but I think you
should seriously consider whether the Cubic Model is superior to your
own due to its ability to explain hard scientific data on the
ionization pattern.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Y.Porat" |
|
| Title: Re: New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding |
04 Feb 2005 10:30:42 AM |
|
|
1 you could not study my model since......
you got only an abstract of a few pages
while my model is 155 pages
2 i never invested work on the spectra issue because it is a project of
say another
10 years
so i whated first to 'sell' my first basic findings and that see for
further
anyway a coplepe model is a job for a geraration not for one man
3 there are many substantiated parts of my model
see for instance the thread that is going on 'Isotop decay chains'
with a seemingly unprecedented prediction
and there are others.
can your model do such predictions as i do ???
----------------
all the best
Y.Porat
------------------
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding
Dr. Dunderhead explains: The electron is our friend
A New Hypothesis on photon emission explains the null result of MMEx but implies a contracting Universe.
Why I don't like Niggers, the dark potter rarely explains Zamfir, it irrigates Lloyd instead, Canadian Prancing Kook.
Chinks, who will we care after Russell explains the clever earth's shopkeeper, British Lucky Spastic.
God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism
Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 2: Feedback Explains Acceleration of Universe
Re: Her code was upper, weak, and explains beneath the river.
| John Cramer's Type II Transaction explains low entropy of universe?
There Is No Need For The String Theory The Smart Model Explains It...
Moving Dimensions Theory--A Physical Grand Unification: MDT Explains Length Contraction and Entanglement With a New Model, thusly unifiying Relativity & QM
Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Away Einstein's Block Universe, Accounts for Action At A Distance, Unifies GR & SR With QM, and Renders String Theory Unnecessary http://physicsmathforums.com
Quantum Gravity 28: Entanglement Explains Magnetic Dipoles, Quark Bag Model, etc.
MICHEL JANSSEN EXPLAINS LENGTH CONTRACTION
Moving Dimensions Theory Explains Time in Both QM & SR: Roger Penrose Has Been Seeking Moving Dimensions Theory
|
|
|
