Science > Physics > New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
05 Aug 2005 07:08:04 PM |
| Object: |
New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design |
AI = Advanced Intelligence
COSMIC COINCIDENCE? REALLY?
http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssi/2005/lec_notes/Kolb1/kolb1_Page_21_jpg.htm
This is too coincidental to be a random coincidence. Is it the COSMIC
WOW SIGNAL for CONTACT with ADVANCED INTELLIGENCE?
Look here are the simple basic equations for precision cosmology
http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssi/2005/lec_notes/Kolb1/kolb1_Page_05_jpg.htm
Note that for "vacuum", i.e. zero point energy there can be an
independent INTRINSIC cosmic time dependence for the zero point energy
density not tied to a(t). Indeed, in my metric engineering theory the
equation for this on a smaller scale is something like the "Flying
Saucer Warp Drive Equation" of Dan Smith's alleged "Visitors" who seem
to prefer "metallic voices" if we are to believe Jim Schnabel about
CIA's Kit Green's experience during the Uri Geller experiments? ;-) As
this message is being sent I am advised that Dan Smith is a "DIA
Contractor" who has just been in a "car accident" in Washington
DC/Baltimore area? There are no coincidences - cosmic or otherwise in
this weird business. Note President Bush recently commented on
"Intelligent Design" and so did a Pennsylvania Senator. It seems to be a
hot topic.
/\(t) = (1/Lp*)(ODLRO Surface Density of Control Thin
Film)Cos(VacuumODLRO Phase - Thin Film Phase)
Where
G*/G = (R/Lp)^n
i.e.
Lp*/Lp = (R/Lp)^n/2
for n extra space-dimensions of scale R.
OK we know k = 0 (Space is flat) from WMAP. This fits inflation.
Therefore the total
Omega = (total density)/(critical density) = 1
trivially because
critical density(t) = 3H(t)^2/8piG
As t increases all densities decrease except for the zero point dark
energy with w = -1.
This means the total critical density itself becomes dominated by the
zero point dark energy.
i.e. H(t)^2 ---> c^2/\(t) as t increases.
Since there is no theory for /\ (other than mine) there can be an
arbitrary t-dependence /\(t) that is independent of the scale factor
a(t) for the expansion of space. Indeed this /\(t) can be from "The
Architect" of Freemasonry, from Michio Kaku's "Masters of Hyperspace",
from Star Trek's "Q", from Dan Smith's "Visitors", from the "Metric
Engineers", from "Darth Vader", from "Gulliver", from "The Matrix", from
"God" - take your pick.
Note that if the dark matter is really negative zero point energy with w
= -1 and positive pressure that cannot be distinguished from w = 0 Cold
Dark Matter (CDM) then NOW ~ 96% of our universe is zero point energy
(73% positive and 23% negative). Only 4% is the stuff we are made from.
On Aug 5, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Desperate Cosmologists How far will they go?
Saul Perlmutter just happens to observe the Type1a supernovae just at
the crossing point NOW 13.7 billion years since the BIG BANG where Dark
Energy is shooting up and everything else is falling down.
Is this Dan Smith's ESCHATON? :-)
Kolb's final lecture at SSI 2005 is VERY FUNNY! (No, he did not mention
Dan).
He compares Saul Perlmutter to Martha Stewart and sudden drop of IMCLONE
when she sold. He uses Creation of Adam with God as Ed Witten and Adam
as Peskin - who is here (the physicist not the politician).
.
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design |
06 Aug 2005 07:02:13 AM |
|
|
"Jack Sarfatti" <sarfatti@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:EbTIe.109$911.25@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
This is too coincidental to be a random coincidence.
Have you read that sentence?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design |
05 Aug 2005 08:24:27 PM |
|
|
A mindless lump isn't the creator of the universe.
God started it with an energy build up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Kastrup" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design |
06 Aug 2005 02:17:26 AM |
|
|
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> writes:
A mindless lump isn't the creator of the universe.
Well, but if Gore claims to have built the Internet, what else is
there to claim for Bush?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design |
06 Aug 2005 07:00:57 AM |
|
|
"Nick" <macromitch@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123291466.906472.80170@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
A mindless lump isn't the creator of the universe.
God started it with an energy build up.
I thought you said a mindless lump wasn't the creator of the universe?
Sadly, Nick, you aren't intelligent enough to argue convincingly in support
of ID. Even more sad is the fact that otherwise intelligent people are
arguing in support of it. Worst of all, cunning and charismatic people are
using their oratory skills to convince people ID is on a par with evolution.
It isn't. Its on a par with life on Earth being seeded by chocolate loving
aliens.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Edward Green" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design |
05 Aug 2005 10:54:21 PM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
There are no coincidences - cosmic or otherwise in
this weird business. Note President Bush recently commented on
"Intelligent Design" and so did a Pennsylvania Senator. It seems to be a
hot topic.
/\(t) = (1/Lp*)(ODLRO Surface Density of Control Thin
Film)Cos(VacuumODLRO Phase - Thin Film Phase)
Well, here's a weird coincidence. I'd never heard of "Off Diagonal
Long Range Ordering" until about 15 minutes ago, when I happened to
skim across the phrase in a 1970's vintage book of essays on
theoretical physics. And now I immediately reencounter the acronym in
your post. It can't be that this is a hot topic -- the damn book is 30
years old, been on my shelf for maybe 20, and something just motivated
me to try reading it a smidgen.
I've not infrequently had experiences of deja vue, and the feeling that
something had leaked through from the next groove of the LP -- a now
defunct analogy. But whether these instances exceed those expected by
chance based on length of life and depth of experience, that's another
matter.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Proginoskes" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design |
05 Aug 2005 10:09:02 PM |
|
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
[...]
This is too coincidental to be a random coincidence.
If you look at the world, mountains aren't all in a line, they're all
different heights, the stars aren't organized either (we did that), and
they're all different colors, all without any pattern. Therefore, there
was NO INTELLIGENT DESIGN in the Universe; all is Chaos. Hail
Discordia!
--- A. C. Fenderson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bozo the Evil Klown" |
|
| Title: Re: New Evidence Supports President Bush on Intelligent Design |
06 Aug 2005 06:10:53 PM |
|
|
http://www.venganza.org/index.htm
See, the trouble with most creationists is they don't take the joke far
*enough*.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
