New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11



 Science > Physics > New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: ""
Date: 04 Dec 2006 04:33:23 AM
Object: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm
.

User: ""

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 05:19:54 PM
wrote:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm

Be aware that the entire... plane or no-plane, 5 frames, short vid of
the 5 frames, etcetera, is all classic gov covert ops DISINFO.
D I S I N F O
disinformation
dis=B7in=B7for=B7ma=B7tion
noun
Definition:
false information: false or deliberately misleading information, often
put out as propaganda
The official story is that it was a 747 but all the evidence (disinfo)
they give you may lead you to believe otherwise.
And there should be CONCLUSIVE video evidence that is without doubt a
747, but they aren't releasing that. After all the pentagon has to have
a very large number of security cameras considering it's a very
important part of our defense department. Curious they could only
"find" 5 frames.
But this way by making it inconclusive it creates disention among the
ranks of the truthers. It breeds false theories which are lumped
together with more credible theories and all called bunk. It also
creates a basis that allows disinfo agents to expand on these false
theories to further muddy the waters.
The inside job was already complicated enough. Why would they try to
swap one of the planes for something else? It would unecessarily
complicate things. But it is advantageous to make it seem to some that
they did it this way.
The biggest argument that it was something smaller is that the hole in
the building is too small. This is wrong because the wall was armored
to a bomb resistant condition with a recent pentagon remodel. So that
the lighter wing ends would obliterate before the wall gave way. This
wall would be much stronger than the WTC which everyone is comparing it
too that shows a hole the size of a large plane.
The only other evidence that sort of supports a smaller plane/missile
is the 5 frames. But this could be very easily manipulated. They either
picked the only camera that didn't show the plane because of frame rate
or took out every other frame until the 747 disappeared. Ask yourself
if the 5 frame evidence came from the perps themselves then how can you
trust it?
.
User: "911 Factoids"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 05:50:44 PM
said:

Be aware that the entire... plane or no-plane, 5 frames, short vid of
the 5 frames, etcetera, is all classic gov covert ops DISINFO.

It's part of the big conspiracy. They're following me everywhere. It's a
false flag covert black disinfo op because they know that I have the secret.
If I wasn't the one they want, why are they always following me and beaming the
voices into my head?
.

User: ""

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 06:52:26 PM
wrote:
<snip>

The official story is that it was a 747 but all the evidence (disinfo)

<snip>

747, but they aren't releasing that. After all the pentagon has to have

<snip>

or took out every other frame until the 747 disappeared. Ask yourself

<snip>
If you can't even get this one basic fact right why should anyone
believe anything you say?
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20020123X00105&key=1
http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/penttbom/aa77/77.htm
.
User: ""

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 08:06:00 PM
wrote:

hatmon76@yahoo.com wrote:
<snip>

The official story is that it was a 747 but all the evidence (disinfo)

<snip>

747, but they aren't releasing that. After all the pentagon has to have

<snip>

or took out every other frame until the 747 disappeared. Ask yourself

<snip>

If you can't even get this one basic fact right why should anyone
believe anything you say?

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20020123X00105&key=1

http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/penttbom/aa77/77.htm

]
I'm sorry, it is a 757, I was just in too much of a hurry to check, my
memory is not what it used to be, especially with numbers. I think you
should be able to get the gist of what I'm saying even if the exact
details are innacurate.
A LARGE PASSENGER JET PLANE, how about that.
.
User: "animal"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 08:15:12 PM
wrote:

philmil62@gmail.com wrote:

wrote:
<snip>

The official story is that it was a 747 but all the evidence (disinfo)


<snip>

747, but they aren't releasing that. After all the pentagon has to have


<snip>

or took out every other frame until the 747 disappeared. Ask yourself


<snip>

If you can't even get this one basic fact right why should anyone
believe anything you say?

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20020123X00105&key=1

http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/penttbom/aa77/77.htm


]
I'm sorry, it is a 757, I was just in too much of a hurry to check, my
memory is not what it used to be, especially with numbers. I think you
should be able to get the gist of what I'm saying even if the exact
details are innacurate.

A LARGE PASSENGER JET PLANE, how about that.

Time to get your BDS treated.
.


User: ""

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 07:50:03 PM
wrote:

hatmon76@yahoo.com wrote:
<snip>

The official story is that it was a 747 but all the evidence (disinfo)

<snip>

747, but they aren't releasing that. After all the pentagon has to have

<snip>

or took out every other frame until the 747 disappeared. Ask yourself

<snip>

If you can't even get this one basic fact right why should anyone
believe anything you say?

Critical thinking does not involve 'believing what people say', it
requires independent and objective analysis of the available evidence.
Don't beat yourself up over it, the mainstream
scientific/political/military/media/religious institutions don't seem
to understand that either.

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20020123X00105&key=1

http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/penttbom/aa77/77.htm

.
User: "animal"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 08:11:48 PM
wrote:

philmil62@gmail.com wrote:

hatmon76@yahoo.com wrote:
<snip>

The official story is that it was a 747 but all the evidence (disinfo)


<snip>

747, but they aren't releasing that. After all the pentagon has to have


<snip>

or took out every other frame until the 747 disappeared. Ask yourself


<snip>

If you can't even get this one basic fact right why should anyone
believe anything you say?



Critical thinking does not involve 'believing what people say', it
requires independent and objective analysis of the available evidence.
Don't beat yourself up over it, the mainstream
scientific/political/military/media/religious institutions don't seem
to understand that either.

WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH.
Critical thinking is knowing and understanding what the facts are,
you've missed out on both counts.



http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20020123X00105&key=1

http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/penttbom/aa77/77.htm



.

User: ""

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 08:08:38 PM
wrote:

philmil62@gmail.com wrote:

hatmon76@yahoo.com wrote:
<snip>

The official story is that it was a 747 but all the evidence (disinfo)

<snip>

747, but they aren't releasing that. After all the pentagon has to have

<snip>

or took out every other frame until the 747 disappeared. Ask yourself

<snip>

If you can't even get this one basic fact right why should anyone
believe anything you say?


Critical thinking does not involve 'believing what people say', it
requires independent and objective analysis of the available evidence.

I agree. By all means, do your own independant and objective anaysis.
Read and compare all the data available.
My question, which did not concern you, or any investigation, was
directed at Hatty and her obvious lack of any such investigation. An
independant and objecive investigation would have uncovered the fact
that, according to the "official story", Flight 77 was a 757 like this;
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/jetliner/b757/b757_15.jpg
and not a 747 like this;
http://www.airliners.net/photos/middle/6/6/4/0906466.jpg
.



User: ""

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 06:03:38 PM
wrote:

schoenfeld.one@gmail.com wrote:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm


Be aware that the entire... plane or no-plane, 5 frames, short vid of
the 5 frames, etcetera, is all classic gov covert ops DISINFO.

D I S I N F O

disinformation
dis=B7in=B7for=B7ma=B7tion
noun
Definition:
false information: false or deliberately misleading information, often
put out as propaganda

The official story is that it was a 747 but all the evidence (disinfo)
they give you may lead you to believe otherwise.

The government has been and still is withholding many pieces of video
footage which clearly show what happened. The government does not want
the truth about the pentagon revealed.
It is the _media_ which is focuses exclusively on the pentagon and not
wtc 7, it is the media trying to make all 9/11 enquires converge on the
pentagon.
This is not some elaborate straw man argument built up then to be
destroyed, it is that the media and the people who own it and run it
are trying to shift blame and attention away from their friends Larry
Silverstein and Benyamin Netanyahou and onto other their puppets in the
whitehouse / pentagon. That's all it is.
That being said, anyone (that still has any tiny bit of objectivity
left) can clearly see from the available evidence that a missle hit the
pentagon, not an airliner.
Anyone who watches this video
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm
and does not come to the same conclusion is unfathomably incompetent
and delusional.

And there should be CONCLUSIVE video evidence that is without doubt a
747, but they aren't releasing that. After all the pentagon has to have
a very large number of security cameras considering it's a very
important part of our defense department. Curious they could only
"find" 5 frames.

But this way by making it inconclusive it creates disention among the
ranks of the truthers. It breeds false theories which are lumped
together with more credible theories and all called bunk. It also
creates a basis that allows disinfo agents to expand on these false
theories to further muddy the waters.

The inside job was already complicated enough. Why would they try to
swap one of the planes for something else? It would unecessarily
complicate things. But it is advantageous to make it seem to some that
they did it this way.

The biggest argument that it was something smaller is that the hole in
the building is too small. This is wrong because the wall was armored
to a bomb resistant condition with a recent pentagon remodel. So that
the lighter wing ends would obliterate before the wall gave way. This
wall would be much stronger than the WTC which everyone is comparing it
too that shows a hole the size of a large plane.

The only other evidence that sort of supports a smaller plane/missile
is the 5 frames. But this could be very easily manipulated. They either
picked the only camera that didn't show the plane because of frame rate
or took out every other frame until the 747 disappeared. Ask yourself
if the 5 frame evidence came from the perps themselves then how can you
trust it?

.


User: "mike3"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 01:21:53 PM
wrote:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm

To me that looks like an airplane. I could see a wing, too. In the
second
repeat you can see the object at it's best, it looks like a bright dot
with
something extending off to the "left" (actually, outwards from it),
something
longer and thinner than it -- a wing! It's an airplane! Not a missile!
.

User: ""

Title: Global Media Blackout On Pentagon Missile Video 05 Dec 2006 06:10:14 PM
I wonder why there seems to be a global media blackout on the new
pentagon video:
http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2006/041206Doubletree.htm
.
User: "Marvin Bush"

Title: Re: Global Media Blackout On Pentagon Missile Video 05 Dec 2006 06:21:44 PM
said:

I wonder why there seems to be a global media blackout on the new
pentagon video:

http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2006/041206Doubletree.htm


They blacked out the ones with the UFOs too.
www.iamthewhacko.com
.

User: "John P."

Title: Re: Global Media Blackout On Pentagon Missile Video 06 Dec 2006 12:46:35 AM
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in a message

I wonder why there seems to be a global media blackout on the new
pentagon video:

I can only guess it is because your LSD hasn't worn off yet.
.

User: "Brian"

Title: Re: Global Media Blackout On Pentagon Flight 77 Video 05 Dec 2006 07:29:49 PM
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165363811.856813.310500@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...

I wonder why there seems to be a global media blackout on the new
pentagon video:

http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2006/041206Doubletree.htm

Your website answers your own question: The video shows nothing
to either support or debunk any wacko conspiracy theories. It's
not worth watching.
.
User: "harry k"

Title: Re: Global Media Blackout On Pentagon Flight 77 Video 05 Dec 2006 08:06:26 PM
Brian wrote:

<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165363811.856813.310500@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...

I wonder why there seems to be a global media blackout on the new
pentagon video:

http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2006/041206Doubletree.htm


Your website answers your own question: The video shows nothing
to either support or debunk any wacko conspiracy theories. It's
not worth watching.

I figure the conspirowhackos don't want to considert the fact that if
it was a plot (as they want it to be) the government would have come up
with a video clearly showing a plane not a clip that shows just what
one would expect from a low quality, slow frame security camera..
Harry K
.


User: "Tonico"

Title: Re: Global Media Blackout On Pentagon Missile Video 06 Dec 2006 03:05:03 AM
ha escrito:

I wonder why there seems to be a global media blackout on the new
pentagon video:

http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2006/041206Doubletree.htm

*********************************************
The video quality is poor, the camera is away from the pentagon and
between the camera and the pentagon there's a highway...and EVEN then
that video shows something that can perfectly well be an airplane
crashing there: it looks like something massive, undoubtedly not what
one could expect to be a missile, running from left to rigth just ahead
that car on the highway just before the big explosion.
Another explanation to the global media blackout of that video could be
that WE ALL are into this conspiracy against YOU...MUAHAHAHAHA!
Tonio
.

User: "BDK"

Title: Re: Global Media Blackout On Pentagon Missile Video 06 Dec 2006 02:11:51 AM
In article <1165363811.856813.310500@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com>,
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com says...

I wonder why there seems to be a global media blackout on the new
pentagon video:

http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2006/041206Doubletree.htm


Worthless video = waste of time.
Simple, like a conspirokook.
BDK
.


User: "BDK"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 11:32:35 AM
In article <1165228403.033905.254930@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>,
schoenfeld.one@gmail.com says...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm


LOL, hilarious.
BDK
.

User: "Barrys Leftnut"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 06:02:46 PM
On 2006-12-04 05:33:23 -0500,
said:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm

The video sucks out loud and shows virtually nothing. I agree and
believe a plane hit it and not a missle as a few assclowns like to
insist on. That video is just plane *****.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 04 Dec 2006 08:12:34 PM
Barry's Leftnut wrote:

On 2006-12-04 05:33:23 -0500,

said:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm



The video sucks out loud and shows virtually nothing. I agree and
believe a plane hit it and not a missle as a few assclowns like to
insist on. That video is just plane *****.

That is a hallmark of propaganda disinfo videos. They are crap
resolution etc. So there is no clear image. Witness the later "bin
laden" videos. The early real bin laden vids were crystal clear. The
later fake bin laden vids were so out of focus, dark, poor quality you
couldn't really tell who it was.
Same with the pentagon vids, it's bad enough to be inconclusive, which
is entirely by design.
.
User: "Bob Cain"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 05 Dec 2006 03:36:32 AM
wrote:

That is a hallmark of propaganda disinfo videos. They are crap
resolution etc. So there is no clear image. Witness the later "bin
laden" videos. The early real bin laden vids were crystal clear. The
later fake bin laden vids were so out of focus, dark, poor quality you
couldn't really tell who it was.

Bin Laden was buried (dead or alive) by a random hit at Tora Bora in
December '03. His body is under enough rock that what's left of it
will show up again in geological time.
Bush and his handlers know that, which is why they quit giving a rat's
***** about finding Bin Laden almost immediately after the Tora Bora
"campaign."
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler."
A. Einstein
.
User: "BDK"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 05 Dec 2006 12:33:10 PM
In article <GNadncSz6sI0oOjYnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
arcane@arcanemethods.com says...

hatmon76@yahoo.com wrote:

That is a hallmark of propaganda disinfo videos. They are crap
resolution etc. So there is no clear image. Witness the later "bin
laden" videos. The early real bin laden vids were crystal clear. The
later fake bin laden vids were so out of focus, dark, poor quality you
couldn't really tell who it was.


Bin Laden was buried (dead or alive) by a random hit at Tora Bora in
December '03. His body is under enough rock that what's left of it
will show up again in geological time.

Bush and his handlers know that, which is why they quit giving a rat's
***** about finding Bin Laden almost immediately after the Tora Bora
"campaign."


Bob

Didn't I watch you on CNN?
BDK
.
User: "Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 05 Dec 2006 07:54:29 PM
no, it was CSPAN,
where I said we were actually trying to land
in the pentagonal courtyard;
I really got all scratched up!

Didn't I watch you on CNN?

thus:
I'd start with the similarity of ABC with AFB.

( http://myhome.hanafos.com/~freeasbird/usenet4.jpg )

--fernmania!
.
User: "BDK"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 06 Dec 2006 02:08:31 AM
In article <1165370069.590234.140830@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
QncyMI@netscape.net says...

no, it was CSPAN,
where I said we were actually trying to land
in the pentagonal courtyard;
I really got all scratched up!

Didn't I watch you on CNN?


thus:
I'd start with the similarity of ABC with AFB.

( http://myhome.hanafos.com/~freeasbird/usenet4.jpg )


--fernmania!


No it was at the races! Sunday! Sunday!
http://www.motorsportunderground.com/NE%20Match%20Racing/NE%20scrap%
20book/New%20England%20Scrapbook%20page%209.htm
Yeah, that was it!
BDK
.




User: "BDK"

Title: Re: New Pentagon Video Shows Missile On 9/11 05 Dec 2006 12:30:57 AM
In article <1165284754.897769.178560@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
hatmon76@yahoo.com says...


Barry's Leftnut wrote:

On 2006-12-04 05:33:23 -0500,

said:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/031206video.htm



The video sucks out loud and shows virtually nothing. I agree and
believe a plane hit it and not a missle as a few assclowns like to
insist on. That video is just plane *****.


That is a hallmark of propaganda disinfo videos. They are crap
resolution etc. So there is no clear image. Witness the later "bin
laden" videos. The early real bin laden vids were crystal clear. The
later fake bin laden vids were so out of focus, dark, poor quality you
couldn't really tell who it was.

Same with the pentagon vids, it's bad enough to be inconclusive, which
is entirely by design.


Yes, yes, it all fits doesn't it? All inside that little empty head of
yours.
You'll do anything to try to make the pieces of the "puzzle" form the
picture you're insanely insisting shows 911 was a government plot.
Keep trying, we "shills" will keep laughing.
Like your friends and family does behind your back. Ask them.
LOL.
BDK
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER