On Mar 27, 10:32 am, "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondoug...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

On Mar 27, 9:59 am, "LeoV...@gmail.com" <LeoV...@gmail.com> wrote:

New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical
challenge
New Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider experiment and a Mathematical
challenge to translate a new geometrical (Polar Ring) system for magic
numbered nuclei, into one formula.
If we imagine the magic numbered nuclei to have not only a symmetrical
shell structure of the nucleon distribution, but also a symmetrical
ring structure around a polar axis of nucleons,
THEN new possibilities to do experiments and math arise.

See:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/03/new-math-needed-for-...

NEW EXPERIMENT:
A Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider ( like Brookhaven's RHIC) should be
able to show traces of this structure, if they are smashing Gold
nuclei or other atom nuclei with different spin directions together.
As an example: if both nuclear spin states of opposite coming nuclei,
are perpendicular oriented to the axis of motion, with a rotation
possibility relative to each other, then perpendicular relative spin
state will produce maximum debri products because of the statistical
chance to be hit.

A magnet to cause the solved spin state for the heavy atom was to be
theorectically systematized. SO success was guarantted.

A theory to make all spin conservation a method of measure then
required the spin as sysyem to occur! A litteral spin assigned to the
laboratory system was the method. So polar ring as a design to see
spin of the ENTIRE system? If I understand the problem here is a good
avenue to attack:

All detection as arrays must be a transformed energy deposition. Have
detection be conservation. A signal interaction then requires all
particles to be see, or the data is thrown out.

Sso the basic liquid tank detector allows all interaction. And choice
of interaction and detection interaction then becomes an issue. A
heavy fragment interaction is always radiative, not quanta.

SO how to infer spin from radiative energy transfer becomes the BIG
issue.
And of course a new magnet is required to alter the spin before
coincidence detection in the liquid.

So place magnets at entry portals to the tanks. ANd all spin is
altered to the correct one! Causing a selected laboratory spin!

Select as detection, is a basic rule to follow. A magnet as the
device to cause heavy ion spin appeared one day. I was reading way
back about Rutherford cable system. A complex testing was to allow
certain spin as direct vector assignment. Rather than accelerate a
mode of usage was to allow direct vector path alteration. So as a
hint of avenue. Modify the Rutherford Cable accelerator.

A phasing? of coil current causes a misalignment. SO a poorly phased?
coil is a spin vector device!

It is like your double Stern-Gerlach spin system. Cause the two
beams. Except the electornmagnetic of S-G was not found suitable
because of the mass difference most likely.

Think MISPHASED /MISALIGNED Rutherford Cable elements.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It was really strange, ALL the phase of current in the Rutherford
coils was to cause spin solution to your exact problem.- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven -

- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven -