| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
30 May 2007 03:16:12 PM |
| Object: |
NIST Neutrons and Z-Liquid Drop Theory |
Liquid-Drop as the model denotes a mass without mulitple energy state
levels. A single energy level is the quanta and the nuclues denotes a
kind of quanta.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/liqdrop.html
Listen. Nuclear theory is all rather binding energy effected right.
Why was the nucleus so caused?
Does it take a rocket scientist to infer the neutron standard as the
cause of binding energy. Is it correct or is it a security system? It
is admitted to only 9% absolute accuracy.
So why do people quote binding energy without error bars? A bad habit
is the nuclear data system and the absense of error bars was to be
understood. It is a laughable security system.
A term absolute calibration is defined differently in the nuclear
standards business. It actually means a relative size concerned with
NBS-1. A fifty year out of calibration standard. It is a secuirty
system so nobody wants it examined closely. Maybe go to Sandia for
quicker calibrations.
A standard was to be a relative error in all binding energy, but it is
not present for security reasons.
A 1% error relative to NBS-1 is quoted.
When I last looked all the equipment was sitting on the NIST loading
Dock. 2 tons of special shielding to make an elaborate detector for
true absolute calibration. NIST must loose the old relation with
nuclear security and walk into the modlern era. A brand new free and
open standard is to be the new age.
It would cost a researcher $40K to calibrate a single neutron
standard. That is how hard it is to do in an absolute fashion without
relative source strength as the reference. So the system is no hidden
it is open knowledge all over the place.
Liquid drop energy was discusses here and the Z as the theory was
commonly hidden as a theory in the old classified system. The new age
is here and open discourse in binding free quanta is arriving. To
calculate binding using Z? It is almost an insult.
.
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|