Science > Physics > Nomination - George E Hammond for Red King's Rook's Pawn {Kook Chess Set}
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Sean Monaghan" |
| Date: |
14 Oct 2005 02:10:23 PM |
| Object: |
Nomination - George E Hammond for Red King's Rook's Pawn {Kook Chess Set} |
I wonder how well a classical science-kook like George Hammond would
fair in an election against a stalking buzz-lamer like Fly Cooter.
Shall we find out?
I hereby nominate George E Hammond to represent the Red King's Rook's
Pawn in the Kook Chess Set.
Seconds, anyone?
--
Kook Chess Set nominations and rules -
http://www.petitmorte.net/sean/chess
.
|
|
| User: "PJR" |
|
| Title: Re: Nomination - George E Hammond for Red King's Rook's Pawn {Kook Chess Set} |
14 Oct 2005 03:28:17 PM |
|
|
On 14 Oct 2005 19:10:23 GMT, Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote
in alt.usenet.kooks:
I wonder how well a classical science-kook like George Hammond would
fair in an election against a stalking buzz-lamer like Fly Cooter.
Shall we find out?
I hereby nominate George E Hammond to represent the Red King's Rook's
Pawn in the Kook Chess Set.
Seconds, anyone?
Seconded.
Btw, I also seconded Colin James III for Red King's Bishop, but my
second isn't litsed on teh website:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/946708f73e984227
PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
<http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Ralph" |
|
| Title: Re: Nomination - George E Hammond for Red King's Rook's Pawn {Kook Chess Set} |
14 Oct 2005 06:42:16 PM |
|
|
"PJR" <pjr@NOSPAMkookbusters.org> wrote in message
news:slrndl0591.gh2.pjr@nntp.petitmorte.net...
On 14 Oct 2005 19:10:23 GMT, Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote
in alt.usenet.kooks:
I wonder how well a classical science-kook like George Hammond would
fair in an election against a stalking buzz-lamer like Fly Cooter.
Shall we find out?
I hereby nominate George E Hammond to represent the Red King's Rook's
Pawn in the Kook Chess Set.
Seconds, anyone?
Seconded.
Objection.
Giving even the most derisory form of honourific only
encourages more idiocy.
sr
Btw, I also seconded Colin James III for Red King's Bishop, but my
second isn't litsed on teh website:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/946708f73e984227
PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
<http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/>
.
|
|
|
| User: "PJR" |
|
| Title: Re: Nomination - George E Hammond for Red King's Rook's Pawn {Kook Chess Set} |
14 Oct 2005 06:58:36 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:42:16 +0100, Steve Ralph
<steve@steveralph.f9.co.uk> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
"PJR" <pjr@NOSPAMkookbusters.org> wrote in message
news:slrndl0591.gh2.pjr@nntp.petitmorte.net...
On 14 Oct 2005 19:10:23 GMT, Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote
in alt.usenet.kooks:
I wonder how well a classical science-kook like George Hammond would
fair in an election against a stalking buzz-lamer like Fly Cooter.
Shall we find out?
I hereby nominate George E Hammond to represent the Red King's Rook's
Pawn in the Kook Chess Set.
Seconds, anyone?
Seconded.
Objection.
Giving even the most derisory form of honourific only
encourages more idiocy.
Here in AUK, we *want* [Hammond] to post more idiocy. Idiocy is what
we enjoy.
PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
<http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
