Science > Physics > NOMINATION: "Uncle" Alan Schwartz for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Nth Complexity" |
| Date: |
25 Jun 2005 02:32:14 PM |
| Object: |
NOMINATION: "Uncle" Alan Schwartz for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award |
Uncle Al wrote:
Nth Complexity wrote:
Bill Hobba wrote:
[snip]
cirejcon:
[snip]
Bill Hobba:
[snip]
Start out with the objects at distance x.
Then wait a time t.
During this time:
The object on the left moves to the right a distance .9 c t.
The object on the right moves to the left a distance .9 c t.
Once again, all of these statements are based on my frame of reference.
Now we use some simple geometry, Bill. I hope this isn't too hard for
you eh!
Label the original location of the left object A. Label its new
location B.
Label the original location of the right object D. Label its new
location C.
I hope it isn't too hard for you to see that B is to the right of A,
and C is to the left of D. And assuming the objects have not yet
passed each other, B is to the left of C.
The order of the points from left to right is A, B, C, D.
We have AB = .9 c t.
We have CD = .9 c t.
We have AD = x.
We have AB + BC + CD = AD.
We have .9 c t + BC + .9 c t = x.
We have BC + .9 c t + .9 c t = x.
We have BC + (.9 + .9) c t = x.
We have BC + 1.8 c t = x.
We have BC + 1.8 c t - 1.8 c t = x - 1.8 c t.
We have BC = x - 1.8 c t.
Now, Bill, the decrease in the distance between the objects is the
original distance between them minus the new distance between them.
Decrease = AD - BC = x - (x - 1.8 c t) = x - x + 1.8 c t = 1.8 c t
The rate of decrease in the distance between the objects is, for a
constant rate of decrease, the amount of decrease divided by the time.
Rate of Decrease = Decrease / t = 1.8 c t / t = 1.8 c.
Notice that all of this was in my frame of reference. The Lorentz
transformations apply to transforming (duh) between different frames of
reference. Since we never did that, the Lorentz transformations do not
apply.
If you have been enlightened enough to make a stab at understanding
when to use the Lorentz transformations, you can read jc's post again:
[snip]
Hopeless idiot. Nothing is moving transluminally. Each relativistic
frame vs. you as observer sees the other two moving according to
Special Relativity... AND SO DO YOU, IDIOT:
Given any achievable velocities V1 and V2 and any finite lightspeed,
the bound on the relative velocities of V1 and V2 as viewed by any
inertial observer cannot exceed
(V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]
This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of
motion. For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta, Jackson gives
u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))
<http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/~souther/waves02/feb0402/sld011.htm>
The universe is not Galilean or Newtonian, idiot. You don't see what
you claim to "see." There are no privileged observers - time,
distance, mass - in a relativistic universe. You should be diddling
projections of hyperbolic rotations not grade school algebra.
"Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
Do you have three grandfathers?
[Note: It is worth remembering that Schwartz used to ask people, "Do
you have two grandfathers?"]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
Bill Hobba has withdrawn his statements which led to me nominating him
for the "Weird Science" award, so it is appropriate for me to withdraw
my nomination as well. But Schwartz has repeated the absurdities.
This alone should qualify him for the award, but he has plenty of other
gems as well. Here's one of his best scientific ones:
Uncle Al wrote:
TheFerryman wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that velocity and acceleration are vector
quantities?
Both quantities contain both direction and magnitude. They are
vectors.
<html>
<HEAD><TITLE>The Time Derivatives of Distance</TITLE></HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm -->
<DIV ALIGN="center">
<TABLE BORDER="1" BORDERCOLOR="black" RULES="all" FRAME="box">
<caption><B>The Time Derivatives of Distance</B></caption>
<tr>
<th>Derivative</th><th>Name</th><th>times Mass</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<TD COLSPAN="3"></TD>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>0th</td><td>position</td><td>mass</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>1st</td><td>velocity</td><td>momentum</td>
</tr>
<tr align=center>
<td>2nd</td><td>acceleration</td><td>force</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td >3rd</td><td>jerk</td><td>yank</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>4th</td><td>snap</td><td>tug</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>5th</td><td>crackle</td><td>snatch</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>6th</td><td>pop</td><td>shake</td>
</tr>
</table>
</DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
When the obvious error was pointed out to him, Schwartz replied, "The
table is correct as stated, you hopeless jackass."
--
Sent by whooptydoodydo from yahoo subpart from com
This is a spam protected message. Please answer with reference header.
Posted via http://www.usenet-replayer.com
.
|
|
| User: "Bill Hobba" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: "Uncle" Alan Schwartz for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award |
25 Jun 2005 08:03:47 PM |
|
|
"Nth Complexity" <u135925292@spawnkill.ip-mobilphone.net> wrote in message
news:l.1119727934.1397521972@[82.96.100.100]...
Uncle Al wrote:
Nth Complexity wrote:
Bill Hobba wrote:
[snip]
cirejcon:
[snip]
Bill Hobba:
[snip]
Start out with the objects at distance x.
Then wait a time t.
During this time:
The object on the left moves to the right a distance .9 c t.
The object on the right moves to the left a distance .9 c t.
Once again, all of these statements are based on my frame of
reference.
Now we use some simple geometry, Bill. I hope this isn't too hard for
you eh!
Label the original location of the left object A. Label its new
location B.
Label the original location of the right object D. Label its new
location C.
I hope it isn't too hard for you to see that B is to the right of A,
and C is to the left of D. And assuming the objects have not yet
passed each other, B is to the left of C.
The order of the points from left to right is A, B, C, D.
We have AB = .9 c t.
We have CD = .9 c t.
We have AD = x.
We have AB + BC + CD = AD.
We have .9 c t + BC + .9 c t = x.
We have BC + .9 c t + .9 c t = x.
We have BC + (.9 + .9) c t = x.
We have BC + 1.8 c t = x.
We have BC + 1.8 c t - 1.8 c t = x - 1.8 c t.
We have BC = x - 1.8 c t.
Now, Bill, the decrease in the distance between the objects is the
original distance between them minus the new distance between them.
Decrease = AD - BC = x - (x - 1.8 c t) = x - x + 1.8 c t = 1.8 c t
The rate of decrease in the distance between the objects is, for a
constant rate of decrease, the amount of decrease divided by the time.
Rate of Decrease = Decrease / t = 1.8 c t / t = 1.8 c.
Notice that all of this was in my frame of reference. The Lorentz
transformations apply to transforming (duh) between different frames
of
reference. Since we never did that, the Lorentz transformations do
not
apply.
If you have been enlightened enough to make a stab at understanding
when to use the Lorentz transformations, you can read jc's post again:
[snip]
Hopeless idiot. Nothing is moving transluminally. Each relativistic
frame vs. you as observer sees the other two moving according to
Special Relativity... AND SO DO YOU, IDIOT:
Given any achievable velocities V1 and V2 and any finite lightspeed,
the bound on the relative velocities of V1 and V2 as viewed by any
inertial observer cannot exceed
(V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]
This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of
motion. For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta, Jackson gives
u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))
<http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/~souther/waves02/feb0402/sld011.htm>
The universe is not Galilean or Newtonian, idiot. You don't see what
you claim to "see." There are no privileged observers - time,
distance, mass - in a relativistic universe. You should be diddling
projections of hyperbolic rotations not grade school algebra.
"Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
Do you have three grandfathers?
[Note: It is worth remembering that Schwartz used to ask people, "Do
you have two grandfathers?"]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
Bill Hobba has withdrawn his statements which led to me nominating him
for the "Weird Science" award, so it is appropriate for me to withdraw
my nomination as well. But Schwartz has repeated the absurdities.
This alone should qualify him for the award, but he has plenty of other
gems as well. Here's one of his best scientific ones:
Uncle Al has said nothing untrue. He made it quite clear he was not
considering closing velocity - something of dubious physicality in the sense
of being able transfer information or energy. My mistake was in not reading
carefully enough what JC said - which I should have done. I should also
have twigged something was amiss because I know JC to be a reputable poster
unlikely to post distortions.
Rest of rant snipped.
Bill
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: "Uncle" Alan Schwartz for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award |
25 Jun 2005 03:49:59 PM |
|
|
In article <l.1119727934.1397521972@[82.96.100.100]>,
(Nth Complexity) posted:
Uncle Al wrote:
Nth Complexity wrote:
Bill Hobba wrote:
[snip]
cirejcon:
[snip]
Bill Hobba:
[snip]
Start out with the objects at distance x.
Then wait a time t.
During this time:
The object on the left moves to the right a distance .9 c t.
The object on the right moves to the left a distance .9 c t.
Once again, all of these statements are based on my frame of reference.
Now we use some simple geometry, Bill. I hope this isn't too hard for
you eh!
Label the original location of the left object A. Label its new
location B.
Label the original location of the right object D. Label its new
location C.
I hope it isn't too hard for you to see that B is to the right of A,
and C is to the left of D. And assuming the objects have not yet
passed each other, B is to the left of C.
The order of the points from left to right is A, B, C, D.
We have AB = .9 c t.
We have CD = .9 c t.
We have AD = x.
We have AB + BC + CD = AD.
We have .9 c t + BC + .9 c t = x.
We have BC + .9 c t + .9 c t = x.
We have BC + (.9 + .9) c t = x.
We have BC + 1.8 c t = x.
We have BC + 1.8 c t - 1.8 c t = x - 1.8 c t.
We have BC = x - 1.8 c t.
Now, Bill, the decrease in the distance between the objects is the
original distance between them minus the new distance between them.
Decrease = AD - BC = x - (x - 1.8 c t) = x - x + 1.8 c t = 1.8 c t
The rate of decrease in the distance between the objects is, for a
constant rate of decrease, the amount of decrease divided by the time.
Rate of Decrease = Decrease / t = 1.8 c t / t = 1.8 c.
Notice that all of this was in my frame of reference. The Lorentz
transformations apply to transforming (duh) between different frames of
reference. Since we never did that, the Lorentz transformations do not
apply.
If you have been enlightened enough to make a stab at understanding
when to use the Lorentz transformations, you can read jc's post again:
[snip]
Hopeless idiot. Nothing is moving transluminally. Each relativistic
frame vs. you as observer sees the other two moving according to
Special Relativity... AND SO DO YOU, IDIOT:
Given any achievable velocities V1 and V2 and any finite lightspeed,
the bound on the relative velocities of V1 and V2 as viewed by any
inertial observer cannot exceed
(V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]
This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of
motion. For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta, Jackson gives
u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))
<http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/~souther/waves02/feb0402/sld011.htm>
The universe is not Galilean or Newtonian, idiot. You don't see what
you claim to "see." There are no privileged observers - time,
distance, mass - in a relativistic universe. You should be diddling
projections of hyperbolic rotations not grade school algebra.
"Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
Do you have three grandfathers?
[Note: It is worth remembering that Schwartz used to ask people, "Do
you have two grandfathers?"]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
Bill Hobba has withdrawn his statements which led to me nominating him
for the "Weird Science" award, so it is appropriate for me to withdraw
my nomination as well. But Schwartz has repeated the absurdities.
This alone should qualify him for the award, but he has plenty of other
gems as well. Here's one of his best scientific ones:
Uncle Al wrote:
TheFerryman wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that velocity and acceleration are vector
quantities?
Both quantities contain both direction and magnitude. They are
vectors.
<html>
<HEAD><TITLE>The Time Derivatives of Distance</TITLE></HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm -->
<DIV ALIGN="center">
<TABLE BORDER="1" BORDERCOLOR="black" RULES="all" FRAME="box">
<caption><B>The Time Derivatives of Distance</B></caption>
<tr>
<th>Derivative</th><th>Name</th><th>times Mass</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<TD COLSPAN="3"></TD>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>0th</td><td>position</td><td>mass</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>1st</td><td>velocity</td><td>momentum</td>
</tr>
<tr align=center>
<td>2nd</td><td>acceleration</td><td>force</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td >3rd</td><td>jerk</td><td>yank</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>4th</td><td>snap</td><td>tug</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>5th</td><td>crackle</td><td>snatch</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>6th</td><td>pop</td><td>shake</td>
</tr>
</table>
</DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
When the obvious error was pointed out to him, Schwartz replied, "The
table is correct as stated, you hopeless jackass."
How about nominating Schwartz for the "SCUM OF THE NET AWARD"?
ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ "Uncle Al" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> (Was: Re: MODERN SCIENCE ALIEN TO BRIT)
In article <42B3394D.43E84531@hate.spam.net>,
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> posted:
***** you, ... STAY OUT OF SCI.CHEM AND SCI.PHYSICS
NET ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ "Uncle Al" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>
In article <rLtme.1514642$6l.199436@pd7tw2no>,
"Jess" <djmsux@hotmail.com> posted:
[...]
PROFILE OF NET ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>
There's more information about Alan Schwartz
in the public archives at:
http://tinyurl.com/5qjmw
[ Subject: Profile: Schwartz, Alan
[ From:
[ Newsgroups: sci.physics
[ Date: 21 Mar 2004 13:34:46 -0800
[ Message-ID: <b31a8173.0403211334.25f9abc5@posting.google.com>
[ NNTP-Posting-Host: 61.11.26.150
[ X-Trace: posting.google.com 1079904887 30505 127.0.0.1
[ (21 Mar 2004 21:34:47 GMT)
[ NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC)
[
[
[ Name: Schwartz, Alan
[ Country: USA
[ Residential Address: SANTA ANA, CA 92705
[ Map: http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?country=US&countryid=250&addtohistory=&address=&city=SANTA+ANA&state=CA&zipcode=92705&submit=Get+Map
[ Postal Address:
[ Alan Schwartz
[ 49 Fabriano
[ P.O. Box 005
[ Irvine, CA 92620-2525
[ E-mail(s): uncleal0@ix.netcom.com,
[ Tel: 714-771-2526 (+1 714 771 2526 for international callers)
[ Spouse: Jackie Schwartz
[ Spouse Occupation: Para-legal
[ Spouse workplace: <pending disclosure>
[
[ ISP: http://www.earthlink.net
[ Email: http://support.earthlink.net/support/MYACCT/forms/csform.jsp
End of forwarded message from
http://tinyurl.com/5qjmw
Or,
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b31a8173.0403211334.25f9abc5%40posting.google.com&output=gplain
In article <43d9f575.0408101155.15fe136e@posting.google.com>,
posted:
EXPOSED - Lying scum and stalker 'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz"
<uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>
How to handle stalkers and
'Uncle Al' aka "Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>
[ Subject: How to handle stalkers and Uncle Al
[ From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutoniu@willinet.net>
[ Newsgroups: sci.chem,sci.physics,sci.archaeology
[ Message-ID: <3A6128B1.7ED158B6@willinet.net>
[ Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001
[
[
[ Ryan Doherty wrote:
[
[ > Uncle Al (24.16.181.181),
[ >
[ > I am consider this message of yours SPAM, so please
[ > keep your childish postings to yourself!
[ > By the way, Grow up.. you are wasting more bandwidth
[ > with your repeated responces that Archimedes and his
[ > questions!
[ >
[ > Ryan
[
[ > Ryan, you are talking to a fence post when you talk to
[ > Uncle Al. He and his motley crew of cohorts have stalked
[ > me for years. In fact they have stalked me nonstop for 7
[ > years now.
[ >
[ > Uncle Al feels he is a police cop of sci.chem and
[ > sci.physics and wants to chase out any poster he does not
[ > like. Many chemistry professors have put Al Schwartz into
[ > their killfile. That is about the only real solution.
[ >
[ > Some say Al Schwartz is a failed chemistry professor of
[ > 80s in age living in Tallahassee Florida or Denton Texas.
[ > He is old, cranky with nothing to do but post to the
[ > Internet. He feels a righteous duty to stalk me. No
[ > matter if I post pure chemistry to sci. chem or pure
[ > physics to sci.physics, Uncle Al feels that none of my
[ > posts belongs to those newsgroups.
[ >
[ > He has set himself up as a self righteous self imposed
[ > police cop of sci.chem.
[ >
[ > Many other people have complained about Uncle Al in sci.
[ > chem.
[ >
[ > SOLUTION: the only solution that I can see is to killfile
[ > Uncle Al and all Al supporters. And to add sci.chem and
[ > sci.physics to all of your posts to the Internet. Let
[ > Uncle Al stalk you everywhere, not just sci. chem or sci
[ > physics. Make it so that everyday Uncle Al wakes up, his
[ > chores and work are to stalk people on the Internet. Make
[ > it such that the essence of life for Uncle Al will now be
[ > to stalk 1 or 3 or 20 or 117 people every day.
[ >
[ > So, I am asking of all those people on the Internet who
[ > have been attacked by Uncle Al, to give Uncle Al what he
[ > craves. Add sci.chem and sci.physics to all of your
[ > Internet posts. And killfile Uncle Al.
[ >
[ > Uncle Al is already a crackpot and is insane, but drive
[ > him wildly insane.
[ >
[ > Force him to waste minutes and hours every day of his
[ > life stalking you.
[ >
[ > And you just sit back and laugh at how the idiot Uncle Al
[ > is making himself a monkey idiot.
[ >
[ > Last year someone emailed me saying that sci.chem was
[ > back to normal and that Uncle Al had been put under
[ > sedation and it was safe to post to sci.chem again.
[ > Sci.chem was flooded by outsiders because Uncle Al had
[ > pissed them off.
[ >
[ > Well, that is not the way to handle the self imposed
[ > sci.chem police dog of Uncle Al. The way to handle Uncle
[ > Al and other stalkers like him is to "killfile them" and
[ > then force them to stalk you all over the Internet. Let
[ > everyone see what a fool he is, not just sci.chem folk.
[ >
[ > I wish that someone is archiving all of the Uncle Al
[ > stalks of Archimedes Plutonium. I have him killfiled and
[ > so I have zero. But I would imagine that Uncle Al has
[ > about 500 posts per year of attacks.
[ >
[ > So, I ask everyone who knows Uncle Al, to add sci. chem
[ > to their Internet posts and to killfile Uncle Al. Let the
[ > fool make himself a larger fool.
[ >
[ > And it takes little energy for me or for you to add
[ > "sci.chem" but think of how much energy and how much rage
[ > it gives Uncle Al. Why, I just burst out into laughter at
[ > all the energy spent by Uncle Al in stalking this and
[ > other posts of mine. Uncle Al is too stupid to realize he
[ > has been defeated and that the world laughs at his cop
[ > enforcement. That method (if they have a newsgroup
[ > hangout) will deal with all stalkers of the Internet, not
[ > just Uncle Al.
End of copy
[ Subject: Re: How to handle stalker Alan 'Uncle Al' Schwartz
[ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004
In article <ZcednUDSG4Zb5NPdRVn-jg@comcast.com>,
Bill Vajk <bill9north@hotmailDITCHTHIS.com> posted:
Arindam Banerjee wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote in message
news:<Stalker-Uncle-Al-27hf3.20040308@news.mantra.com>...
In article <404D34BE.30087280@hate.spam.net>,
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> posted:
[... reference to lies and defamation...]
How to handle stalkers and "Uncle Al"
- snip -
Thanks, Jai, looks like this fellow was not worth my attention. It is
depressing to think, that those in power in the field of modern
physics are what chaps like these want to be.
Al is a chemist wannabe physicist.
Alan Schwartz has published his contact information:
Alan Schwartz
49 Fabriano
P.O. Box 005
Irvine, CA 92620-2525
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:Nu16TComWkEJ:www.mazepath.com/uncleal/advert.htm+%22Schwartz%22+%22Uncle+Al%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
and e-mail addresses:
"Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>
"Alan Schwartz" < >
- - - - -
Thanks for the warning about the modern sceintist who defends
science all the time. Uncle Al is ignored. He is the
flip side of the open thinking philosopher scinetist.
Meaning he requires litterally a falsified predicate thinking.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: IDOT TROLL JAY STEVENS for the Victor von Frankenstein"Weird Science" Award |
25 Jun 2005 04:20:17 PM |
|
|
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" wrote:
[snip troll crap]
alt.bonehead.jai-maharaj, alt.flame.jay-stevens, alt.fan.jai-maharaj,
soc.culture.indian, soc.culture.bengali, sci.astrology.hindu,
alt.jyotish, alt.religion.kibology, misc.writing.screenplays,
soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.russian, soc.culture.british,
soc.culture.european
STAY OUT OF SCI.CHEM AND SCI.PHYSICS IDIOT TROLL JAY STEVENS
<http://www.geocities.com/drjosemariachi/jay_faq.html>
Hawaii State Judiciary (corrected link - look up Jay Stevens)
<http://hoohiki2.courts.state.hi.us/jud/Hoohiki/main.htm>
3:30 a.m. to 12:00 midnight, Hawaii Standard Time
HoohikiHelp@courts.state.hi.us
Monkey with a keyboard idiot troll Jay Stevens. Send complaints plus
attach abusive posts to his ISP.
Jay Stevens is not merely an offensive laughingstock, he has been a
stinking ulcerous rotting Usenet wound for more than a decade. 13,900
posts on the subject and every one of them labels Jay Stevens as a
loathsome *****. Put a plug in it. Forward each of his posts to
his ISP with a complaint.
Still the lying coward, Stevens? Still fancy yourself an East Indian,
Stevens? Your "doctorate" came from a diploma mill - and you were
overcharged. Hey stoooopid, why do you troll your own idiot
newsgroup? There is nothing about you except stooopidity, lies, and
hate.
<http://www.diabetes-forums.com/diabetes/Jay_Stevens_aka_Jai_Maharaj_attacks_Beav__nothing_to_do_with_Dennis_Fetters_231640.html>
Jay Stevens (Jai Mirage, Jai Maharaj) is one of the founding officers
(the other being Joan Miller) of Mantra Corporation, which was
incorporated in Hawaii on November 30, 1990 issued 1000 shares. It's
an astrology scam masquerading as a business consulting and marketing
outfit, with 2 shareholders.
His business phone was (808) 948-4357; and his residence was in
Honolulu, zip code 96817, at 51 Coelho Way, HI phone (808) 595-3947
and -4913.
http://www.geocities.com/drjosemariachi/jay_faq.html
Troll FAQ for Jai Maharaj. His given name is "Jay Stevens"
http://www.cyclingforums.com/archive/index.php/t-55527.html
http://www.lart.com/auk/whiners.html
Kook of the Month for June 1995. His crap must be ended.
news:alt.bonehead.jay-stevens
news:alt.flame.jay-stevens
http://mathquest.com/discuss/sci.math/a/m/387192/387198
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/minifaqs/jai.maharaj.miniFAQ
http://members.tripod.com/sid_e_slicker/india10.html
http://jaimahaaraj.reallysuckass.com/index.html
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=%22Jay+Stevens%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=22&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2000&selm=890778936.233210%40iris.nyx.net&rnum=1>
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=%22Jay+Stevens%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=22&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2000&selm=6ciuj3%24k36%40ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca&rnum=2>
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=%22Jay+Stevens%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=22&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2000&selm=68q17c%24jd8%40ds2.acs.ucalgary.ca&rnum=4>
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=%22Jay+Stevens%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=22&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2000&selm=888583780.260944%40iris.nyx.net&rnum=5>
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=%22Jay+Stevens%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=22&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2000&selm=jjos001-1208972010450001%40uglc5.cs.auckland.ac.nz&rnum=10>
<http://www.google.com/groups?q=%22Jay+Stevens%22&hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&as_drrb=b&as_mind=12&as_minm=5&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=22&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2000&selm=jjos001-2510961330310001%40news.cs.auckland.ac.nz&rnum=11>
Registrant:
Mantra Corporation (MANTRA-DOM)
P. O. Box 1919
Honolulu
HI,96792-6919
US
1-808-521-8808
Record Type: Master Name for a Domestic Profit Corporation
File Number: 82087
D1 Status: Active
Place Incorporated: Hawaii UNITED STATES
Incorporation Date: 11/30/1990
Domain Name: MANTRA.COM
Administrative Contact:
Maharaj, Jai (JM225)
(808) 581-8808
IP Address 206.126.0.13 [flex.com]
Technical Contact:
Wong, Delgory K. (DW403)
FlexNet Inc.
P.O.Box 22481
HONOLULU, HI 96822-2481
US
(808) 539-3790 (808) 539-3793
Information Network 808.732.8849 HAWAII
Email:
IP Address: 199.201.240.1
hindu.org Himalayan Academy
107 Kaholalele Road
Kapaa, HI 11111 US
IP Address 64.75.159.118
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila the Bum" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: "Uncle" Alan Schwartz for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award |
25 Jun 2005 03:57:34 PM |
|
|
Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
In article <l.1119727934.1397521972@[82.96.100.100]>,
u135925292@spawnkill.ip-mobilphone.net (Nth Complexity) posted:
IMHO, the naughty boy is simply jealous.
Now, how to rid the group of it?
Atty
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cnctut" |
|
| Title: Re: NOMINATION: "Uncle" Alan Schwartz for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award |
25 Jun 2005 05:32:51 PM |
|
|
Nth Complexity wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
Nth Complexity wrote:
Bill Hobba wrote:
[snip]
cirejcon:
[snip]
Bill Hobba:
[snip]
Start out with the objects at distance x.
Then wait a time t.
During this time:
The object on the left moves to the right a distance .9 c t.
The object on the right moves to the left a distance .9 c t.
Once again, all of these statements are based on my frame of reference.
Now we use some simple geometry, Bill. I hope this isn't too hard for
you eh!
Label the original location of the left object A. Label its new
location B.
Label the original location of the right object D. Label its new
location C.
I hope it isn't too hard for you to see that B is to the right of A,
and C is to the left of D. And assuming the objects have not yet
passed each other, B is to the left of C.
The order of the points from left to right is A, B, C, D.
We have AB = .9 c t.
We have CD = .9 c t.
We have AD = x.
We have AB + BC + CD = AD.
We have .9 c t + BC + .9 c t = x.
We have BC + .9 c t + .9 c t = x.
We have BC + (.9 + .9) c t = x.
We have BC + 1.8 c t = x.
We have BC + 1.8 c t - 1.8 c t = x - 1.8 c t.
We have BC = x - 1.8 c t.
Now, Bill, the decrease in the distance between the objects is the
original distance between them minus the new distance between them.
Decrease = AD - BC = x - (x - 1.8 c t) = x - x + 1.8 c t = 1.8 c t
The rate of decrease in the distance between the objects is, for a
constant rate of decrease, the amount of decrease divided by the time.
Rate of Decrease = Decrease / t = 1.8 c t / t = 1.8 c.
Notice that all of this was in my frame of reference. The Lorentz
transformations apply to transforming (duh) between different frames of
reference. Since we never did that, the Lorentz transformations do not
apply.
If you have been enlightened enough to make a stab at understanding
when to use the Lorentz transformations, you can read jc's post again:
[snip]
Hopeless idiot. Nothing is moving transluminally. Each relativistic
frame vs. you as observer sees the other two moving according to
Special Relativity... AND SO DO YOU, IDIOT:
Given any achievable velocities V1 and V2 and any finite lightspeed,
the bound on the relative velocities of V1 and V2 as viewed by any
inertial observer cannot exceed
(V1 + V2)/[1 +(V1)(V2)/c^2]
This is transformation of velocities parallel to the direction of
motion. For velocities at an arbitrary angle theta, Jackson gives
u_parallel = (u'_parallel + v)/(1+(v dot u')/c^2)
u_perp = u'_perp/(gamma_v(1+(v dot u')/c^2))
<http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/~souther/waves02/feb0402/sld011.htm>
The universe is not Galilean or Newtonian, idiot. You don't see what
you claim to "see." There are no privileged observers - time,
distance, mass - in a relativistic universe. You should be diddling
projections of hyperbolic rotations not grade school algebra.
"Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
Do you have three grandfathers?
[Note: It is worth remembering that Schwartz used to ask people, "Do
you have two grandfathers?"]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
Bill Hobba has withdrawn his statements which led to me nominating him
for the "Weird Science" award, so it is appropriate for me to withdraw
my nomination as well. But Schwartz has repeated the absurdities.
This alone should qualify him for the award, but he has plenty of other
gems as well. Here's one of his best scientific ones:
Uncle Al wrote:
TheFerryman wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that velocity and acceleration are vector
quantities?
Both quantities contain both direction and magnitude. They are
vectors.
<html>
<HEAD><TITLE>The Time Derivatives of Distance</TITLE></HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm -->
<DIV ALIGN="center">
<TABLE BORDER="1" BORDERCOLOR="black" RULES="all" FRAME="box">
<caption><B>The Time Derivatives of Distance</B></caption>
<tr>
<th>Derivative</th><th>Name</th><th>times Mass</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<TD COLSPAN="3"></TD>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>0th</td><td>position</td><td>mass</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>1st</td><td>velocity</td><td>momentum</td>
</tr>
<tr align=center>
<td>2nd</td><td>acceleration</td><td>force</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td >3rd</td><td>jerk</td><td>yank</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>4th</td><td>snap</td><td>tug</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>5th</td><td>crackle</td><td>snatch</td>
</tr>
<tr align="center">
<td>6th</td><td>pop</td><td>shake</td>
</tr>
</table>
</DIV>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
When the obvious error was pointed out to him, Schwartz replied, "The
table is correct as stated, you hopeless jackass."
--
Sent by whooptydoodydo from yahoo subpart from com
This is a spam protected message. Please answer with reference header.
Posted via http://www.usenet-replayer.com
Nth Complexity--
Sorry, I don't agree on your nomination. As an observer, I see few, if
any, providing any "physics" solutions to problems posted. Al is one of
the few that attempts to help. Although I haven't degraded to "idiot"
calling--I can see why one might do so!
If I were to vote--TDP, Don1, Deda the "lever" and Harris the "Prime"
would be high on my list. :-))
Tut
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
