Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 25.5: Relationship to F(x, y) Inequality



 Science > Physics > Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 25.5: Relationship to F(x, y) Inequality

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 30 Apr 2006 03:31:21 AM
Object: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 25.5: Relationship to F(x, y) Inequality

From Osher Doctorow


It is well known in advanced statistics that if F(x, y) is joint
cumulative distribution function (cdf) of random variables X, Y, and if
FX(x), FY(y) are their univariate ("marginal") cdfs at x, y
respectively, then:
1) max{ FX(x) + FY(y) - 1, 0} < = F(x, y) < = min{FX(x), FY(y)}
For example, Kotz of Stanford and his colleagues have made use of this
in various papers and books.
So if FX(x) + FY(1) - 1 > = 0, then F(x, y) is related to them as
follows:
2) FX(x) + FY(y) - 1 < = F(x, y) (if left hand side is nonnegative)
The joint cdf F(x, y) and its marginals FX(x), FY(y) are fundamental to
conditional probability, Probable Influence/Causation (PI), and
Mainstream general probability-statistics regardless of explicit
conditionality or causation. So the appearance of an expression of
form:
3) FX(u) + FY(v) - 1 < = F(u, v) (if left hand side is nonnegative)
in all those branches of probability-statistics should be compared to
the three key expressions which have appeared in this thread:
4) 1 - x + y
5) x + y - xy
6) x - 1 + y
If we write x = FX(u), y = FY(v) in (3), then (3) can be written:
7) x + y - 1 < = F(u, v)
and rearranging terms:
8) x - 1 + y < = F(u, v)
So considerations of PI and conditional probability have led us to find
an underlying Mainstream probability-statistics cdf relationship to
trilinearity, bilinearity, Jacobson radicals (via star products or
circle composition products in (5) for the latter), etc., and thence to
physics and the minimal supersymmetric standard model, etc. Bilinear
and trilinear supersymmetry-breaking parameters A, B occur in the
minimal supersymmetric standard model. See for example John Ellis et
al (CERN, U. Minnesota) "Very constrained minimal supersymmetric
standard models," hep-ph/0405110 v1 12 May 2004.
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
how can Bell's inequality be violated
The Charms of Postscientism: Clausius Inequality
Bell's inequality vs. Kolmogorov inequality
Quantum Gravity 183.1: More Re Effects of Inequality Opposites on Probable Causation
Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 13: Inequality Dimensional Analysis
Quantum Gravity 183.0: Effects of Inequality Opposites on Probable Causation
Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
Simple but realistic Bell inequality calculation
Mesons violate Bell's inequality
Does anybody know a non-linearly inequality constrainted non-linear least square solver called ENLSIP?
Quantum Gravity 198.0: Information Theory Decoding Inequality
Bell's inequality too specific?
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 7: Stable Distributions Have Infinite Variance
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 9: Infinity "Finiticized" = Counting
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 13: 't Hooft and Special Functions
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER