Science > Physics > NOVA's 3 Oct06 discussion on superheavy elements with Ken Moody; Nuclear Electron Theory disputes Island of Stability
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"a_plutonium" |
| Date: |
05 Oct 2006 01:18:22 AM |
| Object: |
NOVA's 3 Oct06 discussion on superheavy elements with Ken Moody; Nuclear Electron Theory disputes Island of Stability |
There was a good discussion on NOVA this week about nucleosynthesis of
Element 114 with the progress of Ken Moody trying to attain the Seaborg
goal of reaching the Island of Stability.
This was a good 1/3 segment of a hour long program. But I think in the
future, this should be expanded into a full one hour program.
I have some errors to point out. The analogy of a bunge cord was a bad
analogy. Because it does not fit with Strong Nuclear Force and the
known fact that neutrons and protons orbit in the nucleus. And this
Nuclear-Orbit is well patterned. So if you have a well patterned
nuclear orbit of protons and neutrons, by logic, you should not use
bunge cords as an analogy to the Strong Nuclear Force.
I discovered the Nuclear-Electron Theory in the mid 1990s. Basically it
says that a Neutron is a proton and a nuclear electron which runs
around the nucleus to hold protons in place.
So instead of a bunge cord analogy. The better analogy or as far as I
am concerned, the real truth, is that when a neutron enters the
nucleus, it unleashes its nuclear-electron and this nuclear-electron
runs around and holds together all the protons in the nucleus.
The Nuclear-Electron fits together and ties together with the idea that
the neutrons and protons become patterned into Nuclear Orbits. In fact,
the Nuclear Orbits of protons is caused by the Nuclear-electrons. I
would say that if experimental physics looks closely at these Nuclear
Orbits is due to Nuclear Electrons. In other words, it is the Nuclear
Electron that causes nuclear-orbits. Just as the regular electrons
orbit a normal atom in a patterned manner and cause the electron
orbits, the nuclear-electrons with its protons and remember that all
neutrons dissolve apart into nuclear-electrons and protons when in the
nucleus.
Now, it was conveyed in this program that Moody was unable to reach the
Island of Stability but came close to it. That Element 114 like lead at
82 has these so called Magic numbers of neutrons and protons.
But what I am saying is that if you vision this in terms of Nuclear
Electrons, then there are no Islands of Stability. And that Element 114
will always be microseconds.
Each element has an upper limit of how many neutrons can be added
before that isotope becomes microseconds duration. Each element
regardless of so called magic-numbers. And the reason is that Nuclear
Electrons reach a limit of forming nuclear-orbitals. And so Element 113
and Element 115 just like Element 114 surpass the ability of
nuclear-electrons to hold together the protons and that 114 has no
Island of Stability.
There may have been a pattern for the elements from hydrogen to lead
for a Magic Number hypothesis as to extra stability, but it ended with
lead or uranium and the transuranium elements do not continue with this
extra stability. In mathematics they call it convergent up to lead or
uranium and then forever more divergent.
What I think will happen is that we are able to increase our tools to
detect ever smaller units of time. We probably have already
nucleosynthesized Elements 115 to 120 but with our crude instruments
were unable to detect it.
Another possibility of future research is to create Superheavy Elements
by increasing nuclear-electrons but not adding more protons. By adding
what I call "neutrons with an orbiting electron". There is probably a
name for this particle which I am unaware of at this moment. Unlike a
neutron which is a proton + nuclear electron, if we can somehow
increase the number of nuclear electrons into a Element 114 without
adding attendent protons, then we can increase the life-span of the
atom.
I have no proof that Island of Stability is nonexistant. But I tend to
think based on the Nuclear Electron Theory that there is no Island of
Stability.
Anyone know what a electron orbiting a neutron is called?
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: NOVA's 3 Oct06 discussion on superheavy elements with Ken Moody; Nuclear Electron Theory disputes Island of Stability |
05 Oct 2006 08:27:36 AM |
|
|
"a_plutonium" <a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160029102.771311.202230@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Anyone know what a electron orbiting a neutron is called?
Uhh...nonexistent? There is no force save gravity holding them together,
and that's far too weak, so they will both fly off into space.
Eric Lucas
.
|
|
|
| User: "Igor" |
|
| Title: Re: NOVA's 3 Oct06 discussion on superheavy elements with Ken Moody; Nuclear Electron Theory disputes Island of Stability |
05 Oct 2006 12:21:06 PM |
|
|
wrote:
"a_plutonium" <a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160029102.771311.202230@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Anyone know what a electron orbiting a neutron is called?
Uhh...nonexistent? There is no force save gravity holding them together,
and that's far too weak, so they will both fly off into space.
Eric Lucas
You must be new here. It was determined a long time ago that
Archimedes Plutonium is far denser than Osmium.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: NOVA's 3 Oct06 discussion on superheavy elements with Ken Moody; Nuclear Electron Theory disputes Island of Stability |
05 Oct 2006 03:49:30 PM |
|
|
"Igor" <thoovler@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1160068866.532843.202470@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:
"a_plutonium" <a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160029102.771311.202230@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Anyone know what a electron orbiting a neutron is called?
Uhh...nonexistent? There is no force save gravity holding them together,
and that's far too weak, so they will both fly off into space.
Eric Lucas
You must be new here.
Gosh, I've been around since 1993, and I'm still a newbie. This group is
almost as tough as breaking into society in Boston!
It was determined a long time ago that
Archimedes Plutonium is far denser than Osmium.
Sue me, I like to bait him. But how does his density compare to that of
Radium. ;^)
Eric Lucas
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: NOVA's 3 Oct06 discussion on superheavy elements with Ken Moody; Nuclear Electron Theory disputes Island of Stability |
05 Oct 2006 05:32:22 PM |
|
|
"a_plutonium" <a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160029102.771311.202230@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I have no proof that Island of Stability is nonexistant. But I tend to
think based on the Nuclear Electron Theory that there is no Island of
Stability.
if you have a theory then make the prediction and live or die on the
results, that is how science works. if you can't make the prediction then
you don't have much of a theory.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
