Optica! and Fermat.



 Science > Physics > Optica! and Fermat.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "ben ito"
Date: 18 Feb 2005 05:34:12 PM
Object: Optica! and Fermat.
3-01-05, I can prove that the wave and particle theory of light is
invalid which includes quantum mechanic wave packets and QED. The
particle theory would be Einstein's particle structure of light
derived from the probability entropy equation.
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.

User: "Franz Heymann"

Title: Re: Optica! and Fermat. 19 Feb 2005 04:38:48 AM
"ben ito" <benito20044@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:42167b74$1_2@127.0.0.1...

3-01-05, I can prove that the wave and particle theory of light is
invalid which includes quantum mechanic wave packets and QED. The
particle theory would be Einstein's particle structure of light
derived from the probability entropy equation.

That's clever. Now go to the front of the class and kiss the teacher.
--
Franz
"A first-rate laboratory is one in which mediocre scientists can
produce outstanding work"
P.M.S. Blackett
.

User: "The Ghost In The Machine"

Title: Re: Optica! and Fermat. 19 Feb 2005 12:00:03 PM
In sci.physics, ben ito
<benito20044@yahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid>
wrote
on 18 Feb 2005 17:34:12 -0600
<42167b74$1_2@127.0.0.1>:

3-01-05, I can prove that the wave and particle theory of light is
invalid which includes quantum mechanic wave packets and QED. The
particle theory would be Einstein's particle structure of light
derived from the probability entropy equation.

Do be sure to include in any such proof an explanation of
the vagaries of the Compton effect (including
relativistics) and diffraction.
I'll be eagerly awaiting your results. Well, OK, maybe
I'll await your results with some interest. Would
you believe that I'll give your results all due scrutiny,
and only if I have nothing better to do, such as
waxing my jellybean floss? :-)
[.sigsnip]
--
#191,

It's still legal to go .sigless.
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: Optica! and Fermat. 18 Feb 2005 06:11:07 PM
ben ito wrote:


3-01-05, I can prove that the wave and particle theory of light is
invalid which includes quantum mechanic wave packets and QED. The
particle theory would be Einstein's particle structure of light
derived from the probability entropy equation.

*****.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Optica!
Optica!!
#114 true proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem and the Beal Conjecture ; new textbook: "Mathematical-Physics (p-adic primer) for students of age 6 onwards"
Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) 21: How Fermat Discovered Coded Infinity in Quadrics and Conics
#6# book: "Correcting Present Day Mathematics and Setting ...."; chapter (5) proving Fermat's Last Theorem and Beal's Conjecture
Link between Fermat's Last Theorem and String theory
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 81: Sir Isaac and Leibniz Come Out Ahead of Fermat in Nonrenormalization Exponentiation
Re: Fermat's principle and curved spacetime
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 62: A Strange Aspect of Sir Isaac, Leibniz, and Fermat
Newton and Fermat Family Name "Coincidences"
Fermat's principle vs. Maxwell's equations
Russian Engineer May Have Proven Fermat's Theorem
Fermat's Last Theorem - Did It Discover Feedback?
Quantum Gravity 169.2: Fermat's Last Theorem Equation x^n + y^n = z^n In PI Phase
Fermat's Natural Spirals
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER