ahahaha... ahahaha... AHAHAHA.. so, now that all you guys
<stanlio@gmail.com>, <koobee.wublee@gmail.com> ,
<dynamics@vianet.on.ca>,& <koobee.wublee@gmail.com>
<Andreas.Most@t-online.de> etc. have even exited the mortal
Dirt van de mortel, "the third kacksacker", as he calls himself,
but who doesn't understand nil, zero & jack ***** of why you have
cooked & massaged all your "metric tensors, geodesic equations,
partial differentiation, finite apogees, Euler-Lagrange Equations,
Schwarzschild worlds, Christoffel symbols, timelike Killing vectors,
asymptotically flat spacetime, appropriate Noether charges,
with object slow downs when sufficiently near the event horizon
and hover just above it, ever slower & more redshifted [in a] globally
meaningful definition of energy [which] is not possible in arbitrary
situations in GTR..." [1] and disappointing "the third kacksacker"
with your arguments that still continue unabatedly... ahahahaha...
....but, isn't it time for you now to opine on Greysky's post and judge
on: http://www.physorg.com/news10789.html, and Andreas's refs
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505099 & http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505098 )
wherein Greysky comments and Felber says:
~ "The field equation of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity has
never before been solved to calculate the gravitational field of a mass
moving close to the speed of light. ...[and] how inertia is already
embodied in the gravitational field equations of general relativity, [only]
.... the Schwarzschild solution is used to find the exact relativistic motion
of a payload in the gravitational field of a mass moving with constant
velocity. The analysis found that at radial approach or recession speeds
faster than 1/sqrt(3) [57.7%] times the speed of light, any mass repels
any payload gravitationally at any distance. ... The closer a mass gets
to the speed of light, the stronger its 'antigravity beam' becomes.... [and]
for greater practical problems for gravitational propulsion finding a
suitable and accessible driver mass at relativistic velocities, and
maneuvering the payload in and out of the driver trajectory. The seeming
scarcity of suitable relativistic drivers in our galactic neighborhood may
well be due to drag by just the sort gravitational repulsion analyzed in
this paper. [2]
[hanson]
IMO Felber is off the mark, but in principle he has the tune right, sadly
he's not seeing the trees because of the forest..... ahahahaha...
ahahaha... and, all you guys did is fight amongst each other over
math rule-applications of/in GR instead of judging whether he, Felb'
needs Help by you showing him the proper solution or interpretations
in his [2] mish-mash with more of your own in [1]... about those ....
"exact solutions to Einstein's relativistic field equation".... ahahaha...
when the important ones are so obvious.
Here are the distinct numerical solutions of the "field equations" for
the mass of the proton (m_p) and the electron (m_e), not just general
math babble, .... which you can continue to do when you are looking for
the "solutions" to the different contour integrals that will yield the exact
mass of/for any nucleon in the mass-spectrum between (& beyond)
:::: m_p = [c^2/2G]* [L_pl] * [I_H/(f_L*F) ]* sqrt(2a) *(3*pi^2) ... and
:::: m_e = [c^2/G] * [L_pl)] * [1/(f_L*F)] * a* pi * sqrt(3)/3
[sqrt(hG/(2pi*c^3)] = L_pl = T_pl/c, T_pl being the Planck time as the
flash intervals that occur on the measurably level, signaling the presence
of photons at the Lyman series limits f_L, and the EM charge handling
Faraday constant, F, the p-e charge separation/ionization constant I_H,
and the Finestructure constant [a] ... ahahahaha
Have fun!......ahahaha... ahahahanson
.
|
