| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Ludo" |
| Date: |
25 Aug 2006 02:12:46 AM |
| Object: |
particular ask |
I know that in a charged conductor as an example with it charge
positive, chages are exclusively on the external surface of the
conductor.
On the other hand if there aren't other sources in the external region
of the conductor then the superficial distribution \sigma on the
surface of the conductor has always the same sign. Can you help me to
proof such an assertion, please?
Thank you, Ludovico
.
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 04:35:25 AM |
|
|
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156489966.465625.324370@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
|I know that in a charged conductor as an example with it charge
| positive, chages are exclusively on the external surface of the
| conductor.
Do you?
And you know this because you read it somewhere, right?
|
| On the other hand if there aren't other sources in the external region
| of the conductor then the superficial distribution \sigma on the
| surface of the conductor has always the same sign. Can you help me to
| proof such an assertion, please?
No. If you know it, you prove it.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ludo" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 04:37:48 AM |
|
|
Sorcerer ha scritto:
No. If you know it, you prove it.
Androcles.
So you do not know it, well !
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 05:15:16 AM |
|
|
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156498668.104229.313110@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer ha scritto:
|
| >
| > No. If you know it, you prove it.
| > Androcles.
|
| So you do not know it, well !
Correct, I do not know it, and neither does anyone else, well!
Seen any canali on Mars lately, well?
http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/tharsis/canals.html
I do know this... anyone can make statements they cannot prove, well!
Sheep have a tendency to say "baa.a.a" when another sheep says "baaa".
So if you know it, you prove it.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ludo" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 05:24:06 AM |
|
|
Sorcerer ha scritto:
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156498668.104229.313110@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer ha scritto:
|
| >
| > No. If you know it, you prove it.
| > Androcles.
|
| So you do not know it, well !
Correct, I do not know it,
Ok, it is true.
and neither does anyone else, well!
No, it is false.
Seen any canali on Mars lately, well?
http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/tharsis/canals.html
?
I do know this... anyone can make statements they cannot prove, well!
Sheep have a tendency to say "baa.a.a" when another sheep says "baaa".
You are merely a donkey.
So if you know it, you prove it.
I do not know it.
Androcles
Ludovico
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 05:55:17 AM |
|
|
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156501446.031341.231540@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Ludo:
"I know that in a charged conductor as an example with it charge
positive, chages are exclusively on the external surface of the
conductor."
Androcles:
If you know it, you prove it.
Ludo:
"I do not know it."
Go away, *****.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ludo" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 06:49:48 AM |
|
|
Sorcerer: I hope you'll be able to understand: FOTTITI
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 08:58:42 AM |
|
|
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156506588.112473.252540@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer: I hope you'll be able to understand: FOTTITI
I don't. Maybe it's Italian or Yiddish, it isn't English.
I hope you understand this:
*****, moron, you contradicted yourself.
And this:
*plonk*
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ludo" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 10:48:00 AM |
|
|
Sorcerer ha scritto:
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156506588.112473.252540@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer: I hope you'll be able to understand: FOTTITI
I don't. Maybe it's Italian or Yiddish, it isn't English.
I hope you understand this:
*****, moron, you contradicted yourself.
And this:
*plonk*
Dear Sorcerer, ***** to you, brutto bastardo figlio di puttana
zoccolaccia, you are moron, plonk, you are *****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 11:00:08 AM |
|
|
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156520880.742530.70310@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Sorcerer ha scritto:
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156506588.112473.252540@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer: I hope you'll be able to understand: FOTTITI
I don't. Maybe it's Italian or Yiddish, it isn't English.
I hope you understand this:
*****, moron, you contradicted yourself.
And this:
*plonk*
Dear Sorcerer, ***** to you, brutto bastardo figlio di puttana
zoccolaccia, you are moron, plonk, you are *****
and remember this Sorcerer: FOTTITI !
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 11:16:16 AM |
|
|
"Dr. Tom" <rolf180@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44ef1e5d$0$97254$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
|
| "Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
| news:1156520880.742530.70310@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| >
| > Sorcerer ha scritto:
| >
| >> "Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
| >> news:1156506588.112473.252540@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| >> |
| >> | Sorcerer: I hope you'll be able to understand: FOTTITI
| >>
| >> I don't. Maybe it's Italian or Yiddish, it isn't English.
| >> I hope you understand this:
| >>
| >> *****, moron, you contradicted yourself.
| >>
| >> And this:
| >> *plonk*
| >
| > Dear Sorcerer, ***** to you, brutto bastardo figlio di puttana
| > zoccolaccia, you are moron, plonk, you are *****
| >
|
| and remember this Sorcerer: FOTTITI !
|
Sure... whatever...
I know, but I don't know. Can't say that I want to, either.
Androcles B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 11:20:27 AM |
|
|
"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message news:knFHg.63110$fV1.11766@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
"Dr. Tom" <rolf180@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44ef1e5d$0$97254$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
|
| "Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
| news:1156520880.742530.70310@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| >
| > Sorcerer ha scritto:
| >
| >> "Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
| >> news:1156506588.112473.252540@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| >> |
| >> | Sorcerer: I hope you'll be able to understand: FOTTITI
| >>
| >> I don't. Maybe it's Italian or Yiddish, it isn't English.
| >> I hope you understand this:
| >>
| >> *****, moron, you contradicted yourself.
| >>
| >> And this:
| >> *plonk*
| >
| > Dear Sorcerer, ***** to you, brutto bastardo figlio di puttana
| > zoccolaccia, you are moron, plonk, you are *****
| >
|
| and remember this Sorcerer: FOTTITI !
|
Sure... whatever...
I know, but I don't know. Can't say that I want to, either.
Androcles B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D.
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to elementary physicis:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras3.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/EMWaves2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/KineticEnergy.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TimeIsFreq2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Component.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SoundSource.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PureNonsense.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Chuckle2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Competent.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/MoreEM.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/EMWaves.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sound.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Magnetic.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TimeIsFreq.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Coulomb.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NoEnergy.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/MakeFool.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroMMX.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/EnergyConservation.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to Boolean algebra:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORWildStab.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Gibberish.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XOROnceMore.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORrevisited.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORContinued.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORpersistence.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LooksBoolean.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to integrals:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Integral.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to geometry:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SimpleEnough.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FullyAware.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to transformations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroTransform.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to calculations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FALSE.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to groups:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroGroups.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to logs:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LogsHuh.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to vectors:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/IdiotVectors.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroVec.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/VectorLength.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/VectorSpaces.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to limits:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Limit.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to equations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Doofus.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Persuasive.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroDistri.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ToothlessBite.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Competent.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/UseTrans.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sheesh.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DivZero.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Think.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to square roots:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GoodTeachers.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TwoTurds.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/STILL.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/CanSpecify.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Nearly.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Quadratic.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GrowUp.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Tautology.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Material.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GIVEN.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PythagoRescue.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtRev.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NegSqrt.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Humour.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtAnswers.html
The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to partial differential equations:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff2.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff3.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff4.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NotFxy.html
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 11:57:57 AM |
|
|
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:frFHg.40569$8Z5.562209@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
|
| "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message
news:knFHg.63110$fV1.11766@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| >
| > "Dr. Tom" <rolf180@yahoo.com> wrote in message
| > news:44ef1e5d$0$97254$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
| > |
| > | "Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
| > | news:1156520880.742530.70310@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| > | >
| > | > Sorcerer ha scritto:
| > | >
| > | >> "Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
| > | >> news:1156506588.112473.252540@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| > | >> |
| > | >> | Sorcerer: I hope you'll be able to understand: FOTTITI
| > | >>
| > | >> I don't. Maybe it's Italian or Yiddish, it isn't English.
| > | >> I hope you understand this:
| > | >>
| > | >> *****, moron, you contradicted yourself.
| > | >>
| > | >> And this:
| > | >> *plonk*
| > | >
| > | > Dear Sorcerer, ***** to you, brutto bastardo figlio di puttana
| > | > zoccolaccia, you are moron, plonk, you are *****
| > | >
| > |
| > | and remember this Sorcerer: FOTTITI !
| > |
| > Sure... whatever...
| > I know, but I don't know. Can't say that I want to, either.
| >
| > Androcles B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D.
|
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to elementary physicis:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras3.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras2.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/EMWaves2.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/KineticEnergy.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TimeIsFreq2.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Component.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SoundSource.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PureNonsense.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Chuckle2.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Competent.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/MoreEM.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/EMWaves.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sound.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Magnetic.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TimeIsFreq.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Coulomb.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NoEnergy.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/MakeFool.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroMMX.html
|
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/EnergyConservation.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to Boolean algebra:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORWildStab.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Gibberish.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XOROnceMore.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORrevisited.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORContinued.html
|
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORpersistence.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LooksBoolean.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to integrals:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Integral.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to geometry:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SimpleEnough.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FullyAware.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to transformations:
|
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroTransform.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to calculations:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FALSE.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to groups:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroGroups.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to logs:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LogsHuh.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to vectors:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/IdiotVectors.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroVec.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/VectorLength.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/VectorSpaces.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to limits:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Limit.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to equations:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Doofus.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve2.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Persuasive.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroDistri.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Pythagoras.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/ToothlessBite.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Competent.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/UseTrans.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sheesh.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SetSolve.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DivZero.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Think.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to square roots:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GoodTeachers.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TwoTurds.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/STILL.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/CanSpecify.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Nearly.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Quadratic.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GrowUp.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Tautology.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Material.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/GIVEN.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PythagoRescue.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtRev.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NegSqrt.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Humour.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtAnswers.html
| The B.A., M.Sc., Ph.D's approach to partial differential equations:
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff2.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff3.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/PartialDiff4.html
| http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NotFxy.html
|
| Dirk Vdm
What is this?
Some kind of quote of some post?
An introduction to the ***** you produce later on?
***** that you expect someone will bother reading?
Androcles
The imbecile trying to cover his arse after he's
been told the ***** he refers to is Einstein's *****.
"
1) What is this?
2) Some kind of quote of some post?
Clarification:
Something you want us to believe you invented?
Something you found somewhere?
Something you want to tell us?
Something you want to tell us something about?
Something you forgot to delete when you started
with the beginning of your message "Dear Al,"?
3) An introduction to the ***** you produce later on?
4) ***** that you expect someone will bother reading?
Clarification:
The '*****' in question 4 is a reprise of the '*****' in
question 3. This is what we call a 'style figure'.
Didn't they teach you to write English in Germany?
How old are you? " -- Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 05:42:41 AM |
|
|
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message news:1156489966.465625.324370@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
I know that in a charged conductor as an example with it charge
positive, chages are exclusively on the external surface of the
conductor.
On the other hand if there aren't other sources in the external region
of the conductor then the superficial distribution \sigma on the
surface of the conductor has always the same sign. Can you help me to
proof such an assertion, please?
A proof depends on what you already know and what you
are allowed to use.
Perhaps asking yourself this question can help: Can the electric
field remain normal to the surface at every place, and yet vary
smoothly over the surface if it points inward at one place and
outward at another?
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ludo" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 05:48:53 AM |
|
|
Dirk Van de moortel ha scritto:
A proof depends on what you already know and what you
are allowed to use.
surely!
Perhaps asking yourself this question can help: Can the electric
field remain normal to the surface at every place, and yet vary
smoothly over the surface if it points inward at one place and
outward at another?
Why do the electric field sholud vary C^\infty as the point moves on
the equipotential surface of the conductor??
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 05:51:04 AM |
|
|
"Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message news:1156502933.774258.200770@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Dirk Van de moortel ha scritto:
A proof depends on what you already know and what you
are allowed to use.
surely!
Perhaps asking yourself this question can help: Can the electric
field remain normal to the surface at every place, and yet vary
smoothly over the surface if it points inward at one place and
outward at another?
Why do the electric field sholud vary C^\infty as the point moves on
the equipotential surface of the conductor??
Sorry, I should have said continuously in stead of smoothly.
C^1 is sufficient.
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: particular ask |
25 Aug 2006 06:44:33 AM |
|
|
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:sCAHg.40139$Be.588849@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
|
| "Ludo" <ludo.castaldi@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:1156502933.774258.200770@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
| >
| > Dirk Van de moortel ha scritto:
| >
| >> A proof depends on what you already know and what you
| >> are allowed to use.
| >
| > surely!
| >
| >> Perhaps asking yourself this question can help: Can the electric
| >> field remain normal to the surface at every place, and yet vary
| >> smoothly over the surface if it points inward at one place and
| >> outward at another?
| >
| > Why do the electric field sholud vary C^\infty as the point moves on
| > the equipotential surface of the conductor??
|
| Sorry, I should have said continuously in stead of smoothly.
| C^1 is sufficient.
|
| Dirk Vdm
Write it up as an immortal fumble, then. It is immortal, isn't it?
Or would that be an "immoortel fumble"?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You are funnier than Wilson Rabbidge, net kook.
Androcles
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
