On Apr 27, 10:20 am, "Cl\.Mass=E9" <ret...@contactprospect.com> wrote:
..=2E.
Here is how it goes. The field is Fourier analysed, and for any component
with a given momentum, the field equation reduces to a harmonic oscillato=
r,
with the field amplitude as dynamical variable. By quantizing this harmo=
nic
oscillator, discrete states are obtained, labelled by a photon number. B=
ut
like with any harmonic oscillator, the dynamical variable isn't well defi=
ned
in those states. In calculations like for an interaction, the base of
photon number is used out of convenience, but any other base would give t=
he
same result. What happens is that now the field is quantized, and the sa=
me
uncertainty relations like for a quantized point particle appear.
Suppose I used a spectroscope, then the "harmonics"
may be sorted to very high resolution, energy p=3Dhf.
Power W =3D p/t =3D (hf) * N/t , "N" is photon Number.
~~~~~~~~~> Red =3D=3D W(Red) =3D N(Red)/t * hf(Red)
~~~~~~> Green =3D=3D etc.
~~~~> Blue
I can use photo-cells set up on the spectral projection,
and get measureable power output.
In labs I've used "spectrum analyser scopes", with X
being the frequency and Y a calibrated amplitude.
I don't quite understand the problem. The equipment
works, based on good theory.
Ken
.
