Physical FORCE, What It REALLY IS



 Science > Physics > Physical FORCE, What It REALLY IS

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: ""
Date: 24 Oct 2006 07:19:54 PM
Object: Physical FORCE, What It REALLY IS
5>
Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS
Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force
REALLY IS. The best that they can do is to define it in
terms of what it DOES--accelerate a mass, (F = ma).
Yet, they ARROGANTLY use the terms "PSEUDO-FORCE" and
"FICTIONAL FORCE" to describe forces like CENTRIFUGAL
FORCE and the CORIOLIS FORCE. The physicists have
FAILED to pick up the CLUE, about what a force really
IS, from the fact that these so-called "pseudo-forces"
result from MOTIONS.
According to the GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the
Physical Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey
B. Larson, each force is a MOTION, or a COMBINATION OF
MOTIONS, or a RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS, including
INWARD and OUTWARD SCALAR MOTIONS, in the form of
TRANSLATIONAL, VIBRATIONAL, ROTATIONAL, or ROTATIONAL-
VIBRATIONAL motions.
For example, the expansion of the Physical Universe
is simply an OUTWARD SCALAR MOTION, which is an INHERENT
PROPERTY of the Universe and NOT a result of a "big
bang", [which means that "Hubble's constant", whatever
its correct value, can NOT be used to determine the age
of the Physical Universe.].
Gravitation is an INWARD SCALAR MOTION that obeys
the inverse square law. MOTION is what makes a
homogeneous gravitational field "EQUIVALENT" to a
uniformly accelerated reference frame, (which is in a
certain kind of MOTION).
For objects moving at speeds close to the speed of
light, acceleration drops toward zero, (a = F/m), NOT
because "mass increases toward infinity" (mass really
STAYS CONSTANT), but because FORCE decreases toward ZERO
(because of the RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS of the
near-light speed of the object and the OUTWARD SCALAR
MOTION of light at the speed of light, which is UNIT
VELOCITY).
In Larson's Theory, the "strong nuclear force" and
the "weak nuclear force" DO NOT EXIST. They are merely
AD HOC ASSUMPTIONS, resulting from an ERRONEOUS model of
the atom.
A WEALTH of information about Physicist Dewey B.
Larson's GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical
Universe, ("The Reciprocal System of Theory"), can now
be found at the web site http://www.rstheory.com .
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
P.S.: PASS IT ON !
"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."




.

User: "Denis Loubet"

Title: Re: Physical FORCE, What It REALLY IS 25 Oct 2006 02:25:25 AM
<rem460@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1161735594.733243.243360@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

5>
Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS

It's what otherwise rational people would like to apply to your face.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Physical FORCE, What It REALLY IS 25 Oct 2006 03:40:33 AM
wrote:

5>
Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS

Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force
REALLY IS. The best that they can do is to define it in
terms of what it DOES--accelerate a mass, (F = ma).
Yet, they ARROGANTLY use the terms "PSEUDO-FORCE" and
"FICTIONAL FORCE" to describe forces like CENTRIFUGAL
FORCE and the CORIOLIS FORCE. The physicists have
FAILED to pick up the CLUE, about what a force really
IS, from the fact that these so-called "pseudo-forces"
result from MOTIONS.

According to the GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the
Physical Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey
B. Larson, each force is a MOTION, or a COMBINATION OF
MOTIONS, or a RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS, including
INWARD and OUTWARD SCALAR MOTIONS, in the form of
TRANSLATIONAL, VIBRATIONAL, ROTATIONAL, or ROTATIONAL-
VIBRATIONAL motions.

There is no meaning to the claim of "real force" because all physical
concepts, including that of force, are free creations of the human
mind. Only theories with operational definitions are verifiable.
Classically, force is, from the causal point of view, that which is
responsible for deviation from inertial motion of a point particle.
.

User: "Cardinal Chunder"

Title: Re: Physical FORCE, What It REALLY IS 25 Oct 2006 07:17:26 AM
wrote:

5>
Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS

Did you think this up while enclosed by physical RESTRAINTS?
--
"Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is
true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining
lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No."
.

User: "Paul R. Mays"

Title: Re: Physical FORCE, What It REALLY IS 21 Dec 2006 11:04:59 AM
Larson's a goof...
<rem460@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1161735594.733243.243360@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

5>
Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS

Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force
REALLY IS. The best that they can do is to define it in
terms of what it DOES--accelerate a mass, (F = ma).
Yet, they ARROGANTLY use the terms "PSEUDO-FORCE" and
"FICTIONAL FORCE" to describe forces like CENTRIFUGAL
FORCE and the CORIOLIS FORCE. The physicists have
FAILED to pick up the CLUE, about what a force really
IS, from the fact that these so-called "pseudo-forces"
result from MOTIONS.

According to the GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the
Physical Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey
B. Larson, each force is a MOTION, or a COMBINATION OF
MOTIONS, or a RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS, including
INWARD and OUTWARD SCALAR MOTIONS, in the form of
TRANSLATIONAL, VIBRATIONAL, ROTATIONAL, or ROTATIONAL-
VIBRATIONAL motions.

For example, the expansion of the Physical Universe
is simply an OUTWARD SCALAR MOTION, which is an INHERENT
PROPERTY of the Universe and NOT a result of a "big
bang", [which means that "Hubble's constant", whatever
its correct value, can NOT be used to determine the age
of the Physical Universe.].

Gravitation is an INWARD SCALAR MOTION that obeys
the inverse square law. MOTION is what makes a
homogeneous gravitational field "EQUIVALENT" to a
uniformly accelerated reference frame, (which is in a
certain kind of MOTION).

For objects moving at speeds close to the speed of
light, acceleration drops toward zero, (a = F/m), NOT
because "mass increases toward infinity" (mass really
STAYS CONSTANT), but because FORCE decreases toward ZERO
(because of the RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS of the
near-light speed of the object and the OUTWARD SCALAR
MOTION of light at the speed of light, which is UNIT
VELOCITY).

In Larson's Theory, the "strong nuclear force" and
the "weak nuclear force" DO NOT EXIST. They are merely
AD HOC ASSUMPTIONS, resulting from an ERRONEOUS model of
the atom.

A WEALTH of information about Physicist Dewey B.
Larson's GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical
Universe, ("The Reciprocal System of Theory"), can now
be found at the web site http://www.rstheory.com .

Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS

P.S.: PASS IT ON !


"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."





.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Physical FORCE - What It REALLY IS
Physical FORCE , & What It REALLY IS
What Physical Force REALLY IS
Physical FORCE -- What Force REALLY IS
There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! Ph. Tivitists NEVER want to fin
WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
What is physics, the physical world, and reality?
Level broadening, what is the physical reason
What is a physical law (was: Alfred Schild gives SR-GR distinction)
WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
WHAT IS PHYSICAL VACCUUM??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Re: What Can Social Networks Teach us About Physical Laws?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER