| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"vlcek" |
| Date: |
05 Dec 2006 06:33:10 AM |
| Object: |
PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE |
PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE
Has an ordinary physicist the right to criticize the "giants of
physics"?
Has he the right not to criticize them?
The author submits an absolutely new theory, that represents a
revolution in physics. In general knowledge he brings a new view on
safety of atomic power stations, other calculations of energy and speed
of elementary particles, their radii of force range, other relations
for the construction of atomic power stations, the nuclear reactions.
This theory is the product of 25 years of work.
The author remembers the documentary film about the Bikini Island. The
naivet=E9 whith which the soldiers, officers, scientists expected the
A-bomb explosion, the expressions of grandiosity, the feelings of pride
that they were there, the carelessness of the radiation, the swimming
after the explosion, and the results putting out of countenance ending
with cancer, the immense growth of extremities, their rupture - the
consequent amputation of the legs, the high growth of arms, until
death, also a certainty of scientists, that nothing could happen
(signatures of scientists, the agreement with the production of bombs
and their experimental test in presence of a large number of soldiers)
- all these facts witness that it was an ignorance of people, of
regular soldiers as well as scientists (including A. Einstein), the
ignorance originating in a wrong or inconsequent theory, which made a
qualitative point to the justice though, but did not give the
quantitative point to it as is shown in Table 5 of this work:
[1] VLCEK L.: New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava
1996,
ISBN 80-85665-64-6.
[2] VLCEK L.: New Trends in Physics /book, elementes pictures, spheres
in nuclei, forecasted nuclei, ZOO-3D editorfor interactive inspecting
of nuclei spheres/, Academic Electronic Press, Bratislava, 2000, CD-
ROM,
ISBN 80-88880-38-6.
[3] Both book [1] and CD- ROM [2] elementes pictures, spheres in
nuclei, forecasted nuclei are on
http://www.vlcek.euweb.cz
Calculation of the kinetic energy T /kin/ of a body moving at the
velocity of v see on
www.vlcek.euweb.cz/book.php?version=3Duk&page=3D3-2
Vlcek =B4s theory and Einstein =B4s theory
v/c T /kin/ compare T /kin/compare
0.1 0.0050mc2 0.0050m0c2
0=2E2 0.0212mc2 0.0200m0c2
0=2E3 0.0517mc2 0.0480m0c2
0=2E4 0.1033mc2 0.0910m0c2
0=2E5 0.1895mc2 0.1550m0c2
0=2E6 0.3393mc2 0.2500m0c2
0=2E7 0.6233mc2 0.4010m0c2
0=2E8 1.2669mc2 0.6670m0c2
0=2E9 3.4327mc2 1.2930m0c2
0=2E99 47.294mc2 6.9200m0c2
1=2E0 infinite infinite
It clearly shows that the values of total energy calculated by
Einstein are substantially lower as those calculated in our theory for
all particle velocities, even for the lower ones.
At the speed of 0,1c =3D v, there are the differences even by 0,0007mc2,
which keep on increasing.
For v =3D 0,5c this difference in the direction of motion is [0,3068 -
0,155]moc2 =3D 0,1518moc2
and for v =3D 0.99c even [94,3948 - 6,92]moc2 =3D 87,4748moc2
so that in fact the energies in nuclear reactions have been
substantially higher than the current theory of A. Einstein assumes.
It results in the incorrect determination of energies even in nuclear
reactors and thus in the insufficient protection design, what leads to
breakdowns of atom power stations (USA, FRG, UKRAINE, RUSSIA) and
risky, often caraless behaviour of highly educated people of former AS
of USSR, enormous impacts caused by irradiation of population because
of the ignorance of people in high positions and the consequent
disinformation of population. To be able to avoid the breakdowns, it is
necessary to consider our equation for energy calculation and not the
Einstein's one. It involves all activities concerning calculation of
energy of particles (accelerators, reactors,...). We will thus help
substantially to prevent tragedies of the human race caused by
ignorance.=20
L=2EVlcek
.
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: PHYSICIST'S CONSCIENCE |
05 Dec 2006 09:06:47 AM |
|
|
vlcek wrote:
The author submits an absolutely new theory, that represents a
revolution in physics. In general knowledge he brings a new view on
safety of atomic power stations, other calculations of energy and speed
of elementary particles, their radii of force range, other relations
for the construction of atomic power stations, the nuclear reactions.
This theory is the product of 25 years of work.
But is the theory better than the one it attempts to replace? Does
the new theory's predictions agree with the existing body of
observational and experimental data? Is the new theory useful to
*anybody* else?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
