Physicists move closer to the quantum limit



 Science > Physics > Physicists move closer to the quantum limit

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Sam Wormley"
Date: 02 Apr 2004 11:34:34 AM
Object: Physicists move closer to the quantum limit
Ref: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/1
A new experiment in the US has come close to detecting
quantum effects in a macroscopic object. Keith Schwab
and colleagues from the National Security Agency (NSA)
working at the University of Maryland have measured the
vibrations of a tiny nanoelectromechanical arm to probe
the limits at which quantum behaviour breaks down and
classical physics takes over. Although the experiment
was not quite sensitive enough to test the uncertainty
principle, it has come closer to doing so than previous
attempts (M D LaHaye et al. 2004 Science 304 74).
See: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/1
.

User: "Old Man"

Title: Re: Physicists move closer to the quantum limit 03 Apr 2004 02:22:13 AM
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:406DA42A.7018243A@mchsi.com...

Ref: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/1

A new experiment in the US has come close to detecting
quantum effects in a macroscopic object. Keith Schwab
and colleagues from the National Security Agency (NSA)
working at the University of Maryland have measured the
vibrations of a tiny nanoelectromechanical arm to probe
the limits at which quantum behaviour breaks down and
classical physics takes over. Although the experiment
was not quite sensitive enough to test the uncertainty
principle, it has come closer to doing so than previous
attempts (M D LaHaye et al. 2004 Science 304 74).

See: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/1

Poor choice of words:
QM doesn't "break down" in the classical limit. The effect of
Planck's constant becomes insignificant compared to that of the
Hamiltonian which contains all of classical physics. [Old Man]
.
User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Physicists move closer to the quantum limit 03 Apr 2004 08:10:25 AM
Old Man wrote:


"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:406DA42A.7018243A@mchsi.com...

Ref: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/1

A new experiment in the US has come close to detecting
quantum effects in a macroscopic object. Keith Schwab
and colleagues from the National Security Agency (NSA)
working at the University of Maryland have measured the
vibrations of a tiny nanoelectromechanical arm to probe
the limits at which quantum behaviour breaks down and
classical physics takes over. Although the experiment
was not quite sensitive enough to test the uncertainty
principle, it has come closer to doing so than previous
attempts (M D LaHaye et al. 2004 Science 304 74).

See: http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/4/1


Poor choice of words:
QM doesn't "break down" in the classical limit. The effect of
Planck's constant becomes insignificant compared to that of the
Hamiltonian which contains all of classical physics. [Old Man]

I agree--many of physicsweb's titles are "eyebrow raising",
intentionally I presume.
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER