Science > Physics > Potter: THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Sam Wormley" |
| Date: |
02 Dec 2006 09:00:51 PM |
| Object: |
Potter: THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017 |
November 30, 2006
THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017
More information about this topic at the following press release:
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/061129/20061129005426.html?.v=1
.
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Potter: THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017 |
02 Dec 2006 11:19:41 PM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:D5rch.257561$FQ1.116900@attbi_s71...
November 30, 2006
THE GPS MARKET IS EXPECTED TO BE WORTH $757 BILLION BY 2017
More information about this topic at the following press release:
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/061129/20061129005426.html?.v=1
What hath Galileo, Newton, Maxwell, Doppler, Hubble wrought?
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ? |
02 Dec 2006 11:43:15 PM |
|
|
Hi Tom_Potter, You say " The Galileo Effect "
explains frequency changes due to gravitational accelertion... Right ?
Google came up empty on that... What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ? |
03 Dec 2006 12:20:47 AM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_2_13_@Cotse.NET...
Hi Tom_Potter, You say " The Galileo Effect "
explains frequency changes due to gravitational accelertion... Right ?
Google came up empty on that... What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
Many things affect the observed frequency of an oscillator.
Some of these include:
distance - The Hubble Effect
velocity - The Doppler Effect
acceleration - The Galileo Effect
To my knowledge, no one has studied the effects
of jerk, snap, crackle, and pop on observed frequencies,
and I suggest that some young physicist like Gisse
should make a study of the "Jerk Effect",
as it would be fitting for the "Jerk Effect"
to be associated with someone like Gisse.
It is obvious this effect exists,
as can be seen by banging on an oscillator.
As can be seen by reading his works,
Galileo performed many experiments on gravity
and oscillating systems, and what affected falling bodies,
and the frequency of pendulums.
It is interesting to note that over 300 years ago
England sent ships all over the world
with standard pendulums,
to count the oscillations between sun rise and sun rise,
and that Newton used this data to compute many things
about the Earth, including its' shape and size,
the tides in various parts of the world, etc.
Newton was even able to determine who took
faulty data, or had faulty equipment.
Unfortunately few people know that
people like Galileo and Newton understood the
affect of acceleration on oscillating systems,
and Galileo has not received his deserved credit
for his many key discoveries, which opened the
door to modern physics.
No doubt, as the Internet consolidates data,
and makes it available to the masses,
more and more people will recognize Galileo's works,
and the affect of acceleration on oscillators
will come to be known as the "Galileo Effect".
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: Potter, How would you define the SI second ? kilogram ? |
03 Dec 2006 12:33:05 AM |
|
|
Hi Tom_Potter, What did Galileo have to say about how
gravitational acceleration effects time ( specifically, the SI second ) ?
Are you claiming these were occult works... hidden from the masses ?
How would you define the SI second ? kilogram ?
The kilogram could, at least in theory, be defined as
X oscillations of a ( ¿ atom ) laser, just like the SI meter and second.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Potter, How would you define the SI second ? kilogram ? |
03 Dec 2006 10:57:16 PM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_2_17_@Cotse.NET...
Hi Tom_Potter, What did Galileo have to say about how
gravitational acceleration effects time ( specifically, the SI second ) ?
Are you claiming these were occult works... hidden from the masses ?
How would you define the SI second ? kilogram ?
The kilogram could, at least in theory, be defined as
X oscillations of a ( ¿ atom ) laser, just like the SI meter and second.
I dare say that Galileo knew that
"gravitational acceleration" affected the frequency of oscillators,
and did not affect "time" itself.
Regarding your comment about
"occult works... hidden from the masses.",
this seems to pretty much sum up General Relativity,
which is not accessible to the masses, including
the engineers, technicians and programmers
who design and maintain sophisticated modern systems,
as GTR seems to be an occult Tower of Babel,
that wastes time, money and minds,
on such pursuits as time travel, warping through space,
rubber rulers and clocks, etc.
What we call time,
is a count of the ticks from one's reference clock.
The best reference clock would have the qualities
of extremely high stability, reliability, transportability,
and economy of cost and maintenance.
And of course, a high output frequency is desirable
so that fine increments of change can be quantized.
I would use my reference clock to define the
spaces and lengths between two points,
by counting the number of ticks of my clock
it took for the leading edge of an electro-magnetic signal
to travel between the two points,
in a homogeneous, stable, environment,
devoid of any objects, or at least as few objects
as possible.
And I would modulate my e-m signal
with a pseudo-random number,
so that I could eliminate artifact.
After I selected my reference clock,
I would measure it to find good reference
distances and lengths, by determining the
time intervals between the most stable
spaces between sets of two points.
As Kepler's Laws seem to be more stable
than distances and lengths,
I would depend upon Kepler's Laws
to define a standard mass.
mass * constant = time interval^3 / time period^2
As the simply serves to equate my reference mass
to some Earthly reference mass unit
such as the mass units used to conduct trade,
I would set the constant to one "1",
so I could pick the most stable mass reference possible,
and that would perhaps best be the Sun,
or for convenience, the Earth's mass could be used as
a reference, and the numerous satellites orbiting the
Earth could be used to monitor the time intervals
and time periods of the satellites to obtain the
right side of the equation above.
True time is the exponential change
associated with all the bosons and fermions
in the universe.
A sort of local environment time
can be associated with the exponential changes
occurring in an isolated environment.
If you get a boat,
don't forget to stop by and give me a ride
if you get to China.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: Sitting around the fire and chatting. |
04 Dec 2006 03:41:20 AM |
|
|
Hi Tom_Potter, I doubt T.J. will be giving me Fearless_Johnny,
help enough to get my 400 ton Yacht Master's license and
a place to dock for a while...
But, if he does, ( and I don't get too sea sick )
I'd love to come visit you in China.
You and I are both old enough to recall when
sitting around the fire and chatting was all there was... No TV.
Sci.Physics is like that, I think.
You wrote:
_True_ time is the exponential change associated with
all the bosons and fermions in the universe.
Time is _Truly_ spatial, falsely directional.
All changes, all choices, are virtual because
nothing could ever be _Truly_ random.
Think about it...
If _True_ randomness existed, science could not march forward.
Them's the _Hard_ facts... Warts and all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Sitting around the fire and chatting. |
04 Dec 2006 09:37:40 AM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_4_1_@Cotse.NET...
Hi Tom_Potter, I doubt T.J. will be giving me Fearless_Johnny,
help enough to get my 400 ton Yacht Master's license and
a place to dock for a while...
But, if he does, ( and I don't get too sea sick )
I'd love to come visit you in China.
You and I are both old enough to recall when
sitting around the fire and chatting was all there was... No TV.
Sci.Physics is like that, I think.
You wrote:
_True_ time is the exponential change associated with
all the bosons and fermions in the universe.
Time is _Truly_ spatial, falsely directional.
Time is directional
as groups compete in environments,
and increase exponentially in a nurturing environment,
and decrease exponentially in a non-nurturing environment,
and as time, in the sense of being born, aging and dying,
quantized with ticks from one's reference clock,
and ORDERED on the exponential changes
that are occurring in the environment.
The ultimate group competition is between
bosons and fermions, and the bosons appear to be winning.
Yeah, I also remember when TV first came out.
They used five inch Dumont crts,
and the great breakthrough when someone came out
with a ten inch magnifying glass to be put in front of the TV set,
so that more neighbors could gather around the tube and watch
the video noise, and occasional kinescope programs,
that looked like old Edison movies.
Today with Google, youtube, Mapipedia, Wikipedia, Yahoo,
googlesightseeing, mp3, newsgroups, the WWW, etc.
we have information overload.
I was pleased to hear that you received a bonus,
and that you still have a place to stay.
I am still hopeful that tj will not be an Indian giver,
and that he will provide you with a steady job,
and a good place to stay.
The best to you for the holidays.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Sitting around the fire and chatting. |
04 Dec 2006 11:11:54 AM |
|
|
But Tom, for crying out loud, didn't you see or were you cruel?:
"Callffffff calllffff Relllfffff" aka Mr. Yellowtooth invited himself:
Said he: --- [>> I'd love to come visit you in China] --- So, in
response you gave Jeff a long "Mitleid"/Commiseration talk about
TV, tj, Indian givers, directional time & lots of exponential enviroil.
*** But where is your ACCEPTANCE of Jeff's modest wish? ***
I thought you were a person with lots of Samaritan gumption.
ahahaha... ahahahaha.... yeah, right!... ahahaha... Anyway,
Merry Xmas, Happy Hanukah & Kwanzaa, or Happy Holidays
each depending, to you too.... hahahahaha.... ahahahanson
Yo, Jeff... see, there goes another one. You must be doing
something that is NOT quite right that things like this happen
to you over and over again. -- Best wishes to you too & many
thanks for the great and ongoing entertainment you gave us.
ahahaha... ahahahanson
"Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:45743554$0$20644$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_4_1_@Cotse.NET...
Hi Tom_Potter, I doubt T.J. will be giving me Fearless_Johnny,
help enough to get my 400 ton Yacht Master's license and
a place to dock for a while...
But, if he does, ( and I don't get too sea sick )
I'd love to come visit you in China.
You and I are both old enough to recall when
sitting around the fire and chatting was all there was... No TV.
Sci.Physics is like that, I think.
You wrote:
_True_ time is the exponential change associated with
all the bosons and fermions in the universe.
Time is _Truly_ spatial, falsely directional.
Time is directional
as groups compete in environments,
and increase exponentially in a nurturing environment,
and decrease exponentially in a non-nurturing environment,
and as time, in the sense of being born, aging and dying,
quantized with ticks from one's reference clock,
and ORDERED on the exponential changes
that are occurring in the environment.
The ultimate group competition is between
bosons and fermions, and the bosons appear to be winning.
Yeah, I also remember when TV first came out.
They used five inch Dumont crts,
and the great breakthrough when someone came out
with a ten inch magnifying glass to be put in front of the TV set,
so that more neighbors could gather around the tube and watch
the video noise, and occasional kinescope programs,
that looked like old Edison movies.
Today with Google, youtube, Mapipedia, Wikipedia, Yahoo,
googlesightseeing, mp3, newsgroups, the WWW, etc.
we have information overload.
I was pleased to hear that you received a bonus,
and that you still have a place to stay.
I am still hopeful that tj will not be an Indian giver,
and that he will provide you with a steady job,
and a good place to stay.
The best to you for the holidays.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Sitting around the fire and chatting. |
05 Dec 2006 06:34:41 AM |
|
|
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote in message
news:uFYch.2544$Qa7.1103@trnddc03...
But Tom, for crying out loud, didn't you see or were you cruel?:
"Callffffff calllffff Relllfffff" aka Mr. Yellowtooth invited himself:
Said he: --- [>> I'd love to come visit you in China] --- So, in
response you gave Jeff a long "Mitleid"/Commiseration talk about
TV, tj, Indian givers, directional time & lots of exponential enviroil.
*** But where is your ACCEPTANCE of Jeff's modest wish? ***
I thought you were a person with lots of Samaritan gumption.
I didn't ask Jeff to visit me,
I asked him to give me a ride on the boat that tj gives him.
But I am beginning to think that you are right about tj.
He claims to be about 50 years old,
but as you say,
he is probably an 80 year old guy,
and is in a Seattle hospital,
recuperating from "givers remorse".
Hopefully "givers remorse" is not fatal
and hopefully tj was not jacking Jeff around,
because I'd sure not want to have that:
"recorded on evry carbon atom that DNA makes a copie of. "
because as tj says:
"Biuld it well because things last forever on a carbon atoms image."
and
"Evry carbon atom falls into that black hole on judgment day."
Can you imagine going up to St. Peter on "judgment day"
with that kind of behavior on your "carbon atoms"?
The bottom line is,
I don't want Jeff,
or anyone from the newsgroups
(Or Homeland Security)
visiting me,
but I sure would like to see tj
give Jeff more than an apology.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: T.J.'s secret to making lots of money. |
05 Dec 2006 09:17:25 AM |
|
|
Hi Tom_Potter ( and Hanson ),
T.J. only wants to give me ( and any one else who'll listen )
the secret to making lots of money.
" It's too easy to not do ", he says.
So I asked him for a tour of the trading scene,
I wanted him to walk me through a trade.
He said all I needed was to ask 20 people... so I did.
He didn't like the " middle men " I found,
he wanted me to email RusAl.COM ( once owned by his friend Abramovich ).
So I did, twice, one week apart... I got no response.
Then he promised me millions, told me that I hardly tried... and vanished.
To his credit, I'm sure he talked to his lawyers
and discovered that the money would just be tied up in court for years
and nothing would be left after my ex, the lawyers and
the tax men all took their share.
Feareless_Johnny, Deep_II and Rod_Down was his second attempt...
What happened ? It's not done yet ? He didn't want me messing up his rugs ?
He couldn't secure my 400 ton Yacht Master's license ?
He couldn't find a place for me to dock ?
I don't know, but I'm guessing that, once again,
he was confronted with something he didn't expect.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: T.J.'s secret to making lots of money. |
05 Dec 2006 03:13:55 PM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_5_10_@Cotse.NET...
Hi Tom_Potter ( and Hanson ),
T.J. only wants to give me ( and any one else who'll listen )
the secret to making lots of money.
" It's too easy to not do ", he says.
Yet he is actually talking nonsense.
Do you ever get tired of being taken for a ride?
So I asked him for a tour of the trading scene,
I wanted him to walk me through a trade.
He said all I needed was to ask 20 people... so I did.
He didn't like the " middle men " I found,
he wanted me to email RusAl.COM ( once owned by his friend Abramovich ).
So I did, twice, one week apart... I got no response.
Have you ever wondered why?
Then he promised me millions, told me that I hardly tried... and vanished.
Because he has none.
To his credit, I'm sure he talked to his lawyers
and discovered that the money would just be tied up in court for years
and nothing would be left after my ex, the lawyers and
the tax men all took their share.
Yeah, you believe this if you want. If it was true, Frazir would have said
it instead of the empty promises, then vanishing for a few weeks.
Feareless_Johnny, Deep_II and Rod_Down was his second attempt...
And were equally absent from reality.
What happened ? It's not done yet ? He didn't want me messing up his
rugs ?
He couldn't secure my 400 ton Yacht Master's license ?
He couldn't find a place for me to dock ?
I don't know, but I'm guessing that, once again,
he was confronted with something he didn't expect.
The real world?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: May this coming year be your best ever. |
04 Dec 2006 11:37:28 PM |
|
|
Hi Tom_Potter, Happy holidays to you too...
May this coming year be your best ever.
A " steady job " is the last thing T.J. wants me to have.
He wants to make me ( and anyone else willing to listen ) rich.
He claims it's just too easy to not do.
But he cared not one wit for Patinha an Wimpels ( her puppy ).
So I fear he puts money before actual people, with actual problems.
At any rate... he tucked tail and ran.
You told me:
The ultimate group competition is between bosons and fermions, and
the bosons appear to be winning.
Yet, all the same, the cosmos " just is ",
predestined to _Forever_ consume Gibbs Free Energy... Forever dissipating.
Because nothing could ever be _Truly_ random, science can progress and
all changes, all choices, are naught but virtual.
Each is imprisoned in a virtual casino, and the house always wins in the end.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cranks Reply" |
|
| Title: Re: May this coming year be your best ever. |
06 Dec 2006 05:44:23 AM |
|
|
Jeff...Relf wrote:
shite.
relf shut the ***** up you idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: Sure Crank, I'll " shut the f_ck up ". |
06 Dec 2006 04:28:52 PM |
|
|
Sure Crank, I'll " shut the ***** up ".
Anything else you want me to do while I'm at it ?
P.S. Thanks for the _Fat_ check !
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Sure Crank, I'll " shut the f_ck up ". |
06 Dec 2006 06:12:34 PM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_6_5_@Cotse.NET...
Sure Crank, I'll " shut the ***** up ".
Anything else you want me to do while I'm at it ?
P.S. Thanks for the _Fat_ check !
If you've shut up, why are you still posting?
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: Mr. Crank's check bounced. |
06 Dec 2006 08:13:23 PM |
|
|
Hi T_Wake,
You asked me, " If you've shut up, why are you still posting ? "...
Because I just found out that Mr. Crank's check bounced.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr. Crank's check bounced. |
07 Dec 2006 03:51:59 AM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_6_14_@Cotse.NET...
Hi T_Wake,
You asked me, " If you've shut up, why are you still posting ? "...
Because I just found out that Mr. Crank's check bounced.
Was it a real cheque that bounced or an imaginary one.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Mr. Crank's check bounced. |
07 Dec 2006 02:14:51 AM |
|
|
In article <Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_6_14_@Cotse.NET>,
JeffŠRelf <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:
Hi T_Wake,
You asked me, " If you've shut up, why are you still posting ? "...
Because I just found out that Mr. Crank's check bounced.
There's always Frazir to fall back on though. Wonderfully dependent
Frazir. Oh look, he's not around. Probably on his manned mission to Mars.
Or more likely banned from his WebTv for not tidying his bedroom.
--
Just \int_0^\infty du it!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Sure Crank, I'll " shut the f_ck up ". |
06 Dec 2006 04:33:58 PM |
|
|
In article <Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_6_5_@Cotse.NET>,
JeffŠRelf <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:
Sure Crank, I'll " shut the ***** up ".
Anything else you want me to do while I'm at it ?
P.S. Thanks for the _Fat_ check !
Grow a pair?
--
Just \int_0^\infty du it!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: May this coming year be your best ever. |
06 Dec 2006 10:38:50 AM |
|
|
ahahaha... the Y-TURD is back... ahaha... AHAHAHA... y-turd,
a Varney-clone, with an IQ of 3 points less then snot and with
the mentation of a dried *****... got fired again & is here to
vent his grief through his profound 1-liners. He goes by & under:
<yt56erd at gmail.com>, aka "y-turd", aka "Crank Watch
International" <admin at crankwatch.org>, aka "GR_GR" aka
"NunYa Bidness" aka Lodo <TokaMundo at weedizgood.org>
aka, "dda1", the <Deranged avenger at yahoo.com>, aka
*KrankHafter* "CrankHater", etc, etc, and now here as...
"Cranks Reply" <yt56erd@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165405463.631625.229920@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...
Jeff...Relf wrote:
shite.
relf shut the ***** up you idiot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Sitting around the fire and chatting. |
04 Dec 2006 09:47:39 AM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
The ultimate group competition is between
bosons and fermions, and the bosons appear to be winning.
Pure blather, Potter.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ? |
03 Dec 2006 12:20:40 AM |
|
|
Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi Tom_Potter, You say " The Galileo Effect "
explains frequency changes due to gravitational accelertion... Right ?
Google came up empty on that... What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
Why don't you ask him to explain what the "13 hacks of general
relativity" are as well?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ? |
06 Dec 2006 04:55:40 AM |
|
|
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165126840.545925.243200@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...
Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi Tom_Potter, You say " The Galileo Effect "
explains frequency changes due to gravitational accelertion... Right ?
Google came up empty on that... What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
Why don't you ask him to explain what the "13 hacks of general
relativity" are as well?
Better yet Gisse,
considering that you are a phyicist,
who asserts that General Relativity can model
the frequency offset used in the GPS system,
why don't you work out this using GTR,
***as I have using the Galileo Effect***,
so readers can see if you can achive
my results in less than 13 hacks?
Who knows, maybe GTR can be made to
agree with the Galileo Effect with less than 13 hacks,
and maybe you can be the one that proves this.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: Geological features, the earth's spin and Potter's " Galileo Effect ". |
06 Dec 2006 05:29:14 AM |
|
|
Hi Tom_Potter, Are you the only one who knows how to adjust GPS clocks
using " The Galileo Effect " ?
Due to geological features and the earth's spin,
gravity is slightly different all over the globe.
Does your " The Galileo Effect " handle that ?
Has it proved to be accurate to a one meter change in altitude ?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ? |
06 Dec 2006 12:49:19 PM |
|
|
Tom Potter wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165126840.545925.243200@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...
Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi Tom_Potter, You say " The Galileo Effect "
explains frequency changes due to gravitational accelertion... Right ?
Google came up empty on that... What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
Why don't you ask him to explain what the "13 hacks of general
relativity" are as well?
Better yet Gisse,
considering that you are a phyicist,
who asserts that General Relativity can model
the frequency offset used in the GPS system,
why don't you work out this using GTR,
***as I have using the Galileo Effect***,
so readers can see if you can achive
my results in less than 13 hacks?
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
Who knows, maybe GTR can be made to
agree with the Galileo Effect with less than 13 hacks,
and maybe you can be the one that proves this.
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
How many fucking times do I have to ask before you will finally explain
what they are?
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Potter" |
|
| Title: Re: Potter, What is " The Galileo Effect " ? |
07 Dec 2006 03:49:06 AM |
|
|
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165430959.077695.201040@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165126840.545925.243200@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com...
Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi Tom_Potter, You say " The Galileo Effect "
explains frequency changes due to gravitational accelertion... Right ?
Google came up empty on that... What is " The Galileo Effect " ?
Why don't you ask him to explain what the "13 hacks of general
relativity" are as well?
Better yet Gisse,
considering that you are a phyicist,
who asserts that General Relativity can model
the frequency offset used in the GPS system,
why don't you work out this using GTR,
***as I have using the Galileo Effect***,
so readers can see if you can achive
my results in less than 13 hacks?
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
Who knows, maybe GTR can be made to
agree with the Galileo Effect with less than 13 hacks,
and maybe you can be the one that proves this.
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
What are the 13 hacks, crackpotter?
How many fucking times do I have to ask before you will finally explain
what they are?
As I have explained,
many things affect the OBSERVED frequency of an oscillator.
1. Distance - the Hubble Effect
2. Velocity - the Doppler Effect
3. Acceleration - the Galileo Effect
4. Jerk - the Gisse Effect
I suggest that anyone with normal intelligence,
and reading comprehension
can understand what the Galileo Effect is,
from reading the four lines above.
But cut to the chase Gisse,
considering that you are a physicist,
who asserts that General Relativity can model
the frequency offset used in the GPS system,
why don't you work out this using GTR,
***as I have using the Galileo Effect***,
so readers can see if you can achieve
my results in less than 13 hacks?
Now don't get all bent out of shape Gisse,
and go foaming at the mouth,
and try to get out of PROVING
your CLAIMED physics and math talents,
by equivocating, name calling, asking stupid questions,
creating strawmen, using vulgarities, etc.
Just demonstrate your knowledge of GTR
to the sci.physics readers.
--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?=" |
|
| Title: Gisse's posting history says it all. |
07 Dec 2006 05:08:05 AM |
|
|
Hi Tom_Potter, You're barking up the wrong tree.
No one who has ever read Gisse's posting history could come to the conclusion
that he had anything to offer besides:
equivocating, name calling, asking stupid questions,
creating strawmen, using vulgarities, etc.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Gisse's posting history says it all. |
07 Dec 2006 05:48:46 AM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_7_4_@Cotse.NET...
Hi Tom_Potter, You're barking up the wrong tree.
No one who has ever read Gisse's posting history could come to the
conclusion
that he had anything to offer besides:
equivocating, name calling, asking stupid questions,
creating strawmen, using vulgarities, etc.
Which shows _you_ have not read his posting history.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Gisse's posting history says it all. |
07 Dec 2006 11:57:44 AM |
|
|
In article <Jeff_Relf_2006_Dec_7_4_@Cotse.NET>,
JeffŠRelf <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:
Hi Tom_Potter, You're barking up the wrong tree.
No one who has ever read Gisse's posting history could come to the conclusion
that he had anything to offer besides:
equivocating, name calling, asking stupid questions,
creating strawmen, using vulgarities, etc.
You missed out "pointing out your blinding inanity"
--
Just \int_0^\infty du it!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Gisse's posting history says it all. |
07 Dec 2006 06:02:15 AM |
|
|
Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi Tom_Potter, You're barking up the wrong tree.
No one who has ever read Gisse's posting history could come to the conclusion
that he had anything to offer besides:
equivocating, name calling, asking stupid questions,
creating strawmen, using vulgarities, etc.
Don't forget all the times I told you to stop posting ***** to
sci.physics, like you are doing right now.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
