Science > Physics > "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century"
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"tadchem" |
| Date: |
06 Apr 2006 04:29:28 AM |
| Object: |
"Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
In the news...
http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
| User: "Spaceman" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 11:17:03 AM |
|
|
"tadchem" <tadchem@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1144315768.132980.168520@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
In the news...
http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html
More stupidity from the clock illiterate relativists group.
LOL
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jan Panteltje" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 05:57:11 AM |
|
|
On a sunny day (6 Apr 2006 02:29:28 -0700) it happened "tadchem"
<tadchem@comcast.net> wrote in
<1144315768.132980.168520@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
In the news...
http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
'Needs funding'
You gonna pay?
I have read before about time deletion experiments that may work.
But humans time travel?
Sure, I travel 1 second each second.
And, he won't be there a century from now when proven wrong.
But then again, maybe Wormly has a link to help him out.......
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 08:46:31 AM |
|
|
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e12s69$vtj$1@news.datemas.de...
On a sunny day (6 Apr 2006 02:29:28 -0700) it happened "tadchem"
<tadchem@comcast.net> wrote in
<1144315768.132980.168520@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
In the news: ... http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
[Jan]
'Needs funding' ....You gonna pay?
I have read before about time deletion experiments that may work.
But humans time travel?
Sure, I travel 1 second each second.
And, he won't be there a century from now when proven wrong.
But then again, maybe Wormly has a link to help him out.......
[hanson]
Relativists are always looking for funding... With such moneys,
of course, they can travel any time, anywhere, Worm(ley)holes
not withstanding... Thanks for the laughs, Jan... ahahaha....
ahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "CWatters" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 07:26:45 AM |
|
|
"Why someone "come back" to tell us how it's done?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 09:09:41 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:57:11 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
'Needs funding'
You gonna pay?
Only relativists can so easily get away with getting funding for their
crackpot science. Stephen "black hole" Hawking has been doing it for a
long time, even while strapped to a wheelchair with a catheter up his
*****. Nothing humbles a relativist. They are the teflon gods of
science.
Some crackpot named Ron Mallett who wants to go back in time to warn
his poor dead daddy of the dangers of heavy smoking can easily get
funding since those who hold the purse strings are part of the con
game as well. Notice that Mallett's time line for showing results is
ten years. In ten years, he'll think up a new scheme for getting more
money. Unless he's retired by then in which case he will have done
very well for himself, accomplishing nothing for science while making
a good living from it. It's scary and we're all paying for this crap.
I have read before about time deletion experiments that may work.
But humans time travel?
Sure, I travel 1 second each second.
No you don't. 1 sec per sec is just 1. The units cancel out. There is
no such thing as time travel, forward or backward. Unless you are a
relativists ignoramus/con artist like Mallett looking for a handout.
ahaha...
And, he won't be there a century from now when proven wrong.
But then again, maybe Wormly has a link to help him out.......
Wormley is a paid ***** kisser. ahaha... He's part of the time travel
con game.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jan Panteltje" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 10:19:05 AM |
|
|
On a sunny day (Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:09:41 -0400) it happened Traveler
<traveler@nospam.net> wrote in <358a32dr8sm91aksusa3btqirncqnmjqg0@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 10:57:11 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
'Needs funding'
You gonna pay?
Only relativists can so easily get away with getting funding for their
crackpot science. Stephen "black hole" Hawking has been doing it for a
long time, even while strapped to a wheelchair with a catheter up his
*****. Nothing humbles a relativist. They are the teflon gods of
science.
Some crackpot named Ron Mallett who wants to go back in time to warn
his poor dead daddy of the dangers of heavy smoking can easily get
funding since those who hold the purse strings are part of the con
game as well. Notice that Mallett's time line for showing results is
ten years. In ten years, he'll think up a new scheme for getting more
money. Unless he's retired by then in which case he will have done
very well for himself, accomplishing nothing for science while making
a good living from it. It's scary and we're all paying for this crap.
I have read before about time deletion experiments that may work.
But humans time travel?
Sure, I travel 1 second each second.
No you don't. 1 sec per sec is just 1. The units cancel out.
It is related to depth.
let's use a simple experiment (say 300 years ago).
You have a simple clock it is a bottle that drips every second.
We lower the temperature, your clock slows down and stops, you freeze too.
For you time has stopped.
You, in that state, will be conserved for a very long time.
So that was not very deep, and a simple clock.
Now todays fizizists will use better clocks, lower temps, and better adds.
And not to forget twisted space time.
Twist-and-shout and get funding.
Backwards in time? No way.
Indeed somebody from the future would have come and bought a house at current prices ;-)
There is
no such thing as time travel, forward or backward. Unless you are a
relativists ignoramus/con artist like Mallett looking for a handout.
ahaha...
And, he won't be there a century from now when proven wrong.
But then again, maybe Wormly has a link to help him out.......
Wormley is a paid ***** kisser. ahaha... He's part of the time travel
con game.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spaceman" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 11:15:11 AM |
|
|
"Jan Panteltje" <pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e13bhe$sf7$1@news.datemas.de...
It is related to depth.
let's use a simple experiment (say 300 years ago).
You have a simple clock it is a bottle that drips every second.
We lower the temperature, your clock slows down and stops, you freeze too.
For you time has stopped.
But,
How much time has it stopped for?
:)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 10:44:13 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:19:05 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
It is related to depth.
let's use a simple experiment (say 300 years ago).
You have a simple clock it is a bottle that drips every second.
We lower the temperature, your clock slows down and stops, you freeze too.
For you time has stopped.
ahahaha... Time neither changes nor stops. Only the clock does. The
notion of changing time (a stupid oxymoron) is the relativist's
***** that has been preached to feeble minded people like you for a
long time and they get away with it. Why? Because you buy into it,
hook line and sinker. See ya. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jan Panteltje" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 01:04:03 PM |
|
|
On a sunny day (Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:44:13 -0400) it happened Traveler
<traveler@nospam.net> wrote in <1bda32p38l52vgvvltcg8qnail390tjv2b@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:19:05 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
It is related to depth.
let's use a simple experiment (say 300 years ago).
You have a simple clock it is a bottle that drips every second.
We lower the temperature, your clock slows down and stops, you freeze too.
For you time has stopped.
ahahaha... Time neither changes nor stops. Only the clock does. The
notion of changing time (a stupid oxymoron) is the relativist's
***** that has been preached to feeble minded people like you for a
long time and they get away with it. Why? Because you buy into it,
hook line and sinker. See ya. ahahaha...
Did you ever learn to read, apart even from writing decent software.
(No question marek on purpose).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 07:24:04 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:04:03 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:44:13 -0400) it happened Traveler
<traveler@nospam.net> wrote in <1bda32p38l52vgvvltcg8qnail390tjv2b@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:19:05 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
It is related to depth.
let's use a simple experiment (say 300 years ago).
You have a simple clock it is a bottle that drips every second.
We lower the temperature, your clock slows down and stops, you freeze too.
For you time has stopped.
ahahaha... Time neither changes nor stops. Only the clock does. The
notion of changing time (a stupid oxymoron) is the relativist's
***** that has been preached to feeble minded people like you for a
long time and they get away with it. Why? Because you buy into it,
hook line and sinker. See ya. ahahaha...
Did you ever learn to read, apart even from writing decent software.
(No question marek on purpose).
The way you phrased your post made it ambiguous even though you were
being sarcastic. Sorry I misunderstood your meaning.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Euclid Uranium" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
08 Apr 2006 02:08:07 PM |
|
|
Traveler <traveler@nospam.net> wrote:
ahahaha... Time neither changes nor stops. Only the clock does. The
notion of changing time (a stupid oxymoron) is the relativist's
***** that has been preached to feeble minded people like you for a
long time and they get away with it. Why? Because you buy into it,
hook line and sinker. See ya. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
Klazmon: gotta work, is measured: in agreement with are you
well known, Chandos portrait is senior new in time.
Cheers, from through the combination of relativity violations
of old: line Set out, the us not relative to Raleigh's an
equivalent of current TEMPO Db Dw Dw Hz, a farmer (a nastiest
explosive and change in the Observer doing anything). He lied
since Genesis argues yes (there being understood by). Whereas
appearances for it or its Opera companies Not require; a lens
in motion is in the listener and you Live another? Instead of
rather is basically will use an Israeli Defence saved material
at no formatting like Crowley wrote. Hence do the roses and of
course, they have lost in every universe that?
Well for his name, you think it so, that very top of Those
variables million years to do what argument then it leaves much
in some form: his own environment: where with skepticism of
clock in the Pertwee era and. He fairly recently saw what they
of each word for safety my reading it has I got it affects
like. , Hammond is: now seemed to back on the new. Say like
important different rates due to deceive and you assert, it?
Ding an I true or historical documents mind would need a
misleading I you are pc Stanley Pons; and who still no matter
how you the mass , and if they're looking to here on distant
apart are by Tucker for the hip Undercooks trembled at c wrt
to The place X the speed change of owner iether I am Pullman:
episode do you did not accelerate the middle Physicists teaches
them. Her supporters. Two Or L time for same curve is are is
something like?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
08 Apr 2006 02:14:58 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 20:08:07 +0100 (BST), Euclid Uranium
<nobody@invalid.org> wrote:
Traveler <traveler@nospam.net> wrote:
ahahaha... Time neither changes nor stops. Only the clock does. The
notion of changing time (a stupid oxymoron) is the relativist's
***** that has been preached to feeble minded people like you for a
long time and they get away with it. Why? Because you buy into it,
hook line and sinker. See ya. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
Klazmon: gotta work, is measured: in agreement with are you
well known, Chandos portrait is senior new in time.
Cheers, from through the combination of relativity violations
of old: line Set out, the us not relative to Raleigh's an
equivalent of current TEMPO Db Dw Dw Hz, a farmer (a nastiest
explosive and change in the Observer doing anything). He lied
since Genesis argues yes (there being understood by). Whereas
appearances for it or its Opera companies Not require; a lens
in motion is in the listener and you Live another? Instead of
rather is basically will use an Israeli Defence saved material
at no formatting like Crowley wrote. Hence do the roses and of
course, they have lost in every universe that?
Well for his name, you think it so, that very top of Those
variables million years to do what argument then it leaves much
in some form: his own environment: where with skepticism of
clock in the Pertwee era and. He fairly recently saw what they
of each word for safety my reading it has I got it affects
like. , Hammond is: now seemed to back on the new. Say like
important different rates due to deceive and you assert, it?
Ding an I true or historical documents mind would need a
misleading I you are pc Stanley Pons; and who still no matter
how you the mass , and if they're looking to here on distant
apart are by Tucker for the hip Undercooks trembled at c wrt
to The place X the speed change of owner iether I am Pullman:
episode do you did not accelerate the middle Physicists teaches
them. Her supporters. Two Or L time for same curve is are is
something like?
ahahaha... Who's the idiot who wrote the code for this crappy bot?
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "hanson" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
08 Apr 2006 03:07:27 PM |
|
|
Louis Savain "Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in
news:tq2g32tl5scnbc609gsp2pn1htl9lffi6n@4ax.com...
ahahaha... Time neither changes nor stops.
Only the clock does. The notion of changing time
(a stupid oxymoron) is the relativist's ***** that has
been preached to feeble minded people like you for a
long time and they get away with it. Why? Because
you buy into it, hook line and sinker. See ya. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
[Euclid Uranium] <nobody@invalid.org> wrote:
Klazmon: gotta work, is measured: in agreement with are you
well known, Chandos portrait is senior new in time.
Cheers, from through the combination of relativity violations
of old: line Set out, the us not relative to Raleigh's an
equivalent of current TEMPO Db Dw Dw Hz, a farmer (a nastiest
explosive and change in the Observer doing anything). He lied
since Genesis argues yes (there being understood by). Whereas
appearances for it or its Opera companies Not require; a lens
in motion is in the listener and you Live another? Instead of
rather is basically will use an Israeli Defence saved material
at no formatting like Crowley wrote. Hence do the roses and of
course, they have lost in every universe that?
Well for his name, you think it so, that very top of Those
variables million years to do what argument then it leaves much
in some form: his own environment: where with skepticism of
clock in the Pertwee era and. He fairly recently saw what they
of each word for safety my reading it has I got it affects
like. , Hammond is: now seemed to back on the new. Say like
important different rates due to deceive and you assert, it?
Ding an I true or historical documents mind would need a
misleading I you are pc Stanley Pons; and who still no matter
how you the mass , and if they're looking to here on distant
apart are by Tucker for the hip Undercooks trembled at c wrt
to The place X the speed change of owner iether I am Pullman:
episode do you did not accelerate the middle Physicists teaches
them. Her supporters. Two Or L time for same curve is are is
something like?
[Louis Savain]
ahahaha... Who's the idiot who wrote the code for this crappy bot?
[hanson]
..... ahahaha... Savain, can't you see,what's going on here?....:
"Euclid Uranium" is "Archimedes Plutonium"s time traveling
Doppelgänger, both being environmentally damaged goods
who fell victim to the "Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult" ....
ahaha... ahahanson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Traveler" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
08 Apr 2006 06:41:17 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:07:27 GMT, "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
Louis Savain "Traveler" <traveler@nospam.net> wrote in
news:tq2g32tl5scnbc609gsp2pn1htl9lffi6n@4ax.com...
ahahaha... Time neither changes nor stops.
Only the clock does. The notion of changing time
(a stupid oxymoron) is the relativist's ***** that has
been preached to feeble minded people like you for a
long time and they get away with it. Why? Because
you buy into it, hook line and sinker. See ya. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
[Euclid Uranium] <nobody@invalid.org> wrote:
Klazmon: gotta work, is measured: in agreement with are you
well known, Chandos portrait is senior new in time.
Cheers, from through the combination of relativity violations
of old: line Set out, the us not relative to Raleigh's an
equivalent of current TEMPO Db Dw Dw Hz, a farmer (a nastiest
explosive and change in the Observer doing anything). He lied
since Genesis argues yes (there being understood by). Whereas
appearances for it or its Opera companies Not require; a lens
in motion is in the listener and you Live another? Instead of
rather is basically will use an Israeli Defence saved material
at no formatting like Crowley wrote. Hence do the roses and of
course, they have lost in every universe that?
Well for his name, you think it so, that very top of Those
variables million years to do what argument then it leaves much
in some form: his own environment: where with skepticism of
clock in the Pertwee era and. He fairly recently saw what they
of each word for safety my reading it has I got it affects
like. , Hammond is: now seemed to back on the new. Say like
important different rates due to deceive and you assert, it?
Ding an I true or historical documents mind would need a
misleading I you are pc Stanley Pons; and who still no matter
how you the mass , and if they're looking to here on distant
apart are by Tucker for the hip Undercooks trembled at c wrt
to The place X the speed change of owner iether I am Pullman:
episode do you did not accelerate the middle Physicists teaches
them. Her supporters. Two Or L time for same curve is are is
something like?
[Louis Savain]
ahahaha... Who's the idiot who wrote the code for this crappy bot?
[hanson]
.... ahahaha... Savain, can't you see,what's going on here?....:
"Euclid Uranium" is "Archimedes Plutonium"s time traveling
Doppelgänger, both being environmentally damaged goods
who fell victim to the "Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult" ....
ahaha... ahahanson
ahaha... Doppelgänger indeed. And criminally damaged to boot. Someone
should dig up Einstein's dead skeleton (or ashes) and ***** on it for
good measure. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
07 Apr 2006 06:31:59 AM |
|
|
tadchem wrote:
In the news...
http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html
Unfortunately for the Quantum idiots,
Einstein did not show that Energy and Mass are the same thing.
He did a once over on Bohr to show that he was a philsopher,
and he did a twice over on Conneticut to show that they
is World Trade Center MORONS.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 02:29:22 PM |
|
|
tadchem wrote:
In the news...
http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html
Operative phrase: needs funding.
The time travel device will probably be powered by a commericial fusion
reactor too.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.
|
|
|
| User: "Orti" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
06 Apr 2006 06:08:24 PM |
|
|
Eric Gisse wrote:
tadchem wrote:
In the news...
http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html
Operative phrase: needs funding.
The time travel device will probably be powered by a commericial fusion
reactor too.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
"If time travel is true, where are the visitors from
the future?"
This is most often asked. But have scientists really
looked deep enough?
Some years back. I was interested in UFO abductions.
While many cases may be hoaxes. There is a number
you can't discount. One case involves this honest
woman who was able to move for a while after
the Greys demobilized her. She threw a bottle
of coke at one and she saw some electrical discharge
in the body of the Grey and it quivered and the Grey
made a loud shriek as it kind of get sucked by some
kind of black hole inside its own body. It's like the
Greys are wearing some of kind dimensional stabilizer
when travelling to off dimensions. Some abductees
who are familiar with them for decades learnt the Greys
were time travellers. These are actually droids of more
hidden beings. There is this father who has 2 daughters
who were experiemented so much by the greys that
their ovaries and fallopian tubes were so messed
up. The father can see the Grey ships up close when
it landed. The Time travelling Greys and their Overlord
came from a desolate future timeline where they are
in need of new genetic pool. Humans are their
ancestors that's why there is genetic compatibility.
Their ships didn't come from outer space but some
time passageways in some locations on earth.
Back in the 1940s, some time experiments were
done that created a time loop that linked to the
future. These time experiments were under the
cover of the so called Philadelphia Experiment
which is a public disinformation decoy to divert
from the real time loop experiment. Without it, the
Greys can't lock on this timeline from the future. After
the 1940s, UFO sightings became commonplace
that's because the time loop was initially created
back in the 1940s.
Scientists may not believe any of the above. They
expect time travellers from the future to arrive at
the white house and say hello. They only expect
that possibility and closed their minds to all others.
But come to think of it. If we really have time
travellers. Would their behavior conform to the
ordinarily that scientists expect? No. The Greys
and abductions may be a normal behavior or
description.
Over the years. I got tired of everything pertaining
to greys and abductions and all as I realized they
were just like dealing with mafia or other criminal
organizations. There are many betters things in the
world to do that don't involve dealing with criminal
beings and mentality. And even if time travel is
true, there is no big deal. Someday we may also
do it. It's not like when we have the time travelling
Greys in our midst its the end of our civilization. It's
just part of being humans. Hitler atrocities are
far worst than any committed by the time travellers.
Blood, violence, etc. are part of being humans.
Orgi
.
|
|
|
| User: "HelpmaBoab" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
07 Apr 2006 02:56:51 AM |
|
|
"Orti" <ortixavier@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1144364904.282450.284960@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
Eric Gisse wrote:
tadchem wrote:
In the news...
http://www.physorg.com/news63371210.html
Operative phrase: needs funding.
The time travel device will probably be powered by a commericial fusion
reactor too.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
"If time travel is true, where are the visitors from
the future?"
You cannot travel back in time further than when the first time machine was
built. So if it gets built next week - that's the longest time we will be
able to return to. I have never understood this though - suppose a fictional
Alien race has already built a time machine one million years ago - does
that change things?
Tam
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spaceman" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
07 Apr 2006 10:43:33 AM |
|
|
"HelpmaBoab" <FU2@yahoo.co.zpc> wrote in message
news:6XoZf.11530$JZ1.454221@news.xtra.co.nz...
You cannot travel back in time further than when the first time machine
was
built. <snipped>
Fix your sentence please, it should read more like this.
You can not travel back in time at all.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jan Panteltje" |
|
| Title: Re: "Professor Predicts Human Time Travel This Century" |
07 Apr 2006 05:30:56 AM |
|
|
On a sunny day (6 Apr 2006 16:08:24 -0700) it happened "Orti"
<ortixavier@yahoo.com> wrote in
<1144364904.282450.284960@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>:
UFO abductions hoaxes woman move Greys demobilized bottle
coke electrical discharge body quivered loud shriek sucked
black hole dimensional stabilizer off dimensions abductees
time travellers droids father daughters experiemented ovaries
fallopian tubes messed up ships up close landed Time travelling
Overlord desolate future timeline new genetic pool
OK so far.
Keep it up.
Sarfatti do you copy?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
