| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Huang Xien Chen" |
| Date: |
28 Apr 2007 03:51:13 PM |
| Object: |
Public Service Announcement |
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping your left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the ***** on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
.
|
|
| User: "boson boss" |
|
| Title: Re: Public Service Announcement |
28 Apr 2007 05:42:54 PM |
|
|
On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping your left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the ***** on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for
further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information within
the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it occupies
one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own
definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality is
like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet
another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Huang Xien Chen" |
|
| Title: Re: Public Service Announcement |
28 Apr 2007 08:30:09 PM |
|
|
"boson boss" <junkerade@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177800174.637630.306470@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping your
left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the *****
on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for
further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information within
the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it occupies
one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own
definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality is
like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet
another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is.
I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory meter is
going nuts right about now.
Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The graduations
are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of
graduations is indeterminate.
[1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a + ~b ).
[2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as (a)*( ~b).
There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme.
In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves
around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave.
In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around, and
the notion of scale would really help here I think.
Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of the
same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately either
continuous or discrete.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Huang Xien Chen" |
|
| Title: Re: Public Service Announcement |
29 Apr 2007 10:23:08 AM |
|
|
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping your
left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the *****
on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for
further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information within
the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it occupies
one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own
definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality is
like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet
another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is.
I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory meter
is
going nuts right about now.
Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The
graduations
are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of
graduations is indeterminate.
[1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a + ~b ).
[2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as (a)*( ~b).
There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme.
In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves
around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave.
In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around,
and
the notion of scale would really help here I think.
Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of the
same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately
either
continuous or discrete.
You can easily craft some arguments based on this approach which address
everything in QED. Partial reflection of light by a surface of glass,
diffraction gradients, bla bla bla. In fact, this approach sheds light on
"why" you have partial reflection of light on the surface of glass in the
first place, I suspect that absorption reflectance and transmittance is
rather quite a bit like the Huygens-Fresnel model, the usual wave
explanation which explains pinhole diffraction.
.
|
|
|
| User: "boson boss" |
|
| Title: Re: Public Service Announcement |
29 Apr 2007 05:18:19 PM |
|
|
On Apr 29, 5:23 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping your
left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the *****
on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for
further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information within
the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it occupies
one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own
definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality is
like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet
another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is.
I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory meter
is
going nuts right about now.
Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The
graduations
are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of
graduations is indeterminate.
[1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a + ~b ).
[2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as (a)*( ~b).
There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme.
In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves
around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave.
In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around,
and
the notion of scale would really help here I think.
Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of the
same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately
either
continuous or discrete.
You can easily craft some arguments based on this approach which address
everything in QED. Partial reflection of light by a surface of glass,
diffraction gradients, bla bla bla. In fact, this approach sheds light on
"why" you have partial reflection of light on the surface of glass in the
first place, I suspect that absorption reflectance and transmittance is
rather quite a bit like the Huygens-Fresnel model, the usual wave
explanation which explains pinhole diffraction.
I dunno if the waves can go through phase change of medium or
something like that. The push pull philosophy for waves across glass
navigates into zone of free discharge in the empty space.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Huang Xien Chen" |
|
| Title: Re: Public Service Announcement |
29 Apr 2007 07:18:49 PM |
|
|
"boson boss" <junkerade@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177885099.796158.103380@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 29, 5:23 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping
your
left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the
*****
on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for
further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information
within
the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it
occupies
one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own
definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality
is
like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet
another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is.
I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory
meter
is
going nuts right about now.
Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The
graduations
are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of
graduations is indeterminate.
[1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a +
~b ).
[2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as
(a)*( ~b).
There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme.
In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves
around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave.
In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh
around,
and
the notion of scale would really help here I think.
Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of
the
same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately
either
continuous or discrete.
You can easily craft some arguments based on this approach which address
everything in QED. Partial reflection of light by a surface of glass,
diffraction gradients, bla bla bla. In fact, this approach sheds light
on
"why" you have partial reflection of light on the surface of glass in
the
first place, I suspect that absorption reflectance and transmittance is
rather quite a bit like the Huygens-Fresnel model, the usual wave
explanation which explains pinhole diffraction.
I dunno if the waves can go through phase change of medium or
something like that. The push pull philosophy for waves across glass
navigates into zone of free discharge in the empty space.
I get the feeling that folks have been thinking about this exact approach
that I am pursuing. That people have been toying with it for many years, but
have not been able to make it work. That nonexistence makes no sense, and
nobody ever got past that point.
But I am very curious, because allowing existence to be indeterminate does
not seem like such a huge leap. But making the connection to order,
disorder, randomness, bla bla bla, ........now that is quite a stretch,
.....and allowing space to flip flop back and forth from discrete to
continuous freely ? I think that most people would probably scoff at that -
initially anyway. Until it is shown that it might make sense algebraically.
Woo-wee
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "boson boss" |
|
| Title: Re: Public Service Announcement |
29 Apr 2007 08:13:48 AM |
|
|
On Apr 29, 3:30 am, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"boson boss" <junker...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177800174.637630.306470@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping your
left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the *****
on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for
further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information within
the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it occupies
one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own
definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality is
like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet
another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is.
I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory meter is
going nuts right about now.
Yeah catch my string if you can ;-)
Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The graduations
are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of
graduations is indeterminate.
[1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a + ~b ).
[2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as (a)*( ~b).
But you se (e) and (f) contain the same coding sequence!
There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme.
In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves
around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave.
It appears that way, but all extensions, all elongations, all holes,
even some gyrochronological period is one single wave form don't you
think?
In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around, and
the notion of scale would really help here I think.
Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of the
same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately either
continuous or discrete.
Space is mystery. :-))
.
|
|
|
| User: "Huang Xien Chen" |
|
| Title: Re: Public Service Announcement |
29 Apr 2007 01:57:04 PM |
|
|
"boson boss" <junkerade@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177852428.333770.100670@c35g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 29, 3:30 am, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"boson boss" <junker...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177800174.637630.306470@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping
your
left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the
*****
on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for
further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information within
the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it occupies
one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own
definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality is
like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet
another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is.
I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory meter
is
going nuts right about now.
Yeah catch my string if you can ;-)
Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The
graduations
are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of
graduations is indeterminate.
[1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a +
~b ).
[2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as (a)*(
~b).
But you se (e) and (f) contain the same coding sequence!
There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme.
In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves
around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave.
It appears that way, but all extensions, all elongations, all holes,
even some gyrochronological period is one single wave form don't you
think?
gyrochronological ?
Is that something like an OBGYN ?
In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around,
and
the notion of scale would really help here I think.
Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of the
same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately
either
continuous or discrete.
Space is mystery. :-))
.
|
|
|
| User: "boson boss" |
|
| Title: Re: Public Service Announcement |
29 Apr 2007 04:53:07 PM |
|
|
On Apr 29, 8:57 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"boson boss" <junker...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177852428.333770.100670@c35g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 29, 3:30 am, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"boson boss" <junker...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177800174.637630.306470@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 28, 10:51 pm, "Huang Xien Chen" <huangxienc...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Attn: All Physicists of Planet Earth.
Please drop your pants, bend slightly at the waist, and gripping
your
left
foot behind your back just go ahead and kick yourself right in the
*****
on
behalf of myself.
Repeat this 3 times while hopping on the right foot and spinning
counterclockwise as viewed from above.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
I'd like to point out figure (k) which has a certain relevance for
further expansion. Imagine that you have to deliver information within
the "rod". The wave occupies whole rod or one middle. Then it occupies
one half or the quarter at the center. As it searches for it's own
definition of that region it is folded into halves. So nonlocality is
like realizing that all reality exists inside of an antenna, and yet
another one folded. It is unknowable where antenna is.
I can smell a setup a mile away. You're good, but my string theory meter
is
going nuts right about now.
Yeah catch my string if you can ;-)
Image (k) represent length where the quantization if fixed. The
graduations
are stationary. This contrasts with image (f) where the placement of
graduations is indeterminate.
[1] When length is acting like image (e) we can write this as ( a +
~b ).
[2] When length is acting like image (f) we can write this as (a)*(
~b).
But you se (e) and (f) contain the same coding sequence!
There are who possible ways to charaterize waves in this scheme.
In situation [1] the green (sub-Plancklength and trivial) region moves
around discretely, basically a cellular automata-like wave.
It appears that way, but all extensions, all elongations, all holes,
even some gyrochronological period is one single wave form don't you
think?
gyrochronological ?
Is that something like an OBGYN ?
Probably. Its a history of rotation of an object and I think its
unhealthy :-))
In situation [2] you simply allow probability densities to slosh around,
and
the notion of scale would really help here I think.
Lastly, situation [1] and [2] are basically two different aspects of the
same thing due to topological indeterminacy. Space is indeterminately
either
continuous or discrete.
Space is mystery. :-))
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
