Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited)



 Science > Physics > Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Rushtown"
Date: 28 Nov 2004 10:33:57 PM
Object: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited)
Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.
If this is the case the paradox in the double slit experiment can be resolved.
When one makes a measurement it does not split the world into many different
worlds. What happens is that when the next "frame" happens one of zillions of
possible universes happens. This "next to happen frame" incorporates all the
double slit experiments being done in myriads of galaxies between frames at the
same time.
This solves the "action at a distance" problem. We do pick the univese we are
going to live in in the next millisecond by our conscious choices. We just
don't cause a multiplicity of worlds when we do it. Uncle Al says, "Stooopid"
"idiot" --there I saved you the trouble Uncle Al.
.

User: "RolandRB"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 29 Nov 2004 09:29:37 AM
(Rushtown) wrote in message news:<20041128233357.21734.00001251@mb-m14.aol.com>...

Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.
If this is the case the paradox in the double slit experiment can be resolved.
When one makes a measurement it does not split the world into many different
worlds. What happens is that when the next "frame" happens one of zillions of
possible universes happens. This "next to happen frame" incorporates all the
double slit experiments being done in myriads of galaxies between frames at the
same time.
This solves the "action at a distance" problem. We do pick the univese we are
going to live in in the next millisecond by our conscious choices. We just
don't cause a multiplicity of worlds when we do it. Uncle Al says, "Stooopid"
"idiot" --there I saved you the trouble Uncle Al.

I don't like the multiple universe idea. If they chose people to do
the experiment who had previously nearly died then they should get
less interference from other universes because they were there in less
of them.
I fancy a new idea. How about a photon causes a cascade of similar
photons but without enough energy to exist, much like you have
particles that annihilate each other in space because they do not have
enough energy to exist? And these virtual photons interfere with each
other and give you the double slit pattern. That any good?
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 29 Nov 2004 05:10:52 AM
(Rushtown) wrote in message news:<20041128233357.21734.00001251@mb-m14.aol.com>...

Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.
If this is the case the paradox in the double slit experiment can be resolved.
When one makes a measurement it does not split the world into many different
worlds. What happens is that when the next "frame" happens one of zillions of
possible universes happens. This "next to happen frame" incorporates all the
double slit experiments being done in myriads of galaxies between frames at the
same time.
This solves the "action at a distance" problem. We do pick the univese we are
going to live in in the next millisecond by our conscious choices. We just
don't cause a multiplicity of worlds when we do it. Uncle Al says, "Stooopid"
"idiot" --there I saved you the trouble Uncle Al.

Moron.
Your inane ramblings do not solve anything.
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 29 Nov 2004 10:50:54 AM
Rushtown wrote:


Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.

[snip]
Those would be larger or smaller than Planck time intervals?

If this is the case the paradox in the double slit experiment can be resolved.

Idiot.
[snip crap]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.

User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 29 Nov 2004 07:46:15 AM
Rushtown wrote:

Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.

+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
| DO NOT | | LIKE RUSHTOWN -- THEY DRY |
| FEED | | UP AND BLOW AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
| DA | | |
| TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
`\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /
.
User: "Andrew E. Smyth"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 29 Nov 2004 07:48:47 PM
Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<HKFqd.414944$wV.42974@attbi_s54>...

Rushtown wrote:

Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.



+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
| DO NOT | | LIKE RUSHTOWN -- THEY DRY |
| FEED | | UP AND BLOW AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
| DA | | |
| TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
`\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /

Sam, you're trying to ruin my fun. I'm not the idiot---they are the
idiots in responding to me. I would never respond to an idiot such as
myself.
But Uncle Al is hooked for life. Watch my skill in the next few
months getting him hot and bothered by everything I post. Not bad for
a guy who flunked Algebra and got 510 on the math SAT, huh.
.
User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 29 Nov 2004 10:25:49 PM
Andrew E. Smyth wrote:

Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<HKFqd.414944$wV.42974@attbi_s54>...

Rushtown wrote:

Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.



+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
| DO NOT | | LIKE RUSHTOWN -- THEY DRY |
| FEED | | UP AND BLOW AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
| DA | | |
| TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
`\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /



Sam, you're trying to ruin my fun. I'm not the idiot---they are the
idiots in responding to me. I would never respond to an idiot such as
myself.
But Uncle Al is hooked for life. Watch my skill in the next few
months getting him hot and bothered by everything I post. Not bad for
a guy who flunked Algebra and got 510 on the math SAT, huh.

But, you have to ask yourself, is the benefiting anyone other than you.
Uncle Al provides a lot of good resources for folks... why not appreciate
and respect that?
.
User: "Andrew E. Smyth"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 30 Nov 2004 09:26:42 AM
Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<hDSqd.111473$V41.109225@attbi_s52>...

Andrew E. Smyth wrote:

Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<HKFqd.414944$wV.42974@attbi_s54>...

Rushtown wrote:

Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.



+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
| DO NOT | | LIKE RUSHTOWN -- THEY DRY |
| FEED | | UP AND BLOW AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
| DA | | |
| TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
`\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /



Sam, you're trying to ruin my fun. I'm not the idiot---they are the
idiots in responding to me. I would never respond to an idiot such as
myself.
But Uncle Al is hooked for life. Watch my skill in the next few
months getting him hot and bothered by everything I post. Not bad for
a guy who flunked Algebra and got 510 on the math SAT, huh.


But, you have to ask yourself, is the benefiting anyone other than you.
Uncle Al provides a lot of good resources for folks... why not appreciate
and respect that?

I don't need much math to see what Uncle Al is. He's a killjoy.
Everytime someone posts an interesting speculation he immediately
responds "idiot" and kills the thread. Usenet is for interesting
speculations. And speculations about QM and relativity are likely to
be wrong. Why have Al jump in everytime to say IDIOT?
Also, look at Al's website, it is filled with wrong speculations, some
which even I can easily debunk.
.
User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 30 Nov 2004 09:55:45 AM
Andrew E. Smyth wrote:

Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<hDSqd.111473$V41.109225@attbi_s52>...

Andrew E. Smyth wrote:

Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<HKFqd.414944$wV.42974@attbi_s54>...


Rushtown wrote:


Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.



+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
| DO NOT | | LIKE RUSHTOWN -- THEY DRY |
| FEED | | UP AND BLOW AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
| DA | | |
| TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
`\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /



Sam, you're trying to ruin my fun. I'm not the idiot---they are the
idiots in responding to me. I would never respond to an idiot such as
myself.
But Uncle Al is hooked for life. Watch my skill in the next few
months getting him hot and bothered by everything I post. Not bad for
a guy who flunked Algebra and got 510 on the math SAT, huh.


But, you have to ask yourself, is the benefiting anyone other than you.
Uncle Al provides a lot of good resources for folks... why not appreciate
and respect that?



I don't need much math to see what Uncle Al is. He's a killjoy.
Everytime someone posts an interesting speculation he immediately
responds "idiot" and kills the thread. Usenet is for interesting
speculations. And speculations about QM and relativity are likely to
be wrong. Why have Al jump in everytime to say IDIOT?
Also, look at Al's website, it is filled with wrong speculations, some
which even I can easily debunk.

Well it might be interesting in this newsgroup for you to quote
from Uncle Al's website a statement about physics, and then using
empirical data, debunk the same. I'll all ears (or eyes as the case
may be).
.





User: "Morituri-Max"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 28 Nov 2004 10:51:12 PM
Rushtown wrote:

Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.

Why not think of the universe as millions of holes in a multiversic chunk of
swiss cheese?
.
User: "Guy Gordon"

Title: Re: Quantified time solves QM paradoxes (copywrited) 29 Nov 2004 10:55:22 AM
"Morituri-Max" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote:

Rushtown wrote:

Think of the universe as a movie running at zillions of frames per second.


Why not think of the universe as millions of holes in a multiversic chunk of
swiss cheese?

Please! His ideas are cheesy enough as it is.
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER