Science > Physics > Quantum Gravity 107.0: Superconductivity Explained by PI Rather Than Entropy etc.
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"OsherD" |
| Date: |
25 Mar 2007 01:01:34 PM |
| Object: |
Quantum Gravity 107.0: Superconductivity Explained by PI Rather Than Entropy etc. |
From Osher Doctorow
The vortex lquid above the melting point is a new phase of matter in
superconductivity with different properties from the vortex lattice,
including free flowing due to even the smallest driving force.
Although this fits into both chaotic and entropy explanations, it is
arguably better explained by analyzing direct (probable) Causation PI.
P' (A-->B) is in general larger than P(A-->B), so that (Probable)
Causation for the former is larger than for the latter. With the
driving force expressed in terms of set/event A, and the flowing as B,
we can regard the first paragraph above as described by the transition
(arrow ------> of greater than usual length expressing "transition"):
1) P(A-->B) ------------> P' (A-->B)
We can regard this as a phase transition.
There are similarities in the superconducting phase to the inflation
phase of the Universe (where the Universe's "geometry" at least is
regarded as having gone Superluminal if not instantaneous) but also to
entanglement and even to the classical view of light as "viewing its
entire past and future instantaneously".
The emphasis on chaos and entropy, on the other hand, goes in the
opposite direction to (Probable) Causation, and also goes in the
opposite direction to the very positive and "controlled" applications
of superconductivity including MRI and high energy accelerators.
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
| User: "OsherD" |
|
| Title: Re: Quantum Gravity 107.0: Superconductivity Explained by PI Rather Than Entropy etc. |
25 Mar 2007 01:20:16 PM |
|
|
From Osher Doctorow
The "positive" viewpoint of P(A-->B) and P' (A-->B) compared to the
"negative" viewpoint of chaos and entropy also extend to geometry.
In my earlier threads, I discussed the fact that P(A-->B) = 1 + y - x
with y = P(AB) and x = P(A) is a partial one-sided inverse to
Euclidean type distance, where for n dimensions (n > 1) x and y are
respectively replaed by their means (x1 + ... + xn)/n, and (y1 + ... +
yn)/n. For example, with Euclidean distance d given by:
1) d = sqrt{(y1 - x1)^ + (y2 - x2)^2 + ... + (yn - xn)^2}
and then normalizing it on a very large volume box, or even in the
unnormalized scenario, as y approaches x or yi approach xi for i = 1
to n, P(A-->B) approaches 1 (1+ technically), while d approaches 0.
This gives rise to the interpretation of P(A-->B) as the proximity or
"nearness" of A and B, as opposed to distance d or "farness" of A and
B, with the one condition that the former is one-sided (in a manner of
speaking, "from A looking toward B" rather than vice versa). This is
in many ways a positive viewpoint, as opposed to the negatively stated
"A and B are at 0 distance" which is not a "natural" way of speaking
(see various papers on psycholinguistics, fo example).
In terms of individuals versus pluralities, if I may be allowed an
interdisciplinary application, "nearness" brings out the ability of an
Individual to recognize the Individual in any (other or same) person,
while "farness" obscures that ability as an orientation and arguably
teaches people to value abstract mythical super-individual entities
("humanity" not just composed of Individuals but as something "beyond"
them, for example) not to mention averages as ways of life.
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
