Quantum Gravity 116.0: How P, P' Involve Different Phases



 Science > Physics > Quantum Gravity 116.0: How P, P' Involve Different Phases

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: ""
Date: 11 Apr 2007 02:29:53 AM
Object: Quantum Gravity 116.0: How P, P' Involve Different Phases

From Osher Doctorow

We know that:
1) P' (A-->B) = P(A-->B) + P(A' B)
2) P(A<-->B) = P(AB) + PA' B' )

From the first equation, if B is a subset of A or if B = A (up to a

set of probability 0), then P(A' B) = 0, and so P' (A-->B) = P(A--

B). But if A and B just overlap partly, that is to say intersect

partly, then P' (A-->B) and P(A-->B) are not the same in magnitude.
Thus, two different scenarios (physical scenarios in practice) are
described by (1), namely scenarios of (a) partial overlap of two set/
events, and (b) one set/event completely contained in the other.

From the second equation, it may not look at first glance as though

P' (A-->B) is involved, but recall that if B is a subset of A, then AB
= B, and A' is a subset of B' so that A' B' = A', both up to (that is
to say, not including) sets of probability 0. Therefore in the same
cases as in (1), if B is a subset of A or equals A, then (2) reduces
to:
3) P(A<-->B) = P(B) + P(A' ) = P(B) + 1 - P(A) = 1 + P(B) - P(A) =
P' (A-->B)
But P(A<-->B) is not just any old probability, but rather it is
Probable Correlation (defined pointwise rather than by any average in
the random variable representation, unlike Mainstream correlation
coefficients). So the split between partly overlapping and
completely overlapping scenarios has major effects at the levels of
Probable Correlation according to (2) and (3).
We arguably have plenty of motivation to call these two scenarios "two
phases", and what is at least as interesting is that we have a very
simple and intuitive model for how the phase transition occurs.
That is as follows. Take Venn diagrams of set/events A, B, each in
general a different size, and let them first be disjoint or mutually
exclusive and then move partly toward each other until they
intersect. This partly intersecting scenario is phase 1. Then take
the smaller set or if they're both of the same size either set, and
increase the intersection by moving this smaller set into the bigger
one so that the smaller one is "completely overlapped" by the bigger
one. This is phase 2.
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Quantum Gravity 116.1: Even More On How P, P' Involve Different Phases
Quantum Gravity 116.1: Invariance of Net or Balance of Probable Causation Across P, P'
Quantum Gravity 116.2: A Super-Newtonian Derivative For Probable Influence/Causation
Quantum Gravity 167.4: Tachyons May Be Different Phases
Quantum Gravity 175.1: Why Different Phases Are Highly Compatible With Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
Just how 'different' is the Quantum World?
Iranaian Advance in Bohmian Quantum Gravity
A Look At Quantum "Spookiness"
Quantum propagation from a Dirac initial point
Teleporting Matter's Traits: Beaming information quantum-style
Lighting A Quantum Candle On The Nature of Reality
What's the "quantum electrodynamic threshold"?
Two Quantum Mechanics Questions
Quantum interference across time. Is time existent?
Quantum entanglement
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER