Science > Physics > Quantum Gravity 230.7: Hold Onto Your Hats Regarding the 4 Forces!
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"OsherD" |
| Date: |
03 Feb 2008 10:16:49 AM |
| Object: |
Quantum Gravity 230.7: Hold Onto Your Hats Regarding the 4 Forces! |
From Osher Doctorow
Let's abbreviate gravitation as g, the weak force as w,
electromagnetic force as EM, strong force as s.
Since g depends on w which depends on EM which depends on s from last
time, then with a small assumption we can permute these dependencies
(for one thing, s was arbitrary as the starting interaction of
strength 1). Let's indicate that b depends on a or more generally
that a influences b by a --> b, so we get:
1) w --> EM --> s --> g
So gravitation underlies all the interactions, the infinite and finite
forces alternate (quantum nuclear vs macroscopic or cross macroscopic-
quantum), EM is closest to w in this sense as in electroweak
interaction.
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
| User: "OsherD" |
|
| Title: Re: Quantum Gravity 230.7: Hold Onto Your Hats Regarding the 4Forces! |
03 Feb 2008 10:25:23 AM |
|
|
From Osher Doctorow
I mistyped the permutation by stopping at w. It should be:
1) g --> w --> EM --> s
Notice that in the cosmology of the Universe, the unified forces or
interactions first differentiate into g versus w and EM and s, then s
splits off from w and EM, etc.
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Quantum Gravity 230.7: Hold Onto Your Hats Regarding the 4Forces! |
03 Feb 2008 01:24:04 PM |
|
|
On Feb 3, 11:25=A0am, OsherD <mdocto...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
From Osher Doctorow
I mistyped the permutation by stopping at w. =A0It should be:
1) g --> w --> EM --> s
But the problem with cosmology is that the
first two dependcies explain nothing about the other two
dependecies regarding the so-called expansion
of the universe. Since it's entropy that causes
the first dependency, but thermal that causes the others.
Notice that in the cosmology of the Universe, the unified forces or
interactions first differentiate into g versus w and EM and s, then s
splits off from w and EM, etc.
Osher Doctorow
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
