Quantum Gravity 83.9.4 More on Mass/Energy



 Science > Physics > Quantum Gravity 83.9.4 More on Mass/Energy

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 03 Feb 2007 12:34:54 AM
Object: Quantum Gravity 83.9.4 More on Mass/Energy

From Osher Doctorow


I appreciate the positive remarks of the last reader.
A few words on the Regge trajectory for mesons would
not be out of place here. Quantum Chromodynamics,
QCD, has to reproduce approximately results of the
Regge phenomenological theory and methods because
of their experimental success, and Sakellariadou (2007)
should be complemented by the paper of C. Chatterjee
and A. Lahere in this regard, "Monopole confinement
by flux tube," (S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic
Sciences India), Europhys. Lett. 7616, p. 1068 (2006),
http://epljournal.edciences.org, which for stable flux tube
with magnetic monopoles at the ends obtains:
1) J/E^2 = constant
similar to the Regge trajectory for mesons. Multiplying
both sides by E^2, we get of course:
2) J = constant E^2
so this is "prime" with respect to +/- (isn't the product of
two physical observables), where J is angular momentum,
E is the energy function.
Readers may have noticed that if we regard equations
as fundamental only if they have the form:
3) u = k1v1 + k2v2 + ... + knvn (n may be infinity)
where ki are constants and vi are "prime" variables (not
the product of two or more observables but are themselves
observable, and likewise u), then at least for real variables
we have a vector space instead of an algebra.
Physics has generally assumed that quantum and
relativity scenarios are algebraic (roughly speaking have
both + and - and multiplication and division), and vector
spaces don't have any except scalar multiplication
(like kv where k is a scalar and v is a vector), but there
are several reasons to believe that vector spaces are
more Fundamental or "deeper" for physics than algebras:
a) Fundamental equations or variables should intuitively
be more rare than other equations or variables.
b) Quantum algebras are not as versatile as they look,
since constraints like the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
(which the Mainstream accepts) cut down the possible
scenarios enormously.
c) (Real) vector spaces tend to lack singularities like 1/x,
while algebras have them (at 0, etc.).
d) Vector spaces are intuitively simpler than algebras,
just as for example u + v or u - v is intuitively simpler
than uw - vz, etc.
e) Vector spaces call our attention to equations like
E = E1 + E2 + ... + En or F = F1 + F2 + ... + Fn where
E is energy and F is force, which are especially relevant
in present key physics problems like the recent accelera-
tion era of the Universe, Quantum Gravity, etc. Algebras
do not do this because they have "overkill" of operations
and tend to emphasize multiplication, division, composition,
or combinations of these with addition and subtraction,
etc.
By the way, the list of unexplained objects or uncategorized
objects like tachyons and monopoles might well be
clarified and even related to explained objects if some
common variable u is hypothesized which crosscuts them
and physical observables and then additive-subtractive
equations like E = E1 + E2 + ... or u = u1 + u2 + ... are
proposed.
Osher Doctorow
Osher Doctorow
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: Quantum Gravity 83.9.4 More on Mass/Energy 03 Feb 2007 11:55:50 AM
OsherD wrote:
[snip]

Physics has generally assumed that quantum and
relativity scenarios are algebraic (roughly speaking have
both + and - and multiplication and division), and vector
spaces don't have any except scalar multiplication
(like kv where k is a scalar and v is a vector), but there
are several reasons to believe that vector spaces are
more Fundamental or "deeper" for physics than algebras:

[snip]
Description Geometry Dynamics
of state
---------------------------------------------------------
Newtonian Mechanics | Vector in | Euclidean | Newton's
| phase space | 3 + time | laws
----------------------------------------------------------
Special Relativity | Vector in | Minkowski | Newton's
| phase space | 4 dimen | laws
----------------------------------------------------------
General Relativity | Vector in | pseudo- | Newton's
| phase space | Riemannian| laws
----------------------------------------------------------
Quantum Mechanics | Vector in | Euclidean | Newton's
| Hilbert space | 3 + time | laws
----------------------------------------------------------
Relativistic QM | Vector in | Minkowski | Newton's
| Hilbert Space | 4 dim | laws
----------------------------------------------------------
QM of black holes | Vector in | pseudo- | Newton's
| Hilbert Space | Riemannian| laws
----------------------------------------------------------
Idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
User: "Dumbledore_"

Title: Re: Quantum Gravity 83.9.4 More on Mass/Energy 03 Feb 2007 12:07:40 PM
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message =
news:45C4CCA6.1CD0D610@hate.spam.net...
[snip river of *****]
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message =
news:45C399C4.D64D593C@hate.spam.net...

Newtonian physics is infinite lightspeed (instantaneous knowledge of
all aspects of a system),

You fuckin' ignorant, stoooopid, LYING *****!
ROEMER,DOPPLER, MICHELSON, SAGNAC!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ole_R%C3%B8mer
"Cassini had observed the moons of Jupiter between 1666 and 1668, and =
discovered discrepancies in his measurements that, at first, he =
attributed to light having a finite speed."
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/mmx4dummies.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Doppler/Doppler.htm
Einstein: "we shall, however, find in what follows, that the velocity of =
light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great =
velocity."
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Get the ***** out of the river of *****, you are the biggest TORD in it, =
you lying fuckheaded *****!
Go and worship Nehemiah Scudder!=20
***** and DIE!
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Quantum Gravity 83.9.2 More on Mass/Energy
Quantum Gravity 83.9.1 More on Mass/Energy
Quantum Gravity 83.9 More on Mass/Energy
Quantum Gravity 83.8 More on Mass/Energy
Quantum Gravity 83.9.3 More on Mass/Energy
Quantum Gravity 157.1: More Re Bohmian Mechanics Sinks Quantum Mechanics!
Quantum Gravity 164.5: More Re When Acceleration Turns Positive
Quantum Gravity 160.6: More Re How Sine Enters Into Strings and Springs and Elasticity
Quantum Gravity 121.0: Charge May Be More Fundamental Than Mass
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 76.2: Even More Re: Barrow vs Penrose vs PI
Quantum Gravity 117.3: More Re Fibonacci Numbers Confirm Fundamental Phases
Quantum Gravity 152.2: More Re Quantum Intersections, Unions, Distributivity
Quantum Gravity 1.5: More on Riccati Equation
Quantum Gravity 119.1: More Re Generalized Lie Derivative And Riccati Differential Equation
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 69.1: More on Why Mainstream Statistics Chose Logarithms
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER