Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 20.2: University College London



 Science > Physics > Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 20.2: University College London

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 04 Sep 2006 12:57:43 AM
Object: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 20.2: University College London

From Osher Doctorow


Why did I reach back to 2005 in Section 20.1 of this thread? Well,
it's because I was reading a paper of 1 Sep 2006 by Jia-Yu Tang, Jochen
Weller, and Alan Zablocki of University College London, "Probing
modified gravity by combining supernovae and galaxy cluster surveys,"
astro-ph/0609028 v1 1 Sep 2006.
Tang et al point out that there are three posible approaches to
acceleration of the Universe: late-time domination of an addition
component in the energy-momentum tensor, modification of the Einstein
Equation(s) on large scales, and large scale inhomogeneity of the
Universe. They emphasize the second approach and cite Carroll et al
(2005) as one of their main references for this approach, although they
use a particular model that isn't the same as Carroll et al's, namely
the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) model. The latter model is a
braneworld model with a large flat extra dimension and "leakage" of
gravitational degrees of freedom off the brane causing changes in
cosmological evolution. The simplest of these models' modified
Friedman equation is quadratic in the Hubble parameter H or H_DGP with
the non-Hubble term a linear function of energy density of the
constituents of the Universe which is set equal to the matter density
for late times.
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach
Physical Length Contraction Due to Gravity, Is it true.
Riedt's expansion conjecture versus Lorentz' contraction conjecture
Lorentz Eqs Don't Necessarily imply Length Contraction!
Dynamical Systems and Expansion-Contraction
Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 13: Raychaudhuri part 3
Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 14: Raychaudhuri 4
Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 15: Raychaudhuri 5
Lorentz Contraction and Time Dilation
Re: Contraction of Length Measurements in SR? No, not possible.
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 3.0: Gravitation Unifies Space, Time, Matter
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 11.0: Resurrection of Niels Bohr's Model for Quantum Gravity
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 15.0: Deceleration Followed By Acceleration Indicates Parabola Which Indicates Riccati
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 20.0: Determinant-Matrix-Tensor Relationships of Riccati
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER