Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.3: An Infinite Sequence of Logarithmic Paradoxes



 Science > Physics > Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.3: An Infinite Sequence of Logarithmic Paradoxes

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 04 Dec 2006 06:36:33 PM
Object: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 43.3: An Infinite Sequence of Logarithmic Paradoxes

From Osher Doctorow


The Birkhoff Causation of x on y is given by dy/dx. Although often x
is taken to be time t or some function of time, the notion is also
extended to spatial functions in simultaneous scenarios, etc.
We have:
1) Dx(log(x)) = d(log(x))/dx = 1/x, x > 0
2) Dxx(log(x)) = -1/x^2
3) Dxxx(log(x)) = 2/x^3
and so on. Since each (n + 1)st derivative is the derivative of the
nth derivative, we have a Causal sequence from "bottom up" which stays
paradoxical at x = 0, precisely where the MacLaurin Series is supposed
to be "centered". In fact, we have infinity, -infinity, infinity,
-infinity, etc. as alternating extended-real-values (the extended real
valued line, R# or R^#, is R and/or infinity or the point at infinity
and arguably -infinity). This extends to the Taylor Series expanded
about x = k for real k, again paradoxical in the analogues of (1) to
(3) above at x = k.
As if this isn't bad enough, looking at Dxxxx(log(x)) gives us
-3*2*1*x^(-4) where * is real multiplication, and we get the general
term (+/-)n!/x^(n+1) which is the multiplicative inverse of the Causal
expression x^n/n! up to x and the sign where x^n/n! is the general term
of exp(x) as an infinite series. So we're going in the opposite
direction to Probable Influence/Causation (PI) as well as wildly
oscillating from + to -.
Shouldn't we be happy with an alternating series or sequence in view of
PI and determinants and so on? Not if the "Cause" itself alternates
from + to - infinitely. Alternation has the effect of closing PI in
"additive" expressions like 1 + p1 - p2 + p3 - ... It is a
mathematical requirement. Alternation of Cause is a bizarre physical
and mathematical notion. And logarithms don't survive this scrutiny.
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.0: Infinite (Light) Velocity Implies Probable Influence/Causation (PI)
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.0: Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 51.1: Probable Influence/Causation (PI) Implies Infinite Velocity
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 45.1: How Black Holes Generate Both Infinite Gravity and Infinite Repulsion
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 2.8: Lambert's /W/ as Probable Influence/Causation (PI)
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 9.0: Surprising Relationships of Riccati y-y^2
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 77.5: Adding Stochastic Terms to Einstein's Equation For Fundamental Equations of Quantum Gravity
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 63.0: Hadrons as Black Holes
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 66.0: Holes As Tearing Generate Mass in PI and Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 54.0: Big Bang Can't Be "Rounded Off"
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 46.2: Nathan Rosen Originates Bimetric Theory, and Origin of Gravitational Optics
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 29.1: Planes and Plane Waves
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 69.0: Why Mainstream Statistics Chose Logarithms
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 75.1: Jansana in Stanford and Multivalued Logics
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 22.5: The U.K. and Portugal Develop Gravitational Optics
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER