Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.1: U. Chicago and Princeton and U. Texas



 Science > Physics > Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.1: U. Chicago and Princeton and U. Texas

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 29 Dec 2006 12:36:27 PM
Object: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.1: U. Chicago and Princeton and U. Texas

From Osher Doctorow


Bohm et al quant-ph/0212130, cited earlier in this Section and the last
one, replaces the Hilbert Space Axiom by a double Hardy Space Axiom,
which has the effect of enabling both continuous and discrete scenario
to be largely covered but also solving the Causality and Time Asymmetry
problems in Q.M. and general Q.T. (Quantum Theory). The 2005 paper by
Bohm, PP. Kielanowski, and S. Wickramasekara, respectively U. Texas
Austin, CINVESTAV Mexico, and Rice U. Texas, quant-ph/0510060 v1 8 Oct
2005, 27 pages, is equally remarkably. It solves the Causality Problem
because it results in a semigroup evolution (although in a more general
context, semigroups are still far less useful than Probable
Influence/Causation (PI) scenarios and are far too linked to
conditional probability). It solves the Time Asymmetry problem since
Quantum time symmetry is especially detrimental for description of
decay processes and resonance scattering which are intrinsically
irreversible, as well as other processes.
I'll let readers look at those papers while mentioning a few words
about U. Chicago and Princeton U. and the Princeton Institute for
Advanced Studies. The University of Chicago was founded in 1891, at
which time Illinois was still the Frontier together with the West, the
Civil War having just recently ended. Nonconformity is especially
strong in Founding and Frontier scenarios where major changes are
occurring socioculturally.
Princeton University and the Princeton Institute have various different
reasons for being tops, but here I want to mention geographical
proximity to the South. The Princetons are in New Jersey, and for
example Newark New Jersey is only 203 miles from Alexandria Virginia
(177 nautical miles) and 163 miles from Baltimore, Maryland (which was
originally a "Southern" State). It is 142 nautical miles from
Baltimore. New Jersey is the Middle Atlantic State that extends
furthest south, even though part of it touches New York. So in
addition to the stimulus of Creativity from Einstein and Godel, the
factors that operate in the Southern Universities of Texas and Florida
were arguably partly operative in the Princetons.
The proximity of Princeton to Washington, D.C. (198 miles) also put
Princeton in touch with diverse Southern and Northern representatives,
unlike the then mostly out-of-touch northern New England States and
later Western States.
Osher Doctorow
.

User: "OsherD"

Title: Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.1: U. Chicago and Princeton and U. Texas 29 Dec 2006 12:45:34 PM

From Osher Doctorow


The Bohm et al papers also extend the new 2 Hardy spaces Axiom to a
relativistic theory of resonance scattering and decay with Born
probabilities that fulfil Einstein Causality and exponential decay law,
and they enable incorporate of Individual rather than only Ensemble
experiments, including single laser-cooled ion Ba+ experiments of
Dehmelt, Sandberg, Nagourney, Sauter, Newhauser, Blatt, Taschek,
Bergquist, Peik, Hollemann, Walther, Zhao, Yu, etc.
I'll try to continue this shortly.
By the way, the CalTech and MIT engineering founding had some
surprising "Latent consequences" including more Conservative founding
which early had similarities with Southern ideas.
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 60.0: The Nonstandard Analysis Attempt To Relate to the U. Texas Rigged Hilbert Space View
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 59.0: University of Texas Nonconformist Approach
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.1: Loop Quantum Gravity Contradicts Itself and Opens The Way for "Non-Euclidean" Dynamics
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.2: Time-Dependent Eigenvalues
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 1.3: Riccati Eigenvalues
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 7.0: Effective vs "Usual" Equations in Quantum Gravity
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 9.0: Surprising Relationships of Riccati y-y^2
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 11.0: Resurrection of Niels Bohr's Model for Quantum Gravity
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 21: Interaction of Time and Space via Riccati
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 22.2: PI in Cyclotomic Equation
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 22.4: Gravitation-Light Via Cars and the Eddington-Einstein Collaboration
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 23.4: P(AB) Term of The Random Variable That Generates Time
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 23.6: The General Logistic Non-Inflation Case
Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 27.0: y = exp(kx)/x and x/exp(kx) Types
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER