Re: Uncle Al's religious Website.. Smart1234 Comments



 Science > Physics > Re: Uncle Al's religious Website.. Smart1234 Comments

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "S. Enterprize Company"
Date: 05 Aug 2003 08:41:36 AM
Object: Re: Uncle Al's religious Website.. Smart1234 Comments

James Harris wrote:


I remember a post where someone was wondering how I could keep
claiming that I'm right with all these people posting disagreement,
and it seems to me that maybe explaining how might help.


You are insane. You cannot counterargue fact, so you scream some more
as though reality never existed.

http://b5.sdvc.uwyo.edu/bab5/snds/reflecti.wav

You are loathsome and loud, http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

I noticed Uncle Al's Website. It has alot of religion in it, but why not show
the GOOD SIDE TOO.
Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=3320272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Real Atomic Hologram 3D Image Of Cobalt Atom ( Smart1234 Comments...)
Thank you for all your comments so far - keep 'em coming!
geophysics/math Ph.D. proposal, comments desired.
Re: Comments on lack of Lightcurve Evidence?
I don't believe that these comments should be buried in a thread.
Physics, Evidence of a Creator? Freeman Dyson comments
Factoring RSA And the Reversible Multiplier(comments appreciated)
Re: Scientists Rally Around NASA Chief's Global Warming Comments
Comments: "Why E=mc^2?"
Who Killed Benazir Bhutto ? Washington Post Comments
Comments desired
rpasken@eas.slu.edu , you have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is not CORRECT. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2
@%%@ always appealig for cooperation another topic ...COMMENTS??!!
rpasken@eas.slu.edu , You have made comments that Momentum is not Conserved in my PAPER. It is WRONG. It is explained in 100 Years of E=mc2
comments on cramster.com
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER