On 12 Jan, 04:10, TOH100 <toh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 9 Jan, 08:02, "Dilaudid" <dda...@adelphia.net> wrote:
You spoke with him?
I'm gonna spend a moment helping you understand.
"VISUAL COMPLEX ANALYSIS by Tristan Needham
Pg 139 IV The Riemann Sphere
1 The Point at Infinity
"In discussing inversion we saw that results about lines could always be=
understood as special limiting cases of results about circles, simply by=
letting the radius tend to infinity. This limiting process is neverthele=
ss
tiresome and clumsy; how much better it would be if lines could literall=
y be
described as circles of an infinite radius.
=A0 =A0 =A0Here is another, related inconvenience. Inversion in the unit=
circle is
a one-to-one mapping of the plane to itself that swaps pairs of points. =
The
same is true of the mapping z --> (1/z). However, there are exceptions: =
no
image point is presently associated with z =3D 0, nor is 0 to be found a=
mong
the image points.
=A0 =A0 =A0To resolve both these difficulties, note that as z moves furt=
her and
further away from the origin, (1/z) moves closer and closer to zero. Thu=
s as
z travels to ever greater distances (in any direction), it is as though =
it
were approaching a single point at infinity, written (sideways figure
eight), whose image is 0. Thus by definition, this point (infinity)
satisfies the following equations:
1/(infinity) =3D 0, =A01/0 =3D (infinity)
=A0 =A0 =A0The addition of this single point at infinity turns the compl=
ex plane
into the so called "extended complex plane." Thus we may now say, withou=
t
qualification, that z --> (1/z) is a one-to-one mapping of the extended
plane to itself."
See my friend Albert was a real rebel and only he could appreciate the
absolute brilliance of my friend Riemann. As soon as Al saw Riemann divi=
din'
by zero he just had to incorporate Riemann's Math into his General
Relativity Theory. "Of only two things I am certain, the stupidity of
humanity and the universe, and I'm not certain about the
universe." -Einstein
These two to see eye to eye on things of such mystical relevance to
everything. It's like Newton being "The Last Sorceror" Alchemy is a matt=
er
of necessity not choice. Only the epiphany of humanity can actually do t=
he
magical. You speak with Riemann about this when you get time cause he al=
so
has some secrets about Prime Number Distribution that will rattle the
foundations of Knowledge. But enough for now digest division by zero bec=
ause
it is infinite or remains undefined either way we get closer to GOD!
Peace
"bernardz" <berna...@mail.com> wrote in message
news:02182518-7b3c-4566-97c6-cd138ec178f8@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...=
On Jan 7, 11:35 pm, "Dilaudid" <dda...@adelphia.net> wrote:
Perhaps, you should investigate a treatise on complex analysis. I got=
this
friend named Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann who created his very ow=
n
non-Euclidean geometry and decided to assert that 1/0 tends to infini=
ty
Wrong.
1/0 is not solvable.
and
1/infinity tends to zero.
True.
The Mathematica Symbols did not translate to the
newsgroup leaving the Y superimposed on the =3D sign in the proof.
Not that it is too critical since the post is tongue in cheek God doe=
s
not
have time to do math but Riemann's sphere is the non-Euclidean geomet=
ry
that
accurately describes the real universe.
It is yet to be shown that Riemann's geometry accurately describes the=
real universe.
Triangles on Earth add to 182
degrees.
Irrelevant.
I got another friend named Albert who insists this geometry describes=
real
events. Now look at the proof and go figure.
When did Albert say that?
You may want a mild CNS
depressant to relax with. If so try Dilaudid, its so refreshing.
That may explain your comments.
Peace!
"bernardZ" <Berna...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21ecae054627e2a5989730@news...
In article <47812f8b$0$22613$4c368...@roadrunner.com>,
dda...@adelphia.net says...
Conversely, dividing both sides
1/1 =3D 1/1 and 0/0 =3D 0/0
No No No
you cannot divide by zero.
Here is the REAL mathematical proof of a CREATOR, written by Sollog.
You will be amazed when you read these :
http://sollogs.com/Discoveries/creator.shtmlhttp://sollogs.com/Discoveries=
/pdf.htm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I was only thinking earlier that the atom is a spherical field bound
by a cube - bye bye miss american pie!
.