On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:02:14 +0200, "Andreas Keil"
<andreas.keil@apple.nurfuerspam.de> wrote:
"Donald G. Shead" <u10889@snet.net> wrote:
The way I see it guys, is that all masses have inertia! That is it
requires
a net impulse - the product of a net force [f] and its duration [t] -
to
change a body's present velocity [vi], to some other velocity [vt];
during
which period of time, the body is displaced a distance [s]: The ratio
of
this impulse [ft], to the time rate of displacement [s/t = (vt-vi)]
that it
causes is a constant: That is ft/(s/t) = ft/(vt-vi); which can be
written
more concisely as f/t²/s = ft²/ (vt-vi)! Isn't _that_ inertia?
Why are you polluting this newsgroup with your topic. This is the third
thread you started with almost the same topic, isn't it?
You're undercounting by about 17 orders of magnitude. He starts
several every day with essentially the same non-content.
.
