| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Randy Poe" |
| Date: |
23 May 2007 08:32:26 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. |
On May 23, 7:30 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
On May 22, 9:07?pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 22, 8:19 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
On May 21, 1:49?pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 21, 5:56 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
[...]
We are really seeing a flurry of mathematics out of college graduates
today.
Robert B. Winn
What would be the point? You won't understand and there isn't anything
we can say that has not been tried at least once in the past ten
fucking years of you posting your inanities. Go away, idiot welder.
Another attempt at mathematics from a college graduate. ?This one even
attempted subtraction.
Robert B. Winn
Why do you continue to whine about lack of math? You wouldn't
understand any of it even if I were to present it to you.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Sure I would, Eric. College graduates cannot show any set of
transformation equations using t' not equal to t in which there is not
a distance contraction. Galileo, on the other hand has an equation in
his transformation equations which says t'=t. That means there is no
distance contraction in his transformation equations. I know that
this seems like heresy to you Harry Potter fans, but it happens to
coincide with reality.
Do you define "reality" as something other than "the results of
experimental tests?"
There is nothing in existence that gets
shorter just because it moves.
Empirical evidence is against your declaration of faith.
- Randy
.
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. |
23 May 2007 09:56:15 AM |
|
|
Never mind ranting at Winnie the Pooh, Blind Poe, where are the GR
calculations
for the advance of longitude of perihelion/aphelion of Mercury?
A newborn child is 19" tall, a 10-year-old is 55" tall.
Therefore human beings grow at a rate of 30 feet per century.
Empirical evidence is against your declaration of faith, fuckhead.
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1179927146.472903.296880@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
: On May 23, 7:30 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
: > On May 22, 9:07?pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
: >
: >
: >
: > > On May 22, 8:19 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
: >
: > > > On May 21, 1:49?pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote:
: >
: > > > > On May 21, 5:56 am, rbwinn <rbwi...@juno.com> wrote:
: > > > > [...]
: >
: > > > > > We are really seeing a flurry of mathematics out of college
graduates
: > > > > > today.
: > > > > > Robert B. Winn
: >
: > > > > What would be the point? You won't understand and there isn't
anything
: > > > > we can say that has not been tried at least once in the past ten
: > > > > fucking years of you posting your inanities. Go away, idiot
welder.
: >
: > > > Another attempt at mathematics from a college graduate. ?This one
even
: > > > attempted subtraction.
: > > > Robert B. Winn
: >
: > > Why do you continue to whine about lack of math? You wouldn't
: > > understand any of it even if I were to present it to you.- Hide quoted
text -
: >
: > > - Show quoted text -
: >
: > Sure I would, Eric. College graduates cannot show any set of
: > transformation equations using t' not equal to t in which there is not
: > a distance contraction. Galileo, on the other hand has an equation in
: > his transformation equations which says t'=t. That means there is no
: > distance contraction in his transformation equations. I know that
: > this seems like heresy to you Harry Potter fans, but it happens to
: > coincide with reality.
:
: Do you define "reality" as something other than "the results of
: experimental tests?"
:
: > There is nothing in existence that gets
: > shorter just because it moves.
:
: Empirical evidence is against your declaration of faith.
:
: - Randy
:
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. Re: Anisotropy in the gravity force, and Mercury. What liquid is used in non-mercury thermometers?
| Re: Photon Mass, Measuring Distance, and Mercury's orbit Re: Photon Mass, Measuring Distance, and Mercury's orbit How come some low-end thermometers are still made in mercury version? Ratio of tritiated water and hydrogen generated in mercury through anuclear reaction BIG 3 CATCH HEAT OVER MERCURY Strict spectroscopic upper/lower bounds for Mercury Mercury Vapor Lamp--Danger?
|
|
|