Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses"



 Science > Physics > Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses"

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Henry"
Date: 30 May 2007 06:43:36 PM
Object: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses"
Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

On May 25, 10:25 am, Midex <jbmccr...@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml

Another structural engineer ? Who were the others ?

Wow. Are you serious?
http://911proof.com/10.html
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/
http://www.truthout.org/
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/
http://counterpunch.org/
http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron...
.

User: "Rob Kleinschmidt"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 30 May 2007 07:31:08 PM
On May 30, 4:43 pm, Henry <b...@treason.gov> wrote:

Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

On May 25, 10:25 am, Midex <jbmccr...@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml

Another structural engineer ? Who were the others ?


Wow. Are you serious?

http://911proof.com/10.html

In the whole frikkin world, you've found one guy from
Vermont Tech and two from Switzerland. Pretty impressive,
but I think I'll go with the MIT faculty myself.
http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/
.
User: "proehling"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 30 May 2007 09:12:07 PM
"Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216128@aol.com> wrote

In the whole frikkin world, you've found one guy from
Vermont Tech and two from Switzerland. Pretty impressive,
but I think I'll go with the MIT faculty myself.

They're all in on the coverup! (But it *does* seem that in a world with
circa 7 billion people, *three* sounds just a bit low...)
.
User: "Henry"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 01 Jun 2007 07:56:04 AM
p "I'm not psychotic at all" roehling obsessed:

"Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216128@aol.com> wrote

In the whole frikkin world, you've found one guy from
Vermont Tech and two from Switzerland. Pretty impressive,
but I think I'll go with the MIT faculty myself.

They're all in on the coverup! (But it *does* seem that in a world with
circa 7 billion people, *three* sounds just a bit low...)

But Petie, since you timidly chirp your moronic rants while
hiding and cowering behind your killfile, you end up ranting
from a position of ignorance that's even worse than Rob's. He
was proved to be dead wrong when he wrote, "Absolutely nobody
in the structural engineering community seems to find the collapse
difficult to believe." And he's still wrong now that the facts
I've posted forced him to change his story to only three structural
engineers have a problem with the Bush regime's magic fire/super
Arab cartoon conspiracy theory. If you weren't hiding, cowering
and timidly chirping from behind your killfile, you'd know that,
and possibly come across as less of an clownish imbecile.

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/05/structural-engineers-question-collapse.html
Structural Engineers Question Collapse of the World Trade Center
One of the arguments that government apologists have used in trying to
prop up the official story of why the World Trade Centers came down on
9/11 is that no structural engineers have questioned the government's
version of events. However, that is now changing.
The following structural engineers have now publicly challenged the
government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11:
Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider, both emeritus professors in structural
engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (translation here)
Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)
Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member,
Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers
Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas
William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont
Technical College
When considered along with the other prominent scientists who question
9/11, it becomes impossible for any thinking person to accept at face
value the government's version of the destruction of the World Trade Center.
More engineers and experts who explain why your magic fire
kook theory is physically impossible.
http://ae911truth.org/
Another one:
http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml
And quite a few more:
http://911proof.com/10.html
And still more:
http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/02/destruction-of-wtc-7.html
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/
http://www.truthout.org/
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/
http://counterpunch.org/
http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron...
.

User: "Rob Kleinschmidt"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 31 May 2007 01:43:52 PM
proehling wrote:

"Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216128@aol.com> wrote

In the whole frikkin world, you've found one guy from
Vermont Tech and two from Switzerland. Pretty impressive,
but I think I'll go with the MIT faculty myself.


They're all in on the coverup! (But it *does* seem that in a world with
circa 7 billion people, *three* sounds just a bit low...)

The engineering department at Cornell has a couple hundred faculty
members. I'm wondering what percentage of the Cornell Engineering
faculty are in agreement with Henry.
.
User: "The Older Gentleman"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 31 May 2007 01:59:37 PM
Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216128@aol.com> wrote:

The engineering department at Cornell has a couple hundred faculty
members. I'm wondering what percentage of the Cornell Engineering
faculty are in agreement with Henry.

<Curious>
Why don't you just k/f him, and the other kooks?
--
BMW K1100LT 750SS CB400F CD250 SL125
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3
BOF#30 WUSS#5 The bells, the bells.....
.
User: "Rob Kleinschmidt"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 31 May 2007 03:51:36 PM
On May 31, 11:59 am,
(The
Older Gentleman) wrote:

Rob Kleinschmidt <Rkleinsch1216...@aol.com> wrote:

The engineering department at Cornell has a couple hundred faculty
members. I'm wondering what percentage of the Cornell Engineering
faculty are in agreement with Henry.


<Curious>

Why don't you just k/f him, and the other kooks?

Too lazy I guess. Besides, if you killfiled the
kooks, there'd be nothing left of reeky.
.

User: "Henry"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 01 Jun 2007 07:52:08 AM
The Older Gentleman wrote:

Why don't you just k/f him, and the other kooks?

If I kill file them, I won't be able to correct their lies
and idiocy, and others may actually believe it. It's my moral
and civic duty to correct their lies and propaganda. Also, kill
files are the pitiful equivalent of running away with your eyes
and ears covered. It's good to hear all points of view, even
if they are as absurd as the mindless parroting of the Bush
regime's magic fire/super Arab cartoon kook theory.
Did you see Rob's latest gem? He claims that, "absolutely
nobody in the structural engineering community seems to find
the collapse difficult to believe"? Given the facts, that's
a very bizarre comment. More and more professionals are waking
up to the Bush regime's big lie each day. Bush parroting magic
fire conspiracy kooks are today's flat earthers - science takes
a back seat to their blind faith and ignorance.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/05/structural-engineers-question-collapse.html
Structural Engineers Question Collapse of the World Trade Center
One of the arguments that government apologists have used in trying to
prop up the official story of why the World Trade Centers came down on
9/11 is that no structural engineers have questioned the government's
version of events. However, that is now changing.
The following structural engineers have now publicly challenged the
government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11:
Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider, both emeritus professors in structural
engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (translation here)
Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)
Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member,
Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers
Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas
William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont
Technical College
When considered along with the other prominent scientists who question
9/11, it becomes impossible for any thinking person to accept at face
value the government's version of the destruction of the World Trade Center.
More engineers and experts who explain why your magic fire
kook theory is physically impossible.
http://ae911truth.org/
Another one:
http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml
And quite a few more:
http://911proof.com/10.html
And still more:
http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/02/destruction-of-wtc-7.html
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/
http://www.truthout.org/
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/
http://counterpunch.org/
http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron...
.
User: "Antiochus Epiphanes"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 01 Jun 2007 11:04:06 AM
On Jun 1, 8:52 am, Henry <b...@treason.gov> wrote:

The Older Gentleman wrote:

Why don't you just k/f him, and the other kooks?


If I kill file them, I won't be able to correct their lies
and idiocy, and others may actually believe it. It's my moral
and civic duty to correct their lies and propaganda. Also, kill
files are the pitiful equivalent of running away with your eyes
and ears covered. It's good to hear all points of view, even
if they are as absurd as the mindless parroting of the Bush
regime's magic fire/super Arab cartoon kook theory.
Did you see Rob's latest gem? He claims that, "absolutely
nobody in the structural engineering community seems to find
the collapse difficult to believe"? Given the facts, that's
a very bizarre comment. More and more professionals are waking
up to the Bush regime's big lie each day. Bush parroting magic
fire conspiracy kooks are today's flat earthers - science takes
a back seat to their blind faith and ignorance.

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/05/structural-engineers-que...

Structural Engineers Question Collapse of the World Trade Center
One of the arguments that government apologists have used in trying to
prop up the official story of why the World Trade Centers came down on
9/11 is that no structural engineers have questioned the government's
version of events. However, that is now changing.

The following structural engineers have now publicly challenged the
government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11:

Hugo Bachmann and J=F6rg Schneider, both emeritus professors in structural
engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (translation here)

Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)

Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member,
Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Enginee=

rs


Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas

William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont
Technical College

When considered along with the other prominent scientists who question
9/11, it becomes impossible for any thinking person to accept at face
value the government's version of the destruction of the World Trade Cent=

er.


More engineers and experts who explain why your magic fire
kook theory is physically impossible.

http://ae911truth.org/

Another one:

http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml

And quite a few more:

http://911proof.com/10.html

And still more:

http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/02/destruction-of-wtc-7.html

--

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
http://www.911truth.org

Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.

http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html

On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=3Dtype&type=3D21

"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm

http://www.commondreams.org/
http://www.truthout.org/
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/
http://counterpunch.org/
http://responsiblewealth.org/

"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)

Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron...

This is bigger than Bush. Bush (Jr.) is a pawn in this game.
.



User: "Henry"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 05 Jun 2007 09:12:53 PM
Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

proehling wrote:

"Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216128@aol.com> wrote

In the whole frikkin world, you've found one guy from
Vermont Tech and two from Switzerland. Pretty impressive,
but I think I'll go with the MIT faculty myself.

They're all in on the coverup! (But it *does* seem that in a world with
circa 7 billion people, *three* sounds just a bit low...)

The engineering department at Cornell has a couple hundred faculty
members.

So Rob, do you still insist that, "Absolutely nobody in the
structural engineering community seems to find the collapse
difficult to believe"? Given the facts, that's a very bizarre
comment. More and more professionals are waking up to the Bush
regime's big lie each day. Bush parroting magic fire conspiracy
kooks are today's flat earthers - science takes a back seat to
their blind faith and ignorance.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/05/structural-engineers-question-collapse.html
Structural Engineers Question Collapse of the World Trade Center
One of the arguments that government apologists have used in trying to
prop up the official story of why the World Trade Centers came down on
9/11 is that no structural engineers have questioned the government's
version of events. However, that is now changing.
The following structural engineers have now publicly challenged the
government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11:
Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider, both emeritus professors in structural
engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (translation here)
Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)
Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member,
Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers
Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas
William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont
Technical College
When considered along with the other prominent scientists who question
9/11, it becomes impossible for any thinking person to accept at face
value the government's version of the destruction of the World Trade Center.
More engineers and experts who explain why your magic fire
kook theory is physically impossible.
http://ae911truth.org/
Another one:
http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml
And quite a few more:
http://911proof.com/10.html
And still more:
http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/02/destruction-of-wtc-7.html
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
http://www.911truth.org
.

User: "Henry"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 01 Jun 2007 07:52:43 AM
Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

proehling wrote:

"Rob Kleinschmidt" <Rkleinsch1216128@aol.com> wrote

In the whole frikkin world, you've found one guy from
Vermont Tech and two from Switzerland. Pretty impressive,
but I think I'll go with the MIT faculty myself.

They're all in on the coverup! (But it *does* seem that in a world with
circa 7 billion people, *three* sounds just a bit low...)

The engineering department at Cornell has a couple hundred faculty
members.

So Rob, do you still insist that, "Absolutely nobody in the
structural engineering community seems to find the collapse
difficult to believe"? Given the facts, that's a very bizarre
comment. More and more professionals are waking up to the Bush
regime's big lie each day. Bush parroting magic fire conspiracy
kooks are today's flat earthers - science takes a back seat to
their blind faith and ignorance.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/05/structural-engineers-question-collapse.html
Structural Engineers Question Collapse of the World Trade Center
One of the arguments that government apologists have used in trying to
prop up the official story of why the World Trade Centers came down on
9/11 is that no structural engineers have questioned the government's
version of events. However, that is now changing.
The following structural engineers have now publicly challenged the
government's account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11:
Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider, both emeritus professors in structural
engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (translation here)
Doyle Winterton, structural engineer (retired)
Joseph M. Phelps, MS, PE. Structural Dynamicist (ret.), Charter Member,
Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers
Charles Pegelow, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas
William Rice, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont
Technical College
When considered along with the other prominent scientists who question
9/11, it becomes impossible for any thinking person to accept at face
value the government's version of the destruction of the World Trade Center.
More engineers and experts who explain why your magic fire
kook theory is physically impossible.
http://ae911truth.org/
Another one:
http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml
And quite a few more:
http://911proof.com/10.html
And still more:
http://11syyskuu.blogspot.com/2006/02/destruction-of-wtc-7.html
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/
http://www.truthout.org/
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/
http://counterpunch.org/
http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron...
.



User: "Henry"

Title: Re: "Another Structural Engineer Questions WTC Collapses" 01 Jun 2007 07:48:30 AM
Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

On May 30, 4:43 pm, Henry <b...@treason.gov> wrote:

Rob Kleinschmidt wrote:

On May 25, 10:25 am, Midex <jbmccr...@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.vermontguardian.com/commentary/032007/TwinTowers.shtml

Another structural engineer ? Who were the others ?

Wow. Are you serious?
http://911proof.com/10.html

In the whole frikkin world, you've found one guy from
Vermont Tech and two from Switzerland.

Rob, your lies and ignorance are becoming very silly
and extreme. There are many more than that. Why don't you
take some time to do a bit of research? Mindlessly spewing
silly, easily exposed, Bush parroting lies and nonsense from
a position of extreme ignorance makes you look very foolish.
Here's a website set up by Architects and Engineers.
http://ae911truth.org/
Here are some of their members.
http://www.ae911truth.org/joinus.php
There are many others who spoke out publicly, and even more
who question the official conspiracy theory but, but for reasons
that should be obvious even to a mindless Bush parroting cartoon
conspiracy kook, choose to stay out of a very controversial topic.
Anyway, you said, "Absolutely nobody in the structural
engineering community seems to find the collapse difficult
to believe."
I wonder if you have the integrity to admit that your comment,
like you claim that molten aluminum glows bright red or orange
in daylight, is completely absurd and at odds with the facts.
Not only do many engineers find the fire collapse theory difficult
to believe, bu they correctly find it impossible, as it violates
the laws of physics. Why do you think the laws of physics didn't
apply in New York on 9-11-01?

Pretty impressive,
but I think I'll go with the MIT faculty myself.
http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

Apparently you didn't read the link. It's just another comical,
reality defying comedy piece - for example.
"Why did they not fall like a tree?
Some observers have wondered why the buildings telescoped down, instead
of overturning and
rolling to their side like a tree. However, buildings such as the WTC
towers are not like trees.
For one thing, they are not solid, rigid structures, but for the most
part are open space (offices,
staircases, elevator shafts, etc.). Indeed, a typical building is 90%
air, and only 10% solid
material. Thus, it is not surprising that a 110 story structure should
have collapsed into 11
stories of rubble (actually less, because the rubble spreads out
laterally, and parts are
compressed into the foundation)."
WTF does this "mostly air" drivel have to with with a tall, narrow
structure not tipping over, and instead falling directly though 100,00
tons of undamaged steel columns at the same speed it would fall
through air? A thin walled steel pipe is mostly air too, but if you
anchor one to the ground and burn the top end with a torch while
compressing it, it won't disintegrate, shatter, explode, or suddenly
fall through itself - except maybe in Robworld.
This imbecile reminds me of your other MIT hero, Thomas Eagar, who
claims that tall structures can't be made to topple sideways because
gravity pulls straight down. You agreed with him, mumbling some
nonsense about flying blocks and sticks. We're still waiting for you
to finish explaining that one. Remember?
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/experts/articles/eagar_nova/nova_eagar1.html

Apparently, your "expert" Thomas Eagar "thinks" that if
supports on only one side of a tall building are destroyed,
the building would still drop straight down, because - get this
- that's the direction gravity is pulling. For your sake, I really
hope you don't believe that sort of complete idiocy. Do you? <g>

Take any object, a block or a stick for example. Hold it at
an angle, then drop it. Does it fall over sideways, or does it
travel straight to the ground at the same angle ?

Say WTF? Dropping an object and letting it free fall has nothing
to do with the tilting of a structure that's supported by the
ground. There's no fulcrum or pivot point in your analogy. Are
you trolling, or really unable to grasp these concepts? If you
kick two legs off one side of a four legged table, do you think
the table will drop straight down with the top remaining level?
What in the hell are you talking about with these flying blocks
and sticks?
--
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://stj911.org
http://stopthelie.com/1-hour_guide_to_911.html
http://www.911truth.org
Here's what happens to steel framed buildings exposed
to raging infernos for hours on end.
http://davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69c.html
On 9-11-01, WTC7, a 47 story steel framed building, which
had only small, random fires, dropped in perfect symmetry
at near free fall speed as in a perfectly executed controlled
demolition.
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/wtc/videos.html
http://wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm
Ever wonder who benefits from the 300 MILLION
U.S. taxpayer dollars spent each DAY in Iraq?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0223-08.htm
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?list=type&type=21
"They are waging a campaign of murder and destruction. And
there is no limit to the innocent lives they are willing to
take... men with blind hatred and armed with lethal weapons
who are capable of any atrocity... they respect no laws of
warfare or morality."
-bu$h describing his own illegal invasion of Iraq.
http://www.robert-fisk.com/iraqwarvictims_mar2003.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/
http://www.truthout.org/
http://www.prohibitioncosts.org/
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/
http://counterpunch.org/
http://responsiblewealth.org/
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things
that matter." -- Martin Luther King Jr.
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is
not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Don't let bu$h do to the United States what his very close
friend and top campaign contributor, Ken Lay, did to Enron...
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER