Re: Any active physics research fields which do not depend much on experiments



 Science > Physics > Re: Any active physics research fields which do not depend much on experiments

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "greywolf42"
Date: 02 Nov 2004 03:04:22 PM
Object: Re: Any active physics research fields which do not depend much on experiments
The following post was banned from sci.physics.research, without notice.
==========================
"ieee std" <ieeestd802@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:43908fc6.0409292050.1cfa920c@posting.google.com...

Folks:

Can anyone suggest any active physics research fields which do not
depend much on experiments ?

Please do not say theoretical physics, because majority of theoretical
physics still heavily depends on experiment data (such as high energy
physics or condensed matter theory ). Please also do not say
mathematical physics, which is almost a branch of math.

I understand that physics is based on experimental data, I just want
to find a field which is loosely coupled with experimental data.

AFAIK, string theory, cosmology, and general relativity (in that order) are
the general areas of active research most loosely coupled to experiment.
May I suggest you try pure mathematics, however, if you really want to
avoid experiments.
--
greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for e-mail}
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Any active physics research fields which do not depend much on experiments 03 Nov 2004 01:25:14 AM
"greywolf42" <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote in message news:<qDShd.27$l66.25@news.flashnewsgroups.com>...

The following post was banned from sci.physics.research, without notice.
==========================

"ieee std" <ieeestd802@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:43908fc6.0409292050.1cfa920c@posting.google.com...

Folks:

Can anyone suggest any active physics research fields which do not
depend much on experiments ?

Please do not say theoretical physics, because majority of theoretical
physics still heavily depends on experiment data (such as high energy
physics or condensed matter theory ). Please also do not say
mathematical physics, which is almost a branch of math.

I understand that physics is based on experimental data, I just want
to find a field which is loosely coupled with experimental data.


AFAIK, string theory, cosmology, and general relativity (in that order) are
the general areas of active research most loosely coupled to experiment.
May I suggest you try pure mathematics, however, if you really want to
avoid experiments.

It was not allowed into SPR because it was a retarded post crafted by
a moron.
If you don't like SPR's policies, tough *****. Start your own
newsgroup! It worked for [Hammond].
.
User: "greywolf42"

Title: Re: Any active physics research fields which do not depend much on experiments 03 Nov 2004 12:53:18 PM
"Eric Gisse" <fsegg@uaf.edu> wrote in message
news:fd0fc2fa.0411022325.7dbf2acc@posting.google.com...

"greywolf42" <mingstb@marssim-ss.com> wrote in message

news:<qDShd.27$l66.25@news.flashnewsgroups.com>...

The following post was banned from sci.physics.research, without notice.
==========================

"ieee std" <ieeestd802@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:43908fc6.0409292050.1cfa920c@posting.google.com...

Folks:

Can anyone suggest any active physics research fields which do not
depend much on experiments ?

Please do not say theoretical physics, because majority of theoretical
physics still heavily depends on experiment data (such as high energy
physics or condensed matter theory ). Please also do not say
mathematical physics, which is almost a branch of math.

I understand that physics is based on experimental data, I just want
to find a field which is loosely coupled with experimental data.


AFAIK, string theory, cosmology, and general relativity (in that order)

are

the general areas of active research most loosely coupled to experiment.
May I suggest you try pure mathematics, however, if you really want to
avoid experiments.


It was not allowed into SPR because it was a retarded post crafted by
a moron.

If you don't like SPR's policies, tough *****. Start your own
newsgroup! It worked for [Hammond].

I have no problem with SPR's policies. I am simply amused when the
moderators don't follow them.
--
greywolf42
ubi dubium ibi libertas
{remove planet for e-mail}
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Attraction vs repulsion - why does it depend on spin?
structure constants depend on the basis chosen?
Don't think too much or your head will explode
Re: US admits that Kent Death-Rag Copraphagic is at risk from obesity from eating too much Exxon Crap.
Brad Arrives in Chicago, Much to Angie's Delight
What are String Theories Laws? What Are String Thoery's Postulates? Has String Theory Accomplished Anything? How Much Has String Theory Cost Us?
Sunspots Much HOTTER Than Sun's Surface
How much for a small personal wind-turbine?
Never have so many been so wrong about so much!
How much force does it take to move a 2 ton object?
Terminator III, The Rise of Not Very Much ***spoiler***
new study: sunlike stars have planets much like Earth
Wetbacks, as globally as Edna likes, you can answer the cloud much more slowly, Sweet Necrophiliac.
Re: why do Christians hate Atheists so much?
how much dose did I get?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER