Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?



 Science > Physics > Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "TomGee"
Date: 16 Oct 2005 12:09:11 PM
Object: Re: Can current theory explain the twin paradox?
Attention Homeland Security!! This moron redirects responses to
alt.morons!!



Bilge wrote:

TomGee, space kadet from planet flatline, and all around whiner,


That's Warden TomGee to you convict, and when I whine you suck.



Pd, I would venture to say you number in the billions, and trillions
even if you go back in time far enough. How many believed the Earth
was flat, even when their preconceptions blared otherwise?


GeeTom, I give up. How many?

There have been no, none, nil, nada, experiments performed that I know
of to show that a body moves sans any motive force.


GeeTom, there has also never been an experiment done that shows you
have a chance of understanding what you read, yet you persist in
pretending otherwise. Why is that?

In fact, Eeven Newton claimed there is an inherent force that moves
a sole body free of any net external forces.


GeeTom, no he didn't.


Yes he did.



Newton's first, second and third laws say exactly
the opposite in three different ways.


No they don't.



Only you could bat 0 for 3 given
3 simple statements


???



and a semi-infinite


Oxymoron from Bilge the king of the oxymorons!



number of hints from over 400 years
of background material. If anthropologists had your powers of deduction
they wouldn't be able to deduce the history of human existence prior to
late last week and even then there would be no consensus.

But because you and everyone else were brainwashed


GeeTom, one thing is for sure - running your brain through a ringer
to squeeze out the detergent didn't seem to help.


Learn to spell Fool!



into believing that
fairy tale, you hang on to it because you mental defenses will not let
you release such a belief even though your brain tells you to let go of
such a fallacious belief.


Help! I'm being repressed.


But you're such a professional physicist!



I guess there were many like you who hung on to the belief that the
planet is flat in spite of empirical evidence to the contrary.


GeeTom, I guess the joke went over your head. We just put those
N,E,S,W arrows on your EEG as a way of making fun of you and the
intelligence of the flat earthers in one fell swoop. But, for the
same reason, no one expected you to get it.

.

 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER