Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase...



 Science > Physics > Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase...

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "hanson"
Date: 14 May 2007 11:11:45 AM
Object: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase...
"John Decker" <John_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...

Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to
3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12copper.html

[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places and the more inventive, creative thieves rented Vacuum
tanker trucks, drove up to metal-finishing shops in the dark of
the night, pierced the windows with the fire hose and sucked
all the Nickel solutions out of the 10'000 gallons Ni-plating tanks.
ahahaha... Same with Gold when it peaked at ~$900/troz up
from $250. 3 eight-hour shifts were carried out for protection.
ahahaha... ahahahanson
.

User: "CWatters"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 14 May 2007 03:17:29 PM
I recall that in the UK a car was used to pull down the copper lightening
conductor from a church. They just hooked it up at the bottom and drove off.
Unfortunately it also brought down the very top of the spire costing a small
fortune to replace.
Here is a similar story...
Church copper thieves cause danger Apr 25 2007
By The Huddersfield Daily Examiner
THIEVES have endangered lives by stealing part of a lightning conductor from
a church spire in Birkby.
Warden Brian Kitson noticed the damage at St John's on Wednesday last week.
He said: "I was walking round to check everything was OK when to my horror I
saw that a metre of the copper lightning conductor had been removed at
ground level.
"It looks as if they took it off with a hacksaw."
Realising the theft had made the 220ft spire unsafe, Mr Kitson immediaely
contacted an electrician who came and repaired the damage that day.
Metal thefts have been a common occurrence in Huddersfield this year.
Earlier this month, part of the lightning conductor at Portland House
Nursery in Lindley was stolen.
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 14 May 2007 10:58:59 PM
I made 140 cent pound just waiting 16 months.
140,000 ton.
got this last load at 190 cent .
1 year ago.
im trading buy and unloading ..
140,000 is unloading at 290 cent.
nickel at 920 cent pound
.


User: "Mitchell Jones"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 14 May 2007 08:28:37 PM
In article <5T%1i.14344$b67.10180@trnddc06>,
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

"John Decker" <John_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...

Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to
3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12copper.htm
l

[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places

***{Nickel prices are just below their all time highs right now and,
predictably, such thefts have resumed. (See
http://www.isri.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=9577&TEMPLATE=
/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm.)
In fact, we are back in another boom in the prices of storable
commodities like we had in the '70's. The cause is the usual one: the
creation by central banks of counterfeit ("fiat") money at rates faster
than production of goods and services can be increased. With the prices
people actually pay (as opposed to the government's lying CPI) rising at
rates higher than interest rates, savings parked in interest bearing
paper experience negative returns--which means: the savings plus
interest, at year's end, will purchase less than the savings alone would
have purchased at the beginning of the year. That is the condition known
as negative real interest rates. (To compute the real rate of interest,
you subtract the rate of inflation from the rate of increase you are
getting on your savings.) Thus smart people avoid the negative returns
by shifting their savings into storable commodities, to take advantage
of the fact that prices in general are rising at rates above the rate of
interest. Result: due to the influx of buying from savers who are trying
to protect their assets, the rate of increase in storable commodity
prices rises *above* the generalized inflation rate. In effect, storable
commodities begin to pay positive real rates of interest.
As is normal in the first phase of such a boom, base metals prices rise
faster than precious metals, because businessmen are the first people to
recognize what is happening, and they respond by carrying ever larger
inventories of base metals in their warehouses. But then, in the second
phase, upper class families begin to apply such thinking to their
personal savings. They start buying gold and silver coins and bullion,
and precious metals prices begin to rise faster than the prices of base
metals. Result: by the end of phase two, overall percentage gains
precious metals, from their lows to their highs, are as great as the
total gains in the base metals. When that point is reached, phase three
begins. In phase three, middle class families begin protecting their
savings in the same way as the upper classes, and a runaway boom in
precious metals prices ensues. Result: in phase three, precious metals
prices run away from all other prices.
Right now, we are late in the first phase of the process, in a zone of
reaction and consolidation, with the metals swinging wildly back and
forth beneath their all-time highs. Copper, for example, has been
swinging wildly back and forth beneath $4/lb, while nickel has of late
been trading back and forth beneath $23/lb, which is far above the
highest nominal price it reached in the '70's. (For recent nickel
prices, see
http://www.kitcometals.com/charts/nickel_historical_large.html#5years.
Other links on the same page will take you to copper and other base
metals.)
On the 5-year chart, nickel has risen from about $3/lb to around $23/lb,
which is a gain of [(23 - 3)/3][100] = 667%. Gold, by way of contrast,
has risen from roughly $260/Troy oz to about $700/Troy oz, for a gain of
[(700 - 260)/260][100] = 169%. (In comparison to gold, the Dow
Industrials in the same period--Sept '99 to present--have risen from
11200 to 13500, for a gain of [(13500 - 11200)/11200][100] = 21%. To
make this comparison, go to http://www.bohlish.com/ and punch the
required buttons.)
When the vast majority of the metals have broken out above their present
sideways patterns of consolidation and reaction, phase one will be over,
and phase two will begin.
That's the way I see it, at any rate. :-)
--Mitchell Jones}***

and the more inventive, creative thieves rented Vacuum
tanker trucks, drove up to metal-finishing shops in the dark of
the night, pierced the windows with the fire hose and sucked
all the Nickel solutions out of the 10'000 gallons Ni-plating tanks.
ahahaha... Same with Gold when it peaked at ~$900/troz up
from $250. 3 eight-hour shifts were carried out for protection.
ahahaha... ahahahanson

*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 14 May 2007 11:10:51 PM
If you wernt fucking stupid..big if..
dry milk brazil $ 2000 USA $ 3200 UK $3500
uk offer to buy 10,000 ton for iraq.
$ 10 million profit on 10,000 ton.
use the import export bank of the USA finance page .
.

User: "beav"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 16 May 2007 02:35:35 PM
On Mon, 14 May 2007 20:28:37 -0500, Mitchell Jones
<mjones@21cenlogic.com> wrote:

In article <5T%1i.14344$b67.10180@trnddc06>,
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

"John Decker" <John_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...

Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to
3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12copper.htm
l

[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places


***{Nickel prices are just below their all time highs right now and,
predictably, such thefts have resumed. (See
http://www.isri.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=9577&TEMPLATE=
/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm.)

In fact, we are back in another boom in the prices of storable
commodities like we had in the '70's. The cause is the usual one: the
creation by central banks of counterfeit ("fiat") money at rates faster
than production of goods and services can be increased. With the prices
people actually pay (as opposed to the government's lying CPI) rising at
rates higher than interest rates, savings parked in interest bearing
paper experience negative returns--which means: the savings plus
interest, at year's end, will purchase less than the savings alone would
have purchased at the beginning of the year. That is the condition known
as negative real interest rates. (To compute the real rate of interest,
you subtract the rate of inflation from the rate of increase you are
getting on your savings.) Thus smart people avoid the negative returns
by shifting their savings into storable commodities, to take advantage
of the fact that prices in general are rising at rates above the rate of
interest. Result: due to the influx of buying from savers who are trying
to protect their assets, the rate of increase in storable commodity
prices rises *above* the generalized inflation rate. In effect, storable
commodities begin to pay positive real rates of interest.

As is normal in the first phase of such a boom, base metals prices rise
faster than precious metals, because businessmen are the first people to
recognize what is happening, and they respond by carrying ever larger
inventories of base metals in their warehouses. But then, in the second
phase, upper class families begin to apply such thinking to their
personal savings. They start buying gold and silver coins and bullion,
and precious metals prices begin to rise faster than the prices of base
metals. Result: by the end of phase two, overall percentage gains
precious metals, from their lows to their highs, are as great as the
total gains in the base metals. When that point is reached, phase three
begins. In phase three, middle class families begin protecting their
savings in the same way as the upper classes, and a runaway boom in
precious metals prices ensues. Result: in phase three, precious metals
prices run away from all other prices.

Right now, we are late in the first phase of the process, in a zone of
reaction and consolidation, with the metals swinging wildly back and
forth beneath their all-time highs. Copper, for example, has been
swinging wildly back and forth beneath $4/lb, while nickel has of late
been trading back and forth beneath $23/lb, which is far above the
highest nominal price it reached in the '70's. (For recent nickel
prices, see
http://www.kitcometals.com/charts/nickel_historical_large.html#5years.
Other links on the same page will take you to copper and other base
metals.)

On the 5-year chart, nickel has risen from about $3/lb to around $23/lb,
which is a gain of [(23 - 3)/3][100] = 667%. Gold, by way of contrast,
has risen from roughly $260/Troy oz to about $700/Troy oz, for a gain of
[(700 - 260)/260][100] = 169%. (In comparison to gold, the Dow
Industrials in the same period--Sept '99 to present--have risen from
11200 to 13500, for a gain of [(13500 - 11200)/11200][100] = 21%. To
make this comparison, go to http://www.bohlish.com/ and punch the
required buttons.)

When the vast majority of the metals have broken out above their present
sideways patterns of consolidation and reaction, phase one will be over,
and phase two will begin.

That's the way I see it, at any rate. :-)

--Mitchell Jones}***

rather than a conspiracy theory, maybe its simply because demand is
up. WAY up, thanks to the 10+% year over year economic growth in
China and India?
the number of mines opening and the capacity of the open mines is
outstripped by demand.
it didn't help that one buyer in China screwed up the Cu market a
couple years back. Ford botched the Pd market. Inco has always
messed with the Ni market. maybe that'll change going forward thanks
to them getting sucked up.
its cheaper for companies to buy smaller producers than it is to open
new mines. if prices stay up long enough, more production will come
on line.
otherwise, i'm astounded at the prices, too.
.
User: "Mitchell Jones"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 19 May 2007 07:09:05 PM
In article <9rmm43lu7mel0pjui1645on0n8t5uhfths@4ax.com>,
beav <BEAVITH1@NETSCAPE.NET> wrote:

On Mon, 14 May 2007 20:28:37 -0500, Mitchell Jones
<mjones@21cenlogic.com> wrote:

In article <5T%1i.14344$b67.10180@trnddc06>,
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

"John Decker" <John_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...

Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to
3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12copper.
htm
l

[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places


***{Nickel prices are just below their all time highs right now and,
predictably, such thefts have resumed. (See
http://www.isri.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=9577&TEMPLATE=
/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm.)

In fact, we are back in another boom in the prices of storable
commodities like we had in the '70's. The cause is the usual one: the
creation by central banks of counterfeit ("fiat") money at rates faster
than production of goods and services can be increased. With the prices
people actually pay (as opposed to the government's lying CPI) rising at
rates higher than interest rates, savings parked in interest bearing
paper experience negative returns--which means: the savings plus
interest, at year's end, will purchase less than the savings alone would
have purchased at the beginning of the year. That is the condition known
as negative real interest rates. (To compute the real rate of interest,
you subtract the rate of inflation from the rate of increase you are
getting on your savings.) Thus smart people avoid the negative returns
by shifting their savings into storable commodities, to take advantage
of the fact that prices in general are rising at rates above the rate of
interest. Result: due to the influx of buying from savers who are trying
to protect their assets, the rate of increase in storable commodity
prices rises *above* the generalized inflation rate. In effect, storable
commodities begin to pay positive real rates of interest.

As is normal in the first phase of such a boom, base metals prices rise
faster than precious metals, because businessmen are the first people to
recognize what is happening, and they respond by carrying ever larger
inventories of base metals in their warehouses. But then, in the second
phase, upper class families begin to apply such thinking to their
personal savings. They start buying gold and silver coins and bullion,
and precious metals prices begin to rise faster than the prices of base
metals. Result: by the end of phase two, overall percentage gains
precious metals, from their lows to their highs, are as great as the
total gains in the base metals. When that point is reached, phase three
begins. In phase three, middle class families begin protecting their
savings in the same way as the upper classes, and a runaway boom in
precious metals prices ensues. Result: in phase three, precious metals
prices run away from all other prices.

Right now, we are late in the first phase of the process, in a zone of
reaction and consolidation, with the metals swinging wildly back and
forth beneath their all-time highs. Copper, for example, has been
swinging wildly back and forth beneath $4/lb, while nickel has of late
been trading back and forth beneath $23/lb, which is far above the
highest nominal price it reached in the '70's. (For recent nickel
prices, see
http://www.kitcometals.com/charts/nickel_historical_large.html#5years.
Other links on the same page will take you to copper and other base
metals.)

On the 5-year chart, nickel has risen from about $3/lb to around $23/lb,
which is a gain of [(23 - 3)/3][100] = 667%. Gold, by way of contrast,
has risen from roughly $260/Troy oz to about $700/Troy oz, for a gain of
[(700 - 260)/260][100] = 169%. (In comparison to gold, the Dow
Industrials in the same period--Sept '99 to present--have risen from
11200 to 13500, for a gain of [(13500 - 11200)/11200][100] = 21%. To
make this comparison, go to http://www.bohlish.com/ and punch the
required buttons.)

When the vast majority of the metals have broken out above their present
sideways patterns of consolidation and reaction, phase one will be over,
and phase two will begin.

That's the way I see it, at any rate. :-)

--Mitchell Jones}***

rather than a conspiracy theory

***{What conspiracy theory do you propose? --MJ}***

, maybe its simply because demand is
up. WAY up, thanks to the 10+% year over year economic growth in
China and India?

***{There are lots of factors operating, but the primary force driving
the system is the one I mentioned: the creation of fiat money in immense
quantities worldwide. The U.S., prior to Nixon's decoupling the dollar
from gold in 1971, was a creditor nation with the strongest
manufacturing base in the world. Now, 36 years later, we are the world's
largest debtor, and manufacturing has shrunk to around 10% of our
economy. This has occurred because the link to gold placed limitations
on the ability to the U.S. government to expand the money supply. Gold,
unlike fiat money, cannot simply be decreed into existence. Result: as
long as there was a required amount of gold that had to be kept as
backing for a given number of dollars, the inescapable limits on the
supply of gold placed a limit on the U.S. money supply. Since the
gold-dollar link was severed, however, the U.S. has gone on a spending
orgy fueled by "dollars" created out of thin air, and this has afforded
foreign governments an opportunity to take over the markets that used
to be dominated by U.S. manufacturers.
To see how it works, you need to think about what happens if the U.S.
expands its money supply rapidly under the gold standard. In that case,
lots of dollars flow overseas to pay for foreign goods, and, since the
world is on the gold standard, the foreign manufacturers exchange the
paper dollars for U.S. Treasury gold, and gold flows out of the U.S.
Result: before long, the U.S. is forced to cease expanding its money
supply, because if it runs out of gold, it will be bankrupt, and nobody
will take dollars.
Under the regime of fiat money, however, international accounts are not
settled in gold. Result: there is no feedback to stop the U.S.
government from inflating the money supply, because foreign central
banks can simply create their own fiat currencies in whatever quantities
are required to keep the dollar cross rate against their currencies from
falling. (They couldn't do that by creating gold, because you can't
create gold.) Result: under the fiat money regime the more astute
central bankers (e.g., China and India) long ago discovered that if they
kept their currencies at low enough levels vis-a-vis the dollar--i.e.,
if they kept the dollar strong *despite* Washington's inflationary
policies--they could give their domestic export industries a competitive
advantage in U.S. markets. Result: by holding the dollar cross rates at
levels favorable to themselves, they have basically stripped the U.S.
bare of manufacturing capacity, manufacturing jobs, and manufacturing
technical know-how.
Thus the alternative explanation you proposed--i.e., that global demand
for metals is "WAY up, thanks to the 10+% year over year economic growth
in China and India"--is not really an alternative explanation at all.
The reason: it is excessive creation of fiat money by the U.S. and by
foreign central banks, that has enabled nations like China and India to
experience the rapid growth they have experienced in recent years. What
we have here is an unsustainable worldwide boom, due to the creation by
central banks of counterfeit ("fiat") money at rates faster than
production of goods and services can be increased, just as I said in the
beginning. One consequence of that boom is the erosion of the U.S.
manufacturing base, and another is the soaring demand for raw materials,
including storable commodities, to feed the economic expansions in
India, China, and elsewhere.
In short, what we are seeing here is not prosperity, but the destruction
of civilization. The reason: these sorts of expansions always lead to
financial and economic collapse further down the road. (That's why the
phenomenon is known as the "boom and bust" cycle.) However, in the past,
booms and crashes brought about by fiat money have been confined to
individual countries, and, as a consequence, disaster never occurred
everywhere at the same time. This time, the entire world is on a binge
of fiat money creation, and when the bust comes this time, every economy
on Earth is going to come crashing down simultaneously. Result: every
government on Earth is going to "serve mankind" by putting forth a
blizzard of "emergency" legislation violating property rights "in the
public interest." Every country on Earth will be caught up in the
madness. Hence after the dust settles none will be capable of expanding
economically to take up the slack, and, thus, forcing other countries to
rescind their crazy legislation in order to become competitive again.
--Mitchell Jones}***

the number of mines opening and the capacity of the open mines is
outstripped by demand.

***{Yup. One reason is that mining costs are rising almost as rapidly as
the price of the refined product, even in countries like China and
India, where there is an immense supply of cheap labor. The costs of
fuel, for example, are skyrocketing due to the soaring price of crude
oil, even in areas where labor costs are stable. --MJ}***

it didn't help that one buyer in China screwed up the Cu market a
couple years back. Ford botched the Pd market. Inco has always
messed with the Ni market. maybe that'll change going forward thanks
to them getting sucked up.

its cheaper for companies to buy smaller producers than it is to open
new mines. if prices stay up long enough, more production will come
on line.

***{Phase one of the current boom, which seems to be almost over, has
taken 8 years. Still ahead is phase two, consisting of a long period of
ascension punctuated by an ending period of consolidation and reaction,
to be followed by phase three. All together, the period of rising metals
prices should last around 20 years. Since it all began in 1999, it would
in the normal course of events end sometime around the year 2020.
Unfortunately, things could accelerate out of control ahead of schedule,
due to a number of things that do not have to happen, but may happen
anyway. For example, the U.S. may be on the brink of civil war right
now, due to the overweening arrogance of the neocons in Washington, who
seem to think they can rig elections, and even rig the campaigns that
lead up to elections, with impunity. If they don't back off, I can see
this situation blowing up very quickly, to the benefit of no one.
Another example: Bush may attack Iran. If he does, we head off into
terra incognita, with unknown and unpredictable consequences. In such
situations, storable commodity prices are guaranteed to explode, but
only those who have taken themselves out of harm's way--i.e., far from
the major cities--can expect to benefit from having them.
In short, the situation is dangerous, unstable, and in most aspects is
highly unpredictable. Making the best of it clearly involves the
movement of assets into nontraditional forms such as storable
commodities and the stocks of companies that produce such commodities;
but despite our best efforts to get through what is coming, there are
far more unknowns than knowns.
--Mitchell Jones}***

otherwise, i'm astounded at the prices, too.

***{Then you'd best strap yourself into your chair, because the prices
that are coming will make the ones that are already behind us look like
nothing. --MJ}***
*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 22 May 2007 02:48:46 PM
Now then MJ-erk can find the nickle pix index .
I must have shown it to him once !
USA based manufactured goods are at and all time high .
They outsourced the labor by moving the plant in the 80s when MJerk
still had a runny nose.
Its the planets oldest working system .
Thats what drives the planet and why prices climb .
Prices climb when people biuld allot of houses.
When prices stop climbing wages and ships stop running .
There must be 24000 ships loaded ,,if only 18000 ships are loaded for
export then the usa price drops and 5 % of the labors stops.
Higher prices can start new productions .
BUT fair trade can start new production lower prices and work more
people at fair wages ..unless some one gets fucked.

.

User: "John C. Polasek"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 21 May 2007 02:16:47 PM
On Sat, 19 May 2007 19:09:05 -0500, Mitchell Jones
<mjones@21cenlogic.com> wrote:

In article <9rmm43lu7mel0pjui1645on0n8t5uhfths@4ax.com>,
beav <BEAVITH1@NETSCAPE.NET> wrote:

On Mon, 14 May 2007 20:28:37 -0500, Mitchell Jones
<mjones@21cenlogic.com> wrote:

In article <5T%1i.14344$b67.10180@trnddc06>,
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote:

"John Decker" <John_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...

Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to
3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12copper.
htm
l

[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places


***{Nickel prices are just below their all time highs right now and,
predictably, such thefts have resumed. (See
http://www.isri.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=9577&TEMPLATE=
/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm.)

In fact, we are back in another boom in the prices of storable
commodities like we had in the '70's. The cause is the usual one: the
creation by central banks of counterfeit ("fiat") money at rates faster
than production of goods and services can be increased. With the prices
people actually pay (as opposed to the government's lying CPI) rising at
rates higher than interest rates, savings parked in interest bearing
paper experience negative returns--which means: the savings plus
interest, at year's end, will purchase less than the savings alone would
have purchased at the beginning of the year. That is the condition known
as negative real interest rates. (To compute the real rate of interest,
you subtract the rate of inflation from the rate of increase you are
getting on your savings.) Thus smart people avoid the negative returns
by shifting their savings into storable commodities, to take advantage
of the fact that prices in general are rising at rates above the rate of
interest. Result: due to the influx of buying from savers who are trying
to protect their assets, the rate of increase in storable commodity
prices rises *above* the generalized inflation rate. In effect, storable
commodities begin to pay positive real rates of interest.

As is normal in the first phase of such a boom, base metals prices rise
faster than precious metals, because businessmen are the first people to
recognize what is happening, and they respond by carrying ever larger
inventories of base metals in their warehouses. But then, in the second
phase, upper class families begin to apply such thinking to their
personal savings. They start buying gold and silver coins and bullion,
and precious metals prices begin to rise faster than the prices of base
metals. Result: by the end of phase two, overall percentage gains
precious metals, from their lows to their highs, are as great as the
total gains in the base metals. When that point is reached, phase three
begins. In phase three, middle class families begin protecting their
savings in the same way as the upper classes, and a runaway boom in
precious metals prices ensues. Result: in phase three, precious metals
prices run away from all other prices.

Right now, we are late in the first phase of the process, in a zone of
reaction and consolidation, with the metals swinging wildly back and
forth beneath their all-time highs. Copper, for example, has been
swinging wildly back and forth beneath $4/lb, while nickel has of late
been trading back and forth beneath $23/lb, which is far above the
highest nominal price it reached in the '70's. (For recent nickel
prices, see
http://www.kitcometals.com/charts/nickel_historical_large.html#5years.
Other links on the same page will take you to copper and other base
metals.)

On the 5-year chart, nickel has risen from about $3/lb to around $23/lb,
which is a gain of [(23 - 3)/3][100] = 667%. Gold, by way of contrast,
has risen from roughly $260/Troy oz to about $700/Troy oz, for a gain of
[(700 - 260)/260][100] = 169%. (In comparison to gold, the Dow
Industrials in the same period--Sept '99 to present--have risen from
11200 to 13500, for a gain of [(13500 - 11200)/11200][100] = 21%. To
make this comparison, go to http://www.bohlish.com/ and punch the
required buttons.)

When the vast majority of the metals have broken out above their present
sideways patterns of consolidation and reaction, phase one will be over,
and phase two will begin.

That's the way I see it, at any rate. :-)

--Mitchell Jones}***

rather than a conspiracy theory


***{What conspiracy theory do you propose? --MJ}***

, maybe its simply because demand is
up. WAY up, thanks to the 10+% year over year economic growth in
China and India?


***{There are lots of factors operating, but the primary force driving
the system is the one I mentioned: the creation of fiat money in immense
quantities worldwide. The U.S., prior to Nixon's decoupling the dollar
from gold in 1971, was a creditor nation with the strongest
manufacturing base in the world. Now, 36 years later, we are the world's
largest debtor, and manufacturing has shrunk to around 10% of our
economy. This has occurred because the link to gold placed limitations
on the ability to the U.S. government to expand the money supply. Gold,
unlike fiat money, cannot simply be decreed into existence. Result: as
long as there was a required amount of gold that had to be kept as
backing for a given number of dollars, the inescapable limits on the
supply of gold placed a limit on the U.S. money supply. Since the
gold-dollar link was severed, however, the U.S. has gone on a spending
orgy fueled by "dollars" created out of thin air, and this has afforded
foreign governments an opportunity to take over the markets that used
to be dominated by U.S. manufacturers.

To see how it works, you need to think about what happens if the U.S.
expands its money supply rapidly under the gold standard. In that case,
lots of dollars flow overseas to pay for foreign goods, and, since the
world is on the gold standard, the foreign manufacturers exchange the
paper dollars for U.S. Treasury gold, and gold flows out of the U.S.
Result: before long, the U.S. is forced to cease expanding its money
supply, because if it runs out of gold, it will be bankrupt, and nobody
will take dollars.

Under the regime of fiat money, however, international accounts are not
settled in gold. Result: there is no feedback to stop the U.S.
government from inflating the money supply, because foreign central
banks can simply create their own fiat currencies in whatever quantities
are required to keep the dollar cross rate against their currencies from
falling. (They couldn't do that by creating gold, because you can't
create gold.) Result: under the fiat money regime the more astute
central bankers (e.g., China and India) long ago discovered that if they
kept their currencies at low enough levels vis-a-vis the dollar--i.e.,
if they kept the dollar strong *despite* Washington's inflationary
policies--they could give their domestic export industries a competitive
advantage in U.S. markets. Result: by holding the dollar cross rates at
levels favorable to themselves, they have basically stripped the U.S.
bare of manufacturing capacity, manufacturing jobs, and manufacturing
technical know-how.

Thus the alternative explanation you proposed--i.e., that global demand
for metals is "WAY up, thanks to the 10+% year over year economic growth
in China and India"--is not really an alternative explanation at all.
The reason: it is excessive creation of fiat money by the U.S. and by
foreign central banks, that has enabled nations like China and India to
experience the rapid growth they have experienced in recent years. What
we have here is an unsustainable worldwide boom, due to the creation by
central banks of counterfeit ("fiat") money at rates faster than
production of goods and services can be increased, just as I said in the
beginning. One consequence of that boom is the erosion of the U.S.
manufacturing base, and another is the soaring demand for raw materials,
including storable commodities, to feed the economic expansions in
India, China, and elsewhere.

In short, what we are seeing here is not prosperity, but the destruction
of civilization. The reason: these sorts of expansions always lead to
financial and economic collapse further down the road. (That's why the
phenomenon is known as the "boom and bust" cycle.) However, in the past,
booms and crashes brought about by fiat money have been confined to
individual countries, and, as a consequence, disaster never occurred
everywhere at the same time. This time, the entire world is on a binge
of fiat money creation, and when the bust comes this time, every economy
on Earth is going to come crashing down simultaneously. Result: every
government on Earth is going to "serve mankind" by putting forth a
blizzard of "emergency" legislation violating property rights "in the
public interest." Every country on Earth will be caught up in the
madness. Hence after the dust settles none will be capable of expanding
economically to take up the slack, and, thus, forcing other countries to
rescind their crazy legislation in order to become competitive again.

--Mitchell Jones}***

the number of mines opening and the capacity of the open mines is
outstripped by demand.


***{Yup. One reason is that mining costs are rising almost as rapidly as
the price of the refined product, even in countries like China and
India, where there is an immense supply of cheap labor. The costs of
fuel, for example, are skyrocketing due to the soaring price of crude
oil, even in areas where labor costs are stable. --MJ}***

it didn't help that one buyer in China screwed up the Cu market a
couple years back. Ford botched the Pd market. Inco has always
messed with the Ni market. maybe that'll change going forward thanks
to them getting sucked up.

its cheaper for companies to buy smaller producers than it is to open
new mines. if prices stay up long enough, more production will come
on line.


***{Phase one of the current boom, which seems to be almost over, has
taken 8 years. Still ahead is phase two, consisting of a long period of
ascension punctuated by an ending period of consolidation and reaction,
to be followed by phase three. All together, the period of rising metals
prices should last around 20 years. Since it all began in 1999, it would
in the normal course of events end sometime around the year 2020.

Unfortunately, things could accelerate out of control ahead of schedule,
due to a number of things that do not have to happen, but may happen
anyway. For example, the U.S. may be on the brink of civil war right
now, due to the overweening arrogance of the neocons in Washington, who
seem to think they can rig elections, and even rig the campaigns that
lead up to elections, with impunity. If they don't back off, I can see
this situation blowing up very quickly, to the benefit of no one.
Another example: Bush may attack Iran. If he does, we head off into
terra incognita, with unknown and unpredictable consequences. In such
situations, storable commodity prices are guaranteed to explode, but
only those who have taken themselves out of harm's way--i.e., far from
the major cities--can expect to benefit from having them.

In short, the situation is dangerous, unstable, and in most aspects is
highly unpredictable. Making the best of it clearly involves the
movement of assets into nontraditional forms such as storable
commodities and the stocks of companies that produce such commodities;
but despite our best efforts to get through what is coming, there are
far more unknowns than knowns.

--Mitchell Jones}***

otherwise, i'm astounded at the prices, too.


***{Then you'd best strap yourself into your chair, because the prices
that are coming will make the ones that are already behind us look like
nothing. --MJ}***

*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ

MJ: I agree with your pessimistic view of the future, since we have
sold out to the Chinese to make everything for us. Americans
(people/Gresham's) will always buy "the cheap", bad money driving out
good.
Most readers are not old enough to remember the crash and depression
but several things happened that you might think curious (March 1932)
1. You were not allowed to keep gold which the government bought out
at $35 an ounce.
2. They called in all paper money (large size bills) and replaced
them with smaller bills. This eliminated hoarding and exposed one's
true net worth. Bootleg money was especially under pressure. It
probably prompted new accounts at different banks before the deadline,
thus shoring up the banks. The large bills went worthless. I have
never seen an analysis of this tactic. It's something to keep in mind.
3. There was a 4 day bank holiday to prevent people from drawing down
their accounts because banks only hold about 10% cash. When our bank
reopened we were given 2 blankets instead of our deposited money which
was never seen again.
4. The depression was blamed to a large extent on tariffs against
imported goods, the converse of our present "free trade".
John Polasek
.

User: "BioFreak"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 22 May 2007 02:21:10 PM
On Sat, 19 May 2007 19:09:05 -0500, Mitchell Jones
wrote:


Under the regime of fiat money, however, international accounts are not
settled in gold. Result: there is no feedback to stop the U.S.
government from inflating the money supply, because foreign central
banks can simply create their own fiat currencies in whatever quantities
are required to keep the dollar cross rate against their currencies from
falling. (They couldn't do that by creating gold, because you can't
create gold.) Result: under the fiat money regime the more astute
central bankers (e.g., China and India) long ago discovered that if they
kept their currencies at low enough levels vis-a-vis the dollar--i.e.,
if they kept the dollar strong *despite* Washington's inflationary
policies--they could give their domestic export industries a competitive
advantage in U.S. markets. Result: by holding the dollar cross rates at
levels favorable to themselves, they have basically stripped the U.S.
bare of manufacturing capacity, manufacturing jobs, and manufacturing
technical know-how.

Wow.

Thus the alternative explanation you proposed--i.e., that global demand
for metals is "WAY up, thanks to the 10+% year over year economic growth
in China and India"--is not really an alternative explanation at all.
The reason: it is excessive creation of fiat money by the U.S. and by
foreign central banks, that has enabled nations like China and India to
experience the rapid growth they have experienced in recent years. What
we have here is an unsustainable worldwide boom, due to the creation by
central banks of counterfeit ("fiat") money at rates faster than
production of goods and services can be increased, just as I said in the
beginning. One consequence of that boom is the erosion of the U.S.
manufacturing base, and another is the soaring demand for raw materials,
including storable commodities, to feed the economic expansions in
India, China, and elsewhere.

Anything you say "Mitch". Anything to avoid the
obvious.

In short, what we are seeing here is not prosperity, but the destruction
of civilization. The reason: these sorts of expansions always lead to
financial and economic collapse further down the road. (That's why the
phenomenon is known as the "boom and bust" cycle.) However, in the past,
booms and crashes brought about by fiat money have been confined to
individual countries, and, as a consequence, disaster never occurred
everywhere at the same time. This time, the entire world is on a binge
of fiat money creation, and when the bust comes this time, every economy
on Earth is going to come crashing down simultaneously. Result: every
government on Earth is going to "serve mankind" by putting forth a
blizzard of "emergency" legislation violating property rights "in the
public interest." Every country on Earth will be caught up in the
madness. Hence after the dust settles none will be capable of expanding
economically to take up the slack, and, thus, forcing other countries to
rescind their crazy legislation in order to become competitive again.

--Mitchell Jones}***

The climax. And a signature. Problem is your first name
sounds a bit too close to the word we have in Persian
for clitoris. That's just bad :)
--
"be eshghat ey delArA nagravestam
navide vasle to tA nashnavestam
be del tokhme vafAyat keshtam Akhar
bejoz anduho khAri nadravestam"
- Baba Taher
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: One glance at the pump prices tells me the value of U.S. Inc. 22 May 2007 02:31:43 PM
Stock is basically long-long-term debt.
The more stock a company issues, the more debt it takes on.
The U.S. dollar is the stock of " U.S.A. Inc. ".
Gold is always gold, gasoline is always gasoline, year after year.
One glance at the pump prices tells me the value of U.S. Inc.
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: One glance at the pump prices tells me the value of U.S. Inc. 22 May 2007 02:56:10 PM
1929 all over again if the trade gates did not open.
In a closed door system the gov protects the corperation then the
corperation can set the suply against the demand untill the price climbs
higher then the workers that consume it can pay for it then houses
dont go up and people are out of work .
Fair trade is how Gov and corp are stopped from protecting each other
and fucking evryone else.
propaganda is the gov tool of complyance.
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ? 22 May 2007 08:52:02 PM
Yes, Fearless Johnny, trade does grease the wheels of the economy.
I'm sure you earned every dime and then some.
But did you ever really have a choice ?
You're not Tao the Tongass Giant, How did you buy that first ship ?
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ? 24 May 2007 10:33:10 AM
A trade is a trade is a trade.
Its still hunt for a seller for a buyer you see ..
so you can sell it befor you buy it.
Your going to sell it anyway so you might as well sell it and buy it at
the same time so its sold befor you buy it.
fish and logs ..a loadsa;oad
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Frazir, How did you buy that first ship ? 22 May 2007 11:24:06 PM
On May 22, 6:52 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Yes, Fearless Johnny, trade does grease the wheels of the economy.
I'm sure you earned every dime and then some.

But did you ever really have a choice ?
You're not Tao the Tongass Giant, How did you buy that first ship ?

He didn't, you clueless *****. He is lying to you.
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: There's a " Bill Gates " who posts to " Alt.Warez.UK ". 23 May 2007 02:41:33 AM
It doesn't matter if Frazir is Fearless Johnny or not.
On Usenet, what you see is what you get.
Tell me you have 10 physics doctorates, Gisse,
and I'd still think you were ignorant of the subject.
There's a " Bill Gates " who posts to " Alt.Warez.UK ";
see: " news:f27h6h$gnc$1@aioe.org ".
" Sitting pretty and loving it. ", he says.
.




User: "SBC Yahoo"

Title: Re: One glance at the pump prices tells me the value of U.S. Inc. 22 May 2007 03:54:07 PM
Stock is basically long-long-term debt.

The more stock a company issues, the more debt it takes on.
The U.S. dollar is the stock of " U.S.A. Inc. ".

Look at the pump price again,
Stock is a "debt" only in accounting terms. The company never actually has
to pay the debt. When a company takes over another company, they "buy" the
stock of the stockholders with shares of their own stock, generally, which
is more "debt" that never has to be paid. You borrow money from a bank, you
must repay the debt, according to stated terms, or be in default. That is a
real debt, not a accounting trick to classify selling stock as corporate
debt. When one purchases a hundred shares of stock in IBM, they purchase
100 shares that they hope will rise in value over the period they hold them.
That is all they receive, certificates, that may or may not appreciate in
value. The shareholders only expectation is appreciation of share value and
possible payment of dividends, nothing more.
The US Dollar, is legal tender, and has to be accepted in the US for any
financial transaction. You do not own anything if you own dollars, other
than the dollars. If "you" happened to be China, and owned trilloins of
dolalrs, you might effect the true value of the dollar, with respect to
other currencies, if you sold those dollars all of a sudden, but you do not
own one square inch of the US.
The true value of the US has nothing to do with commodities, if we wanted
to, we could have most of the oil in the world next month. Who could stop
us, if we decided to invade, and kill all residents of any oil producing
region? No one. The true value of a country is very difficult to
determine, but I would say we (USA) are still the most valuable country in
the world, but our value is slipping, fast.
The Democrats will see to it that the value of the USA drops by half, before
their terms expire, you can count on it. So, in 5-10 years, will we see a
fire sale on the US - 1/2 price? Going once, going twice, sold to the
highest bidder . . . . . . . . .
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2007_May_22_7_@Cotse.NET...

Stock is basically long-long-term debt.
The more stock a company issues, the more debt it takes on.
The U.S. dollar is the stock of " U.S.A. Inc. ".

Gold is always gold, gasoline is always gasoline, year after year.
One glance at the pump prices tells me the value of U.S. Inc.

.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized. 23 May 2007 04:39:52 AM
It's a well known fact, Mr. " Liberals Suck ",
that the price of commodities
is the best way to gauge the value of the dollar.
Issuing a gigadollar in stock ( or currency, long-long-term debt )
is little different than issuing a gigadollar of long-term bonds.
There is no democracy without capitalism.
One dollar, one vote... No dollars, no votes.
But, at the same time, consuming more means dying that much sooner.
Financial obesity is worse than corporal obesity.
We ( i.e. you, me and the U.S. ) can't be too poor or too thin, I say.
Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized.
.
User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized. 23 May 2007 09:23:17 AM
Jeff…Relf wrote:


It's a well known fact, Mr. " Liberals Suck ",
that the price of commodities
is the best way to gauge the value of the dollar.

Food and fuel are specifically excluded from all Official measures of
US inflation. First the verdict then the trial. Read your MBA
casebook.

Issuing a gigadollar in stock ( or currency, long-long-term debt )
is little different than issuing a gigadollar of long-term bonds.

A $billion? A $BILLION? You stooopid fuckwad! Bush the Lesser's
Muslim adventure tops $1500 BILLION and counting. Haliburton bought
Dubai (United Arab Emirates). It was cheaper than leasing Congress.
We have won the War on inflation! Don't you go planting any
improvised inflative detractors.

There is no democracy without capitalism.
One dollar, one vote... No dollars, no votes.

***** hater.

But, at the same time, consuming more means dying that much sooner.

Sudan, Sahel, Bangladesh, Dafur... What is the famine of the week?
Isn't it a wonderful life when eating 800 calories/day allows you to
procreate like a rabbit colony?

Financial obesity is worse than corporal obesity.

Or Private Pain to General Disorder. Hear this, everybody! Universal
opportunity creates pandemic poverty because only workers have money
to spend.

We ( i.e. you, me and the U.S. ) can't be too poor or too thin, I say.

Socialism tames the beast, making us more civilized.

Idiot Jeff…Relf is now shitting in sci.chem. Time to petition his ISP
for redress.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: The C.P.I. covers, not exposes, the government's private parts. 23 May 2007 06:16:52 PM
Commodities are the same thing, all the time, Uncle_Al.
It's only the currencies that are volatile.
The Consumer Price Index is _ Designed by Congress _
to hide, not expose, the government's private parts.
Quoting " http://WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Commodities_market#Oil_and_fiat ":
" Some argue that [ the crude oil market ] is not so much
a commodity market but more of an assassination market
speculating on the survival ( or not ) of Saddam
or other leaders whose personal decisions
may cause oil supply to fluctuate by military action. ".
I wrote: " Consuming more means dying that much sooner. "
and you replied:
" Sudan, Sahel, Bangladesh, Dafur... What is the famine of the week ?
Isn't it a wonderful life when eating 800 calories/day allows you to
procreate like a rabbit colony ? ".

Starvation is a weapon of war that's sometimes used in Africa.
It has no application to me in Seattle nor you near Disneyland.
I've never read about someone starving in Seattle, much less met one.
Obesity is the issue at hand, not ( primeval-like ) starvation.
You concluded: " Time to petition [ Relf's ] ISP for redress. ".
Get a clue, ISPs don't take sides in political debates.
Even if you knew who my ISP was, you'd soon discover that
it only responds to confirmed-valid legal papers.
.
User: "The_Man"

Title: Re: The C.P.I. covers, not exposes, the government's private parts. 23 May 2007 07:55:20 PM
On May 23, 7:16 pm, Jeff...Relf <Jeff_R...@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Commodities are the same thing, all the time, Uncle_Al.
It's only the currencies that are volatile.

The Consumer Price Index is _ Designed by Congress _
to hide, not expose, the government's private parts.

The irony of a soon-to-be homeless deadbeat dispensing economics
advice is apparently lost on you.


Quoting "http://WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Commodities_market#Oil_and_fiat":

" Some argue that [ the crude oil market ] is not so much
a commodity market but more of an assassination market
speculating on the survival ( or not ) of Saddam
or other leaders whose personal decisions
may cause oil supply to fluctuate by military action. ".

I wrote: " Consuming more means dying that much sooner. "

That's why the highest consuming societies (the "West" and Japan) have
the longest lifespans in history.


and you replied:

" Sudan, Sahel, Bangladesh, Dafur... What is the famine of the week ?
Isn't it a wonderful life when eating 800 calories/day allows you to
procreate like a rabbit colony ? ".

Starvation is a weapon of war that's sometimes used in Africa.

Bangledesh is in Africa? Since when?

It has no application to me in Seattle nor you near Disneyland.
I've never read about someone starving in Seattle, much less met one.

WIll you be sleepless in Seattle?


Obesity is the issue at hand, not ( primeval-like ) starvation.

You concluded: " Time to petition [ Relf's ] ISP for redress. ".

Get a clue, ISPs don't take sides in political debates.
Even if you knew who my ISP was, you'd soon discover that
it only responds to confirmed-valid legal papers.

Do many homesless men have ISP's?
.
User: "=?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=80=A6Relf?="

Title: Natural Capitalism. 23 May 2007 11:43:43 PM
I know computers, so there are tons of places
I can connect to my virtual ISP ( Cotse.NET )
and run my own pop3/smtp_auth/nntp/ftp/http client ( e.g. X.EXE ).
I pop in the ol' flash drive and away I go.
Labs are all over campus, coffee houses, homes, and libraries.
Campus labs have VC++ 8.0 and students who want tutors.
People pay me to set them up.
Being homeless means free time out-the-yang,
no more 430 dollars going to the landlord every month.
Quoting:
http://WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Commodities_market#Is_free_time_a_commodity.3F
" [ Natural Capitalism focuses on ]
using far less of any given commodity input
to achieve the same service outputs as a result.
Indian economist Amartya Sen, applying this thinking to
human freedom itself, argued in his 1999 book
' Development as Freedom ' that human free time was
the only real service, and that sustainable development
was best defined as freeing human time.

Sen won The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences
in Memory of Alfred Nobel in 1999
( sometimes incorrectly called the ' Nobel Prize in Economics ' )
and based his book on invited lectures he gave at the World Bank. ".
Speaking of me, You ( " The Man " ) wrote:
" The irony of a soon-to-be homeless deadbeat dispensing economics
advice is apparently lost on you. ".
For the last 14 years ( and still running )
I've been ( indirectly, informally ) working ( coding in VC++ )
for the ABA ( www.ABA.COM ), .
Financial/Computer literacy has little to do with
one's _ Personal _ net worth.
I wrote: " Consuming more means dying that much sooner. "
And you replied:
" That's why the highest consuming societies
( the ' West ' and Japan ) have the longest lifespans in history. ".
Historically, the Japanese have had one of the finest diets
in the world. I love sushi. They've been skinny and long-lived.
It's the Japanese economy that does most of the consuming,
not the belly of the typical Japanese dude.
A battle torn Afrian or an inner city " nigga " ( or wigga )
doesn't just die faster, he _ Lives _ faster.
These people are nothing like the 102 year old " Queen Mum ":
" http://WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Elizabeth_Bowes-Lyon ".
If you want to live like her,
in your own private Disneyland, then be my guest ( loser ).
Who's starving in Bangladesh ?
Seattle doesn't suffer from pests, cyclones and floods;
even if it did, how would U.S.-style obesity help ?
Quoting " http://WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Bangladesh ":
" Since 1990, the country has achieved
an average annual growth rate of 5% according to the World Bank "
...
" In December 2005, the Central Bank of Bangladesh projected
GDP growth around 6.5%. "
...
" Bangladesh has recently been the subject of
increasing Foreign Direct Investment.

Other Foreign Non-Bangladeshi and Bangladeshi based companies
e.g. Shell [ natural gas ], BP and Royal Bengal Airline
are examples of such inward investment. ".
.










User: "BioFreak"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 22 May 2007 02:01:49 PM
On Mon, 14 May 2007 20:28:37 -0500, Mitchell Jones
wrote:

Right now, we are late in the first phase of the process, in a zone of
reaction and consolidation, with the metals swinging wildly back and
forth beneath their all-time highs. Copper, for example, has been
swinging wildly back and forth beneath $4/lb, while nickel has of late
been trading back and forth beneath $23/lb, which is far above the
highest nominal price it reached in the '70's. (For recent nickel

Stop blabbering so much. I think the Norilsk guys have
started to deal in true dollars with you. And you're
sore from it. Hence all the crap you say to avoid
what's already up yours.
You still keep a dagger from Nam days under your pillow
at nights? You must've had a mind as good as a ***** to
go that far for their dicks. Isn't it so.

--
"zurdAr pul nemikhAd bizur ham pul nemikhAd!"
.

User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 14 May 2007 11:06:21 PM
Thats why I put my money in the hold of an old boat and let it sit near
buyers .
and my prices are allways under market and shipping is cheep and next
day because my boat is allready there when I sell.
beats the bank and beats stocks.
Hold full of aluminum is better then cash in the bank .
.


User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 14 May 2007 08:38:03 PM
On May 14, 9:11 am, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:

"John Decker" <John_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote in message

news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...> Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to

3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12cop...


[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places and the more inventive, creative thieves rented Vacuum
tanker trucks, drove up to metal-finishing shops in the dark of
the night, pierced the windows with the fire hose and sucked
all the Nickel solutions out of the 10'000 gallons Ni-plating tanks.
ahahaha... Same with Gold when it peaked at ~$900/troz up
from $250. 3 eight-hour shifts were carried out for protection.
ahahaha... ahahahanson

Are you aware it would be profitable for you to melt down nickels and
sell the nickel?
It is a federal crime, oddly enough, but you could do it.
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 14 May 2007 09:14:20 PM
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179193083.304925.138500@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:

"John Decker" <John_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...>

Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to

3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12cop...


[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places and the more inventive, creative thieves rented Vacuum
tanker trucks, drove up to metal-finishing shops in the dark of
the night, pierced the windows with the fire hose and sucked
all the Nickel solutions out of the 10'000 gallons Ni-plating tanks.
ahahaha... Same with Gold when it peaked at ~$900/troz up
from $250. 3 eight-hour shifts were carried out for protection.
ahahaha... ahahahanson


[Eric]

Are you aware it would be profitable for you to melt down
nickels and sell the nickel?
It is a federal crime, oddly enough, but you could do it.

[hanson]
Yeah, yeah, yeah!... "Behind every great fortune there is a crime",
Honoré de Balzac, Paris, ca. 1840... ahahaha... ahahaha
Unfortunately, last time I checked nickels were made of alloy
Cu75Ni25. The chem separation of Cu & Ni and the logistics
to acquire sufficient quantities of coins to make the job
profitable are not there... yet... But keep your criminal mind
under development, Eric. One day you may discover that
crime pays far better than singing odes to Einstein... ahaha...
Thansk for the laughs.... ahahaha... ahahanson
.
User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 15 May 2007 01:38:44 AM
On May 14, 7:14 pm, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:

"EricGisse" <jowr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1179193083.304925.138500@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...> "hanson" <h=

an...@quick.net> wrote:

"John Decker" <John_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...>


Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to

3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12cop=

..=2E.


[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places and the more inventive, creative thieves rented Vacuum
tanker trucks, drove up to metal-finishing shops in the dark of
the night, pierced the windows with the fire hose and sucked
all the Nickel solutions out of the 10'000 gallons Ni-plating tanks.
ahahaha... Same with Gold when it peaked at ~$900/troz up
from $250. 3 eight-hour shifts were carried out for protection.
ahahaha... ahahahanson


[Eric]

Are you aware it would be profitable for you to melt down
nickels and sell the nickel?
It is a federal crime, oddly enough, but you could do it.


[hanson]
Yeah, yeah, yeah!... "Behind every great fortune there is a crime",
Honor=E9 de Balzac, Paris, ca. 1840... ahahaha... ahahaha
Unfortunately, last time I checked nickels were made of alloy
Cu75Ni25. The chem separation of Cu & Ni and the logistics
to acquire sufficient quantities of coins to make the job
profitable are not there... yet... But keep your criminal mind
under development, Eric. One day you may discover that
crime pays far better than singing odes to Einstein... ahaha...
Thansk for the laughs.... ahahaha... ahahanson

Melt down the nickels and let gravity do the work of separating the
copper and nickel.
.
User: "hanson"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 15 May 2007 10:46:33 AM
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1179211124.708605.195710@e51g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
news:1179193083.304925.138500@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...

"John Decker" <John_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:f29s2t0gnn@drn.newsguy.com...>


Price of copper metal has increased from .75/lb in 2004 to

3.00/lb for 2007 and is expected to increase in the future.
increasing number of copper thefts across central Texas.
"Some thieves have even snatched window unit air conditioners
and sold the roughly 20 pounds of copper they typically contain."
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/05/12/12cop...


[hanson]
Nothing new about that, JD. Couple decades ago, when Nickel
spiked like that, there was a rash of raids on Ni-metal storage
places and the more inventive, creative thieves rented Vacuum
tanker trucks, drove up to metal-finishing shops in the dark of
the night, pierced the windows with the fire hose and sucked
all the Nickel solutions out of the 10'000 gallons Ni-plating tanks.
ahahaha... Same with Gold when it peaked at ~$900/troz up
from $250. 3 eight-hour shifts were carried out for protection.
ahahaha... ahahahanson


[Eric]

Are you aware it would be profitable for you to melt down
nickels and sell the nickel?
It is a federal crime, oddly enough, but you could do it.


[hanson]
Yeah, yeah, yeah!... "Behind every great fortune there is a crime",
Honoré de Balzac, Paris, ca. 1840... ahahaha... ahahaha
Unfortunately, last time I checked nickels were made of alloy
Cu75Ni25. The chem separation of Cu & Ni and the logistics
to acquire sufficient quantities of coins to make the job
profitable are not there... yet... But keep your criminal mind
under development, Eric. One day you may discover that
crime pays far better than singing odes to Einstein... ahaha...
Thanks for the laughs.... ahahaha... ahahanson

[Eric]
Melt down the nickels and let gravity do the work of separating the
copper and nickel.


[hanson]
ahahaha... Eric, besides developing your mind in the above
suggested fashion your should first do it on the intellectual-
technical level, for if you do follow your idea of gravity separation
you've gotta wait for too long for any profits to materialize, as they
will be all soaked up the heating costs for the long melt... ahahaha...
Eric, the molten Cu-Ni phases are completely soluble in each other.
You attempt here a high temp version of hoping to separate
saltwater into NaCl and H2O by letting it sit in closed jar.. ahaha...
Didn't you know that from the great theories of SR/GR & or QM?
Or you can go and look up some empirical data, like for instance
http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=60
But I am very glad that you have begun to take interest in the
practical aspects of problems that exist in the real world,...
where the money is... Thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson
.
User: "tj Frazir"

Title: Re: Copper Thefts on the Increase... 15 May 2007 01:16:14 PM
copper town mine is still there.
BC the ghost city biult n the 70s.
some body will reopen the copper mine .
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles